&w=3840&q=100)
No relief yet for F-1 students as US plans new study visa termination rules
The United States government is preparing to introduce a new policy to govern the termination of SEVIS records, following lawsuits from international students over wrongful visa cancellations.
SEVIS, or the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System, is the database used to track compliance of international students with their visa conditions.
Court orders prompt action after student lawsuits
Last week, a federal judge in Georgia issued Temporary Restraining Orders (TROs) directing the reinstatement of SEVIS records for 133 students, including Indians, who claimed their visa status was wrongly terminated. The students, holding F-1 and M-1 visas, alleged that their SEVIS records were closed after law enforcement checks, often involving no criminal convictions or charges.
The sudden cancellations left students panicked and confused, with many unaware they were even under scrutiny.
A government lawyer later told a federal court in Oakland, California, that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) was reversing the terminations. In a statement read in court and emailed to lawyers, the government said it was working on a framework to guide SEVIS record terminations going forward.
'ICE is developing a policy that will provide a framework for SEVIS record terminations. Until such a policy is issued, the SEVIS records for plaintiff(s) in this case (and other similarly situated plaintiffs) will remain Active or shall be re-activated if not currently active and ICE will not modify the record solely based on the NCIC finding that resulted in the recent SEVIS record termination,' the statement read.
Brian Green, a lawyer representing one of the plaintiffs, said the government had confirmed the temporary protection would apply to all students in the same situation, not just those who filed lawsuits.
The NCIC, or National Crime Information Centre, is a database maintained by the FBI.
How the crackdown unfolded
According to an Associated Press review of university statements and court filings:
< At least 1,220 students across 187 institutions had visas revoked or legal status terminated since late March
< Some students left the country, others stopped attending classes, and a few went into hiding
< University officials often discovered the terminations during routine database checks
The US government's actions followed an announcement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio last month that his department was revoking visas of visitors acting against national interests. This included protesters against Israel's war in Gaza and individuals facing criminal charges.
However, many international students whose status was revoked said they did not fit into either category, or had only minor incidents on record.
Sheela Murthy, president and CEO of US-based Murthy Law Firm, told Business Standard there was little individual review behind the mass cancellations.
'Based on our understanding, the Department of Homeland Security took a shortcut of targeting anyone who had any type of incident or had their fingerprints taken or attended a court hearing,' said Murthy. 'They may have used AI to send out blanket visa revocations and SEVIS terminations without confirming if they were throwing the baby out with the bathwater.'
She added that most affected students either had no criminal record or had seen their cases dismissed. 'The revocations and terminations in those cases would be clearly incorrect and violate due process under US law,' she said.
According to experts, the damage could have been severe
Mamta Shekhawat, founder of study abroad platform Gradding.com, said the reinstatement offers students a much-needed reprieve.
'This victory served as a relief to the students who were struggling due to Trump's strict policies for SEVPs,' Shekhawat told Business Standard. 'The students can now continue their studies in the US without the disruption and uncertainty of cancellation.'
Shekhawat also warned about the potential consequences had the revocations not been reversed.
'There would have been severe consequences. Deportation is the most predictable. The students could have faced legal proceedings and lost the chance to complete their education in the US,' she said. 'That would mean an incomplete degree and serious difficulty in finding jobs, plus long-term visa challenges in over 100 countries.'
Murthy pointed out that families stood to lose both money and years of investment in education.
'Families could have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars and years of investment in a US education, all because of an error by the government,' said Murthy.
Uncertainty remains over permanent status
Legal experts say the reinstatements remain provisional until further court rulings are made.
'The reinstatements may not be a permanent fix at this time,' said Anna Stepanova, assistant managing attorney at Murthy Law Firm. 'It's a direct response to federal judges' TROs, which are still temporary until a final order is issued. Without that, students may also be blocked from changing status or applying for a green card in future.'
Murthy said she hopes the reinstatement allows students to move forward. 'The hope is that with the reinstatement, students will be able to continue their education, obtain F-1 OPT, and possibly pursue the STEM OPT later.'
Shekhawat advised students to stay vigilant about their SEVIS profiles.
'They should also regularly consult their Designated School Officials (DSOs) and follow the right procedures for changes like course drops or transfers,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'Menswear Guy' admits amid LA riots he's in US illegally, JD Vance responds with a GIF
JD Vance responds to popular fashion blogger Derek Guy who admitted that he is not in the US legally. Derek Guy, also known as Menswear Guy, who is well-known on X for his men's fashion tips and analysis, claimed on the social media platform that he came to the US from Canada as a child and never had any documentation. The long post detailing his family's migration from Canada to the US came as ICE raided several locations in Los Angeles arresting illegal aliens -- leading to riots. Social media users tagged Vice President JD Vance and alerted him about the illegal status of Deek Guy, to which the vice president responded with a GIF, suggesting that he would be deported. Derek Guy said there is a perception that millions of violent criminals are pouring across the border carrying drugs but not everyone falls in the same category. "My family escaped Vietnam after the Tet Offensive and went through an arduous journey that eventually landed them in Canada. My father worked there for a time as a janitor; my mother, a secretary. When work fell through, my dad was offered to work with his sister in the United States, so he went, as our family needed money. He ended up staying in the US longer than he was supposed to — not knowing immigration laws — and asked my mom to come be with him. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Good News: You May Be Richer Than You Think Undo Of course, she went and carried me over the border while I was still a baby," Derek Guy wrote. "I'm still unsure whether we technically broke an immigration law. The border between Canada and the United States was pretty porous (as it is today, for the most part). But either way, since I came here without legal documentation, I eventually fell into the category of being an undocumented immigrant. Yet, I've been in the United States since I was a baby. My identity and roots are very much based in this country, no different from anyone else. " The fashion blogger said there are millions of people like him living in the US whose parents might have crossed the border, not knowing about the law. "I think the ICE sweeps are inhumane. I support and admire the protestors who are putting their bodies on the line for non-violent resistance. Ultimately, I think we need to solve this issue on a systemic level. It's unreasonable to me to expect that the government will deport some 10-20 million people. Even deporting 1 million will cause an insane amount of chaos, not to mention an incredible amount of wasteful government spending," he wrote.


India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
Explained: Why Did Protests Erupt In Los Angeles? Who Sent The National Guard? What Triggered The Chaos?
Los Angeles (United States): The streets of Los Angeles turned tense over the past three days. Immigration raids sparked protests. Self-driving cars were set on fire. Tear gas filled the air. The National Guard arrived in riot gear. Why did it all start? Who sent in the troops? And what exactly happened? Here's a full breakdown of the events and timeline. The first signs of unrest appeared in the afternoon on June 6. Around 3:00 PM Pacific Time, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents carried out raids in Los Angeles. One major operation took place in the Fashion District, where ICE agents arrived at an apparel manufacturing unit. Protesters gathered quickly and tried to block two white vans that were believed to be transporting detained immigrants. Homeland Security officers arrived in riot gear and cleared the way. Later that day, other ICE raids happened in parking lots of Home Depot stores across the city. Protesters accused federal agents of targeting Latino neighbourhoods. By evening, hundreds of demonstrators rallied outside the Los Angeles Federal Building. Homeland Security officers fired pepper balls into the crowd. LAPD officers dispersed the group shortly after. More than 100 people were arrested, including David Huerta, head of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California. Officials said he blocked a federal vehicle and impeded law enforcement. On June 7 morning, demonstrations grew. In Paramount, about 20 miles south of downtown Los Angeles, protesters gathered near a Home Depot after hearing rumors of another ICE raid. Clashes broke out. Protesters kicked and threw items at law enforcement vehicles. Officers responded with tear gas. Later that afternoon, tensions rose. The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department ordered crowds to leave. They warned of arrests and use of force. Tear gas was fired again. In Compton, protests continued after dark. Officers used rubber bullets and flash-bangs. Protesters threw rocks, fireworks and glass bottles. Back in downtown L.A., demonstrators gathered outside the Metropolitan Detention Center. The LAPD declared an unlawful assembly and set up barriers. Around 6:00 PM, President Donald Trump signed a memo ordering 2,000 National Guard members to deploy in Los Angeles. The goal was to protect federal agents involved in immigration enforcement. He acted allegedly without approval from California Governor Gavin Newsom or Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. By early Sunday morning on June 8, about 20 National Guard troops had arrived at the Metropolitan Detention Center. By 10:30 AM, nearly 300 troops were stationed across three sites in Los Angeles. Over a dozen Homeland Security officers in riot gear joined them at the detention centre. By 1:00 PM, Guard members, ICE officers and Homeland Security agents formed a defensive line. They pushed protesters back using tear gas, pepper balls and other crowd-control weapons. Crowds spilled onto the southbound 101 Freeway, blocking traffic. The California Highway Patrol later cleared the road. On Alameda Street, protesters set fire to at least four self-driving Waymo cars. Thick black smoke rose above the buildings. The electric cars exploded as they burned. Trash bins were lit on fire. Windows were smashed. The LAPD Headquarters, U.S. Courthouse and the old Los Angeles Times building were vandalized. The police fired rubber bullets and declared another unlawful assembly by evening. Flash-bangs echoed through the streets. At 6:00 PM, most protesters had dispersed. A few remained near Alameda Street. Who Said What LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell said the department was overwhelmed. He added that the police were not told in advance about the federal raids. Under California's sanctuary law SB 54, the local police cannot assist federal immigration agents. Governor Gavin Newsom called the deployment of the Guard 'illegal and immoral'. He said President Trump had 'federalised the National Guard' without permission. Newsom vowed to sue. Mayor Karen Bass said the administration was provoking chaos, not ensuring safety. President Trump responded on Truth Social, telling LAPD to arrest protesters wearing face masks. He wrote on TruthSocial, 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth posted that Marines at Camp Pendleton were on high alert. He warned they would be mobilised if needed. When asked about when he would send in the Marines, Trump said, 'The bar is what I think it is.' Congresswoman Maxine Waters called the situation outrageous. She accused Trump of targeting sanctuary cities. She said he was trying to create conditions for martial law. Former Vice President Kamala Harris also spoke out. She called the National Guard deployment 'a dangerous escalation' and accused the administration of spreading panic. How This Compares to Past Events While the protests were violent, they did not reach the scale of the Rodney King riots or George Floyd protests of 2020. But the unilateral use of the National Guard marked a historic moment. The last time federal troops were sent without a governor's approval was in 1965, when President Lyndon B. Johnson sent troops to Alabama during a civil rights march.

The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
AIYF leaders demand cancellation of IPL matches due to negative impact on youth and rise in betting
CPI affiliated All India Youth Federation (AIYF) Visakhapatnam district unit leaders and activists have demanded cancellation of IPL cricket matches across the country as they are spoiling the lives of the youth, especially students. The latest incident in which 11 youths died due to a stampede in Bengaluru is an example of the commercial sports programme and its direct impact on the youth and their lives, the activists said. Speaking to reporters at the Gandhi statue here on Monday, AIYF district president Y. Rambabu and secretary Achyutharao said that corporate companies have spoiled cricket by luring players with money to create a special cricket division called IPL. It has become a business event of these corporate bigwigs. In the name of sports, these IPL owners are running a sports programme where the youth and students are targetted. The youth are addicted to this commercial entertainment programme, and suffer huge financial and career losses, they added. In those days, government authorities used to organise One Day International (ODI) matches between countries, and the players and matches were entirely from a particular country, so those players inspired Indians. But in the case of these IPL matches, there are rivalries with Indian players when they represent different IPL franchises. They lamented that this creates an unhealthy situation in the minds of the youth. More importantly, during IPL matches, the youth fall for cricket betting. They said that many middle-class people are suffering from this evil act.