
Is Trump's Greenland plan part of a scramble for the Arctic?
United States President Donald Trump has iterated his ambitions to acquire Greenland ahead of a visit to the semi-autonomous Danish territory by his vice president, JD Vance.
'We need Greenland for international safety and security. We need it. We have to have it,' Trump said in an interview on Wednesday.
He also told reporters at the White House: 'We need Greenland. And the world needs us to have Greenland, including Denmark,' adding that the US will go 'as far as we have to go.'
His comments prompted anger in Greenland where there have long been calls for full independence from Denmark. Now, 85 percent of the Arctic territory's population has also expressed opposition to coming under Washington's rule.
Trump's ambitions have been noted elsewhere as well.
On Thursday, Russian President Vladimir Putin responded to Trump's comments, saying his desire for Greenland is unsurprising and rooted in history.
Putin explained that the US has long coveted the mineral-rich Arctic region, amid a global scramble for the resources.
Here is more about the Arctic scramble, and why Greenland is significant:
During an address at the International Arctic Forum in the Russian city of Murmansk, the largest city within the Arctic circle, Putin said he believes Trump is serious about taking Greenland and the US will continue with efforts to acquire it.
'It can look surprising only at first glance and it would be wrong to believe that this is some sort of extravagant talk by the current US administration,' said Putin, adding that it is obvious the US will continue to 'systematically advance its geostrategic, military-political and economic interests in the Arctic'.
Putin also expressed concerns about Russia's neighbours, Finland and Sweden, joining NATO, the transatlantic military alliance between North America and Europe. Finland joined NATO in 2023 and Sweden joined in 2024.
'Russia has never threatened anyone in the Arctic, but we will closely follow the developments and mount an appropriate response by increasing our military capability and modernising military infrastructure,' Putin said.
He added that Russia is 'open' to cooperating with foreign partners in the Arctic.
'The stronger our positions will be, the more significant the results will be and the broader opportunities we will have to launch international projects in the Arctic involving the countries that are friendly to us, and, possibly, Western countries if they show interest in joint work.'
US Vice President JD Vance and his wife, Usha Vance, are set to touch down in Greenland on Friday.
They will be accompanied by White House National Security Advisor Mike Waltz and US Secretary of Energy Chris Wright to the US's Pituffik Space Base in northwestern Greenland 'to receive a briefing on Arctic security issues and meet with US service members', according to a statement released by Vance's office.
Greenland's acting head of government, Mute Egede wrote in an online post on Monday that Greenland had not in fact extended any invitation for an official or private visit.
'The present government is a caretaker government awaiting the formation of a new government coalition and we have kindly requested all countries to respect this process,' the post read.
Following this, the Vances changed the itinerary of their trip. While Usha Vance was initially supposed to visit the Avannaata Qimussersu dogsled race in Sisimiut, the couple will now visit the US base only.
This change of plan was welcomed by Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen who told Danish public radio DR: 'I actually think it's very positive that the Americans are cancelling their visit to Greenlandic society. Instead, they will visit their own base, Pituffik, and we have nothing against that.'
However, Trump's comments in advance of his vice president's trip have been met with apprehension in both Denmark and Greenland.
Denmark's Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen told Danish broadcasters on Tuesday: 'I have to say that it is unacceptable pressure being placed on Greenland and Denmark in this situation. And it is pressure that we will resist.
'President Trump is serious. He wants Greenland. Therefore, [this visit] cannot be seen independently of anything else.'
Since Trump's inauguration on January 20, he has repeatedly stated that he wants to acquire Greenland, saying that it is critical for US national security.
Greenland is a semi-autonomous Danish territory situated between the Arctic Ocean and the North Atlantic Ocean. The island is a former Danish colony.
Geographically, it is part of North America; its capital Nuuk is closer to New York (some 2,900km or 1,800 miles) than to the Danish capital, Copenhagen, which is located 3,500km (2,174 miles) to the east.
Its location, offering the shortest route from North America to Europe, is seen as strategic for the US. It would give Washington leverage for its military and its ballistic missile early-warning system.
The US is also interested in placing radars in the waters that connect Greenland, Iceland and the United Kingdom. These waters are a gateway for Russian and Chinese ships, which the US wants to track.
Greenland is also rich in natural resources, including rare earth minerals which are used for the manufacture of technology. A 2023 survey showed that 25 of 34 minerals deemed 'critical raw materials' by the European Commission could be found in Greenland.
Most of Greenland's population of 56,000 residents comprise Indigenous Inuit people who oppose the mining of oil and gas, however.
Trump is not the first US leader to covet the island; the US has long expressed interest in Greenland.
In 1867, US Secretary of State William H Seward tried to negotiate with Russia to buy Greenland after the US bought Alaska from Russia. However, the attempt was not successful. When Greenland was still a Danish colony, in 1946, US President Harry S Truman proposed buying the island, an offer Denmark refused.
As the planet warms due to climate change, the vast untapped resources of the Arctic are becoming more accessible. Countries like the US, Canada, China and Russia are now eyeing these resources.
In December 2024, Canada released a policy document detailing plans to ramp up its military and diplomatic presence in the Arctic. Russia is also constructing military installations and power plants in the region.
Meanwhile, Russia and China have been working together to develop Arctic shipping routes as Moscow seeks to deliver more oil and gas to China amid Western sanctions while Beijing seeks an alternative shipping route to reduce its dependence on the Strait of Malacca.
The Northern Sea Route (NSR), a maritime route in the Arctic Ocean, is becoming easier to navigate due to melting ice. The NSR can cut shipping trips significantly short. Russia is hoping to ramp up commerce through the NSR to trade more with Asia than Europe due to Western sanctions. Last year, the number of oil shipments from Russia to China via the NSR rose by a quarter.
China is also probing the region, and has sent 10 scientific expeditions to the Arctic and built research vessels to survey the icy waters north of Russia.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Qatar Tribune
8 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Qatar's International Media Office warns against fabricated reports in Israeli media
DOHA: Fabricated documents are once again circulating in the Israeli media in an attempt to sow tension and division between Qatar and the United States at a crucial stage in our efforts to mediate a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, said the International Media Office of the State of Qatar. In a press statement, the Media Office said that the timing of their release is no coincidence. 'It is a deliberate distraction, deployed by those who want to deflect attention from negative coverage of their own irresponsible actions in Gaza – including those reported in the news over the past week – at a moment when a breakthrough is within reach,' it said. 'This tactic has been used previously by those who want diplomacy to fail. They do not want Qatar's work with the Trump administration – on the Gaza file and other regional files – to succeed in bringing peace to the region. 'Similar methods have been used against those who have spoken out against the continuation of the war, or worked diplomatically to bring the hostages home including members of President Trump's administration, in an effort to discredit them and undermine the diplomatic process.' 'Their efforts will not succeed. No fabricated documents will weaken the bond between Qatar and the United States,' added the statement. The Media Office also urged all media outlets to remain vigilant against misinformation spread by those who want to disrupt the negotiations by any means necessary in order to prolong the conflict.


Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Trump to ‘activate' Marines to respond to LA protests in major escalation
The Pentagon will send a Marine battalion to Los Angeles in a major escalation of US President Donald Trump's response to anti-immigration enforcement protests, the United States military has said. The statement on Monday confirmed the 'activation' of 700 Marines to help protect federal personnel and property in the California city, where Trump had deployed the US National Guard a day earlier. The update came despite opposition from state officials, including California's Governor Gavin Newsom, who had earlier mounted a legal challenge to the deployment of the National Guard troops. In a statement, the military said the 'activation of the Marines' was meant to help 'provide continuous coverage of the area in support of the lead federal agency'. Speaking to the Reuters news agency, an unnamed Trump administration official said the soldiers would be acting only in support of the National Guard and other law enforcement. The official said that Trump was not yet invoking the Insurrection Act of 1807, which would suspend legal limitations that block the military from taking part in domestic law enforcement. Speaking shortly before the reports emerged, Trump said he was open to deploying Marines to Los Angeles, but said protests in the city were 'heading in the right direction'. 'We'll see what happens,' he said. Reporting from Los Angeles, Al Jazeera's Rob Reynolds said protests on Monday organised in the city centre by union groups were peaceful. He noted that the National Guard which Trump had deployed to the city on Sunday played a minimal role in responding to the protests, only guarding federal buildings. That raised questions over why the Trump administration would feel a Marine deployment was needed. '[The National Guard] didn't engage with the protesters. They didn't do much of anything other than stand there in their military uniforms,' Reynolds said. He added that there is an important distinction between the National Guard, a state-based military force usually composed of part-time reserves, and the more combat-forward Marines, which are the land force of the US Navy. 'Now the Marines, this is a whole different thing. The United States sends Marines overseas where US imperialist interests are at stake, but not to cities in the United States,' he said. California Governor Newsom's office, meanwhile, said that according to the information it had received, the Marines were only being transferred to a base closer to Los Angeles, and not technically being deployed onto the streets. Still, it said the 'level of escalation is completely unwarranted, uncalled for, and unprecedented – mobilising the best in class branch of the US military against its own citizens'. The updates on Monday came shortly after Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state had filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's decision to deploy the National Guard to Los Angeles. Newsom has maintained that local law enforcement had the capacity to respond to protests over US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids in Los Angeles and the nearby city of Paramount that first broke out on Friday. The Democratic state leader accused Trump of escalating the situation, saying in a statement that the president was 'creating fear and terror by failing to adhere to the US Constitution and overstepping his authority'. 'This is a manufactured crisis to allow him to take over a state militia, damaging the very foundation of our republic,' Newsom said. The California lawsuit argues that the legal authority Trump invoked to deploy the National Guard requires the consent of the state's governor, which Newsom did not provide. For his part, Trump indicated he would support Newsom being arrested for impeding immigration enforcement, responding to an earlier threat from the president's border czar, Tom Homan. Trump's response to the protests represented the first time since 1965 that a president deployed the National Guard against the will of a state governor. At the time, President Lyndon B Johnson did so to protect civil rights demonstrators in Alabama. Protests against Trump's crackdown – as well as his overall immigration policy – continued on Monday. Standing in front of Ambiance Apparel in Los Angeles, one of the sites raided by ICE agents last week, Indigenous community leader Perla Rios spoke alongside family members of individuals detained by immigration agents. Rios called for due process and legal representation for those taken into detention. 'What our families are experiencing is simply a nightmare,' Rios said. Meanwhile, the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) called for protests in cities across the country over the Trump administration's response to demonstrations, which included the arrest of the union's California president David Huerta. Huerta was detained on Friday during immigration raids and charged with conspiracy to impede an officer during immigration enforcement operations. 'From Massachusetts to California, we call for his immediate release and for an end to ICE raids that are tearing our communities apart,' the SEIU said in a statement. Protesters also gathered in New York and Los Angeles in response to Trump's latest ban on travellers from 12 countries, a policy critics have decried as racist. Speaking at a protest in New York City on Monday, Murad Awawdeh, president of the New York Immigration Coalition, said the policy was 'a continuation of the Muslim and travel ban under the first Trump administration, which separated families and harmed our communities'. The policy, he said, was creating 'an immense amount of fear'.


Qatar Tribune
10 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Trump travel ban on 12 countries comes into effect
dpa Washington A travel ban on 12 countries by US President Donald Trump has come into force. According to a White House statement, the regulation came into effect early on Monday (0401 GMT). Trump announced the ban on Wednesday, saying that he 'must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people.' The ban fully restricts the entry of nationals from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. Those from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela will be partially restricted, Trump's proclamation adds. A fact sheet issued by the White House stated that some of the named countries had 'inadequate screening and vetting processes, hindering America's ability to identify potential security threats before entry.' Other countries 'exhibit high visa overstay rates,' or did not cooperate in sharing identity and threat information, it added. Trump placed travel restrictions on a group of predominantly Muslim nations as one of his first presidential acts after he first took office in 2017. Several federal courts tried to block the ban, before the Supreme Court ruled in 2018 that it was 'squarely within the scope of Presidential authority.'