
Number of UK asylum seekers awaiting appeals up by nearly 500% in two years
The number of asylum seekers left in limbo as they appeal against a rejected asylum application has risen by nearly 500% over two years, putting renewed pressure on the taxpayer, an analysis by the Refugee Council has found.
Figures released by the Ministry of Justice show that at the end of 2024 there were 41,987 asylum appeals in the tribunal courts' backlog, up from 7,133 at the start of 2023.
In the last three months of 2024, there were 12,183 appeals lodged following steps taken by the Labour government to restart asylum decision-making when it arrived in office.
The total number of asylum application appeals against decisions lodged at the first-tier tribunal in 2024 has increased by 71% year on year.
It follows an increase in refusals as the grant rate for asylum applicants in 2024 fell to 47%. According to the charity, the Home Office's effort to clear the asylum backlog, by hiring new caseworkers and shortening initial interviews, has resulted in a rise in errors and omissions.
Enver Solomon, the Refugee Council's chief executive, said more needed to be done to ensure correct first-time decision-making, so a new backlog was not created in a different part of the system.
'Resolving asylum cases well will help reduce costs and the number of people trapped in limbo, stuck in hotels unable to work or move on with their lives. The use of hotels in communities across the country has become a damaging symbol of government failure and a flashpoint for community tensions. There needs to be a clear plan to stopping the use of hotels by the end of this year,' he said.
At the end of 2024, there were 38,079 people being accommodated in hotels by the Home Office, official figures show. The Refugee Council estimates that if those numbers were to remain the same throughout 2025, the annual cost could reach nearly £1.5bn.
Asylum decision-makers have blamed rules introduced by Rishi Sunak for an increase in asylum appeals.
In a rush to fulfil a pledge to clear 90,000 asylum claims by the end of 2023, the former prime minister introduced rules to shorten the training period for staff and gave them a two-hour limit for interviews.
More claims are also being refused since the introduction by the previous Conservative government of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which increased the standard of proof for refugee status.
A shortage of immigration lawyers is adding to lengthy delays to the outcome of asylum appeals. This has led to many cases being adjourned or individuals deciding to represent themselves, which typically makes a hearing six times longer than one with legal representation.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Under Yvette Cooper's Home Office, the number of people receiving initial decisions in the latest quarter, October to December 2024, was more than double that of the previous three months.
The MoJ is undertaking annual recruitment of about 1,000 judges and tribunal members across all courts and tribunals. The lord chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, announced in November a rise of a minimum of 10% in civil legal aid rates for those working in the immigration sector.
A government spokesperson said asylum claims were considered on a case-by-case basis.
'The asylum system we inherited was not fit for purpose, which is why we are taking urgent action to restart asylum processing and clear the backlog of cases, which will save the taxpayer an estimated £4bn over the next two years, and we remain determined to end the use of asylum hotels over time to cut the unacceptably high costs of asylum accommodation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
43 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.


The Courier
an hour ago
- The Courier
Dundee tourist tax early consultation approved
An early consultation on a possible tourist tax in Dundee has been approved. A report on implementing a visitor levy in the city was considered by councillors on Monday evening. During a meeting of the economic growth committee, councillors approved an early engagement exercise with local businesses and residents. A working group will be set up to engage with local businesses, residents and 'any other relevant partners'. Feedback from this will then be heard by councillors at a committee meeting, where they will decide whether a statutory consultation should be approved. The earliest date a Dundee tourist tax will be launched is spring 2028. Edinburgh City Council was the first in Scotland to approve a visitor levy. From next summer, it will charge visitors an extra 5% on top of their accommodation costs. The early engagement period is set to begin this summer and run until spring next year. If approved, a statutory consultation would run for 12 weeks. A decision will then be made in autumn 2026 on whether a Dundee tourist tax should be introduced. If it is approved, an 18-month implementation period will allow businesses and communities time to prepare for the levy. However not all councillors backed the move. Conservative councillor Derek Scott called for councillors to note the report but take no further action, saying it could put people off visiting Dundee. 'I've always been opposed to a visitor levy,' said Mr Scott. 'I think the Scottish Government should be providing sufficiently in their funding allocation to local authorities to fully support the tourism sector. 'I've always been concerned about the impact a tourist tax would have on attracting visitors in what is a very competitive market.'

Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
UK Government ‘betraying Wales' over rail funding, Plaid leader says
Rhun ap Iorwerth, leader of Plaid, criticised the UK Labour Government for reclassifying the £6.6 billion Oxford to Cambridge line to an England and Wales project. The designation means Wales will not receive the additional rail funding it would get if branded an England-only project. Mr ap Iorwerth called on Eluned Morgan, the Welsh Labour First Minister, to condemn the reclassification. Baroness Morgan agreed Wales was not getting its fair share but said she was expecting to see positive changes in the UK Government's spending review on Wednesday. Mr ap Iorwerth's comments come following reports that revealed the project had originally been listed as England-only from 2020 to 2024. The Treasury told the BBC the classification was a 'publishing error' and insisted it was always considered an England and Wales development. Speaking First Minister's Questions in the Senedd on Tuesday, Mr ap Iorwerth said: 'We were getting our share until Labour actively moved the goalposts. 'Labour went out of its way to make sure Wales wouldn't get the money when the big spending really began.' He added: 'She should be joining me in condemning the UK Labour Government for betraying Wales. Will she?' Mr ap Iorwerth argued the reclassification was a 'new HS2 scandal' – a rail project that has been controversial in Wales. Despite none of the track being laid in the country, it was also designated an England and Wales project by the last UK Conservative government. Plaid has said this designation cost Wales £3.9 billion in funding. Responding to Mr Iorwerth, Baroness Morgan said: 'I've learned to expect nothing but constant negativity from the Plaid Cymru leader. 'I've been clear and I've been consistent when it comes to rail funding that we have not been getting our fair share of funding, in a position that the Tories left us with for over a decade. 'The difference between the Tories and the UK Labour Government is that they've recognised that injustice. 'I don't know what's going to be in the spending review, but the one thing I do know is that if Labour gave Wales a total land of milk and honey, Plaid Cymru would still find fault.' Baroness Morgan added they were 'expecting something positive from the spending review', but the Welsh government would have to keep on making the case for a fair share of funding. In January, the UK government admitted Welsh railways had been underfunded, with spending at 'low levels' in recent years. However, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander did not announce any additional funding at the time.