Plans to tackle mental health crisis 'not ambitious enough', charity boss tells Sky News
Government plans to strengthen mental health services are "not ambitious enough", a charity head has told Sky News.
Dr Sarah Hughes, chief executive of mental health charity Mind, spoke to The UK Tonight with Sarah-Jane Mee after a report on mental health cases at A&E reaching crisis levels.
Sky's health correspondent Ashish Joshi reported that waiting times for these cases have risen, and overnight beds in mental health units are down almost 3,700 in a decade.
8:26
Dr Hughes called the report "incredibly important insight into what's happening," before adding: "One of our wonderful campaigners waited 87 hours on a stretcher when she was incredibly distressed.
"These are scenes are happening up and down the country, and I'm afraid to say that whilst I'm devastated to see them, I'm not surprised."
She then said that while "there are all sorts of services" across the UK for mental health, they are "nowhere near the level that we need".
"We are seeing thousands and thousands of people go into A&E every month for very serious mental health challenges, and this can be resolved quite easily by beefing up what's available in the community," Dr Hughes said.
"By making sure that community mental health services are resourced so that people are caught far earlier, that we don't hit crisis, that they're able to get the support they need well before they get into trouble.
"We know what works: We know that with proper investment that we could avoid this situation."
The charity boss also said that while new initiatives from the government on services would be welcomed, "fundamentally, without mental health support, we're not enabling [people] to thrive".
"In fact," she said, "we're putting them into incredibly vulnerable situations day in day out. They are carrying the risk here.
"We know that mental health staff in A&Es are also really struggling. They want to do a good job, and they can't. They're not resourced to."
Plans to tackle spike in cases 'not ambitious enough'
New Freedom of Information data gathered by the Royal College of Nursing shows that over the last five years, waits of 12 hours or more for a mental health bed have increased by more than 380%.
When asked about whether NHS and government plans will help tackle the sharp rise, Dr Hughes said: "We already know that they don't and they won't.
"We are expecting a real-terms cut in terms of the funding around mental health going forward. We are not convinced or persuaded that we've got the share of spend that's right for mental health.
"We're concerned that the plans for mental health are not ambitious enough. We're not really persuaded, I think, that the policies surrounding mental health either are going to help reform and so on.
"All of these things that are going on demonstrate a lack of understanding."
In response to Ashish Joshi's report, the Department for Health and Social Care told Sky News: "We know people with mental health issues are not always getting the support or care they deserve and incidents like this are unacceptable.
"We are transforming mental health services - including investing £26m to support people in mental health crisis, hiring more staff, delivering more talking therapies, and getting waiting lists down through our Plan for Change."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
17 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour support for assisted dying law falls as more MPs switch position to oppose change over coercion fears and effect on vulnerable people
Labour support for legalising assisted dying appears to be falling as more MPs publicly question the law change. The Commons will next week debate changes to the plan to allow terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. But fresh concerns have been raised about the The Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill that is being led through Parliament by backbencher Kim Leadbeater. Opponents have complained the Bill does not have enough protections and has been rushed through, with the criticism coming days after two royal medical colleges voiced their doubts on the legislation in its current form. And now even supporters of the principle of legalising assisted dying are questioning the process. Labour MP Markus Campbell-Savours, who voted for the bill in a preliminary vote last year, told the BBC he now planned to vote against it because in its current form it crossed his 'red lines for protecting the vulnerable'. 'I want to see safeguards that will ensure that assisted dying is not overextended to include those in situations where there are alternative ways to improve the quality of their lives,' said Campbell-Savours. 'I would also be very concerned if legislation produced a situation where people who considered themselves a burden on their families and friends felt pressured to end their life.' The Commons will next week debate changes to the law allowing terminally ill people with less than six months to live to end their own lives, ahead of a crunch vote later this month. And fellow Labour MP Josh Fenton-Glynn told the broadcaster he will vote against the bill, having abstained last year. 'We see quite a few of the amendments which are specifically aimed at stopping coercion being opposed by the supporters of the bill,' he said. 'I don't think chances to make the bill safer have been taken.' At the end of November last year, the Commons backed the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill by 330 votes to 275, a majority of 55 votes. But campaigners believe enough have changed their mind to put its chances of becoming law onto a knife-edge. The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death. This would be subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. The terminally ill person would take an approved substance, provided by a doctor but administered only by the person themselves. The implementation period has been doubled to a maximum of four years from royal assent, rather than the initially suggested two years. If the Bill was to pass later this year that would mean it might not be until 2029, potentially coinciding with the end of this Government's parliament, that assisted dying was being offered. A Government impact assessment published last month estimated that between 164 and 647 assisted deaths could potentially take place in the first year of the service, rising to between 1,042 and 4,559 in year 10. The establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and three-member expert panels would cost an estimated average of between £10.9 million to £13.6 million per year, the document said. It had 'not been possible' to estimate the overall implementation costs at this stage of the process, it added. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years.
The Sun
23 minutes ago
- The Sun
Mum shares urgent warning for summer beach trips with kids as pal's left in hospital following massive allergic reaction
A MUM has shared an urgent warning for summer days at the beach after a friend's near-death experience. Danielle explained that between June and September there are aquatic animals called weever fish, which camouflage themselves in the sand and sea. 3 3 3 They can even "survive for quite a long time" hiding on the beach, but if you step on it with bare feet you'll end up being stung. Danielle - aka The Enchanted Nanny - said that her best friend's brother had found out the hard way about the potentially deadly fish when he stepped on one, and suffered a massive allergic reaction. "He's trodden on it in bare feet, and usually that would cause quite a hefty sting, where you would need to put the hottest water possible on the area to stop the venom from spreading and stinging," she said in a video on her TikTok page. "But he didn't even get that far because he had a massive allergic reaction, which has landed him straight in the hospital. "It's been a really, really scary time and a shock to the system." She added that it's vital to wear some kind of shoes when on the sand near the sea, so that if you did accidentally tread on a weever fish, you wouldn't get stung. "They definitely feature very heavily on our UK coastlines," she continued. "If you're going to the beach, wear beach shoes, flip-flops, jelly shoes. "Do not let your children wander around by the sea without shoes on. "It's just not worth the risk." The dangers of hard to spot Weever fish "Spoiler alert - they sting even when no longer alive, the venom is still potent!" one person warned in the comments section. "I got stung by one in Cornwall," another recalled. "It was so painful, the lifeguard hit me to put my foot in the hottest water I could stand." "I was (stung) - it's terrible and was so painful please be careful!" a third wrote. "Crazy that I have been on the beach barefoot every year for 28 years and I have never heard about or seen these until this year," someone else said. "It's important to note it's not just a little sting," another warned. How should you treat a weever fish sting? ACCORDING to Moelfre Coastguard, if you experience an intense reaction such as trouble breathing or heart palpitations after a sting, you should call 999. If your pain is less intense, the sting can be treated with hot water. The higher temperature will destroy the poison as it is protein-based. Use tweezers to remove the spines. And painkillers can also be taken to ease discomfort. "My whole leg ended up paralysed because we didn't know what it was! "Always buy jelly shoes for you and your children!"
The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Alarming number of drivers have not had eye test in last two years
A recent survey indicates that almost a quarter of UK drivers have not had an eye test in the last two years. The poll, commissioned by Churchill Insurance, highlights increasing worries about the absence of mandatory eye checks for drivers after they pass their initial driving test. Currently, drivers only need to prove they can read a number plate from 20 metres away during their test, with no further requirements to demonstrate adequate vision. The NHS advises eye tests every two years, and drivers are expected to self-report any medical conditions that could impair their driving ability. In April, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander received a report following the deaths of four people caused by drivers with poor eyesight. The drivers had disregarded opticians' warnings about their deteriorating vision. The Churchill survey suggested that 83 per cent of UK adults would support compulsory eye tests for drivers every decade. The figure rises to 88 per cent for those who would be in favour of sight exams every three years once drivers reach 70 years old. Some 12 per cent of drivers surveyed admitted they either thought their sight was not road legal, or were not sure it was. Department for Transport (DfT) figures show 240 people were injured and seven were killed in crashes on Britain's roads in 2023 in which defective eyesight was a factor. That was the most casualties since 2017, when the total was 262. Nicholas Mantel, head of motor insurance at Churchill, said: 'It seems surprising that UK drivers never need to prove that their eyesight is safe enough for driving once they have passed their driving test. 'What is even more remarkable is that some people continue to drive despite suspecting that their eyesight isn't good enough – or are doing so without wearing their prescription lenses or glasses. 'Our research suggests that there's overwhelming public support to make our roads safer by introducing compulsory eyesight tests for drivers.' Ms Alexander recently told the Commons Transport Select Committee she is 'open to considering' requiring older motorists to pass eye tests to keep their driving licence. This could be part of the Government's upcoming road safety strategy. A DfT spokesman said: 'Every death on our roads is a tragedy, and our thoughts remain with the families of everyone who has lost a loved one in this way. 'The NHS recommends adults should have their eyes tested every two years and drivers are legally required to inform the DVLA if they have a condition which affects their eyesight. 'We are committed to improving road safety and continue to explore ways to achieve this.' The survey was conducted by research company Opinium between May 20-23 among 2,000 UK adults, of whom 1,312 were drivers.
