
Loss of data relating to inquiry at NHS trust most likely deliberate, say police
A missing data file containing the details of hundreds of maternity cases was most likely deleted 'intentionally or maliciously', a police investigation has concluded.
Nottinghamshire police began an investigation in February into the temporary loss of the computer file at Nottingham University Hospitals (NUH) NHS trust.
The trust is at the centre of the largest maternity inquiry in the history of the NHS, examining deaths and harm spanning more than a decade at the Queen's Medical Centre and Nottingham city hospital.
The police force's cyber team said the deletion was 'most likely to be the action of an individual' but the loss 'was not caused or contributed to by any systemic corruption within NUH'.
A letter to families involved in the inquiry, seen by the BBC, from assistant chief constable Rob Griffin said the deletion was 'most likely to have been done intentionally/maliciously rather than accidentally'.
Police said the identity of the culprit could not be determined.
The trust previously said the computer file went missing in July 2024 for a few days. It was recovered after its deletion was spotted by the trust and led to about 300 more cases being added to the maternity inquiry.
Nearly 2,500 cases are being examined by the senior midwife, Donna Ockenden, and a national team of leading doctors and midwives, whose review is due to conclude in summer 2026.
A statement from the Nottingham Affected Families Group said: 'Nottingham families would like to thank the police for their determined investigation. We are distressed that they were unable to find who did this.
'We are appalled to hear this news, though sadly we are not surprised … To know that there is most likely an individual who is capable of such behaviour is devastating for the already harmed and for the future of NUH safety.
'We call for openness at this worrying time and for the individual, their colleagues or anyone who knows anything about this to come forwards as a matter of urgency. This is a patient safety emergency.'
Anthony May, chief executive of NUH, said: 'I would like to thank Nottinghamshire police for their support in investigating this matter and we accept their findings. Upon discovering the issue, the trust informed Nottinghamshire police and engaged fully in the investigation.
'We have put appropriate measures in place to secure digital files so that this cannot happen again.'
Last week, Nottinghamshire police said they were investigating possible corporate manslaughter at the trust over the deaths and severe harm of more than 2,000 babies and women.
Det Supt Matthew Croome said at the time that the alleged offences related to 'circumstances where an organisation has been grossly negligent in the management of its activities, which has then led to a person's death'.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
West Mercia Police officer banned for 'vulgar' comments
A gross misconduct hearing has upheld allegations that a male police officer engaged in inappropriate behaviour repeatedly towards female colleagues. PC Nathan Rogers would have been dismissed from West Mercia Police if he had not already resigned, the force said after the hearing on Tuesday. Mr Rogers made "highly offensive" and "vulgar" comments as well as initiating unwanted contact through social media - with his behaviour deemed "derogatory" and "harassing in nature". The former officer, who was based in the Operations and Communications Centre in Worcestershire, will be banned from working for a UK police service in the future. The hearing upheld an allegation that his behaviour, between June 2023 and May 2025, amounted to gross Mercia Police said his conduct was first formally addressed in June 2023, when he was sanctioned with a written warning. The force said despite both informal and formal interventions he continued to breach policing standards of professional behaviour. It said: "Despite prior disciplinary measures, Rogers repeatedly failed to uphold professional standards, showing a blatant disregard for his colleagues and for the values of the force. "The hearing found his actions breached the standards of authority, respect, and courtesy, and amounted to discreditable conduct."Mr Rogers resigned from the force in April Chief Constable Rachel Jones said: "Nathan Rogers was given opportunities to learn and change his behaviour, but he continued to act in a wholly unacceptable and unprofessional manner."His actions were highly unprofessional and undoubtedly made his female colleagues feel deeply uncomfortable and such behaviour will not be tolerated."He will now be added to the College of Policing's barred list, banning him from working for a UK police service in the future. Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.


BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Several US Jolly rancher sweets unsafe to eat, FSA says
A number of products from a brand of US sweets are "unsafe to eat" and contain ingredients which could increase the risk of cancer and cause damage to DNA, the Food Standards Agency (FSA) has businesses and consumers are being urged to stop buying and selling the Jolly Ranchers products, owned by US company FSA says they contain chemical compounds - mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH) and mineral oil saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) - which are "not compliant with UK laws".The products pose a safety risk if consumed regularly over time but there is "no immediate cause for concern, as [the] food safety risk is low", the agency adds. In a food alert published on Wednesday evening, the FSA said: "MOAH can cause damage to DNA and has the potential to increase the risk of cancer, particularly if consumed in high quantities over a prolonged period of time."MOAH is a genotoxic carcinogen, therefore no exposure is without risk to human health."MOAH and MOSH are used in confectionary to prevent stickiness and create a glossy to the agency, The Hershey Company has been working with the UK government body to remove the affected Jolly Rancher products from the UK market since 2024, but some businesses in Britain have continued to import the affected products are: Jolly Rancher Hard Candy, Jolly Rancher 'Misfits' Gummies, Jolly Rancher Hard Candy Fruity 2 in 1, and Jolly Ranchers Berry food agency is advising people who have any of the listed products to not eat them and dispose of them at home. If consumers have any concerns, they are being asked to notify the Trading Standards department or environmental health department in the local authority they made the purchase agency said it was asking enforcement authorities to make "immediate contact" with businesses which had been supplied with or received any of the products, and take action to ensure they were withdrawn from the market.


The Independent
42 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ryanair introduces £500 fines for disruptive passengers
Disruptive Ryanair passengers removed from planes will be fined £500, the airline has announced. The carrier said this will be the 'minimum' punishment, and it will continue to pursue passengers for civil damages. Ryanair expressed hope the new policy will 'act as a deterrent to eliminate this unacceptable behaviour'. A spokesperson for the airline said: 'It is unacceptable that passengers are made to suffer unnecessary disruption because of one unruly passenger's behaviour. 'To help ensure that our passengers and crew travel in a comfortable and stress-free environment, without unnecessary disruption caused by a tiny number of unruly passengers, we have introduced a £500 fine, which will be issued to any passengers offloaded from aircraft as a result of their misconduct. 'While these are isolated events which happen across all airlines, disruptive behaviour in such a confined shared space is unacceptable.'