logo
Baby born with rare life-threatening disorder makes medical history

Baby born with rare life-threatening disorder makes medical history

Independent16-05-2025

A baby born with a rare, life-threatening genetic disorder is thriving after receiving a groundbreaking, personalized gene-editing treatment.
The experimental therapy, crafted specifically for his condition, corrected a minute yet crucial error in his genetic code, offering hope for others with similarly rare diseases.
The infant, KJ Muldoon of Clifton Heights, Pennsylvania, was diagnosed shortly after birth with severe CPS1 deficiency.
This condition, estimated to affect roughly one in a million babies, prevents the body from effectively removing ammonia, leading to potentially toxic buildup in the bloodstream.
While liver transplants can be a solution for some, this innovative gene-editing treatment offers a new avenue of hope.
The study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, details KJ's case and highlights the potential of this technology.
Dr. Kiran Musunuru, a University of Pennsylvania gene editing expert and study co-author, hailed the treatment as "the first step towards the use of gene editing therapies to treat a wide variety of rare genetic disorders for which there are currently no definitive medical treatments."
KJ's case represents a significant advancement in personalized medicine, demonstrating the potential to tailor treatments to individual genetic profiles.
While widespread availability of such personalized therapies remains on the horizon, this success story offers a beacon of hope for the millions affected by rare genetic conditions often overlooked by mainstream medical advancements.
KJ is among the first to benefit from this cutting-edge approach, paving the way for future applications of gene editing in treating a broader spectrum of rare diseases.
Knowing KJ's odds, parents Kyle and Nicole Muldoon, both 34, worried they could lose him.
'We were, like, you know, weighing all the options, asking all the questions for either the liver transplant, which is invasive, or something that's never been done before,' Nicole said.
'We prayed, we talked to people, we gathered information, and we eventually decided that this was the way we were going to go,' her husband added.
Within six months, the team at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Penn Medicine, along with their partners, created a therapy designed to correct KJ's faulty gene. They used CRISPR, the gene editing tool that won its inventors the Nobel Prize in 2020. Instead of cutting the DNA strand like the first CRISPR approaches, doctors employed a technique that flips the mutated DNA 'letter' — also known as a base — to the correct type. Known as 'base editing," it reduces the risk of unintended genetic changes.
It's 'very exciting' that the team created the therapy so quickly, said gene therapy researcher Senthil Bhoopalan at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital in Memphis, who wasn't involved in the study. 'This really sets the pace and the benchmark for such approaches.'
In February, KJ got his first IV infusion with the gene editing therapy, delivered through tiny fatty droplets called lipid nanoparticles that are taken up by liver cells.
While the room was abuzz with excitement that day, 'he slept through the entire thing,' recalled study author Dr. Rebecca Ahrens-Nicklas, a gene therapy expert at CHOP.
After follow-up doses in March and April, KJ has been able to eat more normally and has recovered well from illnesses like colds, which can strain the body and exacerbate symptoms of CPS1. The 9 ½-month old also takes less medication.
Considering his poor prognosis earlier, 'any time we see even the smallest milestone that he's meeting – like a little wave or rolling over – that's a big moment for us,' his mother said.
Still, researchers caution that it's only been a few months. They'll need to watch him for years.
'We're still very much in the early stages of understanding what this medication may have done for KJ,' Ahrens-Nicklas said. 'But every day, he's showing us signs that he's growing and thriving.'
Researchers hope what they learn from KJ will help other rare disease patients.
Gene therapies, which can be extremely expensive to develop, generally target more common disorders in part for simple financial reasons: more patients mean potentially more sales, which can help pay the development costs and generate more profit. The first CRISPR therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, for example, treats sickle cell disease, a painful blood disorder affecting millions worldwide.
Musunuru said his team's work — funded in part by the National Institutes of Health — showed that creating a custom treatment doesn't have to be prohibitively expensive. The cost was 'not far off' from the $800,000-plus for an average liver transplant and related care, he said.
'As we get better and better at making these therapies and shorten the time frame even more, economies of scale will kick in and I would expect the costs to come down,' Musunuru said.
Scientists also won't have to redo all the initial work every time they create a customized therapy, Bhoopalan said, so this research 'sets the stage' for treating other rare conditions.
Carlos Moraes, a neurology professor at the University of Miami who wasn't involved with the study, said research like this opens the door to more advances.
'Once someone comes with a breakthrough like this, it will take no time" for other teams to apply the lessons and move forward, he said. 'There are barriers, but I predict that they are going to be crossed in the next five to 10 years. Then the whole field will move as a block because we're pretty much ready.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BREAKING NEWS WWE icon Ric Flair reveals shock cancer diagnosis
BREAKING NEWS WWE icon Ric Flair reveals shock cancer diagnosis

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

BREAKING NEWS WWE icon Ric Flair reveals shock cancer diagnosis

WWE Hall of Famer Ric Flair has revealed he has been diagnosed with skin cancer for the 'second time in three years.' The 76-year-old has now said that he will begin to undergo treatment next week. The wrestling legend denied reports of his diagnosis on X, formerly known as Twitter, just two days ago in an attempt to keep it private. But the 16-time world champion, who has dealt with a number of health problems over the past decade, later admitted that he was ready to share the devastating news. 'It's the second time in three years that I've been dealing with skin cancer,' he told People 'I will be undergoing treatment next week.'

Harvard author Steven Pinker appears on podcast linked to scientific racism
Harvard author Steven Pinker appears on podcast linked to scientific racism

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Harvard author Steven Pinker appears on podcast linked to scientific racism

The Harvard psychologist and bestselling author Steven Pinker appeared on the podcast of Aporia, an outlet whose owners advocate for a revival of race science and have spoken of seeking 'legitimation by association' by platforming more mainstream figures. The appearance underlines past incidents in which Pinker has encountered criticism for his association with advocates of so-called 'human biodiversity', which other academics have called a 'rebranding' of racial genetic essentialism and scientific racism. Pinker's appearance marks another milestone in the efforts of many in Silicon Valley and rightwing media and at the fringes of science to rehabilitate previously discredited models of a biologically determined racial hierarchy. Patrik Hermansson, a researcher at UK anti-racism non-profit Hope Not Hate, said that Pinker's 'decision to appear on Aporia, a far-right platform for scientific racism, provides an invaluable service to an extremist outlet by legitimising its content and attracting new followers'. He added: 'By lending his Harvard credentials to Aporia, Pinker contributes to the normalisation and spread of dangerous, discredited ideas.' The Guardian emailed Pinker for comment using his Harvard email address but received no response. Nor did he reply when approached through his university press office or his publishers. In the hour-long recording published this week, Pinker engaged in a wide-ranging discussion about economic progress, artificial intelligence and social policy with host Noah Carl. During the podcast, Pinker expressed agreement with claims made by Charles Murray, the author of The Bell Curve, a prominent figure in the 'human biodiversity' movement that seeks to promote race-based theories of intelligence, and like Pinker a one-time participant in a human biodiversity email list convened by Steve Sailer. When Carl cited 'evidence collected by sociologists like Charles Murray suggesting that part of the family breakdown in some communities in America seems to be attributable to the state taking over the traditional function of the father', Pinker responded: 'I think that is a problem.' He added: 'It is a huge class-differentiated phenomenon, as Murray and others write it out.' Reporting last October in the Guardian revealed that Aporia operates within a broader network of groups and individuals seeking to mainstream racial pseudoscience. The initiative had been secretly funded by US tech entrepreneur Andrew Conru until he was contacted for comment on the reporting, and Aporia's editors are connected to far-right extremists, including Erik Ahrens, whom German authorities have designated a 'rightwing extremist' posing an 'extremely high' danger. The investigation also found that Aporia was owned by the Human Diversity Foundation, a Wyoming LLC founded in 2022 by Emil Kirkegaard, a Danish self-described eugenicist and race scientist who has spent years attempting to access genetic datasets, and maintaining publishing platforms including OpenPsych and Mankind Quarterly that serve a network of race-science researchers. The same reporting revealed that in secretly recorded conversations, Aporia co-founder Matthew Frost expressed ambitions for it to 'become something bigger, become that policy, front-facing thinktank, and bleed into the traditional institutions'. He also said that the publication had recruited mainstream writers for the purposes of 'legitimacy via association'. Carl, listed as editor on Aporia's masthead, was dismissed from a Cambridge fellowship in 2019 after an investigation found that he had published articles in collaboration with far-right extremists. He spoke at least twice at the eugenicist London Conference on Intelligence and in a 2016 paper wrote that anti-immigrant stereotypes were 'reasonably accurate' in relation to their propensity for crime. The 2016 conference program, which Carl attended, featured a quote from early 20th-century psychologist Edward Thorndike stating: 'Selective breeding can alter man's capacity to learn, to keep sane, to cherish justice or to be happy.' Aporia's podcast has previously featured prominent white nationalists including Helmuth Nyborg, a Danish psychologist who was suspended and reinstated in 2006 as a professor at the University of Aarhus over his research linking gender and intelligence, and who in 2017 spoke to the white nationalist American Renaissance conference. In his Aporia appearance, Nyborg connected immigration and crime, claiming that 'the more genetically inhomogeneous a population is, the more critical it becomes in terms of social unrule, or what you'll call that social disturbance, criminality and so on'. Another former guest, Jared Taylor, is American Renaissance's founder. Pinker is world famous as the author of bestselling books including The Better Angels of Our Nature and Enlightenment Now. His work has emphasized themes including universal human cognitive abilities and the decline of violence over time, and has previously advocated for 'colorblind equality'. His appearance on Aporia, however, follows a recent pattern of controversy around his connections to figures promoting eugenics and scientific racism, including Steve Sailer. Pinker included a Sailer essay in a collection of American science writing. According to science writer Angela Saini's Superior, a history of the revival of race science, Pinker was in turn an early participant in Sailer's Human Biodiversity email discussion group. His ties to Sailer drew criticism from other writers including Malcolm Gladwell. The Guardian has previously reported on the recent revival of Sailer, a 'white supremacist' and a 'proponent of scientific racism', by the far-right publisher Passage Press. A 2021 academic study led by UCLA academics identified Pinker as one of the 'political centrists' who have 'played a role in legitimizing the ideas of the human biodiversity movement' in a way that has benefited white nationalists, despite not being core proponents themselves. Hermannson, the Hope Not Hate researcher, said: 'Considering the coverage Aporia has received and its long list of racist contributors, it's hard for Pinker to argue he engaged with it unknowingly.'

Many Black women consider synthetic braids safe. A study found toxins in all the brands it tested
Many Black women consider synthetic braids safe. A study found toxins in all the brands it tested

The Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Many Black women consider synthetic braids safe. A study found toxins in all the brands it tested

In recent years, personal care products marketed at Black women have received increased scrutiny for their toxicity, specifically chemical hair straighteners. These perms, also known as 'relaxers', have been condemned for causing severe health problems, including fertility issues, scalp irritations and increased risk of cancer. In light of this, many Black women have turned to natural hairstyles, including braids, as a way to avoid toxic chemicals. But recent research has revealed that popular brands of synthetic braiding hair, human-made extensions that are used in these protective styles, contain dangerous carcinogens, heavy metals and other toxins. Tested brands included in a recent study from Consumer Reports (CR) were Magic Fingers, The Sassy Collection, Shake-N-Go, Darling, Debut, Hbegant and Sensationnel, all mass producers of synthetic braiding hair. According to the CR study, all tested samples of braiding hair contained volatile organic compounds (VOCs), human-made chemicals found in paints, industrial solvents and other products. Exposure to VOCs can cause health problems, including respiratory issues, nausea and fatigue. Long-term exposure has been associated with increased cancer risk and organ damage. Contact with chemicals in synthetic hair doesn't only occur when the hair is installed – exposure can take place under a variety of circumstances. For instance, synthetic braiding hair can be 'brittle', causing smaller pieces of hair to break off on to hands and be accidentally consumed, said Dr James Rogers, director and head of product safety testing at CR. 'Even ingesting just a small amount of braiding hair material could possibly give you enough lead exposure to push you over the limit of what is considered safe,' Rogers said. For Black people globally, braids are among the most common and beloved hairstyles. Some braided hairstyles involve plaiting extensions into one's natural hair to achieve a range of styles, such as box braids, knotless braids, twists, goddess braids and more. These styles, worn by people of all ages, typically remain installed for weeks at a time, acting as a low-maintenance hairstyle that can promote hair growth and combat breakage. Beyond convenience, braids carry cultural significance. Since the advent of the 1960s natural hair movement, braided styles represented an embrace of one's afro-textured hair and Black identity more broadly, a political stance amid the popularization of relaxers. In recent years, new research looking into the health effects of chemical straighteners only boosted the popularity of braids. A 2022 National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences study found that perms increased the risk of uterine cancer. The revelatory study followed 33,497 US women between the ages of 35 and 74 for 11 years and assessed their cancer risks. For women who used hair straightening products frequently – more than four times in a year – their cancer risk more than doubled. The investigation unleashed a flood of public outcry and calls for federal regulation of chemical straighteners. Thousands of women who had used such products joined class-action lawsuits, alleging that they had contracted cancer from the hazardous hair products. But worries about synthetic hair raise new concerns about how Black women – both hair braiders and customers – can still be exposed to dangerous chemicals even when they opt for chemical-free hairstyles. The latest CR study first tested 10 of the most popular brands of synthetic braiding hair, said Rogers. Of the 10 brands tested, three contained benzene, a chemical linked to an increased risk of leukemia. Nine samples contained lead above the level deemed safe by experts. At least five samples contained more than 500,000 measurable VOCs; four samples had over 1m. Researchers then considered how exposure to chemicals on synthetic hair might take place to better understand the posed health risks. In addition to ingestion of the hair, a likely scenario with the most intense form of exposure, braids are typically dipped in hot water or singed with an open flame to seal in the style, offering another opportunity for chemical exposure. The CR report builds on limited research on toxins in synthetic braiding hair. A pilot study published in 2020 by scientists at the University of Colorado Boulder identified at least nine types of VOCs in emissions produced by heated synthetic hair. Chrystal Thomas, a medical student at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, previously published an article on the topic in the Lancet, a peer-reviewed medical journal. Her particular interest stemmed from an adverse reaction she suffered after getting braids in 2023. Thomas said she immediately noticed that her braids had an odor, similar to 'new car or mattress'. Thomas attempted to wash her hair multiple times, but could not get rid of the smell. She also began to experience a host of alarming symptoms. 'I would have trouble breathing,' she said, after getting braids. 'I thought my throat would be very dry and it would feel like it was [tightening] up.' Within a week, Thomas decided to take her braids out to gain some relief. Research on the subject was hard to come by, said Thomas, even as dozens of Black women have written about negative, physical reactions they had to synthetic hair. 'Representation [in science] matters a lot. My experience is not unique,' said Thomas. 'People who have been using synthetic braids have been speaking about this, but researchers haven't necessarily had access to those voices.' The CR study results were unsurprising to Dr Kristian Edwards, a former public health professor at George Washington University. Edwards has tracked chemicals in Black beauty products for years, and in 2017, she founded BLK+GRN, a marketplace for Black-owned, non-toxic products. Ingredients listed on beauty products, including braiding hair, lack 'transparency', said Edwards, with consumers assuming that products being sold in stores must be safe. 'It requires diligence on consumers to check and make sure that all products they are using are safe, which is disheartening,' she said. There has also been a stark increase in 'undisclosed ingredients', Edwards added. An analysis published last month by the Environmental Working Group found that 80% of more than 4,000 beauty products geared towards Black women have at least one moderate hazard, with many brands not disclosing what was in their products. Current methods of regulation also aren't as effective, Edwards said. Focusing solely on what ingredients are toxic 'gives the manufacturer space to keep using ingredients that haven't been researched as much, but may be just as toxic', she said. Overall, researchers are calling for more research on the health impacts of braiding hair and testing of more products, including plant-based extensions and human hair. With investigations into synthetic braiding hair, many consumers have gravitated towards those options, but synthetic braiding hair alternatives still involve some chemical process.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store