EC says Congress' demand for digital copy of Maharashtra voters' list ‘not tenable': Report
A day after the Congress urged the Election Commission to provide a machine-readable digital copy of Maharashtra's voters' list, PTI reported on Thursday, citing poll body sources, that the demand is 'not tenable' under the existing legal framework. Congress seeks digital voter list, polling day footage from Maharashtra, Haryana.(HT File )
They also added that a similar plea by the party was dismissed by the Supreme Court in 2019.
The report added that while Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has been demanding a machine-readable digital copy of the electoral roll for the past seven months, poll body sources said the party's demand is 'not new.'
"Rather, it forms part of a strategy by the political party for well over eight years, a fact that appears to have been selectively obscured in the present representation," an EC source told PTI
The news agency, citing Election Commission sources, reported that while Rahul Gandhi's renewed demand is in line with the Congress party's long-standing position, it is 'not tenable within the contours of the prevailing legal framework.'
The report added that the issue had already been raised before the Supreme Court in a 2018 writ petition filed by Kamal Nath, then president of the Madhya Pradesh Congress Committee.
The sources reportedly said that Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, may not have been fully apprised of the finality with which the matter was settled in judicial records.
Referring to the Supreme Court's 2019 verdict in Kamal Nath vs Election Commission of India, the report quoted sources as saying that the court had found merit in the EC's submissions.
They pointed out that Clause 11.2.2.2 of the Election Manual refers to 'text mode,' and that the draft electoral roll in that format had already been provided to the petitioner, as noted by the apex court.
'The clause nowhere says that the draft electoral roll has to be put up on the Chief Electoral Officer's website in a 'searchable PDF'. Therefore, the petitioner cannot claim, as a right, that the draft electoral roll should be placed on the website in a 'searchable mode'. It has only to be in 'text mode' and it is so provided,' the apex court had observed.
On Wednesday, the Congress urged the Election Commission to provide a machine-readable digital copy of Maharashtra's voters' list, along with polling day video footage from both Maharashtra and Haryana, within a week.
Both the Congress and Rahul Gandhi have repeatedly accused the poll body of manipulating voter data to benefit the BJP.
Gandhi has also alleged that last year's Maharashtra assembly elections were rigged.
The Election Commission has rejected these allegations, saying that elections are conducted strictly in accordance with electoral laws enacted by Parliament.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Planned parenthood funding faces axe after US Supreme Court bombshell ruling for states
A divided Supreme Court Thursday ruled that US states can block the country's biggest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood , from receiving Medicaid money for health services such as contraception and cancer screenings. The top court cleared the way for states to potentially cut off funding for Planned Parenthood, one of the country's largest abortion providers. The 6-3 opinion authored by Justice Neil Gorsuch was not directly about abortion, but it comes as a victory to Republicans seeking to defund the nation's largest abortion provider. Planned Parenthood is already barred from receiving federal money for abortion care. But this ruling, where three liberal justices on the top court dissented, would also allow states to cut off reimbursements for other medical services it provides to low-income Americans under the Medicaid program. "Section 1983 permits private plaintiffs to sue for violations of federal spending-power statutes only in 'atypical' situations … where the provision in question 'clear[ly]' and 'unambiguous[ly]' confers an individual 'right,'" Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in the majority opinion, ruling that the law in question in the present case "is not such a statute." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Cara Membantu Orang Terkasih Menghadapi Limfoma Limfoma Pelajari Undo ALSO READ: Elon Musk's right-hand man quits: Who Is Tesla power player Omead Afshar? States allowed to remove planned parenthood The case stems from an executive order issued by South Carolina's Republican governor Henry McMaster in 2018 cutting off Medicaid funding to the two Planned Parenthood clinics in the state. The decision centers on a South Carolina case involving non-abortion services such as contraception, cancer screenings, and pregnancy testing. Live Events Republican leaders in South Carolina have objected to Planned Parenthood because it provides abortions. Public health care money generally can't be used to pay for abortions, but Medicaid patients go to Planned Parenthood for other needs in part because it can be tough to find a doctor who takes the publicly funded insurance, the organization has said. ALSO READ: DOGE's shock exit: Who is 'Big Balls', the 19 year-old ex-Neuralink prodigy to resign from Elon Musk's team? South Carolina's Republican governor says no taxpayer money should go the organization. The budget bill backed by President Donald Trump in Congress would also cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. That could force the closure of about 200 centers, most of them in states where abortion is legal, the organization has said. In 2018, South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster, a Republican, moved to cut off the organization's funding, arguing that no taxpayer dollars should go to Planned Parenthood. That action was initially blocked by a lawsuit from Julie Edwards, a patient who relies on the clinic for birth control due to a high-risk medical condition. The case also tested whether Medicaid patients have the legal right to sue over the choice of providers. While public health groups such as the American Cancer Society argued in court that lawsuits are often the only tool Medicaid recipients have to enforce their rights, South Carolina contended that patients should not be allowed to file such suits. The court's decision siding with the state could restrict patients' ability to challenge funding decisions, particularly in rural areas with limited access to care. ALSO READ: Zohran Mamdani at risk of losing US citizenship? Shocking twist as New York's mayoral race heats up Though Planned Parenthood receives only $90,000 annually in Medicaid funds from South Carolina—a small fraction of the state's total Medicaid budget—the ruling arrives as Congress considers a Trump-backed federal budget that would eliminate Medicaid funding to the group entirely. According to the organization, such cuts could force the closure of roughly 200 clinics, many in states where abortion remains legal. South Carolina currently bans abortion at around six weeks of pregnancy, following the Supreme Court's 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade. (With AP inputs)
India Today
44 minutes ago
- India Today
Rahul Gandhi may be wrong on Maharashtra poll fixing, but EC must come clean with data
The credibility of India's electoral democracy hangs in delicate balance as the Congress and the Election Commission (EC) engage in a high-stakes confrontation over the fairness of the Maharashtra assembly elections last year. While Congress leader Rahul Gandhi's allegations of electoral manipulation suffer from selective data interpretation, the EC's dismissive responses equally fail to address legitimate concerns with substantive evidence. This impasse threatens the very foundation of public trust in India's electoral June 26, the Congress escalated its demands, calling for the EC to provide 'digital, machine-readable' copies of Maharashtra's voter lists from both the 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly elections, along with CCTV footage from polling day. This demand came through the EAGLE (Empowered Action Group of Leaders and Experts) team, established specifically to coordinate electoral matters between the Indian National Congress and the Congress letter to the EC came in response to the poll body's June 12 invitation to Rahul for a discussion aimed at resolving confusion over the assembly poll has consistently claimed that the assembly elections in Maharashtra were rigged in favour of the BJP-led alliance, using a mix of voter roll manipulation and last-minute turnout spikes to tilt the scales. In a June 7 newspaper column, he laid out his case, citing a sharp and sudden rise in voter registrations in constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the Lok Sabha elections, and an unusual jump in turnout after 5 pm on polling day. The EC dismissed the charges as misleading and invited Rahul for a discussion, but the Congress has refused to engage unless the requested voter data and footage are the core of Rahul's argument is the claim that the number of registered voters in Maharashtra jumped from 92.9 million in May 2024 (Lok Sabha elections) to 97 million by November 2024 (assembly elections)—an increase of 4.1 million in just five months, following a five-year increase of only 3.1 million since 2019. This acceleration in voter registration, Rahul argued, appeared suspiciously historical data (see table: Maharashtra Voter Trends) reveals that such surges are not unprecedented. During Congress rule in 2004, voter registration increased by 32 per cent in the five months preceding assembly polls. The 2009 elections, also under Congress governance, witnessed a 30 per cent jump. Most dramatically, 2019 recorded an 84 per cent surge in the final five months before elections. In this context, the 2024 increase of 49 per cent appears substantial but not historically anomalous. More specifically, Rahul alleged that new voter registrations were concentrated in approximately 12,000 of Maharashtra's 100,000 booths, primarily in 85 constituencies where the BJP had underperformed in the Lok Sabha elections. The Kamthi constituency served as his primary case study: while the Congress maintained roughly similar vote totals between the Lok Sabha (136,000) and assembly elections (134,000), the BJP's tally surged from 119,000 to 175,000, an increase of 56,000 votes that Rahul attributed to the 35,000 newly registered voters in the statistical analysis reveals the limitations of this argument. The BJP's 2024 vote-share of 54 per cent represented a recovery to its 2014 levels (exactly 54 per cent) after a dip to 44 per cent in 2019. The party has consistently won this seat since 2004, making its performance less exceptional than Rahul suggests. While the concentration of new voters warrants investigation, attributing voting patterns solely to new registrations oversimplifies electoral Rahul's most provocative claim concerned the mathematical impossibility of Maharashtra's voter registration exceeding its adult population. He cited 'government estimates' showing the state's adult population at 95.4 million compared to 97 million registered voters. The 2019 Population Projections for India and States report, by the National Commission on Population, places Maharashtra's adult population at 91.4 million in 2021, projected to rise to 98.1 million by 2026. A midpoint estimate for 2024 would be around 95.3 million, below the voter roll these are projections, not exact figures, and similar discrepancies have occurred elsewhere. For instance, in the Karnataka assembly polls in 2023, 52.1 million voters were registered despite the state's 2023 projected population being just 50.1 million. The number of registered voters even exceeded the 2026 projection of 51.9 million. The Congress won that election without raising concerns about inflated voter most intriguing allegation—and the one most difficult to verify through public data—concerns the dramatic increase in voter turnout after official polling hours. On polling day, the provisional turnout at 5 pm stood at 58.22 per cent. By the next morning, it had risen to 66.05 per cent, a jump of 7.83 percentage points or roughly 7.6 million votes. Rahul claims this swing exceeds patterns (see table: Maharashtra Turnout) from previous Maharashtra elections and, therefore, has demanded access to CCTV footage and digital voter lists to probe it. Here, the EC's defensiveness is troubling. On the CCTV footage request, the EC cited privacy concerns and voter security, arguing that footage could enable identification of voters and expose them to potential intimidation. Intriguingly, on May 30, a week before Rahul's article was published, the EC revised its guidelines, reducing the retention period for election footage from varying periods up to one year to a uniform 45 days after result declaration, citing 'recent misuse' of such materials. It also clarified that such recordings were only internal management tools, not a legal voter lists, the EC maintained that the Congress already possessed the rolls, having received draft lists in August 2024 and final versions in late August or September. The EC noted that of 19,27,508 claims and objections received during the revision process, only 89 appeals were filed against additions or deletions, suggesting minimal concerns at the the Congress now demands—and what the EC has yet to provide—are machine-readable, digital versions of both the 2024 Lok Sabha and assembly voter lists to enable systematic comparison. As the Congress letter of June 26 articulated: 'To investigate this thoroughly, any rational person would agree that the starting step is to compare the final electors list for Maharashtra 2024 Lok Sabha elections and final electors list for Maharashtra 2024 Vidhan Sabha elections.'advertisementWhile the Congress's allegations suffer from selective data interpretation and fail to account for historical precedents, the EC's reluctance to provide comprehensive, verifiable data undermines its credibility as an impartial arbiter. The EC bears a higher burden of proof precisely because it serves as the guardian of electoral no political party, including the Congress, should be permitted to erode public confidence in the electoral process through unverified or anecdotal claims. If the election process was fair and above board, it is in the interest of Indian democracy and the EC's own credibility to counter the charges with evidence-backed, data-driven clarity, not just indignation. Let the facts speak louder than to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Cong looks to bolster grassroots outreach, launches ‘selfie with booth prez' campaign
1 2 3 Guwahati: Assam Pradesh Congress Committee (APCC) initiated a programme where state and district-level leaders met booth presidents and workers on Friday to take selfies. These photographs were shared across social media platforms as a direct communication strategy. During a press interaction, APCC president and MP Gaurav Gogoi, commemorating his first month in office, highlighted the positive response from grassroots workers. He said this development caused visible anxiety among BJP leaders, particularly CM Sarma. Gogoi highlighted the Congress's success in raising public awareness against the BJP-led govt's actions in Assam. He said Congress revitalised its ground-level workers' spirits and collectively opposed the present govt's alleged corruption. He emphasised that bolstering the grassroots organisational structure was crucial in the past 30 days, receiving active support from party workers. The Congress aims to establish a strong presence across all 126 assembly constituencies. "No candidate can win — or make others win — without a strong organisational structure," he stated. Regarding electoral matters, he confirmed the party's commitment to ensuring accurate voter lists and conducting fair elections. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo "Whether it's about a town, village, or district, Congress workers will raise the local issues of the public everywhere. We prepared a strategy for the expansion of the party organisation," Gogoi said. Responding to BJP's criticism about the Emergency, Gaurav said people expressed their verdict by re-electing Indira Gandhi as Prime Minister after the Emergency. "The day Indira Gandhi became PM again after the Emergency, the people of India gave their opinion on her long back. But what's about the 'Emergency' created by BJP today? People cannot ask questions, they cannot even write Facebook posts (questioning BJP) or RTI applications," Gaurav alleged.
