logo
Number of UK asylum seekers awaiting appeals up by nearly 500% in two years

Number of UK asylum seekers awaiting appeals up by nearly 500% in two years

The Guardian16-03-2025

The number of asylum seekers left in limbo as they appeal against a rejected asylum application has risen by nearly 500% over two years, putting renewed pressure on the taxpayer, an analysis by the Refugee Council has found.
Figures released by the Ministry of Justice show that at the end of 2024 there were 41,987 asylum appeals in the tribunal courts' backlog, up from 7,133 at the start of 2023.
In the last three months of 2024, there were 12,183 appeals lodged following steps taken by the Labour government to restart asylum decision-making when it arrived in office.
The total number of asylum application appeals against decisions lodged at the first-tier tribunal in 2024 has increased by 71% year on year.
It follows an increase in refusals as the grant rate for asylum applicants in 2024 fell to 47%. According to the charity, the Home Office's effort to clear the asylum backlog, by hiring new caseworkers and shortening initial interviews, has resulted in a rise in errors and omissions.
Enver Solomon, the Refugee Council's chief executive, said more needed to be done to ensure correct first-time decision-making, so a new backlog was not created in a different part of the system.
'Resolving asylum cases well will help reduce costs and the number of people trapped in limbo, stuck in hotels unable to work or move on with their lives. The use of hotels in communities across the country has become a damaging symbol of government failure and a flashpoint for community tensions. There needs to be a clear plan to stopping the use of hotels by the end of this year,' he said.
At the end of 2024, there were 38,079 people being accommodated in hotels by the Home Office, official figures show. The Refugee Council estimates that if those numbers were to remain the same throughout 2025, the annual cost could reach nearly £1.5bn.
Asylum decision-makers have blamed rules introduced by Rishi Sunak for an increase in asylum appeals.
In a rush to fulfil a pledge to clear 90,000 asylum claims by the end of 2023, the former prime minister introduced rules to shorten the training period for staff and gave them a two-hour limit for interviews.
More claims are also being refused since the introduction by the previous Conservative government of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022, which increased the standard of proof for refugee status.
A shortage of immigration lawyers is adding to lengthy delays to the outcome of asylum appeals. This has led to many cases being adjourned or individuals deciding to represent themselves, which typically makes a hearing six times longer than one with legal representation.
Sign up to First Edition
Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters
after newsletter promotion
Under Yvette Cooper's Home Office, the number of people receiving initial decisions in the latest quarter, October to December 2024, was more than double that of the previous three months.
The MoJ is undertaking annual recruitment of about 1,000 judges and tribunal members across all courts and tribunals. The lord chancellor, Shabana Mahmood, announced in November a rise of a minimum of 10% in civil legal aid rates for those working in the immigration sector.
A government spokesperson said asylum claims were considered on a case-by-case basis.
'The asylum system we inherited was not fit for purpose, which is why we are taking urgent action to restart asylum processing and clear the backlog of cases, which will save the taxpayer an estimated £4bn over the next two years, and we remain determined to end the use of asylum hotels over time to cut the unacceptably high costs of asylum accommodation.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Six candidates in Powys Council by-election in Llanidloes
Six candidates in Powys Council by-election in Llanidloes

Powys County Times

time4 minutes ago

  • Powys County Times

Six candidates in Powys Council by-election in Llanidloes

SIX candidates will be contesting the Llanidloes by-election next month, including one former council heavyweight. The deadline for candidate nominations was late on Friday afternoon, June 6 and the election is set to take place on Thursday, July 3. Canvassing is already in full swing as candidates and their supporters pounded the streets of Llanidloes looking for votes over the weekend. The election follows the resignation of veteran councillor Liberal Democrat Gareth Morgan last month, after more than 50 year representing the town in both the 1974 to 1996 and current version of Powys County Council. All mainstream political parties in Wales have put a candidate forward with two of them having served as county councillors in the past. Former cabinet member for education Phyl Davies, who represented the Blaen Hafren ward between 2017 and 2022, has thrown his hat in the ring for the Conservative party. His Tory predecessor in the now extinct Blaen Hafren ward from 2012 to 2017, Graham Jones will be standing on the Reform UK ticket. Applications to register to vote need to reach Powys County Council's electoral registration officer by midnight on June 17. Applications for a postal votes need to be made to the council's electoral registration officer by 5 pm on Wednesday, June 18. The deadline for application to vote by proxy is 5pm on Wednesday, June 25. Applications can be made online by visiting –

Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision
Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision

Western Telegraph

time9 minutes ago

  • Western Telegraph

Government facing ‘walk of shame' over Chinese embassy decision

Sir Iain Duncan Smith said response by the Government to the proposed embassy near the the capital's financial district had become 'Project Kowtow', as he criticised the Government for 'one denial after another (and) one betrayal after another'. Sir Iain referred to the warnings reportedly issued by the White House and Dutch government to Downing Street over the plans, which is set to be scrutinised by ministers. The worries stem from the close proximity of the proposed embassy's Royal Mint Court site to data centres and communication cables. The Sunday Times said the US was 'deeply concerned' about the plans, quoting a senior US official. In response, planning minister Matthew Pennycook said he could not give a full response as the matter was still to come before the department for a decision, and any verdict could be challenged by the courts. Sir Iain said: 'Beijing has a recent history of cutting cables and confirmed infrastructure hacks, including embedding malware capable of disabling all that infrastructure. 'Minister Peter Kyle yesterday on television said surprisingly that this was in the planning process and could be managed. Will the minister correct this record? The planning inquiry has concluded, no changes can be made to the Chinese planning application at all. 'I'll remind him the application contains nothing about cabling. Indeed to the inquiry, the Chinese have rejected only two requests, which he referred to actually, made by the Government in the letter from the foreign and home secretaries, despite ministers regularly saying that this letter, and I quote, should give those concerned, 'comfort'.' Sir Iain Duncan Smith took part in a protest over the plans for the embassy in February (PA/Jordan Pettitt) The Conservative MP said rerouting the cables would cost millions of pounds, and asked Mr Pennycook why the Government had denied the existence of cables until the White House confirmed it. He asked Mr Pennycook to deny reports by Chinese state media, saying the UK had given the Chinese assurances that it would allow a development 'no matter what'. He added: 'I see this as Project Kowtow, one denial after another, one betrayal after another. No wonder our allies believe that this Chinese mega embassy is now becoming a walk of shame for the Government.' Mr Pennycook replied because of the 'quasi-judicial nature' of his role, he could not comment on details of the application. He also said it would not be 'appropriate' for him to comment on the cabling or national security issues. He said he did not 'recognise the characterisation' by the Sunday Times of the embassy being raised in talks between the UK and China on trade. 'It is important to also emphasise that only material planning considerations can be taken into account in determining this case,' he said. 'But, as I say, I cannot comment in any detail on a case and it is not yet before the department.' Tory shadow communities secretary Kevin Hollinrake said Parliament had been treated with disdain by the Government. Mr Hollinrake said: 'Question after question, letter after letter, the Government has consistently treated Parliament with complete disregard on this matter. Stonewalling legitimate inquiries about national security, about ministerial discussions, and warnings about security bodies.' He added: 'Why won't the Government follow the examples of the US, Australian, and Irish governments which veto similar embassies that threaten their national security? 'The Government is on the verge of making a decision that will lead to huge risk, that will persist for decades. Will they change course before it is too late?' Mr Pennycook replied: 'No decision has been made on this case. No application is yet before the department.' Marie Rimmer, Labour MP for St Helens South and Whiston, said: 'China has a track record of aggressive state-backed espionage, and surely this country cannot afford to make a massive underestimation of what risk if this would go ahead?' She added: 'We cannot not say anything in this House. We must comment on what we see, and please understand that we must do so.' Meanwhile, former security minister, Conservative MP Tom Tugendhat, asked whether the Government believed the Chinese would treat a similar application in the same way. He said: 'Do you honestly believe that thr minister thinks that the Chinese would look at this proposal in the same way? 'Do we actually in this House believe that our economic security being threatened, as highlighted by the Americans and the Dutch, would go through a bureaucratic planning process with no ability to vary it because, frankly, them's the orders? 'I don't think that's the way China would do it, and it's certainly not the way we should.' Mr Pennycook replied: 'I'm very glad that we have a different and more robust planning system than the People's Republic of China.'

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street
Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Spending review is ‘settled', says Downing Street

The spending review is 'settled', Downing Street has said, after the Home Office was the last department locked in budget negotiations. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to announce funding increases for the NHS, schools and defence along with a number of infrastructure projects on Wednesday, as she shares out some £113 billion freed up by looser borrowing rules. But other areas could face cuts as she seeks to balance manifesto commitments with more recent pledges, such as a hike in defence spending, while meeting her fiscal rules that promise to match day-to-day spending with revenues. On Monday morning, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper was the last minister still to reach a deal with the Treasury, with reports suggesting greater police spending would mean a squeeze on other areas of her department's budget. Speaking to reporters on Monday afternoon, the Prime Minister's official spokesman said: 'The spending review is settled, we will be focused on investing in Britain's renewal so that all working people are better off. 'The first job of the Government was to stabilise the British economy and the public finances, and now we move into a new chapter to deliver the promise and change.' The Government has committed to spend 2.5% of gross domestic product on defence from April 2027, with a goal of increasing that to 3% over the next parliament – a timetable which could stretch to 2034. Ms Reeves' plans will also include an £86 billion package for science and technology research and development. Last week the Chancellor admitted that she had been forced to turn down requests for funding for projects she would have wanted to back, amid the Whitehall spending wrangling. Mayor of London Sir Sadiq Khan's office is concerned that Wednesday's announcement will include no new funding or projects for London. The mayor had been looking to secure extensions to the Docklands Light Railway and Bakerloo line on the Underground, along with the power to introduce a tourist levy and a substantial increase in funding for the Metropolitan Police. A source close to the mayor said on Monday that ministers 'must not return to the damaging, anti-London approach of the last government', adding this would harm both London's public services and 'jobs and growth across the country'. They said: 'Sadiq will always stand up for London and has been clear it would be unacceptable if there are no major infrastructure projects for London announced in the spending review and the Met doesn't get the funding it needs. 'We need backing for London as a global city that's pro-business, safe and well-connected.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store