logo
Goya's former CEO said he didn't know why he was fired. His family on the board alleges he was part of a cover-up

Goya's former CEO said he didn't know why he was fired. His family on the board alleges he was part of a cover-up

CNN27-02-2025

Earlier this week, the controversial former boss of Goya Foods self-published a mysterious press release about his departure from the company. Robert 'Bob' Unanue said that after nearly five decades at the family business, he was suddenly informed that his 'employment' at the company was over and he had 'no real answers' as to why, noting Goya did not publicly indicate he was no longer leading the company.
'While the (board's) decision has left many questions unanswered,' Unanue, a prominent supporter of President Donald Trump, continued on X, 'one thing is certain — I will not waver in my fight against child trafficking,' referencing his view that open border policies lead to exploitation and trafficking.
The post has nearly 70,000 likes on X and support in the comments from conservative-leaning accounts.
But a lawsuit filed in Bergen County, New Jersey Superior Court by Bob Unanue's cousin and Goya executive and board member Francisco 'Frankie' Unanue on February 5 alleges that Bob Unanue engaged in a 'clandestine agreement' that permitted the 'looting' of Goya and thereafter 'colluded' with a long-time friend to 'perpetrate and/or cover up the resulting damage to Goya.'
Bob Unanue was well aware of why he was removed from the board since at least early February – and it had nothing to do with Unanue's political leanings or work against child trafficking, according to a source connected to the board who spoke on condition of anonymity because they're not authorized to speak publicly.
In a statement, Goya Foods said its 'recent decision regarding a change in leadership has absolutely no connection to politics, media appearances, nor has it impacted our vital work in protecting children and addressing food insecurity through our Goya Cares and Goya Gives initiatives.'
In a statement, a representative for Bob Unanue said, 'Any allegations against Mr. Unanue are frivolous, absurd, and have absolutely no merit whatsoever. The allegations are both a smokescreen and defamatory and will be addressed accordingly.'
CNN has reached out to Frankie Unanue's representation for comment.
The lawsuit alleges that for nearly a decade, Bob Unanue failed to supervise his 'decades-long friend' and hand-picked head of the company's IT department, Suvajit Basu. Bob entered into a 'clandestine agreement' to hire Basu for five years without the knowledge of the board, the lawsuit alleges, and 'enabled, aided and abetted Basu,' which led to vulnerabilities in the IT structure, three full system shutdowns within a year and millions of dollars of misused funds.
Goya Foods filed a lawsuit against Basu in October 2024. In February, Frankie joined the case as a plaintiff and named Bob as a defendant.
A representative for Basu declined to comment.
'There is simply no doubt that Bob intentionally failed to exercise his duty of care, sought to interfere in the ordinary course of Goya's business and permitted Basu for years to have 'carte blanche' over Goya's IT function,' the updated February lawsuit said, going as far to say that Bob even interfered with the company's efforts to fire Basu and repair the IT management.
That resulted in millions of wasted dollars, the lawsuit said.
For example, once Basu became IT head in 2015, he purged employees and brought in people affiliated with him, the lawsuit said. Those affiliates were serving duplicative roles, which caused the company to pay excessive consulting service fees, according to the February complaint.
Bob strongly defended Basu even after Basu's termination in October 2024, according to the lawsuit, claiming the board asked him to fire Basu without cause and Basu was subject to harassment and defamation.
But Frankie Unanue's lawsuit alleges that Bob Unanue refused to participate in a board meeting regarding an independent investigation into Basu and tried to deflect responsibility for the IT department onto others, all while refusing to turn over his electronic devices to Goya's board and asserting that the author of the investigation had an 'unknown agenda.'
Bob Unanue then went on to create 'a fictitious written record' to support Basu, the complaint alleges.
Basu, in a counter complaint, alleged that Bob's brother and Goya Foods vice president Peter Unanue, as well as Frankie, allowed and promoted discrimination and a hostile work environment over Basu's age and Indian ancestry, including 'racist jokes and verbal abuse,' such as being told by Goya executives that there were 'too many Indians in the IT department.'
Goya said in a statement it denies 'all of the allegations in Basu's counter claim and third-party complaint.'
Basu's complaint also claims that his upgrades to the company's internal systems, including automated demand forecasting systems that 'increased revenue in the hundreds of millions of dollars,' were 'the primary driver of Goya's ascension to a billion-dollar corporation with approximately 4,000 employees worldwide.'
Though Goya is a private company, the lawsuit said it generates over $1.5 billion in annual revenue.
Frankie's lawsuit against Bob alleges breach of fiduciary duty, among other counts, and seeks compensatory damages, punitive damages and attorneys' fees. It also asks for a trial by jury.
The inner workings of the nation's largest Hispanic-owned food company are rarely publicized due to the dynamics of the family-controlled company and the fact that the company is private, not publicly owned.
The company was founded in 1936 by Bob's grandfather, Don Prudencio Unanue and his wife Carolina. The nine-member board is still made up entirely of Unanue family members, the source said.
Francisco, Peter and Bob are the third generation of the Unanue family to run Goya, court documents said.
'This is a family issue, and they deal with those things the way they always do,' the source said. 'Privately and through the board.'
'There is no reason he should be shocked,' the source added. 'It was discussed with him.'
Unanue's connections to politics have landed him, and the company, in hot water in the past.
In 2021, the board voted to censure Bob over controversial remarks questioning the legitimacy of the November 2020 election. He was no longer allowed to speak to the media without the board's permission, a source told CNN in 2021.
Bob Unanue praised Trump in his first term, saying, 'We are all truly blessed… to have a leader like President Trump who is a builder. We have an incredible builder, and we pray. We pray for our leadership, our president.'
Those comments spread like wildfire online, leading social media users to call for a boycott of the company.
Bob spoke at the Republican National Convention in 2024 in support of Trump, saying 'four years ago, I dared to say that we were blessed by Donald J. Trump… got into trouble for that.'
CNN's Maria Santana and Chris Isidore contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump tears into Iran saying ‘They're all DEAD now' as he ‘supports' Israel after night of missile strikes on hard-liners
Trump tears into Iran saying ‘They're all DEAD now' as he ‘supports' Israel after night of missile strikes on hard-liners

Yahoo

time10 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump tears into Iran saying ‘They're all DEAD now' as he ‘supports' Israel after night of missile strikes on hard-liners

President Donald Trump on Friday put the United States firmly in Israel's corner after Israeli forces attacked Iranian nuclear sites and conducted targeted strikes on Iranian military commanders and nuclear scientists, warning Iranian officials that they should come back to the negotiating table with him before more Israeli strikes hit with devastating effect. In a Truth Social post, Trump said he'd given Tehran 'chance after chance to make a deal' that would have headed off the strikes by putting restrictions on the country's nuclear weapons program and complained that Iranian negotiators had never been able to come to an agreement. 'I gave Iran chance after chance to make a deal. I told them, in the strongest of words, to 'just do it,' but no matter how hard they tried, no matter how close they got, they just couldn't get it done,' he wrote. Trump also said he'd warned Iran that Israel 'has a lot' of American-made military hardware — 'the best and most lethal' — and is quite proficient in using it. 'Certain Iranian hardliner's spoke bravely, but they didn't know what was about to happen. They are all DEAD now, and it will only get worse!' he added. Continuing, Trump said there was 'still time' for Iranian officials to make the 'slaughter' by Israeli forces 'come to an end' before 'even more brutal attacks' come next. 'Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE,' he said. In a separate post, Trump said he'd previously given Tehran a '60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal'' and claimed that the strikes by Israel took place on 'day 61.' 'I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance,' he said. In a brief phone interview with The Wall Street Journal on Friday, the president elaborated on his social media post when asked if he was saying the U.S. had gotten advance warning of the strikes from Israeli officials. "Heads-up? It wasn't a heads-up. It was, we know what's going on,' he said. "I told the other side, I said, you have 60 days to make the deal. On the 61st day, they attacked. Today is 61 actually, and it was a very successful attack. They should have made a deal and they still can make a deal while they have something left— they still can," he added. Separately, the president told CNN that the Israeli attacks had been 'very successful' and said the Israeli government had operated with full American support. 'We of course support Israel, obviously and supported it like nobody has ever supported it,' he said. Trump's boast of having foreknowledge of Israel's attack plans directly contradicts the initial reaction from another top American official, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who in a statement released by the White House called the strikes 'unilateral' and said the U.S. was 'not involved in strikes against Iran' and remained focused on protecting forces in the region. Rubio, who is also serving as Trump's acting national security adviser, added that Israel had 'advised' American officials that the strikes were 'necessary for its self-defense' and warned Iran against targeting American 'interests or personnel.' The Israeli attacks, which are understood to include audacious drone strikes launched from within Iran's borders as well as hundreds of Israeli Air Force fighters, come after weeks of negotiations between American and Iranian officials aimed at reaching an accord to curb Iran's nuclear program. Those talks, which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposed, are unlikely to resume at this point.

CNN, MSNBC insist anti-ICE protests have been ‘mostly peaceful' despite unrest
CNN, MSNBC insist anti-ICE protests have been ‘mostly peaceful' despite unrest

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

CNN, MSNBC insist anti-ICE protests have been ‘mostly peaceful' despite unrest

CNN and MSNBC have bent over backwards to remind viewers that anti-ICE demonstrations and riots causing turmoil and unrest across the country were 'mostly peaceful,' according to a new study from the Media Research Center. Los Angeles, the epicenter of the anti-ICE chaos, has been hit with continued disorder and flash mob-style looting incidents as law enforcement has been forced to make mass arrests. Videos and photos of the disorder have taken the internet by storm and some businesses have even boarded up their shops. Anti-ICE protesters have also clashed with police in New York City, where several police vehicles were set on fire inside an NYPD parking lot overnight Wednesday. In Chicago, a car drove through a crowd of demonstrators Tuesday night as hundreds of anti-ICE protesters gathered, and multiple police vehicles have been vandalized in that city, too. 10 Protesters burning cars and waving Mexican flags during an immigration protest in Los Angeles. AFP via Getty Images 10 Protesters at a Salt Lake City rally hold signs against ICE. / MEGA 10 Damaged police vehicles on a freeway during a protest in downtown Los Angeles. REUTERS While major cities such as L.A., New York and Chicago have received the most attention, there have also been anti-ICE demonstrations in Washington, North Carolina, Missouri, Texas, Indiana, Colorado, Georgia, and a variety of other areas. Through it all, CNN and MSNBC have continued to insist the demonstrations and riots were 'mostly peaceful.' The Media Research Center (MRC) analyzed all coverage from June 7-11 and found a staggering 211 examples of CNN and MSNBC personalities insisting the chaos was 'largely peaceful,' 'mostly peaceful' or something similar. 10 CNN and MSNBC have completely dismissed the dangerous reality of these nationwide protests. MRC CNN was responsible for 123 claims that the riots were 'peaceful,' while MSNBC reminded viewers 88 times, according to the MRC. NewsBusters senior research analyst Bill D'Agostino, who conducted the MRC study, noticed that whenever there was violence, CNN and MSNBC attributed it to a nebulous, separate group that had no connection with the 'peaceful protesters.' 10 Police officer firing a weapon at protesters during a demonstration in Los Angeles. Getty Images 10 Protesters in Salt Lake City holding a sign that says f–k ICE. Abram Iman/ZUMA / 10 A protester smashes a Waymo vehicle with a skateboard in LA. AFP via Getty Images D'Agostino told Fox News Digital he 'counted any assertion that specifically [said] these riots or protests were 'peaceful,' 'largely peaceful,' 'mostly peaceful,' or any other permutation thereof,' during segments in which the violence had been acknowledged or shown on screen. 'No reporter acknowledged any link between the peaceful and violent elements of the crowds. The rioters were exclusively framed as 'rogue actors,' or 'lone wolves,' and there was never any assertion that they might share common cause with the more peaceful individuals,' D'Agostino told Fox News Digital. 10 A protester in LA showing rubber bullet wounds. 10 Toby Canham, a photographer covering the LA ICE protest for the Post was shot by a rubber bullet on June 8. Louise Barnsley 10 A journalist says he was also hit by a rubber bullet in LA. REUTERS 'Conversely, there was also no instance in which a reporter acknowledged that the National Guard and Marines had been mobilized exclusively to address the violent elements of the crowd,' D'Agostino continued. 'There were numerous complaints about the use of military force against 'peaceful protesters.'' D'Agostino also only found one instance in which a journalist from CNN or MSNBC referred to the chaos unfolding in Los Angeles as a 'riot,' which CNN's Jake Tapper did on June 7.

CNN analyst defends Kristi Noem, federal agents for removing Padilla
CNN analyst defends Kristi Noem, federal agents for removing Padilla

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

CNN analyst defends Kristi Noem, federal agents for removing Padilla

CNN national security analyst Josh Campbell defended Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and the actions of federal agents who forcibly removed Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) from a press conference in Los Angeles on Thursday, saying their response followed standard security protocol. Speaking during an appearance on CNN's 'The Arena' with Kasie Hunt, Campbell, a former FBI special agent, broke down the incident and said the agents were justified in their initial efforts to escort Padilla out of the room after he loudly interrupted Noem. 'From a law enforcement perspective, we're really looking at three separate incidents that happened within a short period of time,' Campbell said. 4 Josh Campbell (seen second from left) defended the actions of DHS Sec. Kristi Noem and federal agents who removed Sen. Alex Padilla from a briefing in Los Angeles on Thursday. CNN 'First, you have the DHS secretary who was addressing the press. This was not a Q&A period, and she was interrupted. She was interrupted by someone who was speaking very loudly,' the CNN analyst told Hunt. 'And so her security detail confronts what we obviously now know to be the senator. And at that point, he is now going to be escorted out. You can't interrupt something like that that's already in progress without having those consequences.' Campbell added that when Padilla resisted and turned back toward agents, the situation escalated. 'The second incident, in my view, happens the moment — as officers are trying to lead him out — he then turns and walks back towards kind of into those agents,' Campbell said. 'At that point, from a security detail perspective, we're taking this person out against their will… they realize this is not someone who is going to comply.' However, Campbell did raise concerns about what happened next — when officers forced Padilla to the ground and handcuffed him outside the press room. 'There will be big questions raised about those kinds of tactics,' Campbell noted. 'Were there other options that were available to the federal agents… What they do is they actually order him to his knees and then quickly shove him down to the ground where he is then handcuffed. So again, you're in a federal building, people are screened for weapons — him having a gun or some type of device like that would not be a concern… So there will be a big question about the tactics that were used.' 4 Campbell added that when Padilla (far right) resisted and turned back toward agents, the situation escalated. AP 4 Campbell said that the incident was 'neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem (pictured above).' AFP via Getty Images Still, Campbell defended Noem, who has come under fire for the incident. 'This was neither the fault nor the responsibility of DHS Secretary Noem,' he said. 'She's in the middle of a press conference… I don't think any of that was her responsibility.' Padilla was removed after interrupting Noem's remarks on ongoing anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles. As Noem accused California leaders of enabling lawlessness, Padilla stood up and shouted questions about her rhetoric. 4 Padilla is seen as he is wrestled to the ground and handcuffed. via REUTERS 'Hands off!' he shouted as security moved in. Video shows him resisting, identifying himself as a senator, and continuing to argue before being pushed outside and subdued. Padilla later criticized the aggressive response, saying, 'If this is how the DHS responds to a senator with a question, you can only imagine what they are doing to farmworkers… throughout the country.' Noem countered on Fox News, saying Padilla 'burst into the room,' 'did not identify himself,' and was 'lunging toward the podium' before being detained. The Post has sought comment from DHS and Padilla.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store