India's External Affairs Minister meets Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi
Abu Dhabi: Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Tuesday met Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan, during his official visit to the UAE.
Jaishankar highlighted that the Crown Prince recalled his recent visit to India, underscoring the growing ties between the two nations.
Sharing a post on X, Jaishankar wrote, 'Pleased to meet Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi HH Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan.'
'Recalled his recent visit to India and discussed further advancement of India-UAE partnership,' the post added.
Nahyan attended the 10th Vibrant Gujarat Global Summit in January 2024 as the Chief Guest.
Earlier in the day, Jaishankar also met Anwar Gargash, Diplomatic Advisor to the President of the UAE.
In a post on X, Jaishankar wrote, 'Nice to meet Anwar Gargash, Diplomatic Advisor to the President, UAE this morning. Discussed our special partnership and its further progress.'
Notably, Jaishankar is on an official visit to the UAE from January 27 to 29 with goals to build a closer relationship between India and the Emirates and improve bilateral ties.
India and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have enjoyed strong diplomatic relations since they established ties in 1972. The UAE opened its embassy in India in the same year, followed by the opening of the Indian embassy in the UAE in 1973. Over the years, these relations have evolved into a robust and multifaceted partnership.
The momentum in India-UAE relations reached a significant milestone during Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 2015 visit to the UAE, which marked the first visit of an Indian Prime Minister to the UAE in 34 years. This visit set the stage for a new phase in bilateral ties, marked by the launch of a Comprehensive and Strategic Partnership. In recent years, Prime Minister Modi has visited the UAE multiple times, most recently in November-December 2023 to attend the COP28 World Climate Action Summit in Dubai.
The UAE's diplomatic engagement with India has been similarly active. President Mohamed bin Zayed (MBZ) has visited India on numerous occasions. As Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, he visited India in 2016 and 2017, strengthening the relationship further. More recently, as the President of the UAE, he visited India in September 2023 to attend the G20 Leaders' Summit and participated in the 2nd Virtual Global South Summit in November 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Passenger traffic at Oman's airports reaches 4.7 million
MUSCAT: Passenger traffic across the Sultanate of Oman's airports reached just over 4.7 million by the end of April 2025, representing a 4.1% decline compared to the same period in 2024, according to preliminary data from the National Centre for Statistics and Information (NCSI). Muscat International Airport handled 4,222,789 passengers during the first four months of the year, down 4.7% from 4,428,726 recorded in the corresponding period of 2024. The number of flights also fell sharply, totalling 29,731, an 8.6% decline from 32,520 flights during the same period last year. In contrast, Salalah Airport posted positive growth, registering a 6.8% rise in passenger numbers to 458,394, up from 429,181 a year earlier. However, the number of flights dipped marginally by 0.2% to 2,974, compared to 2,980 last year. Sohar Airport saw a dramatic contraction in activity. Passenger numbers plunged by 98.7% to just 307, compared to 23,842 in the same period of 2024. The number of flights also declined sharply, falling by 62.5% to 72 flights. At Duqm Airport, both passenger and flight numbers saw slight decreases. Passenger traffic dropped by 2.7% to 19,565, while flight movements edged down by 1.9% to 204. As for passenger nationalities at Muscat International Airport in April 2025, Indian nationals topped the list with 182,628 passengers, comprising 99,163 arrivals and 83,465 departures. Omanis followed with a total of 101,087 (45,072 arriving and 56,015 departing), while Pakistani nationals accounted for 47,078 passengers (25,426 arriving and 21,652 departing). — ONA
Observer
2 hours ago
- Observer
Work-life balance: myth or reality?
The dynamic business landscape, emerging work patterns, job insecurity, the pressure of automation, the threat of artificial intelligence, and workplace competitiveness have blurred the lines between work and life for millions of professionals globally. While 60% of employees worldwide report having a healthy work-life balance, burnout remains widespread, with 82% of workers at risk and rates continuing to rise. Many professionals scorn, ridicule, and perceive the work-life balance as non-existent. There are two opposing schools of thought on this global dilemma of the workplace cauldron. One perspective stems from the belief that work-life balance is an unattainable myth. It states that work and life are deeply intertwined, exacerbated by the flux of work patterns and artificial intelligence. The second perspective is that work-life imbalance is a reality, and it can be resolved with leader interventions, policy shifts, and attitudinal transformations. Work-life balance is at the core of the sustainable future of work and organizational productivity. While burnout is a global phenomenon prevalent across all sectors, the healthcare, technology/IT, finance, and education sectors are at higher risk due to demand for long hours, high emotional calls, and chronic understaffing, which are some burnout drivers. In most European countries, work weeks are shorter, vacation policies are more generous, and there is a stronger emphasis on leisure and family time. Many of these countries are ranked higher for their work-life balance. Many European countries have also enacted legislative rules and laws granting employees the right to disconnect from work outside official working hours. France, Belgium, Portugal, Italy, Iceland, Greece, Cyprus, Slovenia, and Slovakia have laws that protect employees' mental health and promote a culture of work-life balance. In the Middle East, the burnout rate is lower at 43%. In contrast, Asian countries like India, China, Japan, and South Korea often prioritize long working hours and dedication to work. India reports 62% burnout, which is 3 times the global average. China stands at 58% with a "996 culture" from 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week. Recently, a leading Indian IT business leader, Narayan Murthy, has been criticized and shunned by the public and media for their outrageous suggestion that a 70-hour working week is necessary for Indian global competitiveness. Leaders also released similar comments from other industries, like L&T leader SN Subramanyam, who suggested employees work 90 hours per week, which sparked outrage and criticism from professionals and leaders across all walks of life. These are signs of burnout, mental health risks, and productivity decline. Japan was traditionally known for a culture of workaholism. Traditionally, Japan was known for this approach of "live to work" national culture and "Karoshi," which means death by work. However, Japan has embraced the "work to live" culture since a decade and is making significant policy and national behavior changes to maintain a healthy work-life balance. This cultural shift in Japan is driven by younger generations who prioritize life over work. Australia and New Zealand were traditionally recognized for work-life balance due to their job climate, security, annual leave, and focus on well-being. However, recent assessments indicate that both countries face deteriorating work-life balance and increasingly toxic work environments. Intriguingly, the US also struggles with work-life balance: 66% report officially having difficulty, and 77% of the working population experience burnout. Similarly,79% to 92% of UK workers have experienced burnout at some point in their careers. Work-life balance is complex, evolving, and intensely influenced by nations, technology, and individual perceptions. Whether the readers believe it is a myth or a reality, the world needs to move toward a balanced work-life synchronization for the sustainability and well-being of humankind.
Times of Oman
15 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Relationship between India-Bangladesh people cordial: BGMEA president Mahmud Hasan Khan Babu
Dhaka: Mahmud Hasan Khan Babu, President of Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), termed the relationship between India and Bangladesh people as "cordial". Babu highlighted the similarities between the culture of West Bengal and Bangladesh, due to which the relationship between both countries is "good". Mahmud Hasan Khan asserted that due to the regime change in both countries, the situation also changes. He said that sometimes the relationship of countries is cordial, sometimes one-sided love and sometimes it is a resentful situation. Weighing on the "huge" business between India and Bangladesh, Mahmud Hasan Khan said the people of both countries will benefit if relationship is cordial. "The relationship between Indian and Bangladeshi people is cordial. Especially in West Bengal and Bangladesh, we have some common cultural things, so the relationship is good. But the problem is that when the government changes on both sides, the situation also changes. Sometimes cordial, sometimes one-sided love and sometimes it is a resentful situation. It depends on the government in India or the government in the relations between the governments are cordial, it would be the best because both countries will benefit. Business between India and Bangladesh is huge", he told ANI. Meanwhile, addressing the issue of investment situation in the country, Mahmud Hasan Khan Babu praised the current government and said that it has taken some good initiatives in terms of banking reforms, especially, control of looting and mismanagement of the banking sector. However, Babu asserted that the investors are waiting for the elected government in Bangladesh for investment and said that the business people of the country also want a "permanent" government. "By definition, this government is interim. Everybody knows, for the time being, they have come after the situation of the July uprising and revolution (last year)...This government has taken some good initiatives in terms of banking reforms, especially, control of looting and mismanagement of the banking sector. But in terms of investment, investors or businesses are waiting for the elected government. We, business people, would like to have a permanent government. We would like to see who is coming in the future. Based on their policy and activities, investment will depend. In an interim government, investors do not want to invest", Mahmud Hasan Khan Babu added.
