Albuquerque mayor files complaint against city council over AFR staffing ordinance
ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (KRQE) – It was a highly debated bill addressing paramedic staffing within Albuquerque Fire Rescue, pitting the fire chief against the firefighters union and Albuquerque City Council. The bill passed but the fight against it isn't over as Mayor Tim Keller has taken it to the courts claiming the council overstepped its authority.
Story continues below
Crime: Sentencing begins for group involved in fatal drive-by shooting of 5-year-old
Entertainment: When will ski resorts in New Mexico, southern Colorado close for 2025?
Rankings: Where does this New Mexico town rank among the 2025 'Best Places to Live'?
After a heated and lengthy council meeting earlier this month, council voted 7-2 to pass R-25-122. The bill codified the current staffing requirement of having two paramedics on AFR rescue units. It came after AFR Chief Emily Jaramillo rolled out a pilot that would have a firefighter with basic EMT training take the place of one of the two fully-trained paramedics when responding to calls. The chief said this would allow at least one paramedic at more calls across the city and noted the department's challenge in recruiting paramedics.
Though the ordinance is now in place, its future could be uncertain. Instead of vetoing the bill, Mayor Tim Keller has filed a legal complaint against the council asking a court to at least put a pause on the ordinance.
It claims that after AFR leadership and the firefighters union, International Association of Fire Fighter 244, disagreed on that staffing change, the union conspired with city councilors to get their preference through legislation. The complaint claims this violated the city's Labor Management Rights Ordinance.
The complaint also accused city council of violating the separation of powers set forth by state and city law, by intruding on the executive branch's authority of determining staffing.
Personnel disputes need to be resolved by the labor board and through the courts, not by politicians including me. Until then, I'm confident our Fire Chief and our firefighters will keep doing what they do best, protecting our city and serving those in need.
Mayor Tim Keller
But in another statement tonight Councilor Dan Lewis, who was one of the sponsors of the bill along with Councilor Joaquin Baca, argued otherwise. The councilor maintained that the city charter grants council the power to 'adopt all ordinances conducive to the welfare of the people of Albuquerque,' and that this action was fully within that authority.
'While Mayor Tim Keller fights the International Association of Fire Fighters, the City Council is listening to the union and the paramedics in the field who are saving lives,' said Councilor Lewis in an emailed statement. 'Having two paramedics on a rescue unit increases the chances of someone surviving a heart attack or serious injuries from an automobile accident.'
There is no hearing date set yet on the complaint. Chief Jaramillo sat down with News 13's New Mexico News Insiders podcast. To listen to her in-depth interview on this issue, you can listen to the episode wherever you get your podcasts starting on March 25, 2025.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Would you live in Ohio for 3 years for $20,000 in college aid?
(Stock photo via Getty Images) Ohio Republican state senators are proposing $20,000 to top high school students to stay in state for their higher education — but there's a catch: You have to stay in Ohio for three years after graduating from college. Senior year of high school is all about decisions, ones that 17-year-old Michelle Huang is getting ready to make. 'Everyone around me is working on applying; everyone's thinking about college,' Huang said. 'It's on the top of our minds right now.' And like a lot of students, where she goes could be chosen in part by how much financial aid she gets — which Ohio Statehouse leaders are trying to address. 'We wanted to keep our best and brightest in Ohio,' Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, said. The Governor's Merit Scholarship was passed in the Ohio House budget. Already existing, this language would extend the proposal that gives the top 5% of each graduating high school class $5,000 a year to attend a public or private school in Ohio. But the Ohio Senate made some changes in their proposal, reducing the scholarship to the top 2% of students. McColley explains that now — that money has strings attached. 'If we want to keep them in Ohio, we should actually require them to stay in Ohio post-graduation,' the Senate president said. The scholarship recipients would be required to stay in Ohio after graduation for three years. If they didn't? 'There would be an expectation that that person would have to pay back a portion or all of the aid that they received,' McColley said. Both House GOP and Democratic leaders question how this would be enforceable. 'I assume we're not going to go across the state line to Detroit and try to drag somebody back,' Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman said, noting that it would be nearly 'impossible to implement.' This is also disappointing for Huang, who already had doubts about staying within Ohio. She is only planning to apply to one school in Ohio, she said. 'After Ohio Senate Bill 1, I think a lot of us are really, really considering going out of state for school,' the rising senior said. High school students reconsidering applying to Ohio universities due to new higher education law S.B. 1 was signed into law by Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine earlier this year. The new law bans diversity efforts, prohibits faculty strikes, and regulates classroom discussion of 'controversial' topics, among other things. The law applies to public universities and community colleges and is set to take effect this month. The elimination of DEI would mean no diversity offices, trainings or scholarships — including ones that Huang was hoping for. 'There are programs and there are topics that we'd be able to learn about and discuss about in other schools that we would otherwise not be able to here in Ohio,' she said. There are other ways that the state could retain graduates, she added. 'I think that the legislators should make sure that we're protecting the interests of young people by not writing bills that are upending our education system,' the high schooler said. The Ohio Senate passed its version of the state budget on Wednesday. The Ohio House and Senate will need to pass a compromise budget bill by July 1. Click here to learn more about the House's passed budget. Follow WEWS statehouse reporter Morgan Trau on X and Facebook. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Albuquerque RENT Ordinance fails in committee after landlord pushback
Jun. 11—An Albuquerque City Council committee on Wednesday voted down a proposed set of regulations intended to increase the power of renters and comprehensively regulate landlords after the latter expressed concern that the bill was an overreach and would negatively affect the rental market. The bill died after 3-2 vote in the Land Use, Planning, and Zoning Committee. But Shanna Schultz, policy and government affairs administrator for the city, who wrote the bill on behalf of Mayor Tim Keller, left open the possibility of another similar bill in the future. "I understand the intent of this bill. But I also think there are a lot of unintended consequences," said Councilor Renée Grout. In its original form, the Renter's Empowerment and Neighborhood Transparency (RENT) Ordinance would've affected almost every element of the renting experience, from signing a lease to evictions and deposits. The RENT Ordinance sought to give renters more power over their landlords, according to Councilor Tammy Fiebelkorn, who sponsored the bill on behalf of the mayor's office. The measure, styled as a "Renters Bill of Rights," comes as the council has required landlords to provide cooling to tenants and created a code enforcement position dedicated to tenant-landlord issues. It also comes as the city faces an escalating housing crisis. Some of the bill's most notable changes aimed to enhance transparency. The RENT Ordinance would've required landlords to disclose all costs associated with a rental agreement in clear, straightforward language in their published listings. This included any information from a background check that might disqualify an applicant, as well as minimum credit score and income requirements. Another notable part of the RENT Ordinance would have eliminated pet rent. Landlords could accept a pet deposit of up to $150. The RENT Ordinance drew support from some renters and housing advocates, including OLÉ New Mexico. They said the ordinance would hold bad landlords accountable and improve the living conditions of renters, who make up about 44% of Albuquerque residents, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. The bill also drew concern from landlords, some realtors, and property management companies. They argued the ordinance infringed on property rights, increased their liability since tenants could deduct repair costs from rent payments in some instances, and would lead to higher rents. Ultimately, Fiebelkorn was joined by Councilor Nichole Rogers in trying to keep the bill alive. Councilors Dan Champine and Brook Bassan joined Grout in voting to end the bill.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Senate, House each passed their ideal budget; What's next?
Jun. 11—An Ohio Senate vote this week finalized its two-year state spending plan that would, among many other things, create a flat 2.75% income tax; push funds to higher performing school districts; and use Ohioans' unclaimed funds to partially fund a new Cleveland Browns stadium. The 23-to-10 Senate vote Wednesday and the subsequent 84-to-1 House vote not to concur with the Senate's changes set up a so-called conference committee — a negotiation between hand-picked members of each chamber that caps off nearly every operating budget process. "This is tradition with budgets with limited exceptions," Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told this outlet. "It's usually just the standard process of getting together, working out the differences and figuring out where we're going to end up for the final version." Whatever compromise the GOP-dominated House and Senate chambers agree on then has to be sent to Ohio's Republican governor, who wields line-item veto power and can cross out provisions he doesn't like. Most of the negotiation happens behind closed doors and out of public view, but the major points of contention heading into this conference committee are fairly obvious. Highlights from the Senate's now-confirmed plan compared to the House's plan include: — Creating a flat, 2.75% income tax rate for all Ohioans who earn more than $26,050 annually. The proposal eliminates Ohio's highest tax bracket for earners pulling over $100,000 per year, eliminating over a billion dollars in state tax revenue over a two-year period. — Expanding access to Ohio's "homestead exemption" property tax relief program by increasing the income threshold from $40,000 to $42,000 and allowing slightly more of a qualifying participants' home value to be tax exempt. — Granting county budget commissions the authority to reduce property tax millage "if the commission finds it reasonably necessary or prudent to avoid unnecessary, excessive, or unneeded property tax collections." — Eliminating replacement and substitute property tax levies. — Capping a school district's financial reserves at 50% of the prior year's operating expenses, as opposed to the House-proposed 30% carryover cap. General funds in excess of that 50% cap would then be portioned back out to the property taxpayers of that district. — Directing $600 million of the state's $3.7 billion in unclaimed funds to the Cleveland Browns' new stadium project instead of issuing public bonds as the House proposed. — Requiring school boards to obtain a 2/3 vote from members before putting a property tax levy on the ballot. — Adding $633.9 million more to the state's K-12 public schools than the current biennium, phased in largely through new "performance-based" incentives that will reward high-performing and improving districts with more cash. — Establishing a $100 million set-aside to potentially withhold from state universities that do not come under compliance of the newly-passed Senate Bill 1, which eliminates university-sanctioned diversity, equity and inclusion programs on public campuses. Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, told reporters Wednesday that the Senate's school funding plan and flat tax rate will likely be central points of internal discussion as his caucus prepares for negotiations. "We'll have the next two-plus weeks to deal with it," Huffman said. "Our staff and some of the leadership and other folks are set to spend the weekend reviewing these items, so I think there's already discussions going on among a variety of people in different areas about what we may do." But, Huffman said he overall believes that the House and the Senate aren't too far apart on the big stuff — he likes the idea of a flat tax, he's framed the Senate's idea on using unclaimed funds to help the Browns as clever — but pointed to "a lot of very basic policy differences" within the disparate proposals. When asked about his non-negotiables, McColley said he didn't want to reveal too much. "But we're firm believers in some of the big items. The flat tax is something that we feel pretty strongly about," McColley said. "That would be something we're pretty committed to, hopefully we don't get a lot of push back. But other than that, we'll let the process play out." Asked about his non-negotiables, Huffman told reporters, "I'd like to tell you that there is nothing that's non-negotiable, even if somebody says it's non-negotiable."
