logo
Israeli resilience tested as Iranian missile strikes hit home

Israeli resilience tested as Iranian missile strikes hit home

Reutersa day ago

TEL AVIV/JERUSALEM, June 16 (Reuters) - Four days into their war with Iran, Israelis are shaken and anxious, yet remain resilient, still backing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's decision to confront a longstanding foe.
Netanyahu ordered a surprise attack on Iran in the early hours of Friday, vowing to end Tehran's nuclear ambitions, which he says represent an existential threat to his nation.
In response, Iran has fired nightly barrages of ballistic missiles that have brought destruction in their wake -- and also stirred defiance among some of those who have suffered.
"We trust God and Bibi Netanyahu," said Suki Yoram, standing in front of his partially destroyed block of flats in the Petah Tikva neighbourhood, just east of Tel Aviv, which was hit by a missile overnight, killing four people.
"We are with you till the end, do not stop, go on... There is no other choice," he told Reuters.
Dozens of apartment blocks and other buildings in central and northern Israel have been wrecked by the waves of missiles since Friday, leaving 24 dead and hundreds injured.
The severity and depth of the damage have outstripped anything that either Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip or Hezbollah fighters in neighbouring Lebanon have managed to inflict on Israel in decades of confrontation.
"It's very sad. And we don't want to lose any people. But what can you do," said Adi Shindler, 71, a Jerusalem resident.
Israel's longest-serving prime minister, Netanyahu has repeatedly warned that Iran was looking to build nuclear weapons and wanted to turn them on Israel -- a small nation home to nearly half the world's Jews.
Iran has said its nuclear programme is purely for civilian purposes, but Israelis, whose society has been shaped by the memory of the Nazi Holocaust, think otherwise.
"We don't have a choice. It's better this way than to have missiles come at us, nuclear missiles. And then we're all dead," said Shindler.
Israel's own airstrikes have gutted Iran's nuclear and military leadership. Iran's death toll has reached at least 224, with civilians accounting for 90% of the casualties, an Iranian official said. Thousands of residents of Tehran are fleeing their homes and stockpiling essential supplies for fear that Israel's campaign will escalate in the coming days.
Netanyahu is a deeply divisive figure in Israel. Many blame him for failing to prevent the October 7, 2023 attacks by Hamas on southern Israel, that killed around 1,200 people and triggered a brutal war in Gaza that is still grinding on.
Opposition politicians have accused him of prolonging that conflict to stave off a reckoning over the 2023 security failings. But they have closed ranks since the Israeli airforce launched its mass assault on Iran on June 13.
"When it comes to the security of the people of Israel in the face of our enemies, we are one people, with one mission. Our children will not live in fear of an Iranian nuclear bomb. Not today, not ever," said opposition leader Yair Lapid.
A poll released on Monday by Agam Labs researchers said 70% of Israelis supported the military assault on Iran -- a number that rose to 83% among the country's Jewish population. Only 16% of people surveyed opposed the operation.
Nonetheless, the nightly rush to air raid shelters and scenes of bombed-out homes is jangling nerves.
When an Iranian rocket, which typically carries between 300-700 kg (660-1,540 pounds) of explosives, makes a direct hit near the heavily populated coast, the boom can be distinctly heard 55 km away (35 miles) in Jerusalem.
In Tel Aviv, 31-year-old chef Guydo Tetelbaun stood on smashed glass and debris outside what had once his apartment.
"It's terrifying because it's so unknown," he said in the early hours of Monday. "This could be the beginning of a long time like this, or it could get worse, or hopefully better, but it's the unknown that's the scariest."
While there is undoubtedly broad support for the attack on Iran, not everyone agrees with the war -- the biggest conflagration of the past 20 months during which time Israel has also squared off against Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen.
"I don't think it will bring any good," said Ben Keller, an Israeli studying for a doctorate in Britain and currently back home to see his family.
"I never really believed Iran would use a nuclear weapon. It's just something people like to have in order to make threats, but they won't actually use it," he said.
Investors, however, seemed to take the view that the conflict would ultimately be good for Israel, betting that Netanyahu would win his military gamble and manage to destroy Iran's nuclear ambitions, removing a long shadow over the country and its economy.
The shekel gained more than 3% against the dollar on Monday -- its biggest daily percentage gain since at least 2008 -- while the Tel Aviv stock market rose 2%.
"Reducing Israel's geopolitical risk significantly is likely to reduce the risk premium priced into the bond market and provide Israel with a more positive growth outlook," said Jonathan Katz, chief economist at Leader Capital Markets.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's chilling warning to Iran: we won't kill Supreme Leader
Trump's chilling warning to Iran: we won't kill Supreme Leader

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Trump's chilling warning to Iran: we won't kill Supreme Leader

Donald Trump has warned Iran to make a deal 'before there is nothing left' and issued a chilling threat: we know where the Supreme Leader is 'hiding' and we won't kill him – 'at least for now.' He demanded a "real end" to the bloody conflict with Israel, which is now entering its sixth day, and told Tehran there was still time to end the war if it delivered 'unconditional surrender.' After launching 'Operation Rising Lion' last week with an unprecedented attack on Iranian nuclear sites and top military figures, Israel claimed on Tuesday to have the Iranian military leadership 'on the run'. Warning that the the operation – which marks the largest attack on Iran since the 1980s – was 'not over yet', Israel said an overnight attack on Tehran's command centre killed Iran's new wartime chief of staff, Ali Shadmani – who had only been in the role for four days. As terrified Iranians fled Tehran and other areas being pounded by the Israeli air force, civilians told The Independent they were either trying to stockpile supplies and take cover without bomb shelters or sprint hundreds of kilometres to borders with countries like Armenia. Israel's ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, insisted his country's strikes on Iran were 'the war to end wars' and 'engender peace in the Middle East', as he told Merit TV that Mr Trump was not putting pressure on Israel to halt its offensive. Referring to the pager attack on Hezbollah, the senior Israeli diplomat added: 'We've pulled off a number of surprises – when the dust settles – you're going to see some surprises on Thursday night and Friday, that will make the beeper operation almost seem simple.' After leaving the G7 summit in Canada early on Monday night 'because of what's going on in the Middle East', Mr Trump said his departure 'certainly has nothing to do with a cease fire' and was 'much bigger than that', adding: 'Stay tuned!' Asked by reporters alongside Sir Keir Starmer whether he supported regime change in Tehran, Mr Trump replied: 'I want to see no nuclear weapons in Iran, and we're well on our way to making sure that happens.' The US president later told CBS News that he wanted a 'real end' to the issue of Iran's nuclear programme, and predicted that Israel would not be slowing its attacks on Iran, claiming: 'You're going to find out over the next two days. You're going to find out.' Mr Trump later boasted that 'we know exactly where the so-called 'supreme leader' is hiding', adding: 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin.' But speaking at the G7 on Tuesday, Sir Keir insisted that Mr Trump was not planning to attack Iran, telling reporters: 'There is nothing the president said that suggests he's about to get involved in this conflict. On the contrary, the G7 statement was about de-escalation. 'I think what he said was he wanted to go beyond a ceasefire effectively and end the conflict. And I think he's right about that. I mean, a ceasefire is always a means to an end.' The conflict continued to rage on Tuesday, with an Israeli military official telling reporters that that, overnight alone, Israel struck 'dozens' of military assets, including a Tehran command centre 'responsible for managing combat operations' and components connected to the Iranian nuclear programme. He claimed that Israeli forces have taken out 'more than a third of Iran's missile launchers' in a wave of strikes which continued over western Iran on Tuesday. Iran, meanwhile, has likely fired more than 1,000 projectiles at Israel, including 400 ballistic missiles and dozens of drones, the official added. Around 35 of those missiles have penetrated Israel's defensive shield and made impact, Israeli officials say. Iran's Revolutionary Guards claimed to have hit Israel's military intelligence directorate and spy agency Mossad's operational centre early on Tuesday. There was no Israeli confirmation of such attacks. Iranian officials have reported 224 deaths, mostly civilians, while Israel said 24 civilians had been killed, although rights groups say the toll in Iran is likely to be significantly higher. 'At one point every thirty minutes or so there were explosions,' said one man in the Iranian capital who asked not one identified for fear of backlash from the Iranian authorities for speaking to Western media. 'We were terrified,' he added, saying that civilians felt that if Iran hadn't retaliated with attacks on Israel 'Israel would have destroyed us now'. He continued: 'We haven't left our homes, in my area alone at least 10 civilians have been killed.' Other families were taking the long road from places like Tehran to Armenia, and evacuating by land. One of Israel's main targets has been Iran's nuclear facilities — with Israeli officials saying they have pounded the sprawling nuclear sites of Natanz and Isfahan, as well as the Organisation of Defensive Innovation and Research in Tehran (SPND), and had killed at least 10 scientists so essential to the nuclear programme 'it will be very hard advancing it without their knowledge.' When asked if Israel had the sufficient capability to eliminate Iran's capacity to produce nuclear weapons – and whether it would be able to target underground facilities in places like the Natanz nuclear facility without US assistance – the military official added: 'We have a few surprises up our sleeve.' He said Israel was still assessing the damage to the Natanz facility 'but our initial understanding is that the strikes were successful, at least to some degree.' The UN nuclear watchdog said on Tuesday there were indications of direct impacts on the underground enrichment halls at the Natanz facility, but that there was no change to report at the Fordow and Isfahan sites. Iran has insisted that its nuclear programme is merely for civilian purposes. Israel claims it acted on intelligence suggesting Iran was 'approaching the point of no return' in creating a nuclear weapon, although anonymous US officials have suggested this does not chime with Washington's assessments.

Suspected Israeli hackers claim to destroy data at Iran's Bank Sepah
Suspected Israeli hackers claim to destroy data at Iran's Bank Sepah

Reuters

time27 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Suspected Israeli hackers claim to destroy data at Iran's Bank Sepah

June 17 (Reuters) - An anti-Iranian government hacking group with potential ties to Israel and a track record of destructive cyberattacks on Iran claimed in social media posts on Tuesday that it had destroyed data at Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah. The group — known as Gonjeshke Darande, or 'Predatory Sparrow' — hacked the bank because they accused it of helping fund Iran's military, according to one of the messages posted online. The hack comes amid increasing hostilities between Israel and Iran, after Israel attacked multiple military and nuclear targets in Iran last week. Both sides have launched multiple missile attacks against each other in the days since. Reuters could not immediately verify the attack on Bank Sepah. The bank's website was offline on Tuesday and its London-based subsidiary, Bank Sepah International plc, did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Customers were having problems accessing their accounts, according to Israeli media., opens new tab Gonjeshke Darande did not respond to multiple messages sent via social media. 'Disrupting the availability of this bank's funds, or triggering a broader collapse of trust in Iranian banks, could have major impacts there,' Rob Joyce, the former top cybersecurity official at the NSA, said in a post on X. In 2022, Gonjeshke Darande claimed responsibility for a cyberattack against an Iranian steel production facility. The sophisticated attack caused a large fire at the facility, resulting in tangible, offline damage. Such attacks are usually beyond the capabilities of activist hackers, security experts say, and would be more in line with the capabilities of a nation state. The group has also been publicly linked by cybersecurity researchers to a 2021 cyberattack that caused widespread outages at gas stations across Iran. Israel has never formally acknowledged that it is behind the group, although Israeli media has widely reported Gonjeshke Darande as 'Israel-linked'.

Killing foreign leaders is a western tradition
Killing foreign leaders is a western tradition

Telegraph

time32 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Killing foreign leaders is a western tradition

Iranian leaders are not safe. Israel has killed Iran's top military commander, Ali Shadmani, less than a week after they killed his predecessor. Although president Donald Trump has reportedly vetoed an Israeli plan to kill Iran's supreme leader, 86-year-old Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the ageing cleric clearly still feels in danger – he is said to be skulking with his son and heir Mojtabi in an underground bunker outside Tehran. Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hinted that assassinating the Middle East's most durable religious and political leader remains an option that is still very much on the table. Questioned about the alleged assassination plan, Netanyahu replied that Israel 'will do whatever it needs to do'. Assassinating foreign leaders perceived as enemies of western democracies may seem an extreme and undiplomatic act, but it is a method that has been used more than once in recent history. In fact, President Trump himself ordered the killing of another prominent Iranian leader during his first term in the White House, when Major General Qassim Soleimani, head of the elite Quds Force of Iran's Revolutionary Guards, was blown to bits along with ten of his aides by a US drone outside Baghdad Airport in January 2020. Soleimani was the mastermind behind many terrorist acts by Iran's proxies across the Middle East, and paid the ultimate price for his activities. Trump's apparent squeamishness about inflicting the same rough justice on the Grand Ayatollah comes from his fears that Khamenei's enraged followers would unleash a bloody revenge on US assets if their beloved leader is harmed. Such fears did not stop previous American leaders from paying back the worst humiliation in American history: Japan's deadly aerial assault on Pearl Harbour in December 1941, which brought a reluctant United States into World War Two. In April 1943, Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, chief planner of the Pearl Harbour raid, was flying over the Solomon Islands when his aircraft was shot down by US fighter planes. This was no accident but a deliberate assassination plan candidly codenamed Operation Vengeance. Japan's military cyphers had been cracked by Allied boffins, and Yamamoto's flight plans were known in advance. Britain, too, has not been backward when it comes to killing foreign leaders deemed too dangerous to let live. In May 1942 Czechoslovak agents, trained and parachuted in by Britain, ambushed and assassinated the fearsome SS chief Reinhard Heydrich, Hitler's 'man with the iron heart' in Prague. Heydrich – who had planned and ordered the Holocaust just months before his demise – is the perfect example of the dangers raised by such extrajudicial killings. In retaliation for Heydrich's death, the Nazis razed the Czech village of Lidice to the ground and murdered its entire population of 600 innocent men, women and children. It was a high price to pay for eliminating such a monster. Towards the end of the war an even more deserving and tempting target came into British crosshairs: Adolf Hitler himself. Britain's spying and sabotage agency the Special Operations Executive (SOE) devised Operation Foxley, a scheme to drop a 'Day of the Jackal' style sniper close to Hitler's Bavarian mountain retreat, the Berghof , and shoot him on one of his daily exercise strolls. The plan was only aborted at the last minute as it was thought that the Fuehrer was so manic by then that he was doing more damage to Germany alive than dead. Even as late as 1956, a British prime minister was still attracted by the idea of assassinating a foreign enemy. During the Suez Crisis caused by Egyptian president Gamal Abdul Nasser's nationalisation of the British owned Suez Canal, Prime Minister Sir Anthony Eden rang his Foreign Office minister Anthony Nutting at the Savoy Hotel and demanded: ' Don't you understand? I want Nasser murdered'. Later still, in the 1960s at the height of the Cold War, America's CIA Intelligence Agency devised numerous plans to kill Cuba's Communist dictator Fidel Castro. Poisoning Castro's cigars or his skuba diving suit were among the absurd options considered, along with more conventional killing methods. None succeeded, but the lethal intention was perfectly serious. So does Khamenei deserve to die violently? According to Israel, very much so – whatever the consequences. After all, this is a man who since coming to power in 1989 has issued regular blood curdling threats to wipe the 'Zionist entity' and all its inhabitants off the face of the earth. He has made similar threats to the 'Great Satan', as Iran calls the US, and Iranian agents inside America have plotted to kill Trump. Israel has already, within the past week, amply demonstrated its formidable expertise in the assassination game by killing much of Iran's political and military elite, along with the top scientists working at its nuclear facilities. There is no doubt that their intelligence services and special forces have both the capacity and the courage needed to strike at the very top of the Islamic Republic should the order be given. For the Jewish state it is not a matter of moral or diplomatic scruples, but a question of sheer survival in the face of an existential and mortal threat.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store