What Harvard's Federal Funding Cuts Mean for the University
The Eliot House dormitory on the Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, on Tuesday, May 27, 2025. Credit - Sophie Park—Bloomberg via Getty Images
Harvard University is poised to lose its remaining federal funding and ties to the federal government as its battle with the Trump Administration intensifies.
The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) asked federal agencies in a Tuesday letter to reconsider all federal contracts with Harvard and instead 'seek alternative vendors' for future endeavors. The letter was first reported on by The New York Times.
'The Trump Administration is not backing down from its onslaught of attacks on the institution,' says Katharine Meyer, an education policy fellow at the Brookings Institution. 'No sort of path is too small for them to look into going after.'
The GSA and Harvard did not respond to TIME's requests for comment. The university has previously filed multiple lawsuits against the Administration over its actions.
Here's what to know about what the requested federal funding cuts, and what they mean for Harvard.
The Trump Administration has targeted a number of colleges and universities over their diversity, equity, and inclusion programs and pro-Palestinian demonstrations on their campuses, among other issues. Harvard, which has refused to comply with the Administration, has faced particular ire.
In April, federal officials sent a letter to Harvard demanding that it modify its hiring practices, implement 'viewpoint diversity' to include conservative ideology, and alter its student discipline regulations or risk federal financial support.
Harvard's defiance of the demands initially put $2.2 billion in multi-year federal grants at risk. Another $2.7 million in Department of Homeland Security grants and $1 billion in federal funding for health research are under threat as well.
The Trump Administration has also moved to attempt to revoke Harvard's tax-exempt status and the university's ability to enroll foreign-born students. A federal judge on Thursday will decide whether a preliminary injunction issued against the latter should be extended.
In its Tuesday letter, the Administration cited what it called 'discriminatory practices' related to Harvard's hiring and admissions process, the university's handling of antisemitism on campus, and a 'lack of commitment' to 'national values and priorities' in its request for agencies to cancel remaining contracts with the school.
'This $100 million dollar contract pullback is certainly the smallest effort that we've seen, but I think the cumulative impact is hurtling toward a point where eventually Harvard does not have infinite funds to be able to fill in where they've lost federal contracts and grants and any other sources of their revenue,' says Meyer.
Harvard's operating expenses reached $6.4 billion for fiscal year 2024, compared to the more than $3 billion in federal funding for the university at risk under the Trump Administration.
Federal sponsorship for research made up 11% of the university's total operating revenue for the 2024 fiscal year. Harvard warns on its website that without federal funding, cutting-edge research into conditions including cancer, heart disease, and diabetes 'will come to a halt midstream, and researchers will lack necessary resources to finish ongoing projects or to finance new ones.' Some Harvard labs, including one working on human organs-on-chips, which replicate the function of organs, have received stop-work orders following the Trump Administration's efforts to slash funding. Those researchers were using that technology to study how certain organs react to radiation therapy.
The Administration's move to bar Harvard from enrolling international students could hit another source of the university's funds beyond the money it receives through government grants and contracts. Harvard received more than a fifth of its funding in 2024 from education revenue, including tuition, housing, food income, and more. International students contribute a large portion of that revenue, with more than 6,700 enrolling at the school for the most recent school year. The standard cost of attendance for foreign-born students, many of which pay full price for tuition, is $101, 974.
Harvard has mounted legal challenges against the Administration's unprecedented actions. It filed a lawsuit on April 21, citing violations of the First Amendment and claiming federal officials did not abide by the proper procedural rules to slash grant funding. A second lawsuit followed last Friday after officials moved to bar the university from enrolling international students, and a federal judge temporarily blocked the Administration from doing so.
Harvard's substantial federal endowment, which distributed $2.4 billion in the fiscal year ending in June 2024, also puts it in a unique financial position to bite back against the Trump Administration's attacks.
But restrictions on how the endowment is used mean it can't be relied on as a simple replacement for lost federal funding. And as the lawsuits continue to play out in the courts, some experts warn that the federal government's actions are already changing the higher education landscape. The legal limbo surrounding student visas has led universities worldwide to attempt to entice Harvard international students to transfer to their higher education institutions. Some colleges and universities are also implementing policy changes to proactively avoid Trump's ire.
'[Universities] are certainly very worried that the courts will rule that the federal government has the ability to do these ad hoc rescissions of grants and contracts and institutions that don't have the financial means of Harvard are not going to be able to say no,' says Meyer. 'With the legal uncertainty, I think a lot of institutions are reviewing their policies and reviewing their practices and trying to kind of proactively rearrange what they're doing and try to position themselves to be in the federal government's good graces.'
Meyer believes that the Trump Administration will likely move to rescind Harvard's ability to award federal financial aid to students, dealing the school a further blow.
'When institutions lose the ability to award federal financial aid just largely because they're truly bad faith actors who are misleading students about their enrollment opportunity,' she says. 'To do so for Harvard because of ideological reasons would be completely unprecedented, but I expect that the Trump Administration is looking through every policy that exists to see if they might have grounds to do so.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US-backed Gaza aid group to halt distribution on Wednesday, UN to vote on ceasefire demand
By Nidal al-Mughrabi, Crispian Balmer and Michelle Nichols CAIRO/JERUSALEM/UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) -The U.S.-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation will not give out any aid on Wednesday as it presses Israel to boost civilian safety beyond the perimeter of its distribution sites, a day after dozens of Palestinians seeking aid were killed. The GHF said it has asked the Israeli military to "guide foot traffic in a way that minimizes confusion or escalation risks" near military perimeters; develop clearer guidance for civilians; and enhance training to support civilian safety. "Our top priority remains ensuring the safety and dignity of civilians receiving aid," said a GHF spokesperson. An Israeli military spokesperson warned civilians against moving in areas leading to GHF sites on Wednesday, deeming them "combat zones". The Israeli military said on Tuesday that it opened fire on a group of people it viewed as a threat near a GHF food aid distribution site. The International Committee of the Red Cross said at least 27 people were killed and dozens injured. The GHF said the incident was "well beyond" its site. Palestinians who collected food GHF boxes on Tuesday described scenes of pandemonium, with no-one overseeing the handover of supplies or checking IDs, as crowds jostled for aid. The U.N. Security Council is also set to vote on Wednesday on a demand for a ceasefire between Israel and Palestinian militants Hamas and humanitarian access across Gaza, where aid has trickled amid chaos and bloodshed after Israel lifted an 11-week blockade on the enclave where famine looms. "It is unacceptable. Civilians are risking – and in several instances losing – their lives just trying to get food," U.N. spokesperson Stephane Dujarric said on Tuesday, adding that the aid distribution model backed by the U.S. and Israel was "all a recipe for disaster, which is exactly what is going on." That model is run by the newly created GHF, which started operations in the enclave a week ago and said on Tuesday that it has given out more than seven million meals from three so-called secure distribution sites. GHF Interim Executive Director John Acree urged humanitarians in Gaza: "Work with us and we will get your aid delivered to those who are depending on it." U.S. VETO? The U.N. and other aid groups have refused to work with the GHF because they say it is not neutral and the distribution model militarizes aid. GHF uses private U.S. security and logistics companies to get aid to the distribution sites. It is the latest in a string of efforts to get more aid into the enclave, where experts say the entire population of some 2.1 million people is at risk of famine. Jordan last year spearheaded humanitarian air drops, while the U.S. briefly installed a floating aid pier, but it was beset by challenges. The U.N. has long-blamed Israel and lawlessness in the enclave for hindering the delivery of aid into Gaza and its distribution throughout the war zone. Israel accuses Hamas of stealing aid, which the group denies. Israel said on Tuesday that three of its soldiers had been killed in fighting in northern Gaza. Gaza health officials said at least 18 more Palestinians were killed in other military strikes in the territory on Tuesday. Reuters could not independently verify the reports in northern and southern Gaza. The 10 elected members of the U.N. Security Council have asked for the 15-member body to vote on Wednesday on a draft resolution that demands "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." The draft text, seen by Reuters, also demands the release of all hostages held by Hamas and others, and the immediate lifting of all restrictions on the entry of aid and its safe and unhindered distribution, including by the U.N., throughout Gaza. "The time to act has already passed," Slovenia's U.N. Ambassador Samuel Zbogar told Reuters. "It is our historical responsibility not to remain silent." As U.S. President Donald Trump's administration tries to broker a ceasefire in Gaza, it was not immediately clear if Washington would veto the draft text. A spokesperson for the U.S. mission to the U.N. said: "We cannot preview our actions currently under consideration." A resolution needs nine votes in favor and no vetoes by the permanent members - the United States, Russia, China, Britain or France - to pass. The war in Gaza has raged since 2023 after Hamas militants killed 1,200 people in Israel in an October 7 attack and took some 250 hostages back to the enclave, according to Israeli tallies. Israel responded with a military campaign that has killed over 54,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities, which do not distinguish between fighters and non-combatants. (Writing by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Stephen Coates)
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Santa Ono rejected to lead University of Florida after GOP backlash
June 3 (UPI) -- Dr. Santa Ono, the former president at the University of Michigan, was rejected Tuesday as the next president at the University of Florida amid backlash from Republicans over his earlier support of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Tuesday's decision by the 17-member Board of Governors comes one week after UF's Board of Trustees unanimously approved Ono as the finalist. Ono was on track to become one of the highest paid public university presidents in the country. He was due to sign a five-year contract with a base salary of $1.5 million and incentives to earn as much as $15 million over the life of the deal. Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, who signed the 2023 bill banning DEI initiatives in public colleges, delivered a lukewarm response when Ono became the presidential pick, saying Ono's statements made him "cringe." Other Republicans, including Sen. Rick Scott and Reps. Byron Donalds and Greg Steube expressed outrage. "The UF Board of Trustees has made a grave mistake," Steube wrote in a post last week. "Dr. Ono gave it his best 'college try' walking back his woke past, claiming he's now 'evolved.' But I'm not sold. This role is too important to gamble on convenient conversions." Republican state Rep. Jimmy Patronis also questioned the presidential search committee's decision to make Ono the sole finalist. "UF sets the benchmark for education nationwide. There's too much smoke with Santa Ono. We need a leader, not a DEI acolyte. Leave the Ann Arbor thinking in Ann Arbor," Patronis wrote on X. During questioning for the role, Ono stated he believed DEI programs do more harm than good. He said he closed the University of Michigan's DEI offices in March and vowed DEI would not return to Florida's campus, if he were president. "The fact is some of my past remarks about DEI do not reflect what I believe, and that evolution did not take place overnight and it was shaped over a year and a half of thinking, discussions, listening to faculty, staff and students and their thoughts on the DEI program," Ono said. Ono, who was criticized for allowing an encampment of pro-Palestinian protesters to remain at the University of Michigan for a month, vowed last week during questioning to fight anti-Semitism at the University of Florida. "Let me be very clear: based on my experience, I believe that anti-Semitism is not just one form of hatred among many," Ono said. "It is a uniquely virulent and persistent threat, especially on college campuses today."


Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Candidate for University of Florida president is rejected over his diversity stance
At Michigan, Ono had presided over a campus that was rife with acrimonious debates over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the role of diversity in higher education. Those issues have been hotly debated in Florida, where Republican leaders have successfully enacted conservative priorities across K-12 schools and in college. Ono had tried to distance himself from the politics of Michigan as he sought to transition to the Sunshine State. Last month, he wrote an opinion essay disavowing diversity programs, for instance. Advertisement Paul Renner, a member of the Board of Governors who voted against Ono's confirmation, said in an interview Tuesday that Ono had led a university that embraced diversity, equity and inclusion programming. Renner said he did not find Ono's attempt to distance himself from those efforts sincere. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The public record completely contradicted what the nominee was telling us,' said Renner, a former speaker of the Florida House. Republicans celebrated the unexpected move. Ono had already given notice that he would be leaving his job in Michigan. A Michigan spokesperson did not immediately return a message. But a member of the school's Board of Regents, Jordan Acker, suggested that Ono could not get his old job back. 'Santa Ono tendered his resignation and we accepted it,' Acker said in a brief interview. Advertisement Rebekah Modrak, a recent chair of Michigan's Faculty Senate, called the assertion that Ono was soft on pro-Palestinian activism 'absolutely untrue.' She criticized his decision to close the university's DEI office, which had been known as a national leader in such programming. 'He's a man who witnessed racial bias but closed the office of diversity, equity and inclusion,' Modrak said in an email, adding, 'There's a strong sense of justice in the fact that Santa Ono is now out of a job.' In Florida, the opposition to Ono was flipped. In recent weeks he had been criticized by some conservatives in the state over his past stances on diversity programming. 'There's too much smoke with Santa Ono,' Rep. Jimmy Patronis, R-Fla., wrote on social media Monday. 'We need a leader, not a DEI acolyte. Leave the Ann Arbor thinking in Ann Arbor.' Ono had supporters in Florida. The chair of the university's board of trustees, Mori Hosseini, who has aimed to move the university in Gainesville, Florida, up in rankings, had supported Ono. 'He is the right person to accelerate UF's upward trajectory,' Hosseini said in a message to the Florida community last week. He could not be immediately reached for comment. Ono would have replaced Ben Sasse, a former Nebraska senator who abruptly resigned last summer. Ono was born to Japanese immigrant parents in Vancouver, British Columbia, and grew up in Pennsylvania and Maryland. Before leading the University of Michigan, he served as president of the University of British Columbia and the University of Cincinnati. Ono could not be immediately reached for comment. The University of Florida declined to comment. Advertisement This article originally appeared in