logo
Patrick McGee, author of 'Apple in China', shares 153 million reasons why Tim Cook's tech giant can't go full throttle in India

Patrick McGee, author of 'Apple in China', shares 153 million reasons why Tim Cook's tech giant can't go full throttle in India

Time of India3 days ago

China's early advantage and Apple's deep roots
India: A market full of promise but bound by constraints
Live Events
India's potential, but Apple's cautious steps
Growth but not at China's scale
Lessons from China and Trump's US push
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Apple's journey in India has been steady but far from spectacular. Despite India's vast potential and rising middle class, Apple has yet to match the explosive growth it saw in China during a similar timeframe. This gap reflects not just corporate caution but also the different business environments India and China offer.Patrick McGee, former Financial Times Apple reporter and author of Apple in China, lays out how Apple's success in China grew from long-term, deep investments. His book explains how Apple tied its fortunes closely with Beijing, benefiting from a manufacturing ecosystem decades in the making.A key moment was the 2022 Shanghai lockdown, which exposed the fragility of China as a supply base. McGee quotes a former Apple executive: 'China went from being a reliable supplier to a completely unreliable supplier.' This disruption pushed Apple to accelerate its India plans, but not without hesitation.Tim Cook once said in 2018 that India was on a 'China-like trajectory.' Yet, five years later, the pace remains cautious. Unlike China a decade ago, India demands 30 per cent local sourcing of components, making it tougher for Apple to build the kind of supply chain it enjoyed in China.'When the rules were relaxed in 2017, Apple suppliers began assembling some iPhones in India – with Taiwanese partner Wistron – a move that allowed Apple to avoid hefty tariffs,' McGee writes. This helped Apple sell more affordable iPhones to India's growing middle class.However, the first online Apple Store in India only opened in 2020, and the first physical store came in 2023—fifteen years after China's first store. India started by assembling entry-level models like the iPhone SE, then moved on to flagship devices. By 2024, India was producing Pro models, matching distribution timelines with China.Speaking to CNBC-TV18, McGee explained India's market allure: 'Apple has been making iPhones in India since 2017, but that was just about tariffs. PM Narendra Modi had put tariffs on smartphones coming from China, about 20%. When Apple looked at India and saw the next big growth market, 8% GDP growth, an emerging middle class, and 1.5 billion people, it began investing in India to avoid tariffs."However, he emphasised the scale still falls short: 'You might say - Oh, there's a new factory that needs 30,000 people. Dormitories being built by Foxconn, that's not enough. In China, for instance, a company called Biel Crystal, which plays a role in the iPhone's glass, had 72,000 people just working on Apple products. That's more than 14 factories in India combined.'India offers promise but lacks the scale and ecosystem Apple needs for a full shift.Still, the numbers show India's growth is modest by comparison. McGee notes, 'From 2016 to 2023, iPhone production in India grew from zero to around 15 million units, accounting for 7 percent of global shipments. China, between 2006 and 2013, ramped production from zero to 153 million units.' That means India's pace is roughly one-tenth of China's at the same stage.Apple's operations in India focus mainly on FATP — final assembly, test, and pack out — which is labour-intensive. Components are flown in from China and assembled locally by Wistron and Foxconn. McGee shares a witty remark from a manufacturing engineer: made-in-India iPhones are 'assembled in China, disassembled there, and then sent to China for reassembly.'Apple aims for India to become fully self-sufficient, but this will take years. A senior Apple engineer told McGee the development pace has been slow, and having assembly in both countries using the same supply chain adds complexity, not resilience.Lower labour costs in India are partly offset by logistics challenges of moving parts from China. The trade-off is clear: India offers potential cost savings, but the supply chain remains tangled.McGee also recalls a telling episode from the US. During Donald Trump's first term, the president showcased an Apple factory in Texas as a victory for American manufacturing. Yet, it was an 'unmitigated fiasco.' Workers from China had to be flown in to fix production issues. This contrasts starkly with the long-term ecosystem China built around Apple.McGee writes that Apple's transfer of technology to China over decades helped fuel China's tech ambitions, including the Made in China 2025 plan. He says, 'Here was America's most famous tech giant volunteering to play the role of Prometheus, handing the Chinese the gift of fire.'While Apple's move to India and Vietnam may help reduce reliance on China, the company cannot yet abandon the Chinese supply chain without risking disruption. Apple's China story is a lesson in the importance of an integrated manufacturing ecosystem — one that India is still years away from building.Apple's experience shows the challenge of building a complex supply chain in a new country. China's low wages, limited labour rights, and political environment allowed a manufacturing ecosystem to flourish rapidly. India's democratic governance and economic policies offer different hurdles and advantages.Apple is inching towards India and Vietnam but remains deeply tied to China for now. The company's cautious approach reflects the complex balance between opportunity and risk in global manufacturing.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SEC's crypto confusion deepens as next-gen ETFs test limits
SEC's crypto confusion deepens as next-gen ETFs test limits

Economic Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

SEC's crypto confusion deepens as next-gen ETFs test limits

Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel A new line of yield-chasing crypto funds is forcing the Securities and Exchange Commission to confront unresolved gaps in its regulatory framework, just as the Trump administration eases oversight of digital immediate dispute centres on two proposed funds from ETF firms REX Financial and Osprey Funds that would allow investors to earn rewards by deploying Ether and Solana tokens to help validate blockchain transactions, a process known as staking. The firms said they had cleared an initial SEC registration hurdle last week, but agency staff took the unusual step of objecting that very same evening. Staff warned the products may not meet standards to qualify as investment companies under federal law, raising broader questions about the regulation of a hot corner of the crypto-investment staff noted that to meet the definition of an investment company, a firm must primarily invest in securities. That's a problem when it comes to digital assets: there are no clear lines around what crypto activities trip securities laws and what don't.'When ETFs generate income from staking, they may start to resemble traditional investment companies under the Investment Company Act — especially if investors are relying on the managerial efforts of others to earn those returns,' said Adam Gana, an attorney at law firm Gana Weinstein LLP. 'However, these types of ETFs are testing the boundaries of what counts as an investment company, and the SEC is sending mixed signals.'Gana added that 'just because you throw some stocks into the mix doesn't mean the SEC will look the other way.'The SEC, REX and Osprey declined to comment. The general counsel at REX said earlier that the firm expected to satisfy the SEC's crypto industry has long argued that many tokens aren't securities and shouldn't fall under the SEC rules. Under Trump, the agency has appeared open to these arguments, and its new chair, Paul Atkins, is a proponent of digital currencies. SEC staff guidance has signalled that memecoins and stablecoins may fall outside securities recently as May 29, the staff said federal securities laws generally don't apply to staking activities — further complicating the regulatory picture as firms try to launch novel piecemeal statements create inconsistent policy, according to Corey Frayer, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America.'The SEC and the industry don't get to treat crypto assets as securities when it's convenient, and not as securities when they want weaker regulation,' said Frayer, who served as a senior adviser to former SEC Chair Gary Gensler, a frequent target of crypto industry the crux of the matter is the so-called Howey test , which comes from a 1946 Supreme Court decision that still governs securities classification. Under the test, an asset can be considered a security — and thus will fall under SEC purview — if investors contribute capital with the expectation derived from the managerial efforts of others. Bitcoin is generally considered a commodity but the status of other tokens like Ether and Solana are less Commissioner Hester Peirce, head of the agency's crypto task force, took the unusual step of highlighting the SEC staff's queries about whether the proposed funds met the definition.'I have those same questions,' Peirce wrote in a post on Trump embraced the digital-asset industry during his reelection campaign, pledging to make the US the 'crypto capital of the planet.' Since re-entering the White House, he has established a national stockpile of Bitcoin, anointed a 'crypto czar' and welcomed memecoin enthusiasts to a private dinner in have recently been successful in resolving SEC staff concerns about novel offerings. Earlier this year, agency staffers rebuked an ETF by State Street Corp. and Apollo Global Management — the world's first to invest in private credit — hours after the fund listed over concerns about the fund's liquidity and its ability to comply with valuation rules. The firms took action to rectify the executives are optimistic that US regulators will eventually greenlight the staking ETFs.'They've followed a crawl-walk-run approach — first futures ETFs, then spot ETFs, and hopefully staking ETFs,' said Matt Hougan, chief investment officer at Bitwise Asset Management Inc., which acquired an Ethereum staking platform last year. 'I'm hopeful we'll get to the finish line soon.'

'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle
'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle

Time of India

time15 minutes ago

  • Time of India

'It could have gone nuclear': Trump again claims he 'stopped India-Pakistan war'; doubles down on trade angle

US President Donald Trump (PTI photo) US President Donald Trump on Friday once again claimed that he played a key role in stopping a possible war between India and Pakistan - a conflict he said might have gone nuclear if not for his intervention. Speaking to reports on Air Force One, Trump said he used trade as a tool to get both sides to halt hostilities immediately. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," US President said. He explained that both countries stopped their attacks after he warned them the US would suspend trade if the fighting continued. "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other.' They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Secure Your Child's Future with Strong English Fluency Planet Spark Learn More Undo In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India. " Trump's version of events got a rare endorsement from Moscow. Russian President Vladimir Putin 's aide Yury Ushakov backed Trump's claim, saying his direct involvement helped end the conflict - something that even came up in a phone call between Trump and Putin. "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," Ushakov said. The US president's comments, however, stirred diplomatic pushback. Congress MP Shashi Tharoor , who is leading an all-party delegation to the US, said they addressed Trump's mediation claims directly with US Vice President JD Vance. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," Tharoor said. Trump has made similar claims in the past, especially after India carried out Operation Sindoor -- precision strike on terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu & Kashmir (PoJK) on May 7, in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. India later responded to Pakistani military aggression with airbase strikes. Eventually, tensions eased after Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) contacted his Indian counterpart and agreed to stop further action.

US suspends nuclear equipment exports to China amid trade war escalation
US suspends nuclear equipment exports to China amid trade war escalation

Time of India

time16 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US suspends nuclear equipment exports to China amid trade war escalation

The US in recent days suspended licenses for nuclear equipment suppliers to sell to China's power plants, according to four people familiar with the matter, as the two countries engage in a damaging trade war . The suspensions were sent to companies by the US Department of Commerce , the people said, and affect export licenses for parts and equipment used with nuclear power plants . Nuclear equipment suppliers are among a wide range of companies whose sales have been restricted over the past two weeks as the US-China trade war shifted from negotiating tariffs to throttling each other's supply chains. It is unclear whether a Thursday call between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping would affect the suspensions. The US and China agreed on May 12 to roll back triple digit, tit-for-tat tariffs for 90 days, but the truce between the two biggest economies quickly went south, with the US claiming China reneged on terms related to rare earth elements , and China accusing the US of "abusing export control measures" by warning that using Huawei Ascend AI chips anywhere in the world violated US export controls. On Friday, Trump said US and Chinese officials would meet again on June 9. The US Department of Commerce did not respond to a request for comment on the nuclear equipment restrictions. On May 28, a spokesperson said the department was reviewing exports of strategic significance to China. "In some cases, Commerce has suspended existing export licenses or imposed additional license requirements while the review is pending," the spokesperson said in a statement. US nuclear equipment suppliers include Westinghouse and Emerson . Westinghouse, whose technology is used in over 400 nuclear reactors around the world, and Emerson, which provides measurement and other tools for the nuclear industry, did not respond to requests for comment. The suspensions affect business worth hundreds of millions of dollars, two of the sources said. A spokesperson for the Chinese Embassy in Washington said Xi emphasized on his call with Trump that both sides should make good on the agreement reached in Geneva on May 12. China has been "earnestly" executing the agreement, the spokesperson, Liu Pengyu, said in a statement on Friday. "The US side should acknowledge the progress already made, and remove the negative measures taken against China," the statement said. China's rare earth export controls are in line with common practice and not targeted at specific countries, it added. They also coincide with Chinese restrictions on critical metals threatening supply chains for manufacturers worldwide, especially America's Big Three automakers. China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers for the US automakers, Reuters reported on Friday. Reuters could not determine whether the new restrictions were tied to the trade war, or if and how quickly they might be reinstated. Department of Commerce export licenses typically run for four years and include authorized quantities and values. But many new restrictions on exports to China have been imposed in the last two weeks, according to sources, and include license requirements for a hydraulic fluids supplier for sales to China. Other license suspensions went to GE Aerospace for jet engines for China's COMAC aircraft, sources said. The US also now requires licenses to ship ethane to China, as Reuters reported first last week. Houston-based Enterprise Product Partners said Wednesday that its emergency requests to complete three proposed cargoes of ethane to China, totaling some 2.2 million barrels, had not been granted. Enterprise said a May 23 requirement for a license to sell butane to China, in addition to the ethane, was subsequently withdrawn. Dallas-based Energy Transfer said it was notified on Tuesday about the new ethane licensing requirement, and planned to apply and file for an emergency authorization. Other sectors that have been hit with new restrictions include companies that sell electronic design automation software such as Cadence Design Systems.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store