logo
Parents CHARGED after son they allowed to walk home alone is hit and killed by a car

Parents CHARGED after son they allowed to walk home alone is hit and killed by a car

Daily Mail​3 days ago

A pair of North Carolina parents have been charged with manslaughter for allowing their seven-year-old son to walk home with his older brother, a decision judges say cost him his life.
Legend Jenkins was killed on Tuesday after darting out into traffic in Gastonia. He was walking home from the grocery store with his older brother.
The driver, an unidentified 76-year-old woman, stayed at the scene.
She has not been charged - but the boy's parents, Sameule and Jessica Jenkins, have.
Prosecutors say they are guilty of involuntary manslaughter and child neglect. The pair are now in jail, and were recently denied a request to attend the boy's funeral.
Authorities said the older brother tried to pull Legend back from the road, but was too late.
Summer Williams, a witness to the crash, told local outlet WSOC she tried to comfort the young boy as they waited for emergency responders.
'Just letting him know that somebody was there and he wasn't alone,' she told the outlet. 'Stay with us, sweetheart. You're going to be alright. Stay with us.''
'Even at night, I still see his face,' Williams added.
'The children were very young. They shouldn't have been crossing a busy intersection like that in the first place,' said Williams.
Legend was first rushed to a local hospital and later transferred to a children's facility in Charlotte.
He succumbed to his injuries four hours later.
Police said the driver is not expected to face charges. There is no evidence she was speeding or driving recklessly.
'While the Gastonia Police Department offers its deepest sympathies to the family for the heartbreaking loss of their child, the investigation revealed that the children involved were unsupervised at the time the boy stepped into traffic,' police wrote in a statement on Facebook.
'In such cases, adults must be held accountable for their responsibilities to ensure a safe environment for their children.'
'At this time, there is no evidence of speeding or wrongdoing on the part of the driver, therefore no charges have been filed,' the statement continued.
'The driver continues to be cooperative and the incident remains under active investigation by the Gastonia Police Department's Traffic Division.
Before her arrest, Ivey, the boy's mother, told the Gaston Gazette the store was close by and it was the first time she had ever let the boys walk home on their own.
At a bond hearing Friday, both parents asked to be released so they could attend their son's funeral.
The judge denied the request and set bail at $1.5 million each
A fundraiser has been set up by the boy's family. The GoFundMe has since raised $6,250 raised of its $10K goal.
'My baby was only 7 about to be 8 in august and he was tragically killed by a car accident right outside of his neighborhood.
'He was a mommas boy up and down. He was smart, creative, and even if he was ill would always keep a smile,' his parents wrote in the description.
'He loved playing any sports. He was truly a warrior, but after being revived close to twelve times he unfortunately passed away at.
'WE ASK that y'all send prayers for our family in this time of heartbreak and if you wish to give, anything would be very grateful.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The long wait for answers over Lockerbie bombing grows longer
The long wait for answers over Lockerbie bombing grows longer

BBC News

time9 minutes ago

  • BBC News

The long wait for answers over Lockerbie bombing grows longer

Major television productions are bringing the story of the Lockerbie bombing to a new global audience, but the real life drama of the trial of a new Libyan suspect has been delayed once Agila Mohammed Mas'ud Kheir al-Marimi, known as Masud, had been due to face a Washington jury last month, accused of making the bomb that destroyed Pan Am Flight 103 and killed 270 12 May starting date was abandoned because of problems with his health and the complexity of the case, and the trial is now scheduled to start in April, date was set at the District of Columbia District Court, where Masud listened with the help of a translator and was expressionless throughout. After the hearing, relatives of American victims of the bombing told BBC News of their disappointment that the trial is now scheduled to start 50 weeks later than originally Weipz is the president of the US group Victims of Pan Am Flight 103 and lost her 20-year-old brother Richard Monetti on the plane."I'm just going to pray that it stays at 20 April," she said. "I was 15 when this happened, and I'm 52 now and among the relatives I'm considered young."A lot of our family members are in their seventies and eighties and unfortunately, we lose them weekly or monthly now."The travesty in all of this that they're not seeing the justice that they've worked 37 years to see."That's what concerns us the most, that this trial will come around and we'll have lost more family members." Victoria Cummock's husband John was coming home from a business trip to Europe a day earlier than planned, to surprise his founder of the Pan Am 103 Lockerbie Legacy Foundation, Mrs Cummock said: "We've lived through 36 years of delays and postponements simply because this is an international case filled with politics."Thirty six years with seven different administrations in America have really collided with the families' search for accountability and justice."It's no surprise that our mission to hold them to account is being delayed."Mrs Cummock added she was concerned that President Trump's ban on Libyan citizens travelling to the US could affect the said: "It just seems like it's a very slow journey to getting this case started." Masud's health problems Masud has been in US custody since December 2022 and has pled not guilty to the Tunisian-born Libyan is in his seventies and is understood to have diabetes and heart family in Libya has already expressed concerns over the delays to the case, saying he's an innocent new trial date was fixed after a joint motion submitted by the prosecution and the defence, both of whom raised the international nature of the evidence and witnesses.A series of crucial legal arguments will have to be resolved before the trial can go ahead, with the judge Dabney Friedrich describing the 20 April date as "tentative."Those will include the admissibility of a confession Masud is alleged to have made while in custody in 2012, following the collapse of Colonel Gaddafi's regime. Another complication is the fact that new information on the case is still emerging, almost four decades after the attack.A book published in France revealed the existence of documents said to have been retrieved from the archives of the Libyan intelligence service, of which Masud is alleged to have been a proved genuine, those documents detail his involvement in preparations for the attack on Pan Am more than 24 years since the first Lockerbie trial, when three Scottish judges convicted Libyan intelligence agent Abdulbasset al-Megrahi of playing a key role in the plot. Megrahi was jailed for life but released on compassionate grounds by the Scottish government in 2009 after he was diagnosed with terminal cancer. He died three years later at home in release infuriated many of the American relatives, which is why they have set so much store on the trial of Masud, the first suspect to face an American court over believe it will deliver the justice they were denied by the Scottish legal bombing remains the worst terror attack in British history and claimed the lives of 43 UK citizens. 'This isn't a normal criminal case' Some, but not all, of the British relatives have never accepted the verdict against Megrahi, including the Rev John Mosey, whose daughter Helga was on the plane."I think they're just waiting for people like me to pop our clogs and get out of the way," he said."I'm still pretty cynical about the whole thing. I would like to be proved wrong but I can't see it happening."As far as I'm concerned, who made the bomb and who put in on the plane are secondary as to who were the main criminals."They were the group of people who had all the warnings that this was going to happen and warned their own people but didn't warn the public."The big budget television dramas may have pushed the Lockerbie bombing back into the public eye but it's clear that there's a very long way to go before a jury delivers its verdict on Friedrich warned that if things are not done in a timely manner, there's a risk the trial could "slip" into she reminded everyone in the court: "This isn't a normal criminal case."

Exit stage Right-wing: The Trump-Musk bromance ends explosively
Exit stage Right-wing: The Trump-Musk bromance ends explosively

Telegraph

time14 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Exit stage Right-wing: The Trump-Musk bromance ends explosively

And they seemed like such a happy couple… In reality, few are surprised by the public divorce between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. Trump, the master showman, does not like to share the spotlight, and he has a long history of turning against and denouncing his former allies and subordinates. Not for nothing is his most famous phrase, from the reality TV show 'The Apprentice,' 'You're fired!' Having only just departed the White House, Musk has lost no time airing his grievances against the Trump administration. Not only has he publicly dubbed the President's 'one big beautiful bill' as a 'disgusting abomination', he has now claimed that Donald Trump is named in undisclosed government files on the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. The President, according to Mr Musk writing on X/Twitter, 'is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public.' The only surprise is that the Trump-Musk bromance lasted as long as it did before coming to an abrupt end before the first year of Trump's second presidency was half over. After Musk endorsed Trump for president in July 2024, he spent hundreds of millions of dollars on the Trump campaign. It is doubtful that Musk's money made any difference in the outcome, given the unpopularity of Kamala Harris and the long-term shift of working-class voters in swing states towards the Republicans. Nevertheless, at the beginning of his second term Trump made the billionaire a 'special government employee' and put him in charge of something called DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency). The name was a juvenile joke, referring to a dog meme that is a favourite of the online right-wingers who obsessively follow alt-right bloviators on Twitter (now Musk's X). Like Trump, Musk had never served in public office before. His ignorance of government organisation and procedures showed. Like generations of other vain, ignorant business tycoons, he thought the problem with government is that it is not run like a business. Musk set about using his ill-defined authority to try to downsize the federal government as though it were one of his own companies, Tesla or PayPal or SpaceX. In 2022, when he bought control of Twitter, Musk prepared for mass lay-offs of Twitter employees by sending the workforce an email asking what they had done last week. Similarly, in February, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), over which Musk had no authority, nevertheless on his behalf sent an email to around two million federal employees that demanded they send their managers a list of five accomplishments from last week. Later on X Musk announced, on the basis of no authority whatsoever, that anyone who refused to answer would be fired; he subsequently said the millions of employees would get a second chance, and finally reversed himself, saying it had just been a 'pulse check.' The Department of State, led by former Senator Marco Rubio, along with the Defense Department and FBI told their employees not to answer Musk's email. The tensions between Musk, who according to the administration was not actually in charge of DOGE, and Trump's constitutionally-appointed, Senate-confirmed Cabinet secretaries were on public display in a bizarre videotaped Cabinet meeting in which a Musk, dressed in black, babbled in front of stony-faced officials. According to reports, Musk on another occasion got into a shouting match with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. Disloyal as he is to his own subordinates, Trump expects loyalty from others. It was one thing for Musk to fight with other Trump appointees behind the scenes, another to attack them in public. After Trump unveiled his half-baked tariff plan on April 2, Musk called Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro 'truly a moron' and 'dumber than a sack of bricks.' Reportedly Musk further damaged his relationship with Trump by pouring $20 million into a special Wisconsin state Supreme Court election, offering to pay a million dollars apiece to lucky individual voters. This crass attempt to buy an election backfired against the Republican candidate Musk favoured and the backlash powered the Democrat to victory. The trigger for the final break between Musk and Trump was money. On Twitter/X, Musk tried to rally Republicans in Congress to vote against the 'big, beautiful bill' that would be the central achievement of Trump's first year in his second term. 'KILL the BILL' Musk ranted in one of more than two dozen tweets criticising the legislation. Some Republicans blamed Musk's opposition to the bill on cuts to subsidies to consumers who bought electric cars from Tesla and other companies. Telling reporters that he was 'very disappointed' in his donor and former DOGE czar, Trump said, 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' On X Musk responded: 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude.' No stranger to social media, Trump replied on his own platform, Truth Social: Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY! Trump followed this up with a threat: The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it! Exit Stage Right Wing. The end of the Trump-Musk relationship is a source of amusement to Democrats and a source of relief to Republican populists who dream of what Trump once called the 'Republican workers party,' not a party subordinated to weird libertarian billionaires. But everyone can learn from the latest demonstration of the fact that celebrity outsiders who have never held office before – generals like Ulysses S. Grant and Dwight Eisenhower, businessmen like Herbert Hoover and Donald Trump and Elon Musk – tend to perform poorly when given authority over America's complex government, compared to presidents who had worked their way up in politics like Washington, Lincoln, and FDR. When General Eisenhower was elected as President, his predecessor Harry Truman joked: 'He'll sit right there and he'll say do this, do that! And nothing will happen. Poor Ike – it won't be a bit like the Army.' Or Tesla or Twitter, either.

Tesla shares hit as Trump-Musk feud explodes
Tesla shares hit as Trump-Musk feud explodes

BBC News

time15 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Tesla shares hit as Trump-Musk feud explodes

Investors sold off shares in Tesla on Thursday, as tensions erupted between boss Elon Musk and US President Donald in the electric car company dropped 14%, wiping out roughly $150bn in market value in one of the worst days in losses were an indication of what might be at stake for Musk, as he breaks with a White House known for wielding the power of government against what it sees as the dispute devolved, Trump threatened to cut off government contracts to Musk's companies, including rocket firm SpaceX, which has contracts worth tens of billions of dollars with the government. "Go ahead, make my day," Musk fired back in response to the stark turn in the relationship between the two men played out live on social media, quickly spiralling from policy disagreements into personal insults. Trump and Musk enter bitter feud - and Washington buckles upTrump 'very disappointed' by Musk as row explodes into publicAnalyst Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities, a longtime Tesla cheerleader, called it "jaw dropping and a shock to the market",He said the clash had sparked fear among investors about what it might mean for regulation of the company, which is seeking to expand self-driving and robotics and had hoped for a more relaxed regulatory approach under the Trump administration. "This must start to be calmed down," Mr Ives wrote in a note, adding that it "put a fly in the ointment of the Trump regulatory framework going forward". Musk's foray into government has already proven a wild ride for Tesla had surged last year, on hopes his alliance with Trump would benefit the investor sentiment soured this year, as Musk's alliance with Trump and his role leading controversial cuts to government spending proved a lightning rod, sparking backlash and hurting sales, especially in Europe. Investors were also concerned that Musk - who had been fighting for a record-breaking pay package - was not focused on the month, the head of Tesla's board was forced to publicly deny a report that the company had started to look for someone else to lead the firm. Musk's pledge on an investor call that he would be stepping back from his role leading Doge had prompted an upswing in the stock. He formally left the government at the end of last month. But Tesla now finds itself back in the political crossfire. The breach with Trump was sparked by Musk's criticism of a Trump-backed spending has sought to rally opposition, arguing that it will add too much the government's debt load. He has also been critical of Trump's tariffs, which he said on Thursday would cause an economic recession in the second half of the year. Trump said Musk's welcome at the White House was wearing thin and accused him of being unhappy about the elimination of a tax credit for electric vehicles, which has been key to Tesla's sales in the US. The two men have also clashed over Trump's decision to withdraw his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally, to lead Nasa. Thursday's fall put the company's share price at its lowest level since May, erasing gains that had been made on hopes that Musk would refocus attention on the the two men went at it, investors watched in disbelief. "Can someone please take the phone away from him," wrote investor Ross Gerber, who has been vocal about his concerns about the impact of Musk's politics on Tesla and cut back his holdings. "Tesla is getting destroyed."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store