logo
Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned

Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned

UPI3 hours ago

Kim Yeong-hee works at a Homeplus Geumcheon branch. Late last week, MBK vowed to write off its entire stake in Home Plus to facilitate the company's corporate rehabilitation process.File photo by Jeon Heoo-Kyun/EPA-EFE
SEOUL, June 20 (UPI) -- Michael Byungju Kim, who worked at Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group, founded MBK Partners in 2005. Over the next two decades, he built it into one of Asia's leading private equity funds through aggressive mergers and acquisitions. It now manages up to $30 billion in assets.
However, Chairman Kim and MBK face challenges, because of its major investments in Home Plus, South Korea's No. 2 discount chain, and Lotte Card, the country's fifth-largest card issuer. This prompts experts to question the business model of the buyout fund.
Late last week, MBK vowed to write off its entire stake in Home Plus to facilitate the company's corporate rehabilitation process. The firm stated that "All $1.8 billion worth of common shares held by MBK in Home Plus will be canceled without compensation."
This means that MBK is ready to walk away from the Home Plus investment empty-handed, although it poured billions of dollars to take over the supermarket chain.
In 2015, MBK acquired Home Plus from Tesco in a $5.1 billion deal financed through a combination of equity and debt. But the rise of e-commerce and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic severely undermined its performance.
Since 2021, Home Plus has reported losses for four consecutive years, and its debt-to-equity ratio surged to nearly 500% this year. It filed for corporate rehabilitation in March, and MBK eventually decided to relinquish all management rights and claims while receiving nothing in return.
Yet, MBK is under pressure to do more, as the National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik noted during his visit to a Home Plus outlet in Seoul on Wednesday. He accused MBK of showing an irresponsible stance.
"The livelihoods of some 100,000 people, who are directly and indirectly employed by Home Plus, are now at risk. The damage is already severe," Woo wrote on social media.
"Even after initiating rehabilitation procedures, MBK failed to assume responsibility, instead shifting the burden to workers and merchants through delayed payments, asset sales, and store closures," he added.
Woo hinted at potential legislative action, including a parliamentary hearing and new regulations targeting private equity funds.
Lotte Card up for grabs
There are other crucial tasks for MBK and its Chairman Kim, particularly regarding Lotte Card. In 2019, MBK partnered with Woori Bank to channel $1 billion for a 79.8% interest on Lotte Card. MBK holds 59.8% and Woori has the remaining 20%.
MBK tried to sell its stake in Lotte Card in 2023, but failed. The fund strives to divest its stake once again by reportedly sending teaser letters to multiple potential bidders, including Hana Financial Group, last month. UBS is managing the sales, with preliminary bids expected to open as early as mid-July.
It remains to be seen whether MBK will be able to dispose of Lotte Card this time. But the sale price is predicted to go down due to the recent setbacks of the company.
Lotte Card's net profit for 2024 more than halved to $100 million compared to $269 million in 2023. During the first quarter of 2025, it netted $10 million in profit, down 42.4% from a year before.
Two years ago, MBK reportedly hoped to secure at least $2.2 billion for its stake, but the price is feared to decrease substantially now, which may significantly reduce MBK's potential profit.
"MBK's business model has been very successful over the past 20 years as shown by the fact that its founder Kim has become the wealthiest man in the country," Seoul-based consultancy Leaders Index CEO Park Ju-gun told UPI.
"But, its business model is now being put to the test. The company would have to worry about its damaged reputation and growing political momentum for regulating private equity funds," he added.
In the 2025 Forbes billionaire list, Kim was second to none among South Koreans with $9.5 billion in wealth, surpassing $8.2 billion of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong.
Park expected that the country's unicameral parliament might introduce an act curbing highly leveraged buyouts and banning private equity funds from directly managing companies after acquisition.
Seo Yong-gu, a professor of business administration at Sookmyung Women's University, echoed the concerns, although he opposed excessive regulations.
"MBK has played a key role in developing Korea's capital market. But buyout funds have often been criticized for seeking short-term gains at the cost of long-term growth for a fast exit. We may need a reform," he said in a phone interview.
"Highly leveraged acquisitions are also problematic. Still, I am against the idea of prohibiting private equity funds from managing their portfolio firms. It would fundamentally deny the very essence of the business," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

A Florida Home Has Been Sitting On The Market For Over 200 Days. After Several Price Cuts, The Seller Feels 'Like It's Never Going To Sell'
A Florida Home Has Been Sitting On The Market For Over 200 Days. After Several Price Cuts, The Seller Feels 'Like It's Never Going To Sell'

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

A Florida Home Has Been Sitting On The Market For Over 200 Days. After Several Price Cuts, The Seller Feels 'Like It's Never Going To Sell'

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. More than 200 days have passed since a 2,500-square-foot pool home just north of Tampa, Florida, went up for sale. Despite multiple price cuts, the seller still hasn't found a buyer. 'I feel like it's never going to sell,' the homeowner wrote in a recent Reddit post that's drawn hundreds of replies. Originally listed at $525,000, the home is now priced at $470,000. It's located in Spring Hill, a small town about 50 miles north of Tampa. Many commenters pointed out that homes in that area are going for much less. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Peter Thiel turned $1,700 into $5 billion—now accredited investors are eyeing this software company with similar breakout potential. Learn how you can 'At $470,000 you are well over the median home price by over 150k,' one person said, referencing Zillow data. Another added, 'No one with a under 55 would be so far away from anything.' Others were blunt: 'If it's not selling for 200 days, the price is too high,' said one of the most upvoted responses. Another simply put it: 'It's not some magic solution, it's always the price.' Florida's housing market has been under pressure. High property insurance, limited availability of coverage, and recent changes to Federal Emergency Management Agency support have made it harder to sell. 'Florida is not attractive to buyers right now,' one commenter wrote. 'High insurance and interest rates ruined the market. It's not your fault.' Spring Hill, in particular, has been described as oversaturated. The seller agreed: 'Very over-saturated market where I'm at unfortunately.' 'There are literally hundreds of posts asking why a house won't sell. Short answer: it's not 2022 anymore,' one user commented. 'House values are on a decline in many areas.' Trending: , which provides access to a pool of short-term loans backed by residential real estate with just a $100 minimum. The home was purchased about four years ago, during the peak of the COVID-era housing frenzy. Several users mentioned that homes bought during 2020–2022 were often overvalued. 'You bought in '21 while the Tampa Bay Area (and FL generally) market was going hyperbolic,' one person wrote. 'You're now selling after 4 years of continuous homeowner insurance hikes.' Another person noted, 'Most who bought between 2020-2022 that are trying to sell now would not make money.' The homeowner admitted the situation is frustrating and financially stressful. 'I am going to lose money on it,' they wrote. Several people shared similar experiences. One person said they took a huge loss on a house in Arizona after sitting on the market for 150 days. 'You just gotta accept it or your cost to carry is going to kill you,' they said. Another repeated that view: 'Acceptance that you'll be in financial loss is the first step towards financial freedom. Drop the price.'Advice in the thread leaned toward realism. Suggestions ranged from cutting the price drastically to taking the house off the market and relisting later, or renting it out until the market recovers. 'Everything will sell. Just not everything sells at the price we list them,' one person noted. A real estate photographer added another perspective: 'There definitely comes a point in a listing where the number of days on the market becomes a critical issue and reducing the price only makes things worse, not better.' Others encouraged the seller to reset the listing and change agents. 'Take it down off the market. Hire a new agent... maybe get professional staging, get some new photographs,' one person suggested. Many believe that waiting could make things worse. 'You're going to take a bit of a loss, but if you wait another 200 days, how much more will you lose? Is the time and headache worth a few extra grand?' one Redditor asked. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to .This article A Florida Home Has Been Sitting On The Market For Over 200 Days. After Several Price Cuts, The Seller Feels 'Like It's Never Going To Sell' originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

IKEA suddenly closing more stores amid concerning customer trend
IKEA suddenly closing more stores amid concerning customer trend

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

IKEA suddenly closing more stores amid concerning customer trend

It's not exactly the prettiest time to be a retailer right now. The past five years have wrought seemingly irreversible damage to even the strongest retail brands. Related: Huge retail chain suddenly closing 100s of stores, no bankruptcy Covid, which swept the U.S. in early 2020, forced many people into their homes for prolonged periods of time. Suddenly, very few of us were driving to an office every day, going out to restaurants, concerts, or sports events. The world screeched to a halt. And this had outsized effects on the economy. With fewer of us driving around or commuting, demand for everything from gasoline to button-down shirts decreased. As Covid wore on, we adapted to these changes. More people opted for loungewear and traded cars for walks around the block. More of us made coffee at home, prepared meals at home, and ordered a lot of our necessities from the comfort of our couch. Customer behavior patterns have changed forever, and retail chains have been forced to follow the money. That means trying to meet customers where they are. And, increasingly, that is online. Image source: Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images Before the pandemic, some of the most popular brick-and-mortar stores were furniture and home decor chains. Whether they were planning a new space, welcoming a new family member, or simply needed a furniture upgrade, many people spent the weekend traipsing through a showroom. More closings: Popular local Dairy Queen rival suddenly closing, no bankruptcyAnother big Mexican chain closing down restaurant, no bankruptcyUPS suddenly closing more stores amid chaotic new change, layoffsPopular fast-food burger chain closes all restaurants in key area And, largely, these showrooms were considered necessary and convenient. They'd allow folks to test out everything, from dining room tables to nursery chairs to mattresses. But when Covid struck, most of these stores closed down. So people adapted. They opted to shop instead at online retailers, like Wayfair. Fast shipping and easy returns helped to reduce friction to the online furniture world, so taking a risk on a pricey item became less daunting. Of course, this hurt many brick-and-mortar operations, and many have been forced to reduce their footprints as our online shopping habit sticks around. But some retail chains seem to defy the odds. IKEA, the Swedish chain known for discount furniture and reliable quality (if you have patience for the assembly instructions), has been growing steadily over the years. Customers enjoy winding through the massive, warehouse-style stores and often drive hours just to access the closest one. IKEA has rolled out a new concept, called the Plan & Order Point, which allows more distant customers to come into a smaller-format location to plan out rooms, such as the living area or bathroom. Related: Whole Foods suddenly closing down another grocery store forever These stores, which are often located in urban areas and range in size from 3,000 to 15,000 square feet, don't function as physical stores where a customer can purchase and carry out inventory immediately. Instead, they can chat with specialists and plan out future purchases. But IKEA has announced it will shut down three Plan & Order Point stores - two locations in England and one in Long Beach, Calif. They are located at: Aintree, Liverpool, UKMerseyway Shopping Centre, Stockport, UKLong Beach, Calif., U.S. "There has been an increased demand for Click and Collect services, a desire to shop a smaller selection of home furnishing accessories, as well as the ability to return goods to physical IKEA units, something which, owing to the space available, the current location is unable to offer," a spokesperson for IKEA said of the UK closures. All are slated to close in June 2025. IKEA is, however, planning to open several Plan & Order Point locations in 2025 and 2026, especially around the U.S. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned
Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned

Miami Herald

time2 hours ago

  • Miami Herald

Analysis: Business model of Asia's top private equity fund questioned

SEOUL, June 20 (UPI) -- Michael Byungju Kim, who worked at Goldman Sachs and the Carlyle Group, founded MBK Partners in 2005. Over the next two decades, he built it into one of Asia's leading private equity funds through aggressive mergers and acquisitions. It now manages up to $30 billion in assets. However, Chairman Kim and MBK face challenges, because of its major investments in Home Plus, South Korea's No. 2 discount chain, and Lotte Card, the country's fifth-largest card issuer. This prompts experts to question the business model of the buyout fund. Late last week, MBK vowed to write off its entire stake in Home Plus to facilitate the company's corporate rehabilitation process. The firm stated that "All $1.8 billion worth of common shares held by MBK in Home Plus will be canceled without compensation." This means that MBK is ready to walk away from the Home Plus investment empty-handed, although it poured billions of dollars to take over the supermarket chain. In 2015, MBK acquired Home Plus from Tesco in a $5.1 billion deal financed through a combination of equity and debt. But the rise of e-commerce and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic severely undermined its performance. Since 2021, Home Plus has reported losses for four consecutive years, and its debt-to-equity ratio surged to nearly 500% this year. It filed for corporate rehabilitation in March, and MBK eventually decided to relinquish all management rights and claims while receiving nothing in return. Yet, MBK is under pressure to do more, as the National Assembly Speaker Woo Won-shik noted during his visit to a Home Plus outlet in Seoul on Wednesday. He accused MBK of showing an irresponsible stance. "The livelihoods of some 100,000 people, who are directly and indirectly employed by Home Plus, are now at risk. The damage is already severe," Woo wrote on social media. "Even after initiating rehabilitation procedures, MBK failed to assume responsibility, instead shifting the burden to workers and merchants through delayed payments, asset sales, and store closures," he added. Woo hinted at potential legislative action, including a parliamentary hearing and new regulations targeting private equity funds. Lotte Card up for grabs There are other crucial tasks for MBK and its Chairman Kim, particularly regarding Lotte Card. In 2019, MBK partnered with Woori Bank to channel $1 billion for a 79.8% interest on Lotte Card. MBK holds 59.8% and Woori has the remaining 20%. MBK tried to sell its stake in Lotte Card in 2023, but failed. The fund strives to divest its stake once again by reportedly sending teaser letters to multiple potential bidders, including Hana Financial Group, last month. UBS is managing the sales, with preliminary bids expected to open as early as mid-July. It remains to be seen whether MBK will be able to dispose of Lotte Card this time. But the sale price is predicted to go down due to the recent setbacks of the company. Lotte Card's net profit for 2024 more than halved to $100 million compared to $269 million in 2023. During the first quarter of 2025, it netted $10 million in profit, down 42.4% from a year before. Two years ago, MBK reportedly hoped to secure at least $2.2 billion for its stake, but the price is feared to decrease substantially now, which may significantly reduce MBK's potential profit. "MBK's business model has been very successful over the past 20 years as shown by the fact that its founder Kim has become the wealthiest man in the country," Seoul-based consultancy Leaders Index CEO Park Ju-gun told UPI. "But, its business model is now being put to the test. The company would have to worry about its damaged reputation and growing political momentum for regulating private equity funds," he added. In the 2025 Forbes billionaire list, Kim was second to none among South Koreans with $9.5 billion in wealth, surpassing $8.2 billion of Samsung Electronics Chairman Lee Jae-yong. Park expected that the country's unicameral parliament might introduce an act curbing highly leveraged buyouts and banning private equity funds from directly managing companies after acquisition. Seo Yong-gu, a professor of business administration at Sookmyung Women's University, echoed the concerns, although he opposed excessive regulations. "MBK has played a key role in developing Korea's capital market. But buyout funds have often been criticized for seeking short-term gains at the cost of long-term growth for a fast exit. We may need a reform," he said in a phone interview. "Highly leveraged acquisitions are also problematic. Still, I am against the idea of prohibiting private equity funds from managing their portfolio firms. It would fundamentally deny the very essence of the business," he said. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store