logo
Number of UK asylum seekers awaiting appeals up by nearly 500% in two years

Number of UK asylum seekers awaiting appeals up by nearly 500% in two years

The Guardian16-03-2025

The number of asylum seekers left in limbo as they appeal against a rejected asylum application has risen by nearly 500% over two years, putting renewed pressure on the taxpayer, an analysis by the Refugee Council has found.
Figures released by the Ministry of Justice show that at the end of 2024 there were 41,987 asylum appeals in the tribunal courts' backlog, up from 7,133 at the start of 2023.
In the last three months of 2024, there were 12,183 appeals lodged following steps taken by the Labour government to restart asylum decision-making when it arrived in office.
The total number of asylum application appeals against decisions lodged at the first-tier tribunal in 2024 has increased by 71% year on year.
It follows an increase in refusals as the grant rate for asylum applicants in 2024 fell to 47%. According to the charity, the Home Office's effort to clear the asylum backlog, by hiring new caseworkers and shortening initial interviews, has resulted in a rise in errors and omissions.
Enver Solomon, the Refugee Council's chief executive, said more needed to be done to ensure correct first-time decision-making, so a new backlog was not created in a different part of the system.
'Resolving asylum cases well will help reduce costs and the number of people trapped in limbo, stuck in hotels unable to work or move on with their lives. The use of hotels in communities across the country has become a damaging symbol of government failure and a flashpoint for community tensions. There needs to be a clear plan to stopping the use of hotels by the end of this year,' he said.
At the end of 2024, there were 38,079 people being accommodated in hotels by the Home Office, official figures show. The Refugee Council estimates that if those numbers were to remain the same throughout 2025, the annual cost could reach nearly £1.5bn.
Asylum decision-makers have blamed rules introduced by Rishi Sunak for an increase in asylum appeals.
In a rush to fulfil a pledge to clear 90,000 asylum claims by the end of 2023, the former prime minister introduced rules to shorten the training period for staff and gave them a two-hour limit for interviews.
More claims are also being refused since the introduction by the previous Conservative government of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which increased the standard of proof for refugee status.
A shortage of immigration lawyers is adding to lengthy delays to the outcome of asylum appeals. This has led to many cases being adjourned or individuals deciding to represent themselves, which typically makes a hearing six times longer than one with legal representation.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Under Yvette Cooper's Home Office, the number of people receiving initial decisions in the latest quarter, October to December 2024, was more than double that of the previous three months.
The MoJ is undertaking annual recruitment of about 1,000 judges and tribunal members across all courts and tribunals. The lord chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, announced in November a rise of a minimum of 10% in civil legal aid rates for those working in the immigration sector.
A government spokesperson said asylum claims were considered on a case-by-case basis.
'The asylum system we inherited was not fit for purpose, which is why we are taking urgent action to restart asylum processing and clear the backlog of cases, which will save the taxpayer an estimated £4bn over the next two years, and we remain determined to end the use of asylum hotels over time to cut the unacceptably high costs of asylum accommodation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rachel Reeves' massive spending review only points to more tax rises and pain for voters in the future
Rachel Reeves' massive spending review only points to more tax rises and pain for voters in the future

The Sun

time29 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Rachel Reeves' massive spending review only points to more tax rises and pain for voters in the future

Pay later… WHAT a difference a year makes. Last July, Rachel Reeves was busy talking down the economy and slashing winter fuel payments for pensioners to fill a budget 'black hole'. Yesterday, she insisted the country's foundations had now been miraculously fixed by Labour. So much so that she could go on a massive spending splurge, including £113BILLION on capital projects and more money for an unreformed NHS. Defence gets a long overdue uplift — albeit to less than the level demanded by Nato. Creaking local transport networks will be improved (no doubt to counter the threat of Reform in the Red Wall). Some £39billion will go on more affordable homes. But there was also plenty of political smoke and mirrors. The Home Office — while getting a wedge of cash to shore up our porous borders — was starved of sufficient funds for policing. Council tax rises beckon. Most worryingly it's far from clear how the Chancellor is planning to pay the massive overall bill. Not least because the economy is — in reality — in a far worse condition than last year. Le copout THE Government says it will end free hotels for illegal migrants by 2029. Even in the unlikely event that target is met, it means taxpayers forking out billions on hotel freebies for another FOUR years. After that, many young, male illegal immigrants will probably be moved to unsuitable rented accommodation with families living next door. We don't doubt Home Secretary Yvette Cooper wants to stop the boats. But with friends like the French police — who needs enemies? Just yesterday they were shrugging on the beach as boatloads of migrants set sail for Dover. Soft Rock AFTER the grubby deal to give away the Chagos Islands, Labour has now begun the sellout of Gibraltar. In one more stunning failure of negotiation, Foreign Secretary David Lammy has limply agreed to effectively hand over control of its borders. Yet another unnecessary concession to Europe which allows Spanish workers free movement to Gibraltar. Spain has long coveted the outcrop and will be cock-a-hoop at this self-inflicted weakening of British sovereignty.

Fact check: 2025 spending review claims
Fact check: 2025 spending review claims

The Herald Scotland

time34 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Fact check: 2025 spending review claims

We've taken a look at some of the key claims. How much is spending increasing by? At the start of her speech Ms Reeves announced that 'total departmental budgets will grow by 2.3% a year in real terms'. That headline figure doesn't tell the full story, however. Firstly, 2.3% is the average annual real-terms growth in total departmental budgets between 2023/24 and 2028/29. That means it includes spending changes that have already been implemented, for both the current (2025/26) and previous (2024/25) financial years. The average annual increase between this year and 2028/29 is 1.5%. Therefore, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) has said, 'most departments will have larger real-terms budgets at the end of the Parliament than the beginning, but in many cases much of that extra cash will have arrived by April'. Secondly, it's worth noting that the 2.3% figure includes both day-to-day (Resource DEL) and investment (Capital DEL) spending. Capital spending (which funds things like infrastructure projects) is increasing by 3.6% a year on average in real terms between 2023/24 and 2029/30, and by 1.8% between 2025/26 and 2029/30. Day-to-day departmental budgets meanwhile are seeing a smaller average annual real-terms increase – of 1.7% between 2023/24 and 2028/29 and 1.2% between 2025/26 and 2028/29. Which departments are the winners and losers? Ms Reeves touted substantial spending increases in some areas (for example, the 3% rise in day-to-day NHS spending in England), but unsurprisingly her statement did not focus on areas where spending will decrease. Changes to Government spending are not uniform across all departments, and alongside increases in spending on things like the NHS, defence and the justice system, a number of Government departments will see their budgets decrease in real terms. Departments facing real-terms reductions in overall and day-to-day spending include the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (this factors in reductions in aid spending announced earlier this year to offset increased defence spending), the Home Office (although the Government says the Home Office's budget grows in real terms if a planned reduction in asylum spending is excluded) and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. Did the Conservatives leave a '£22 billion black hole'? Ms Reeves made a claim we've heard a number of times since it first surfaced in July 2024 – that the previous Conservative government left a '£22 billion black hole in the public finances'. That figure comes from a Treasury audit that forecast a £22 billion overspend in departmental day-to-day spending in 2024/25, but the extent to which it was unexpected or inherited is disputed. The IFS said last year that some of the pressures the Government claimed contributed to this so-called 'black hole' could have been anticipated, but others did 'indeed seem to be greater than could be discerned from the outside'. An Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) review of its March 2024 forecast found an estimated £9.5 billion of additional spending pressures were known to the Treasury at that point in time, but were not known to the OBR as it prepared its forecast. It's true that this review didn't confirm the £22 billion figure, but it also did not necessarily prove that it was incorrect, because Labour's figure included pressures which were identified after the OBR prepared its forecast and so were beyond the scope of the OBR's review. We've written more about how the Government reached the figure of £22 billion in our explainer on this topic. How big is the increase in NHS appointments? Ms Reeves took the opportunity to congratulate Health Secretary Wes Streeting for delivering 'three-and-a-half million extra' hospital appointments in England. The Government has previously celebrated this as a 'massive increase', particularly in light of its manifesto pledge to deliver an extra two million appointments a year. Ms Reeves' claim was broadly accurate – data published last month shows there were 3.6 million additional appointments between July 2024 and February 2025 compared to the previous year. But importantly that increase is actually smaller than the 4.2 million rise that happened in the equivalent period the year before, under the Conservative government – as data obtained by Full Fact under the Freedom of Information Act and published last month revealed. What do announcements on asylum hotels, policing, nurseries and more mean for the Government's pledges? Ms Reeves made a number of announcements that appear to directly impact the delivery of several pre-existing Labour pledges, many of which we're already monitoring in our Government Tracker. (We'll be updating the tracker to reflect these announcements in due course, and reviewing how we rate progress on pledges as necessary). The Chancellor announced an average increase in 'police spending power' of 2.3% a year in real terms over the course of the review period, which she said was the equivalent of an additional £2 billion. However, as police budgets comprise a mix of central Government funding and local council tax receipts, some of this extra spending is expected to be funded by increases in council tax precepts. Ms Reeves said this funding would help the Government achieve its commitment of 'putting 13,000 additional police officers, PCSOs and special constables into neighbourhood policing roles in England and Wales', a pledge we're monitoring here. The spending review also includes funding of 'almost £370 million across the next four years to support the Government's commitment to deliver school-based nurseries across England', which Ms Reeves said would help the Government deliver its pledge to have 'a record number of children being school-ready'. The Chancellor also committed to ending the use of hotels to house asylum seekers by the end of this Parliament, with an additional £200 million announced to 'accelerate the transformation of the asylum system'. When we looked last month at progress on the Government's pledge to 'end asylum hotels' we said it appeared off track, as figures showed the number of asylum seekers housed in hotels was higher at the end of March 2025 than it was when Labour came into Government.

Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East
Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East

ITV News

timean hour ago

  • ITV News

Treasury technicalities plus party politics bring more attention for the North East

The Chancellor's big ticket items for the North East came early - which is somewhere between encouraging and disconcerting when we're talking about public transport projects. Around £2.8 billion from the Spending Review was announced last Wednesday for infrastructure in our region, including extending the Tyne and Wear Metro to Washington. By comparison, Rachel Reeves' big speech today was a bit of an anticlimax. In the small print afterwards, we found that areas of Newcastle, Middlesbrough and Stockton that 'have been too easily left behind' are to receive up to £20m over the next decade for things like improving parks and tackling graffiti. The government are calling them 'trailblazer neighbourhoods', which sounds a bit like a spoof initiative from The Thick Of It, and a lot like the Conservative governments' various funding pots for local regeneration schemes. The Tories talked a lot about what they called 'levelling up', with mixed results. Labour have talked less about tackling regional inequalities, but have made a technical tweak that might make a big difference. They've revised the Treasury's 'Green Book', used to judge value-for-money for investment. London and the South East normally deliver bigger bang for your buck, so have often been prioritised for new infrastructure. The government says: no more, wider impacts will be considered, so regions like ours will be able to compete. Despite some government departments having their budgets squeezed when it comes to day-to-day spending, there is money around for investment due to another tweak to government rules, around borrowing. Rachel Reeves made a passing promise today to set out the government's plans for 'Northern Powerhouse Rail' in the coming weeks. Campaigners say it should mean a high speed rail line from Liverpool to Hull, and up to the North East. It's hard not to be sceptical, given it's been talked about in many forms over many years. The Chancellor spoke quite a bit today about the government being focused on ensuring there's economic growth, and people have opportunity, in every part of the country. She also dedicated a fair amount of time to attacking Reform UK, reflecting the threat they pose to Labour, after their local election successes in places like County Durham. The Chancellor has been accused of doom and gloom in her first 11 months in office, focusing on what she claims has been a horrible inheritance from the Conservatives. With this Spending Review she tried to change gear and set out a more positive plan for the years ahead. The North East will hope to play a big part.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store