logo
Bills look to expand North Dakota student opportunities through savings accounts

Bills look to expand North Dakota student opportunities through savings accounts

Yahoo10-02-2025

From the left, Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, Shane Goettle, Joy-Nicole Smith and Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, participate in a meeting of the North Dakota Educational Opportunities Task Force on Thursday, Sept. 26, 2024. The Legislature is considering several school choice proposals. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)
North Dakota lawmakers are weighing several proposals to establish Education Savings Accounts, but the eligibility, method of payment and amount students may receive differs.
Supporters say they want to give families more options but opponents object to using public dollars to pay for private school tuition.
Legislators have already demonstrated support for school choice, approving a bill in 2023 that would have provided $10 million in state funding to offset the cost of private school tuition for students who met income requirements.
The bill was vetoed by then-Gov. Doug Burgum, who at the time said he supported the concept but didn't think the bill went far enough to promote competition or expand options in rural areas. He also called for more transparency and accountability.
'I can say confidently today that he (Burgum) was most definitely correct,' said Sen. Michelle Axtman, R-Bismarck, during a hearing last week.
Axtman is the prime sponsor of Senate Bill 2400, which would provide a $1,000 Educational Savings Account for every student, whether they attend public or private school or are homeschooled.
Students attending private schools could qualify for $2,500 or $4,000 per year if their households meet certain income thresholds.
'This bill isn't about one educational option over another,' Axtman said. 'This bill is about increasing educational opportunities for each and every North Dakota student.'
The savings accounts can cover tuition, fees, textbooks, school meals, educational therapy and tutoring, among other educational items and services. Axtman added North Dakota would be the first state to cover student mental health services through the accounts.
Participating private schools would have to meet accountability requirements. For example, students who pay for school with a voucher would need to participate in statewide tests, with school results presented to a legislative committee. The state superintendent of public instruction would administer and audit the program.
A fiscal note estimating the cost of the program had not been prepared as of last week.
Charter school bill narrowly fails in North Dakota House; Senate considers similar bill
'Unless this is going to happen for free, the money is going to have to come from somewhere, and those are public dollars,' said Nick Archuleta, president of North Dakota United, a union representing teachers and public sector employees.
Rick Diegel, superintendent of Kidder County Public Schools, used basic math during his testimony in opposition to Axtman's bill and said the total for about 120,000 North Dakota students to receive at least $1,000 would bring the cost to about $120 million per school year.
In an interview, Axtman acknowledged $120 million per year would be a conservative estimate. She added she doesn't expect every North Dakota student will use the entire amount in their savings account every year.
Alexandre Fall, a senior associate with Pew Charitable Trusts who has studied school choice programs, said Education Savings Accounts have increased in popularity since 2020. The costs can be difficult to estimate because budget analysts don't know how many students will use the programs or transition from public to private education or homeschooling, he said.
'Once these programs become more popular, we'll have a better understanding of the cost mechanisms and the shifts in enrollment,' Fall said. 'But it's a very new policy and it is surrounded by a lot of uncertainty.'
Archuleta said siphoning of tax dollars to fund something that isn't for a public purpose, like private school tuition, means less money for public education, roads or anything else providing a public good for the state.
He said future Legislatures would need to continue funding the program, even in years with tight budgets.
Armstrong's first budget proposal addresses prison crowding, invests in housing
In Gov. Kelly Armstrong's budget proposal, he calls for a 2% annual increase to the K-12 funding formula, or an additional $60 million, which would bring total K-12 education spending to $3.12 billion for the 2025-27 biennium.
'We don't think it's enough,' Archuleta said. 'I think we can do better.'
Armstrong's budget also included $44.3 million for Education Savings Accounts.
Supporters of school choice, including Armstrong, have said the initiatives can be funded in addition to the traditional K-12 system.
Page Forrest, a senior associate with Pew Charitable Trusts, said education systems across the country have faced budget crunches, in part due to the expiration of federal pandemic aid.
'If budgets continue to tighten across the country, that means it may feel like public schools and nonpublic alternatives are competing for an increasingly smaller piece of the pie, even if they are being funded as separate entities,' Forrest said.
A separate proposal from Rep. Pat Heinert, R-Bismarck, takes a different approach. House Bill 1590 would establish what he calls education services accounts that would require matching dollars from families.
Families can deposit up to $2,000 per child and the Bank of North Dakota would provide funds to match 50%.
The dollars could be spent on private school tuition, dual-credit courses, vocational and technical courses, online courses and other approved programs.
Students could use the money in the accounts to pay for school meals, tutoring, mental health counseling and special needs programs, higher education entrance exams, other educational materials and education-related camps.
'Every student in the state of North Dakota is eligible to participate at whatever dollar amount they are comfortable putting into an account,' Heinert said. 'The idea of a match is not acceptable to many, but I think it makes the program go farther.'
Legislative Council estimates the program would cost $41.2 million.
Heinert's bill is a pilot program that would run through the 2026-27 school year.
'We've got two years to look at this,' he said. 'We've never done this before in North Dakota. We've tried. We've never got it accomplished. It's time though.'
Two similar proposals would provide state funding to be used toward private school tuition or homeschool expenses.
Senate Bill 2303, sponsored by Sen. Mike Wobbema, R-Valley City, and House Bill 1540, sponsored by Rep. Ben Koppelman, R-West Fargo, would deposit 80% of the amount allocated to public school students, or more than $8,800, into an Education Savings Account. Another 20% would be transferred to the student's home public school district. The dollars could be used for education-related expenses, but the participating student must be counted in their home school district to provide accurate state aid payments.
The proposals don't have any income requirements. The Bank of North Dakota would administer the accounts.
The estimated cost for each bill is $243 million for 2025-2027 based on the current enrollment of private and homeschooled students.
More 2025 legislative session coverage
House Bill 1607, sponsored by Rep. Matthew Heilman, R-Bismarck, would provide state dollars for private school students. His proposal would provide the full per-pupil state aid payment, or about $11,000, for each student to be used on eligible education expenses. The families would receive the dollars on a debit card. The estimated cost is $179 million for 2025-2027. The proposal does not have income requirements.
In all cases, the actual cost of the school choice programs would depend on how many people participate.
No action has been taken on the proposals, which had public hearings last week. The Senate and House education committees are expected to discuss education savings accounts this week.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process
Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wyoming lawmakers seek to eliminate SIPA, again, in effort to simplify budget process

CHEYENNE — Wyoming lawmakers will try again to eliminate the state's Strategic Investments and Projects Account (SIPA) in a continued effort to make the state's budget process more transparent for the public. Efforts have been made in past legislative sessions to eliminate Wyoming's many financial 'coffee cans.' In 2024, lawmakers successfully repealed the School Capital Construction Account and its related accounts. This year, the Legislature successfully eliminated the Budget Reserve Account (BRA) through Senate File 168 and nearly eliminated SIPA through the passage of SF 169. However, Gov. Mark Gordon line-item vetoed SF 169 and kept SIPA online. The governor maintained his long-term support of simplifying the state's budget process, but he disapproved of the Legislature's approach in SF 169. Gov. Mark Gordon Gov. Mark Gordon '(SIPA) was originally a compromise between a previous legislature and the then-serving governor,' Gordon wrote in his veto letter. He served as state treasurer in 2013, when SIPA was first created. 'The compromise recognized the value of the governor's authority to use some of the funds when making budget recommendations.' Gordon argued the original structure of the bill limited his ability to make budget recommendations. Currently, excess funds from the state's Permanent Mineral Trust Fund (PMTF) account are split evenly between SIPA and the state's main savings account (the Legislative Stabilization Reserve Account, or LSRA). SF 169 originally eliminated SIPA by July 2026 and transferred all excess funds into the LSRA. Wyoming statute prohibits the governor from proposing appropriations from LSRA in excess of the 5% statutory reserve account. In other words, he can't make budget recommendations from this account. 'It is a cagey strategy to undermine a long-standing compromise between the executive and legislative branches and breach the original intent of SIPA,' Gordon wrote. One effect of Gordon's veto removed the split of funds flowing into SIPA and LSRA; now, all excess funds go directly into SIPA, effective immediately. He reasoned this action is necessary, as he expects the state will see greater pressure to fund public schools with the passage of more tax cuts and diversions, along with falling oil and natural gas prices. 'The combined effects of these factors create substantial pressure on the general fund to cover any school funding deficit and still meet the ongoing costs of government,' Gordon wrote, 'as well as provide services to Wyoming families and businesses.' Impact of veto During the Legislature's Select Committee on Capital Finance meeting on Thursday, lawmakers moved to draft a bill similar to SF 169 and, in a sense, make it 'veto-proof.' Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs, who was the primary sponsor of SF 169, said Gordon's veto 'left … quite a dilemma here.' 'The net effect of this line-item veto, if we allow this to stay in statutes the way it currently is, it zeros out the reserve accounts,' Hicks said. Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs (2025) Sen. Larry Hicks, R-Baggs Legislative budget and fiscal staff provided a comparison of the two versions of the bill and their long-term fiscal impacts, based on numbers from the January long-term forecast of the state's fiscal profile. The SIPA transfers 45% of what it retains to the School Foundation Program (SFP) account, the state's main spending account to fund public schools. If the SIPA is entirely repealed, the SFP loses that funding. Before SF 169 was signed into law, the LSRA and SFP were estimated to receive $124.1 million and $369.4 million, respectively, from SIPA over a six-year forecast period. Under the version passed by the Legislature, LSRA was estimated to receive $191.6 million in that same time period. The SFP would receive a total of $111.4 million in the first two fiscal years, and then not receive anything starting in fiscal year 2027 with the repeal of SIPA. Under Gordon's vetoes, the SFP is estimated to receive $470 million over the six-year forecast period, and the LSRA will receive no funding at all. 'But I want to point out that, starting in FY 28 the (PMTF) reserve account can't guarantee the full amount, and it falls short by about $60 million,' said LSO senior fiscal analyst Polly Scott. 'As Sen. Hicks did state … the estimate is that the reserve account is depleted somewhere in (fiscal year 2028).' Under the version adopted by the Legislature, the reserve account's life is extended beyond the six-year forecast, Scott added, because the state is relying on it less. Lawmakers respond State Treasurer Curt Meier noted that the PMTF reserve account is acting the way the LSRA should act. He suggested removing the 1.25% guarantee from the PMTF reserve account into SIPA so it can 'function (as) what it was supposed to do.' 'You're spending money you don't have and then you're trying to catch up … so you can spend it in this year's legislative session,' Meier said. 'Let the reserve account stand on itself, rather than putting more pressure on it than what it can afford to bear.' Then, the Legislature could move the unrealized capital gains into the LSRA, he said. The LSRA already provides $100 million to the school spending account once it drops below a certain threshold. Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne (2025) Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne Chairwoman Sen. Tara Nethercott, R-Cheyenne, suggested also discussing lifting this cap from the LSRA into the SFP at the committee's next meeting in September. For now, committee members voted to draft a bill that eliminates the SIPA, with a provision to remove the 1.25% flow guarantee from the PMTF reserve account, and discuss it at the next meeting. 'The elimination of the SIPA account is important, I think, to the Legislature as a whole, in order to simplify and provide transparency to the budget process,' Nethercott said. 'Because the SIPA account has been butchered. It's been tortured ... and no longer serves its intended purpose, creating a transparency issue.'

Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison
Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan sentenced to 7.5 years in prison

CHICAGO, Ill. (WTVO) — Former Illinois House Speaker Mike Madigan has been sentenced to 7 and a half years in prison on bribery and corruption charges. A jury convicted Madigan earlier this year of conspiracy, bribery, and wire fraud in a high-profile corruption trial. He was also ordered to pay a $2.5 million fine. The jury could not reach a decision on six of the 23 counts against him, including an overarching racketeering conspiracy charge, after deliberations that lasted more than 10 days. Ultimately, he was convicted on 10 counts of bribery, conspiracy, and wire fraud. Acting U.S. Attorney Morris Pasqual called it a 'historic' conviction, ranking high among top public corruption cases tried in Chicago's federal courthouse. He said that Illinois residents have a right to trust in their government.' The trial, which began in October, featured more than 60 witnesses, including a congresswoman, business leaders and former state legislators. Madigan, 83, served as House speaker for more than 30 years, becoming the longest serving U.S. legislator, and earned the nickname the 'Velvet Hammer' for his forceful yet quiet leadership style. He left political office in 2021 while under investigation and was indicted the following year. First elected to the Legislature in 1970, Madigan was speaker of the state House from 1983 to 2021, except for two years when Republicans were in control. He set much of Illinois' political agenda by deciding which legislation would be voted on and by controlling several campaign funds. He also oversaw political mapmaking. Among his crimes: Madigan used his influence to pass legislation that benefited companies like ComEd, which gave kickbacks, jobs, and contracts to Madigan loyalists in return. Rep. John Cabello (R-Machesney Park) reacted to the sentencing, saying, 'I hope the entirety of his trial sends a message to every corrupt politician watching: The people of Illinois deserve better—not the corrupt cesspool Madigan and his cronies created. Sadly, there are currently 57 state lawmakers, including those from the Rockford area, who received funding from or maintain ties with Madigan. Another reason that Illinois needs real ethics reform now.' Rep. Joe Sosnowski (R-Rockford) said, 'No one is above the law. Speaker Madigan was found guilty of gaming the system for personal gain. The people of Illinois expect more from their leaders and deserve an ethical state government. We need to stop the culture of pay-to-play politics that has allowed corruption to run rampant in Illinois for decades'. The Associated Press contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure
Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Republican Nevada governor vetoes voter ID measure

Nevada's GOP Gov. Joe Lombardo on Thursday vetoed a voter ID measure, foregoing a proposed requirement to have voters show identification before casting ballots at the polls. The bill, known as A.B. 499, was passed in a bipartisan effort by the state Legislature to improve voter verification and increase the number of drop boxes for mail ballots across the state. Lombardo said he ultimately chose to veto the bill over a lack of clear provisions and guidelines on regulations. 'I wholeheartedly support Voter ID and am appreciative of the effort to codify it into statute. However, this bill is not entirely consistent with the constitutional amendment that Nevada voters will consider again in 2026,' the governor wrote in a Thursday message. 'AB 499 fails to resolve-and may even introduce- inconsistencies in how voter identification is reviewed, does little to improve signature verification and leaves too much ambiguity for future interpretation or regulation,' he added. The legislation would've required in-person voters to show their ID while allowing mail-in ballots to be accepted with a valid signature. 'This inconsistency undermines the principle of uniform voter verification. Voter ID is essential for ensuring election integrity, and it should be applied consistently across all voting methods,' Lombardo said. However, state Assembly Speaker Steve Yeager (D) said the veto symbolized a 'breach of trust' after the governor previously shared support for the bill, according to The Associated Press. Lombardo's veto comes as Republicans usher in a sweeping push to codify stricter identification requirements for voters. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store