Housing project in Delhi's fragile Morphological Ridge zone gets CEC nod with strict environmental conditions
The Central Empowered Committee (CEC), in its latest report to the Supreme Court, has recommended that a private builder be allowed to use 4,553 square metres of land in Sector-B, Pocket-1, Vasant Kunj, which falls within Delhi's Morphological Ridge zone, for a group housing project.
The approval is subject to several conditions: no felling of any of the 23 existing trees on the site; plantation of 250 indigenous trees along the periphery and 250 along internal roads; and deposit of 5 per cent of the sanctioned project cost with the Ridge Management Board Fund, to be used under the supervision of the Delhi Forest Department.
The project must provide water for birds and squirrels, follow all conditions imposed by statutory authorities, including the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), and implement waste management, potable water supply, rainwater harvesting, and energy conservation measures. Quarterly compliance reports must be submitted through the CEC's online portal.
The land in question—approximately 5,353 square metres, of which 4,553 square metres fall within Delhi's Morphological Ridge—is part of the Aravalli ecosystem.
Although not notified as a forest, the Morphological Ridge holds environmental significance as per several court rulings, which mandate Supreme Court clearance for any construction in such areas.
The Indian Express had reported in March that the project was the first known case to receive a conditional environmental clearance from the ministry, and not CEC as is mandated in such cases, given that it is located in the Morphological Ridge area.
The CEC submitted the report on May 14 based on two applications concerning the group housing project in Vasant Kunj. An application filed by Rajeev Ranjan, RWA president at Pocket B-1, Vasant Kunj, opposed the project, citing ecological sensitivity and the ridge's protection.
The other, contested by the builder, argued that the land is residential, part of an approved Delhi Development Authority (DDA) layout plan, and lacks typical ridge features.
In response, the CEC consulted stakeholders such as DDA, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD), Forest Department and the MoEFCC, and inspected the site on January 3, this year. The committee found that more than 80 per cent of the land lies within the Morphological Ridge as per the Forest Department's e-Vanlekh map. It was also observed that however, the site appeared flat and surrounded by residential houses of DDA, upon inspection.
Mapping confirms ridge status: Using the Delhi Government's official e-Vanlekh portal, the CEC confirmed that about 85 per cent of the project site lies within the Morphological Ridge area.
Legal precedents demand clearance: The report highlights judicial precedents, including Delhi High Court and Supreme Court rulings, which insist that land with ridge-like morphological features cannot be developed without permission from the Ridge Management Board (RMB) and the Supreme Court.
All statutory approvals in place: Despite the ecological concerns, the project has obtained approvals from a range of statutory bodies—including DDA, MCD, Delhi Urban Art Commission, Airports Authority of India, Delhi Jal Board, BSES Rajdhani Power Limited, Fire Department, and the MoEFCC.
The CEC referred the proposal for construction on the Morphological Ridge to the RMB on February 25 this year. The RMB responded on March 24, stating that it could not give an approval due to restrictions set by the Supreme Court in its May 16 order last year, wherein it restrained the board from clearing any project proposals involving diversion of ridge forests—including Morphological Ridge areas—without prior permission of the court.
This meant that no administrative or expert body other than the Supreme Court could have authorised the project. Even though the developer has all other statutory approvals, the absence of RMB clearance, due to the court's restriction, has made the Supreme Court's decision the final and only pathway.
The land was originally part of a large-scale SFS housing scheme planned by the DDA in 1987, but remained privately owned as the acquisition did not take place. Over the years, multiple applications and appeals for layout plan sanctions were filed. Eventually, the MCD approved the layout plans under the Master Plan for Delhi (MPD) 2021.
The project had obtained approvals, including a layout plan sanction from the MCD in March 2024 and a conditional environmental clearance from the MoEFCC in January this year. It also secured No-Objection Certificates from the Delhi Pollution Control Committee and several other bodies. Additionally, the land acquisition collector confirmed the land is free of acquisition claims.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Edu council issues 5-point norms to strengthen safety in Bihar schools
Patna: To enhance students' safety and ensure a secured environment, Bihar Education Project Council (BEPC) has issued fresh directives to all district education officers (DEOs) and district programme officers (DPOs), mandating strict adherence to the "School Safety and Protection Guidelines – 2021". "This is in line with Supreme Court directives and National Education Policy 2020. Every school must now adhere strictly to the prescribed standards," said state project director Mayank Warwade in a letter to all DEOs and DPOs across the state. The guidelines cover five broad areas, including infrastructure, health, emotional safety, cybersecurity and disaster management. Warwade said the infrastructure includes boundary walls and emergency exits from the schools. "Health and physical security requires schools to provide first aid kits, conduct regular health check-ups and maintain comprehensive health cards for each student. The emotional safety stresses classroom monitoring and age-appropriate education on personal safety, including the difference between "good touch" and "bad touch". Cybersecurity protocols talks about computer labs with internet access," he said. Talking about the disaster management guidelines, the project director said all schools must now have a disaster management plan and conduct mock drills regularly. "We want students and staff to be prepared, not panicked, in an emergency situation," he said, adding that the full guideline is available for download on the Union education ministry's website and will be monitored for compliance.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Bakrid festival celebrated with prayers and religious fervour in Hubballi
1 2 Hubballi: The Bakrid festival, also known as Eid-ul-Adha, was celebrated with religious fervour in Hubballi. Families gathered to commemorate the occasion. Muslim brethren celebrated the festival by offering mass prayers on Saturday. Following this, mass prayers were held at Idgah Maidan, Rani Chennamma Circle, for the welfare of the world, praying for good rains and crops, and for peace everywhere. Muslim brothers and sisters participated in the mass prayer and exchanged greetings with each other. After the prayers, as per tradition, the Muslim leaders visited Moorusavira Math and received blessings from the seer. President of Anjuman-E-Islam, AM Hindasgeri, Congress leader Altaf Hallur, and others were present. Mass prayer was held at the old Hubballi Idgah Maidan by Maulana Hazrat Abdul Subana Naeemi of Fatesha Wali Dargah Masjid. It was attended by the honorary secretary of Anjuman E-Islam, Basheer Hallur, education board members Salim S, Naveed Mulla, and other dignitaries from the Muslim community. Police were deployed near the Idgah Maidan, and tight police security was in place to maintain peace and order. The mobile commando center was also deployed, and traffic was restricted near Rani Chennamma Circle, with traffic arrangements made through diversions. Pic: Muslim community prayed and exchanged greetings at Idgah Maidan, Hubballi
Indian Express
9 hours ago
- Indian Express
Vidarbha's ‘Zudpi' scrub lands are ‘forest' lands: how SC ruling has struck a balance between development and environment concerns
After several decades of litigation over about 86,000 hectares of Zudpi jungle (shrub forest) lands peculiar to Maharashtra's eastern Vidarbha region, the Supreme Court last month ruled that such lands should be considered as 'forest' lands. On May 22, the top court provided clarity on the usage of Zudpi lands, saying they cannot be converted without prior approval from the central government, and only after complying with the conditions laid down by the court. An official report referred to by the court says Zudpi is a Marathi word that literally translates to bushes or shrubs, and Zudpi land means an inferior type of unoccupied land with bushy growth. The term was used for all wastelands that were not occupied by individual farmers for cultivation and other purposes. According to the report, Zudpi jungle lands are peculiar to six districts of eastern Vidarbha (Nagpur division) – Nagpur, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Bhandara, Wardha, and Gondia – and have been used for non-forest purposes for the past several decades. These lands, traditionally used for grazing, were classified as Gairan under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. For decades, legal status uncertain Vidarbha's Zudpi lands remained in a legal limbo for decades due to administrative lapses, inconsistent government actions, and contrasting interpretations of India's forest laws. Initially vested with the Revenue Department, these lands were used for development, public amenities like schools, health centres, water pipelines, burial grounds, and for allotment to landless farmers. They were also used for infrastructure projects, including railways, defence, and irrigation. After the reorganisation of states in 1960, similar lands elsewhere in Maharashtra were recorded as Gairan or Gurcharan. However, in Vidarbha, they continued to be classified as 'Zudpi Jungle' due to bureaucratic inaction. The Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 (FCA) prohibited diversion of forest land without the Centre's approval. However, in November 1987, the Maharashtra government issued an order declaring Zudpi lands as 'scrub forests' that would not attract the provisions of FCA, and handed them to the Revenue Department for afforestation and grazing purposes. This 1987 Government Order was challenged by the Bombay Environmental Action Group (BEAG) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court. While this plea was pending, the Centre in February 1992 changed and relaxed its earlier position. It clarified that Zudpi Jungle would continue to be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA; however, for the part of Zudpi lands that were used for non-forest purposes, the state government shall make a proposal to the Centre seeking its approval under the FCA. Taking a cue from the Centre's decision, the Maharashtra government in 1994 withdrew its 1987 order. With these changing positions, ambiguity prevailed until the Supreme Court's December 12, 1996 judgment in the 'TN Godavarman Thirumulpad' case, which stated that Zudpi lands would also be treated as 'forest lands' under the FCA. In 1998, a High-Powered Committee appointed by the state government recommended that 92,115 hectares should be declared protected forests and 86,409 hectares that were unfit for forest use should be de-notified. Eight years ago, the state government again pushed to denotify Zudpi jungle lands. In 2019, the Maharashtra government, through the Divisional Commissioner, Nagpur, filed an interim application and sought the SC's approval to exclude the latter category of land from the purview of FCA. The SC formed a Central Empowered Committee (CEC), which filed its first report after site visits. Since some issues were yet to be resolved, the SC last year sought another report from the CEC. This report formed the basis of the SC's May 22, 2025 verdict. GOVERNMENT: The Maharashtra government argued that Zudpi lands were never forest lands, and due to the reorganisation of states and the inaction of certain officials, the revenue records were never corrected. As such, these lands continued to be erroneously described as Zudpi lands in revenue records. The state argued that denying it relief would lead to 'grave and irreparable damage' to lakhs of citizens, and would stall several projects. INTERVENER: Environmentalist Prasad Khale, intervener in the case, however, argued that de-notifying these lands would degrade healthy forests and disrupt wildlife corridors. He submitted that the 2025 CEC report had ignored ecological concerns, including those of wildlife corridors and the protection of scrub forests, which should not be used for non-forest activities. SC directives strike a balance The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Bhushan R Gavai and Justice Augustine Masih said that it could arrive at a solution to 'balance the rights of the citizens at large on one hand and the interest of the environment on the other hand' due to the efforts made by the CEC. The SC recognised that a large number of Zudpi lands in Nagpur city alone had public utilities such as the High Court building, defence buildings, state secretariat, graveyards, etc. It said citizens residing on these lands for years, or farmers could not be deprived of their residence or livelihood. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that Zudpi jungle lands would be treated as forests, but made exceptions for lands allotted for non-forest use before December 12, 1996. For such lands, where classification (purpose) hadn't changed, the state would be required to obtain the Centre's approval under Section 2 of the FCA for their deletion from the list of forest areas. The court said the Centre shall consider proposals without imposing compensatory afforestation conditions, and should not seek deposition of Net Present Value (NPV) levies. The court directed the Centre and the state to consult and finalise a proposal format within three months with prior approval of the CEC. For post-December 12, 1996 allotments of Zudpi lands, the Centre shall process proposals only after ascertaining reasons and ensuring action against the officers who took allotment decisions in violation of the SC's directions. Special Task Forces in each district will remove encroachments made after October 25, 1980, within two years. All commercial allotments post-October 25, 1989, are to be treated as encroachments. The court clarified no land may be diverted to non-government entities after scrutiny. The Revenue Department must transfer remaining Zudpi lands to the Forest Department within a year, which are to be used for compensatory afforestation. Other Zudpi lands will not be allowed for compensatory afforestation unless certified by the Chief Secretary. Benefitting the state's development plans The verdict has in some ways paved the way for infrastructure and other development works that the state government plans to undertake on certain tracts of lands, after obtaining approval from the central government. Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis welcomed the ruling, calling it a boost to Vidarbha's stalled development. The CEC will monitor the transfer of forest land, as directed by the SC. States and Union Territories have been directed to reclaim possession of such lands from occupiers and hand them over to the Forest Department. The SC had said that if reclaiming possession is not in the public interest, the state/UTs shall recover land costs from occupiers and use them to develop forests.
