logo
How Trump vs. Harvard is a page out of the Project 2025 playbook

How Trump vs. Harvard is a page out of the Project 2025 playbook

Yahoo27-04-2025

The extent to which the Trump administration has gone to strong-arm the world's wealthiest university into abiding by its wishes has sent shockwaves through higher education.
But the actions taken thus far against Harvard University — and other academic institutions across the country — were essentially laid out two years ago in Project 2025, a 900-plus page master plan of sorts that reenvisions a federal government with expanded presidential power.
Though President Donald Trump tried to distant himself from the controversial conservative initiative while on the campaign trail, many of his moves related to higher education in recent months have come straight from it.
'Project 2025 is being carried out in almost every aspect of the Trump attacks on higher education,' said Lynn Pasquerella, president of the Association of American Colleges and Universities and a former president at Mount Holyoke College.
Published in April 2023 by the Heritage Foundation — a nonprofit whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies — Project 2025 proposed some of the following in its blueprint for higher education:
Curtail student loan forgiveness and repayment programs
Eliminate federal student aid programs
Eliminate the Department of Education
Allow states to create their own college accreditors
Ban critical race theory
Roll back Title IX protections and consider only biological birth sex
Cap indirect cost rate paid by the National Institutes of Health to universities for research
Trump has gotten the wheels turning on nearly all of those stated objectives. The administration also carried out mass student visa revocations, and later decided to reverse them after weeks of scrutiny from courts and several restraining orders. Still, the future of international students at American colleges and universities remains uncertain.
Read more: Harvard has a $53 billion endowment. Could it be a weapon in its fight against Trump?
One of Trump's proposals includes creating the American Academy, a federally funded online university that awards a bachelor's degree, as an affordable alternative to a traditional four-year college degree, according to his website.
It would be paid for by institutions like Harvard University by taxing, fining and suing selective institutions' endowments. Harvard has the world's largest higher education endowment at $53.2 billion.
Trump and Harvard are currently in the midst of a historic showdown. Last week, Harvard sued the Trump administration after it threatened to pull $9 billion in federal funding unless the university agreed to a series of demands ordered in the name of addressing antisemitism.
Sending a wave of resistance through higher education, Harvard said it would not comply with the demands.
'No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue,' Harvard President Alan Garber wrote in a letter to the school community.
While the Trump administration is positioning its actions against colleges and universities as a quest to clamp down on antisemitism, 'this was not something that came as a result of the attacks on Israel by Hamas, this was something that they said they were going to engage in years before,' Pasquerella said, citing Project 2025.
Some higher education leaders took the document's contents seriously when it was first published, she said, though they didn't necessarily anticipate what has actually come to fruition. Others viewed it as a worst-case scenario, and thus, have been shocked.
'This couldn't even have been imagined, that this kind of attack on higher education would be leveled,' Pasquerella said.
Bruce Kimball, emeritus academy professor at Ohio State University and co-author of Wealth, Cost, and Price in American Higher Education, said Trump is far from being the architect of what's transpiring between the federal government and the higher education establishment.
He cited growing disdain and resentment, specifically toward the country's wealthiest and most elite universities, that took root in the 1980s and has mounted since. As endowments increased, so did the cost of a college education and student debt.
'What we're now seeing, this attack by the Trump administration, draws on 30 or 40 years of growing resentment in the public,' said Kimball, who holds two degrees from Harvard.
Ryan Wells, a professor of higher education at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, said the sheer cost of colleges and universities alone 'makes people feel resentment toward them.'
The authors of Project 2025 capitalized on the snowballing narrative pushed by members of the Republican Party that higher education institutions have become liberal bastions that espouse anti-American teachings.
Read more: Trump signs executive orders targeting colleges for 'wokeness'
Conservative activist Christopher Rufo, who's led the national movement opposing critical race theory and diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), says colleges and universities should 'reform, or lose funding.'
'The Trump administration has a once-in-a-generation chance to reform higher education,' he co-wrote in a February blog post titled 'How Trump Can Make Universities Great Again.'
He went on to write that higher education institutions have devolved into 'left-wing propaganda factories' and abandoned the 'pursuit of knowledge.'
'These schools posture as though their position is untouchable, but their business model is nearly entirely reliant on federal largesse,' Rufo wrote. 'Demanding that universities behave in a manner worthy of their unique financial and cultural position is long overdue.'
UMass Amherst professors Jennifer Lundquist and Kathy Roberts Forde are among faculty members who recently organized a letter — signed by approximately 5,000 people at universities and colleges across the country — calling for higher education to stand together.
The federal government is 'inserting itself into higher education in a way we've never seen before,' Lundquist said.
They, too, see the fingerprints of Project 2025 on nearly every decision Trump is handing down.
'Project 2025 is one of the playbooks and a pretty powerful one at that,' said Roberts Forde, who cited what she views as being at the heart of the hard-right initiative: maintaining dominance and control of information.
Lundquist said perhaps equally as important as Project 2025, but not receiving nearly the same attention, is Project Esther, another publication by the Heritage Foundation that came out last October before the election.
Project Esther describes the pro-Palestinian movement as a 'Hamas support network' that's disrupting the American education system. It advertises its contents as a national strategy to combat antisemitism.
'It lays out a blueprint for exactly what's happening around the weaponization of antisemitism,' Lundquist said.
The Boston Globe recently interviewed Jewish students and recent graduates at Harvard University about how they see antisemitism manifesting on campus. The response was nuanced: While they're concerned about antisemitism, many said they are far more worried about the Trump administration's actions against higher education institutions.
UMass Amherst was included on the list of 60 universities the Department of Education released in March, announcing investigations into whether the schools have failed to meet their obligations to Jewish students under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
Other schools in Massachusetts included on the list were Boston University, Tufts University, Emerson College, Harvard University and Wellesley College.
Being named beside Harvard means the schools' futures are closely intertwined. What happens to one could likely happen to the rest.
'Harvard is the test case,' Roberts Forde said. 'If the federal government can bring Harvard to its knees, then there goes higher education. We're watching really closely what Harvard is doing and we're hoping they stay the course and continue filing lawsuits.'
MassLive reporter Juliet Schulman-Hall contributed to this story.
'Games of chicken': Trump reversing foreign student legal status raises concerns
Trump is threatening to block international students from Harvard. Is that legal?
Could Trump's crackdown on foreign students exacerbate declining college enrollment?
Harvard has a $53 billion endowment. Could it be a weapon in its fight against Trump?
Harvard's president to talk stakes of Trump admin's demands in new NBC interview
Read the original article on MassLive.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Read the original article on MassLive.
Read the original article on MassLive.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'
U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

Hamilton Spectator

time16 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

U.S. ambassador says Canadians facing device searches, detainment ‘not a pattern'

OTTAWA - The American ambassador to Canada is pushing back on Ottawa's travel advice, saying his country doesn't search phones at the border and arguing some Americans travelling here are having a tough time. 'We welcome Canadians to come in and invest, to spend their hard-earned Canadian dollars at U.S. businesses,' U.S. Ambassador Pete Hoekstra told The Canadian Press in an interview Friday. 'If a Canadian has had a disappointing experience coming into the United States, I'm not denying that it happened, but I'm saying it's an isolated event and it is not a pattern.' In April, Ottawa updated its advice to Canadians travelling to the United States to warn them about the possibility they might be detained if denied entry. 'Expect scrutiny at ports of entry, including of electronic devices,' reads the new guidance. There have been reports of Canadians facing intensified scrutiny at the border, having phones searched and, in some cases, being detained. Hoekstra insisted concerns about device searches are not grounded in reality. 'Coming to the U.S., that's a decision for the Canadians to make. Searching devices and all of that is not a well-founded fear. We don't do that. America is a welcoming place,' he said. He said some Americans have expressed similar concerns about Canada. 'I've heard that from Americans coming into Canada as well, OK? Saying, 'You know, we've not received a warm reception when we've gotten to Canadian customs,'' he said. When asked if these reports from American travellers involve arbitrary phone searches and lengthy detainment, Hoekstra said there are consular cases of Americans complaining to the embassy about the Canada Border Services Agency. 'We've said, 'OK this may have been an isolated event. There may have been a Canadian border person who was having a bad day, and thought they'd take it out on, you know, somebody across the border,'' he said. In a statement, the CBSA said its officers follow a code of conduct and the federal ethics code that both require them to treat everyone equally, and the agency investigates any complaints of mistreatment. 'Employees are expected to conduct themselves in a way that upholds the values of integrity, respect and professionalism at all times,' wrote spokeswoman Karine Martel. 'Treating people with respect, dignity and fairness is fundamental to our border services officers' relationship with the public and a key part of this is serving all travellers in a non-discriminatory way.' Hoekstra said travel to the U.S. is up to individuals. 'If you decide that you're not going to come down or whatever, that's your decision and you're missing an opportunity. There are great things to see in America,' Hoekstra said. He also noted the case of CNN journalist Christiane Amanpour, who recently said she prepared to visit the U.S. last month as if she was 'going to North Korea' — with a 'burner phone' that didn't carry any personal information — only to experience a warm welcome. 'It's like, (let's) get past the rhetoric and let's look at the real experiences that people are having here,' Hoekstra said. Airlines have been cutting flights between Canada and the U.S. due to a slump in demand, and Flight Centre Travel Group Canada reported a nearly 40 per cent drop in flights between the two countries year-over-year in February. A survey in early May conducted by Leger Marketing for the Association for Canadian Studies found 52 per cent of respondents feel that 'it is no longer safe for all Canadians travelling to the United States,' with 29 per cent disagreeing and 19 per cent saying they were unsure. Roughly the same proportion said they personally feel unwelcome in the U.S. LGBTQ+ groups have opted against attending World Pride events in Washington and United Nations events in New York, citing scrutiny at the border as the Trump administration scales back protections for transgender and nonbinary people. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 7, 2025.

UFC fans share what they think about Trump ahead of O'Malley-Dvalishvili showdown
UFC fans share what they think about Trump ahead of O'Malley-Dvalishvili showdown

Fox News

time21 minutes ago

  • Fox News

UFC fans share what they think about Trump ahead of O'Malley-Dvalishvili showdown

UFC fans gathered in Newark, N.J., for the highly anticipated matchup between Merab Dvalishvili and Sean O'Malley. But the two fighters weren't the only special guests in the arena — President Donald Trump was also in attendance. Though there was no official announcement, fans were clearly anticipating Trump's arrival. Fox News Digital spoke to fans before the event about Trump's performance during the first six months of his second term. Some were eager to praise the president, while others were skeptical or outright disappointed. "He's doing an amazing job. He's shocking us all, but he's doing what everybody knows he's going to do. Wow," Erin Kerr said. "I believe that Trump is somebody to respect. He's always honest about things and at the end of the day, you know, it might be politics, but you know we should kind of respect what's going on, you know what I'm saying," Eric Ventura told Fox News Digital. "I'd much rather see the UFC than see two bloated billionaires fight each other," Paul Gordon said. "Probably Elon would be kind of funny, but I gotta go with what's happening tonight, it's gonna be better," Chris Wright said. "Trump — he's got that big a-- chin," Wright told Fox News Digital. "He took a bullet, right? I think if you just take a bullet, maybe you can take a punch," Gustavo Granados said. "If Elon, if Trump were to fight, I think Trump would get it done," Jimmy Malloy said. Several fans also chose Musk, noting the billionaire was several years younger than the president, which they thought would give him an advantage. In the end, Trump received a warm welcome from the roaring crowd as he entered the Prudential Center with UFC CEO Dana White, a longtime ally of the president who spoke at the 2024 Republican National Convention.

Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government
Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Cathie Wood says the Musk-Trump feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the government

Ark Invest's Cathie Wood has weighed in on the public feud between Elon Musk and Donald Trump. Wood said the feud reveals how much Musk's companies rely on the US government. Trump said Saturday he had no desire to fix his relationship with the Tesla CEO. The public feud between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump has shown investors just how much control the US government has over Musk's companies, Ark Invest CEO Cathie Wood says. "I think the way this is evolving is Elon, Tesla, and investors are beginning to understand more and more just how much the government has control here," Wood said in a video posted to the company's YouTube channel on Friday. Many of Musk's companies have key links to the government and have received billions of dollars in federal loans, contracts, tax credits, and subsidies over the years. "Elon is involved in companies that are depending on the government," Wood said, pointing to Tesla, SpaceX, and Neuralink as examples. SpaceX's COO, Gwynne Shotwell, said last year that the company has $22 billion worth of federal contracts. Neuralink, Musk's brain chip company, is subject to FDA regulation, and a less friendly regulatory environment could impact Tesla's robotaxi rollout plans. Tesla stock fell more than 14% on Thursday after Musk and Trump became locked in a series of increasingly bitter clashes. The feud appeared to begin, at least publicly, on Tuesday, after Musk criticized Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." He called it a "disgusting abomination" and said it would increase the national budget deficit. Tensions rose fast between the once-close allies on Thursday. Trump threatened to cut Musk's government contracts and Musk said SpaceX would immediately begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft — which returned stranded NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore from the International Space Station in March. Musk later retracted that threat, which Wood said was a sign he was "beginning to walk this back." Wood said the rift with Trump could, in part, be Musk's attempt to further decouple himself from the Trump administration. Musk announced in April that he would be stepping back from his government work. "One of the hypotheses out there is that what has happened was partly — not entirely — orchestrated," Wood said. "Clearly, there has been some brand damage to Tesla, which he readily admits, and I think he's trying to disengage from the government and being associated with one party or the other." Moving forward, Wood said neither Trump nor Musk needed to get "bogged down" with a fight and that she believed both would eventually heed that reasoning. She also appeared to be confident that Musk could make the situation work for him. She said Musk "works really well under pressure" and that "he creates a lot of that chaos and pressure himself." Trump, however, signaled Saturday that he had no desire to fix his relationship with the SpaceX CEO anytime soon. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Trump told NBC News. "I think it's a very bad thing, because he's very disrespectful. You could not disrespect the office of the President," he added. Vice President JD Vance struck a somewhat friendlier tone when asked about the possibility of reconciliation during a Thursday interview with podcaster Theo Von. Vance said that while he thought it was a "huge mistake" for Musk to "go after the president," he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store