Merz says NATO spending boost to counter Russia
"We are not doing this, as some claim, to do the United States and its president a favour," he told the German parliament before setting off for the gathering in The Hague.
"We are doing this based on our own observations and convictions. Russia, above all, is actively and aggressively threatening security and freedom" across Europe, he added.
"We have to fear that Russia will continue its war beyond Ukraine."
The summit has been viewed as heavily focused on keeping Trump happy after he made comments that sparked concern about Washington's commitment to NATO and insisted that other member states spend at least five percent of their GDP on defence.
NATO's 32 countries have thrashed out a compromise deal to dedicate 3.5 percent to core military spending by 2035, and 1.5 percent to broader security-related areas such as cybersecurity and infrastructure.
On Monday, Europe's biggest economy revealed plans to reach the 3.5 percent level for core spending six years early -- in 2029 -- with the vast extra outlays necessary made possible after Germany eased its rules on taking on debt.
Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Tuesday that he would head to the NATO summit with the message that "external security and defence capability are once again an absolute priority in (German) government policy".
Advertisement
"We are bringing about a historic turnaround in defence spending."
On the summit, he said there were "good signs" about "the broad consensus on how to proceed... I see no reason to assume that we will be given the cold shoulder".
Since taking office in May, Merz has been racing to build up Germany's long-neglected armed forces, with the aim of turning them into the "strongest conventional army" in Europe -- a radical shift in a country with strong pacifist traditions due to its dark wartime past.
A drive has been launched to boost military personnel, which aims to attract 11,000 fresh recruits this year alone -- and Pistorius has suggested conscription, which was halted in Germany in 2011, could be reintroduced if too few people sign up voluntarily.
Germany is also building up a permanent military brigade in Lithuania -- the country's first such overseas deployment since World War II -- to bolster NATO's eastern flank against Russia.
© Agence France-Presse
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Supreme Court Justice Warns 'Thousands Will Suffer' After Trump Admin Allowed to Deport Migrants to Any Country That Will Take Them
The Supreme Court's three liberal justices warned that "thousands will suffer" following a ruling that allows the Trump administration to deport migrants to any country willing to accept them, without prior notice or a hearing. The 6-3 ruling, issued Monday, overturned a lower court decision that had allowed immigrants to challenge their deportation if they faced the risk of death or torture in the receiving country. A 19-page dissent, written by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and joined by justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, condemned the decision as a "gross abuse" of the court's authority, warning that it "exposes thousands to the risk of torture or death." "Apparently, the court finds the idea that thousands will suffer violence in far-flung locales more palatable than the remote possibility that a district court exceeded its remedial powers when it ordered the government to provide notice and process to which the plaintiffs are constitutionally and statutorily entitled," Sotormayor wrote The justice added that "the Government is in every respect responsible for any resulting harms." "Had it complied with the preliminary injunction, no followup orders would have been necessary, nor would the Government have faced a 'sudden need . . . to detain criminal aliens' abroad," she continued. The Court's conservative majority, however, issued the ruling without providing a rationale. Members of the Trump administration celebrated the court's ruling. Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, posted on X Monday, "Fire up the deportation planes." "The SCOTUS ruling is a victory for the safety and security of the American people. The Biden Administration allowed millions of illegal aliens to flood our country, and, now, the Trump Administration can exercise its undisputed authority to remove these criminal illegal aliens and clean up this national security nightmare," she continued. Fire up the deportation planes. The SCOTUS ruling is a victory for the safety and security of the American people. The Biden Administration allowed millions of illegal aliens to flood our country, and, now, the Trump Administration can exercise its undisputed authority to remove…
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Trump Mocked for Being 'Grumpy' Over Israel and Iran Ceasefire Tensions: 'He is Desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize'
President Donald Trump is being mocked for his testy response to questions about tensions between Iran and Israel following the declaration of a ceasefire. Social media users are ridiculing President Donald Trump for his testy response to questions about tensions between Iran and Israel following the declaration of a ceasefire. The two nations agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire deal which was announced Monday night. However, the two nations reportedly launched attacks at one another just hours after the White House shared news of the agreement. When speaking to reporters in Washington, Trump expressed his vexation at both nations for their inability to maintain the ceasefire. "I'm not happy with [Israel]. I'm not happy with Iran either, but I'm really unhappy with Israel's going out this morning because of one rocket that didn't land that was shot, perhaps by mistake, that didn't land. I'm not happy about that," he told reporters. "We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing, do you understand that?" Trump continued. Social media users took to online platforms to mock the president's response, joking that his irritation stems from his diminishing chances at being awarded a Nobel Peace Prize as tensions between the two nations in the Middle East continue to escalate. "Someone woke up grumpy about not getting a Nobel peace prize," said one user. — Reese🇺🇸🐊 (@reeseonable) June 24, 2025 "'DO NOT DROP THOSE BOMBS!' Trump watching his Nobel Peace Prize dreams go up in smoke," joked another. "That just shows how mad he is... watching his coveted Nobel Peace Prize slip away again. It's exhausting," one user added. That just shows how mad he is… watching his coveted Nobel Peace Prize slip away again. It's exhausting. — Madeleine Bertrand 'Vive le Canada' (@Maddie7787) June 24, 2025 "He is desperate for a Nobel Peace Prize. THAT'S why he bombed Iran; to claim it created peace," one user claimed. "People whose survival may be at stake are interfering with him winning a fabulous prize," said another. People whose survival may be at stake are interfering with him winning a fabulous prize. — Mostly Stoic (@RussellGor25133) June 24, 2025 The president took to Truth Social on Friday to announce that he and Secretary of State Marco Rubio had brokered a peace deal between the Democratic Republic of the Congo and the Republic of Rwanda. However, his post was laden with complaints about not receiving the prestigious award despite his efforts, "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for this, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between India and Pakistan, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for stopping the War between Serbia and Kosovo," he wrote. "I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for keeping Peace between Egypt and Ethiopia (A massive Ethiopian built dam, stupidly financed by the United States of America, substantially reduces the water flowing into The Nile River), and I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize for doing the Abraham Accords in the Middle East which, if all goes well, will be loaded to the brim with additional Countries signing on, and will unify the Middle East for the first time in 'The Ages!'" he continued. "No, I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do, including Russia/Ukraine, and Israel/Iran, whatever those outcomes may be, but the people know, and that's all that matters to me!" he concluded. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Int'l Business Times
4 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Conservative Strategist Proclaims US Violates Other Countries' Sovereignty 'All the Time' in Defense of Trump's Iran Strikes
A conservative strategist declared that the U.S. violates the sovereignty of other countries "all the time" in defense of President Donald Trump's strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. The assertion came during a panel discussion on "CNN NewsNight" Monday night, where former White House spokesperson and political commentator Pete Seat praised the president's involvement in the war between Israel and Iran. "The Iranians do not speak the language of diplomacy unless force is used, and that is what President Trump and the United States used this past weekend in a precision, perfection way," Seat said. Cornel West, an activist and 2024 independent presidential candidate, then jumped in, arguing that the strikes were "illegal, unconstitutional." As Seat pushed back, West went on to say, "It is a violation of international law. You can't violate [the] national sovereignty of a country." "Why? We do it all the time," CNN political commentator and conservative strategist Scott Jennings responded. While West agreed that the U.S. "violates international law all the time," Jennings added, "Who's going to stop us?" The exchange stunned users online, with several calling the assertion "horrible" and "disgusting." "'We do it all the time' is not the flex Jennings thinks it is," one user commented . Another added , "This is absurd." "That was a real mask off moment," one user declared . Another wrote , "Spoken like a true entitled bully. Trump announced that Israel and Iran had agreed to a ceasefire Monday night after the two countries began hailing airstrikes at each other following an attack by Israel on June 13. Although the ceasefire remains intact, both countries have since accused each other of violating the agreement. Originally published on Latin Times
