Confused about the COVID-19 booster? Here's what children, pregnant women in Kentucky need to know
The guidance about who can and should receive COVID-19 vaccines and boosters is shifting.
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said on May 27 that the COVID-19 vaccine will no longer be included in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's recommended immunization schedule for healthy children. Instead of lumping it in with recommended vaccines, doctors will utilize a shared decision-making model with parents or guardians to determine whether a child should be vaccinated. The same day, the CDC also rolled back its recommendation that pregnant women receive the vaccine, which clashes with previous guidance.
These changes are unprecedented in the sense that the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices traditionally meets and votes on changes to the immunization schedule, or recommendations on who should get vaccines. From there, the director of the CDC typically makes a final call ― but the committee did not vote on the changes Kennedy announced on May 27.
There have been reports, too, that this fall U.S. Food and Drug Administration may limit vaccine availability for healthy adults.
With all this in mind, The Courier Journal sat down with Dr. Steven Stack, the commissioner for the Kentucky Department for Public Health, who guided Kentucky through the COVID-19 pandemic. We also checked in with Dr. Kristina Bryant, who serves as associate medical director for Louisville Metro's Department of Public Health and Wellness, as well as UofL Health's Dr. Valerie Briones-Pryor, who treated patients on frontlines of the COVID-19 pandemic and was one of the first five people in Kentucky to receive the vaccine.
More: COVID isn't over. RFK Jr.'s vaccine recommendation is a terrible choice. | Opinion
All three experts stressed that the most important thing a person can do amid these changes is consult your primary care physician or your child's pediatrician about what's best for your household.
But there are still many question marks about what these changes could mean for the public.
If you're confused by the recommendations coming out of federal government regarding the COVID vaccine and booster availability, you're not alone. Here's what a few Kentucky medical experts have to say on the topic:
COVID-19 has largely shifted from a deadly pandemic to a virus that doctors are able to control, Briones-Pryor said. There are more than 200 different kinds of respiratory viruses in humans, and even the common cold can be deadly when it hits a person who is immunocompromised. In many cases, the treatment is the same whether the virus is COVID-19 or not. Patients usually need rest, fluids and time to heal.
'It's evolved to such a way that now I don't ask if they're vaccinated anymore, because they all come in with respiratory viral illnesses and and there's really no treatment for it,' Briones-Pryor said.
COVID-19 remains a serious respiratory disease, and it still kills far more people than influenza does, Stack said. People who keep current with their immunizations are less likely to end up in the hospital with complications from COVID-19.
Adults, in general, are more likely than children to get sick from COVID-19, Stack said, but children often become sicker from COVID-19 than they do from most other regular viral respiratory illnesses.
'The thing that has changed is we've had a federal election, and the administration has changed,' Stack, the commissioner for the Kentucky Department for Public Health, said. 'And with that change in administration, (there's) a new approach to messaging related to infectious diseases, immunizations and public health in general, so that that's what's changed.'
More: As memories fade, playing hockey is frozen in time for Louisville man with Alzheimer's
The COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women and it protects the mother and the unborn child from the disease, Stack said. While federal agencies have stopped recommending the COVID vaccine for pregnant women, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has not. Stack cited a statement the college released on May 27.
'ACOG is concerned about and extremely disappointed by the announcement that HHS will no longer recommend COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy,' said Dr. Steven J. Fleischman, president of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. "As ob-gyns who treat patients every day, we have seen firsthand how dangerous COVID-19 infection can be during pregnancy and for newborns who depend on maternal antibodies from the vaccine for protection. We also understand that despite the change in recommendations from HHS, the science has not changed.'
The COVID-19 vaccines will still be available for children, under a shared decision-making model, Bryant, with Louisville Metro's Department of Public Health and Wellness, said. The language and approach doctors use are the primary difference between a shared decision-making model and the recommendation that existed up until this point.
With a recommendation from the CDC, the COVID-19 vaccine would be offered as readily as immunizations for tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis, Bryant said.
With a shared decision-making model, the doctor would tell a parent the vaccine is available and offer some education about why they might want to consider it, Bryant said. Then the doctor would ask if the parent has questions, and if they'd like their child to have the vaccine.
Bryant also stressed that even with this change, the CDC has not advised against the COVID-19 vaccine for children.
'I would say to parents that, as a reminder, the COVID-19 vaccine is safe and effective,' Bryant said. 'This vaccine underwent the most rigorous safety studies In U.S. history ... and there have been multiple studies that have shown that the vaccine is safe and effective in children and adults.'
More: Kentucky marks first whooping cough deaths since 2018. What we know
Stack isn't worried about COVID-19 overwhelming hospitals in its present form. The virus would have to mutate in an unexpected way to cause the chaos it did in 2020.
It's still too early to know whether insurance companies will continue to cover the COVID-19 vaccine for pregnant women, children and healthy adults.
In general, insurance companies have followed the federal recommended vaccine schedule, Stack said.
However, Stack said, the companies follow those schedules 'in the confidence that a rigorous and transparent scientific process makes recommendations for what should or should not be on that schedule, and who should or should not get certain types of immunizations depending on their risks of harm from the diseases.'
That hasn't been the case because the CDC's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices didn't meet and vote on this guidance.
'I think there's a lot of concern in the scientific community and in the medical community about whether these recommendations are based in sound science,' Stack said.
Overall, Stack said, if vaccines are discouraged or not recommended, it could create confusion for commercial and public health insurers about what they are required to cover.
'It really does throw into uncertainty 'will Kentuckians and will the American people continue to have access to immunizations that have clearly protected countless numbers of people and saved an enormous number of lives over the years?'' Stack said.
It can be difficult to keep up with changes and advancements in science, Briones-Pryor said, so it's important to talk with your primary care physician to figure out what's best for you and your household. She noted that throughout her career, she's seen several medicines go off the market and frequency of preventative screenings, such as pap smears and colonoscopies, shift overtime.
'Change is hard, especially in medicine,' Briones-Pryor said. 'We don't do change well as a society. ... We continue to learn about the things that we do (in medicine), and hope that we can find things that are better and safer. It's been an interesting ride.'
Practicing good hygiene can help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and other respiratory illnesses. Briones-Pryor recommended washing hands frequently for the full-length of the 'Happy Birthday,' avoiding touching your face, carrying hand sanitizer and trying to cover all coughs and sneezes.
More: Kentucky families must renew Medicaid for first time since pandemic. Here's what to know
The CDC recommends that anyone who may have COVID-19 or another respiratory virus stay home and avoid in-person contact with other people. A person can return to their normal activities when your symptoms have improved overall and you've been fever-free for at least 24 hours. Symptoms typically include fever, chills, fatigue, cough, runny nose and headache.
The CDC encourages added precautions during the first five days of normal activities such as physical distancing, keeping good hygiene and wearing a mask.
Information from the Courier Journal's sister paper, USA Today, was used in this report. Reach Courier Journal reporter Maggie Menderski at mmenderski@courier-journal.com.
This article originally appeared on Louisville Courier Journal: Is the COVID vaccine necessary now? Read what Kentucky experts say
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
People with Covid-like symptoms took almost a year before feeling like themselves again, researchers say
Did you have Covid-like symptoms? It may take nine months or even longer to start feeling like yourself again. Researchers at UCLA found that 20 percent of patients with those symptoms continued experiencing suboptimal quality of life for nearly a year after infection. Whereas, physical well-being returned after only three months. "We have newly recognized the difference in recovery with respect to mental vs. physical well-being after a COVID infection," Lauren Wisk, an assistant professor of medicine at UCLA, said in a statement. "The findings showed that health care professionals need to pay more attention to their patients' mental well-being after a Covid infection and provide more resources that will help improve their mental health, in addition to their physical health,' she added. Wisk was one of the lead authors of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-funded study that was published Tuesday in the journal Open Forum Infectious Diseases. The study compared people who sought treatment for Covid-like symptoms. Of those, 75 percent tested positive for the virus. The rest were negative. Of the 4,700 participants who experienced the symptoms between mid-December 2020 and late August 2022, the people who were positive for Covid were statistically likelier to return to optimal health-related quality-of-life than their Covid-negative counterparts in the year following the infection. The authors said the findings suggest that health authorities may have previously underestimated the long-term effects of non-Covid infections on a patient's well-being. To reach these conclusions, researchers analyzed responses from nearly 1,100 Covid-positive patients and 317 Covid-negative negative patients, assessing aspects including physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, social participation, sleep disturbance, pain interference and cognitive function. They found that approximately one in five of those who were part of the study remained in poor overall quality of life, with a high likelihood of self-reporting long Covid for up to a year after initial infection. 'In this large, geographically diverse study of individuals with 12 months of follow-up after Covid-19-like illness, a substantial proportion of participants continued to report poor [overall quality of life], whether or not the inciting acute symptoms were due to SARS-CoV-2 or another illness,' they said. Mental well-being recovered gradually, with significant improvements manifesting between six and nine months after infection, researchers found. The authors said further research was needed, noting that it remains unclear which conditions the symptomatic Covid-negative patients were suffering from and that Covid tests can yield both false-positive and false-negative results. The common cold, allergies, flu and Covid share many similar symptoms. "Future research should focus on how to improve the treatment models of care for patients who continue to experience Covid-19 symptoms and their impact on patients' quality of life, especially as one in five patients may continue to suffer over a year after their initial infection, which likely reflects long Covid," Wisk said.

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Data on sexual orientation and gender is critical to public health – without it, health crises continue unnoticed
As part of the Trump administration's efforts aimed at stopping diversity, equity and inclusion, the government has been restricting how it monitors public health. Along with cuts to federally funded research, the administration has targeted public health efforts to gather information about sexual orientation and gender identity. In the early days of the second Trump administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention took down data and documents that included sexual orientation and gender identity from its webpages. For example, data codebooks for the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System were replaced with versions that deleted gender identity variables. The Trump administration also ordered the CDC to delete gender identity from the National Violent Death Reporting System, the world's largest database for informing prevention of homicide and suicide deaths. For many people, sexual orientation and gender identity may seem private and personal. So why is personal information necessary for public health? Decades of research have shown that health problems affect some groups more than others. As someone who has studied differences in health outcomes for over 15 years, I know that one of the largest health disparities for LGBTQ+ people is suicide risk. Without data on sexual orientation and gender identity, public health cannot do the work to sound the alarm on and address issues that affect not just specific communities, but society as a whole. Health is determined by the interplay of several factors, including a person's genetics, environment and personal life. Of these types of health information, data on personal lives can be the most difficult to collect because researchers must rely on people to voluntarily share this information with them. But details about people's everyday lives are critical to understanding their health. Consider veteran status. Without information that identifies which Americans are military veterans, the U.S. would never have known that the rate of suicide deaths among veterans is several times higher than that of the general population. Identifying this problem encouraged efforts to reduce suicide among veterans and military service personnel. Studying the rates of different conditions occurring in different groups of people is a vital role of public health monitoring. First, rates can set off alarm bells. When people are counted, it becomes easier to pick up a problem that needs to be addressed. Second, rates can be a benchmark. Once the extent of a health problem is known, researchers can develop and test interventions. They can then determine if rates of that health problem decreased, stayed the same or increased after the intervention. My team reviewed available research on how sexual orientation and gender identity are related to differences in mortality. The results were grim. Of the 49 studies we analyzed, the vast majority documented greater rates of death from all causes for LGBTQ+ people compared with people who aren't LGBTQ+. Results were worse for suicide: Nearly all studies reported that suicide deaths were more frequent among LGBTQ+ people. A great deal of other research supports this finding. Without data on sexual orientation and gender identity, these issues are erased. Higher death rates among LGBTQ+ people affect everyone, not just people in the LGBTQ+ community. And when suicide is a major driver of these death rates, the costs increase. There are societal costs. Deaths from suicide result in lost productivity and medical services that cost the U.S. an estimated $484 billion per year. There are also human costs. Research suggests that for every suicide death, about 135 people are directly affected by the loss, experiencing grief, sadness and anger. President Donald Trump's targeting of research on sexual orientation and gender identity comes at a time when more Americans than ever – an estimated 24.4 million adults – identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. That's more than the entire population of Florida. LGBTQ+ people live in every state in the country, where they work as teachers, executives, janitors, nurses, mechanics, artists and every other profession or role that help sustain American communities. LGBTQ+ people are someone's family members, and they are raising families of their own. LGBTQ+ people also pay taxes to the government, which are partly spent on monitoring the nation's health. Stopping data collection of sexual orientation and gender identity does not protect women, or anyone else, as the Trump administration claims. Rather, it serves to weaken American public health. I believe counting all Americans is the path to a stronger, healthier nation because public health can then do its duty of detecting when a community needs help. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: John R. Blosnich, University of Southern California Read more: Anti-LGBTQ+ policies harm the health of not only LGBTQ+ people, but all Americans Trans youth are significantly more likely to attempt suicide when gender dysphoria is met with conversion therapy than with hormone treatment RFK Jr's shakeup of vaccine advisory committee raises worries about scientific integrity of health recommendations John R. Blosnich receives funding from the National Institutes of Health. He is affiliated with the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), however all time and effort into writing this piece was done outside of his work with the VA. The opinions expressed are those of Dr. Blosnich and do not necessarily represent those of his institution, funders, or any affiliations.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
PointClickCare Pledges $75,000 to the Senior Living CaRES Fund in Support of Education Grants for Senior Living Workers
Leading health tech company commemorates National Long-Term Care Day with three-year commitment aimed at strengthening and empowering Canada's senior living workforce TORONTO, June 13, 2025 /CNW/ -- PointClickCare, a leading health tech company helping providers deliver exceptional care, today announced a three-year philanthropic partnership with the Senior Living CaRES Fund. The company will contribute $25,000 annually — totaling $75,000 — to fund educational grants that support professional development for workers in long-term care and retirement communities across Canada. Founded in 2020, the Senior Living CaRES Fund has provided over $3 million in emergency financial assistance and educational grants to frontline workers. The fund recognizes the vital role senior living professionals play in caring for older adults and is committed to fostering a stronger, more resilient workforce. "At PointClickCare, we believe that investing in people is the most meaningful way to drive lasting impact," said Angeline Pleunis, Vice President, Workplace Experience & Social Impact at PointClickCare. "The individuals working in senior living communities play an essential role in the health and well-being of our aging population, and they deserve every opportunity to grow, thrive, and succeed in their careers. Our partnership with the Senior Living CaRES Fund reflects our deep commitment to supporting this incredible workforce through education and development." The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted significant challenges in long-term care and heavily burdened frontline staff. These workers showed, and continue to show, remarkable resilience and compassion, often making personal sacrifices. It's clear that investing in their education and development is essential. PointClickCare's support enhances access to continuing education and training, equipping staff to excel in their careers and improve care quality. "We are incredibly grateful for PointClickCare's generous commitment to the Senior Living CaRES Fund," said Rebecca Scott Rawn, Executive Director at Senior Living CaRES Fund. "Their support will directly empower frontline workers with access to education and professional development opportunities – tools that not only enhance individual careers but strengthen the quality of care for seniors across Canada. Together, we are investing in the champions who make compassionate care possible every day." On National Long-Term Care Day, PointClickCare and the Senior Living CaRES Fund are proud to honour the dedication of those working in senior living communities. Together, they are investing in a future where every senior living worker feels valued, supported, and empowered to make a lasting impact. To learn more about PointClickCare's award-winning culture and philanthropic programs, visit the website here. For more information on the Senior Living CaRES Fund, visit the website here. About PointClickCarePointClickCare is a leading health tech company with one simple mission: to help providers deliver exceptional care. With the largest long–term and post–acute care dataset, we power AI-driven healthcare to deliver intelligent transitions, insightful interventions, and improved financial performance. Enhanced by our marketplace of 400+ integrated partners and trusted by over 30,000 provider organizations and every major U.S. health plan, we're redefining healthcare, so it doesn't just survive — it thrives. About The Senior Living CaRES FundEstablished in May 2020 by founding partners Chartwell Retirement Residences, Revera Inc., Extendicare, and Sienna Senior Living, the Senior Living CaRES Fund was created in recognition of the extraordinary efforts of senior living sector employees whose passion, commitment and resilience while caring for the most vulnerable is nothing short of heroic. Since its establishment, the Fund has assisted over 970 employees across the country, distributing more than $3.1 million in emergency financial aid and bursaries for education. Media ContactPointClickCareMedia@ SOURCE PointClickCare View original content to download multimedia: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data