Trump Jr.'s 'Rooftop Koreans' meme sparks outrage as 1992 LA riot imagery resurfaces amid ICE protests
Trump Jr. under fire for referencing 1992 LA riots in controversial post
Donald Trump Jr. sparked widespread backlash after posting a meme depicting an armed Korean American atop a rooftop, a reference to the 1992 Los Angeles riots. The image, widely associated with Korean shop owners defending their stores during racially charged unrest, was captioned with "Make Rooftop Koreans Great Again," drawing criticism for glorifying vigilante justice.
The post came amid escalating protests in Los Angeles following immigration raids conducted by federal agents. Demonstrators clashed with law enforcement, blocked ICE vans, and set fires. Though Trump Jr. added no comment to the image, the symbolism was interpreted as a call for armed retaliation against protesters.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Bank Owned Properties For Sale In Cemengbangkalan (Prices May Surprise You)
Foreclosed Homes | Search ads
Search Now
Undo
Also read:
Trump's ICE war spills onto streets: Where's the US headed?
Korean American groups condemn the meme amid ongoing protests
The Korean American Federation of Los Angeles (Kafla) condemned Trump Jr.'s meme, stating that it exploited the community's painful history. During the 1992 riots, Korean-owned businesses were specifically targeted, and many Korean Americans were left to defend their property without police support.
Live Events
'As the son of the sitting president and a major influencer, his actions carry grave risks amid such a tense atmosphere,' Kafla stated. The group emphasized that the current unrest, while volatile, is not comparable to the chaos of 1992. Kafla also criticized the ongoing immigration raids for lacking due process and fueling confusion within immigrant communities, including Korean Americans.
Trump's National Guard deployment reignites tensions with State leaders
President Trump's decision to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles was made without California Governor Gavin Newsom's consent, marking the first such move in six decades. The action drew comparisons to the 1992 riots, but key differences remain.
Also read:
Trump deploys 2,000 national guard troops to LA amid growing anti-ICE protests
In 1992, the Guard was deployed at the request of state leaders after the acquittal of LAPD officers in the Rodney King case triggered days of deadly violence. This time, Trump cited Section 12406 of Title 10, asserting federal authority amid protests over immigration enforcement. Newsom, who filed suit against the administration, called the deployment a 'manufactured crisis.'
Historic parallels raise concerns about racial polarization
The invocation of 1992-era imagery by Donald Trump Jr., coupled with federal deployment of military forces, has renewed fears about deepening racial and political polarization. In 1992, more than 60 people died and over 1,000 buildings were destroyed in a racially charged uprising. Korean Americans, then caught in the crossfire, remain sensitive to any rhetoric that revives that trauma.
Also read:
Trump vows to "HIT" any protester who spits on police. He pardoned those who did far worse on Jan. 6
This time, the unrest stems from immigration policy and enforcement, but the response is drawing similar imagery and tactics. Civil rights groups warn that such associations risk inflaming public sentiment and creating dangerous environments for minorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
World Cup 2026: Donald Trump's trade and immigration policies cloud preparations, seamless for fans
With all the visa backlogs and commotion surrounding the case of overseas supporters, will it really be a smooth experience for fans across the globe for the 2026 FIFA World Cup? (Image via Chung Sung-Jun/Getty Images) When the United States, Mexico and Canada launched their joint bid for the 2026 World Cup in the shadow of the Statue of Liberty, the prevailing mood was unmistakeably upbeat. Peace, love and harmony: three countries joining forces in a "United Bid" to roll out the welcome mat for the most popular sporting carnival on the planet, a beacon of hope in a polarised world. "We don't believe sport can solve all the issues in the world," US Soccer chief Sunil Gulati told an audience at a Manhattan skyscraper. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "But ... we believe this is a hugely positive signal and symbol of what we can do together in unifying people, especially in our three countries." Fast forward eight years, and the soaring optimism that accompanied the bid's launch in 2017 has run into some stiff geopolitical headwinds, the re-election of President Donald Trump casting a pall of uncertainty over preparations for the event in ways that few could have imagined. While Trump has been a staunch backer of the World Cup from the outset, the US leader has nevertheless taken a combative stance to co-hosts Mexico and Canada since returning to the White House, from trade wars to border crackdowns, while simultaneously calling for Canada to become the "cherished 51st state" of the US. Poll Do you believe that geopolitical tensions could impact the 2026 World Cup attendance? Yes, it will deter fans No, fans will attend regardless That in turn has led to Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney vowing to pivot away from the US, declaring in March that "the old relationship we had with the United States - based on deepening integration of our economies and tight security and military cooperation - is over." 'Tension's a good thing' Trump, who enjoys a close friendship with Gianni Infantino, the president of world football's governing body FIFA, the organisers of the World Cup, has laughed off suggestions that trade turmoil could impact the tournament. "Tension's a good thing, I think it makes it much more exciting," Trump said in March when asked how his administration's tariffs against Canada and Mexico might affect the World Cup. Trump's policies, though, already appear to be hurting US tourism, with hotel search site Trivago last month reporting double-digit percentage declines in bookings to the US from visitors from Japan, Canada and Mexico. World Cup 2022: New features added to the FIFA 2022 football Figures from the US government's National Travel and Tourism Office released in April found an 11.6% decline in visits to the US from overseas in March compared to a year earlier. Andrew Zimbalist, an economics professor at Smith College in Northampton, Massachussetts whose books include "Circus Maximus: The Economic Gamble Behind Hosting the Olympics and the World Cup", believes Trump's economic policies could reduce the number of international fans travelling to the World Cup. But, Zimbalist added, "in terms of the actual playing of the games, the tariffs don't affect athletes." "So unless the political situation internationally deteriorates further and people decide to boycott the games in large numbers, I wouldn't anticipate a very large impact," he told AFP. 'Seamless experience' for fans? Other commentators have questioned whether World Cup fans will be deterred by the Trump administration's hardline border crackdown, which has seen visitors from countries including France, Germany, Australia and Canada either turned away at the border or subjected to harsh interrogation and detention. "Will soccer fans really want to crisscross our borders right now - and be squinted at by guards simply because they speak a Romance language or risk being held on a cold floor in a detention cage?," Washington Post columnist Sally Jenkins asked recently. Bombay Sport Exchange Ep. 6: Harish Thawani on cricket's TV market and the watershed moments The Trump administration's 2026 World Cup Task Force last month insisted all fans would be welcome, saying football supporters could look forward to a "seamless experience" when visiting the US. Vice President JD Vance though cautioned that foreign visitors would have to leave at the end of the tournament. "We'll have visitors, probably from close to 100 countries," said Vance, the vice-chair of the World Cup task force. "We want them to come. We want them to celebrate. But when the time is up, they'll have to go home." John Zerafa, a Britain-based sports communications strategist, believes the Trump administration may need to "short circuit" current visa processing wait times in order to facilitate large numbers of foreign fans at the World Cup. "I think the US and the Trump administration will go out of their way to try and make that process as smooth as possible," Zerafa told AFP. "But there's also the other part of how that stacks with the MAGA agenda and closing borders. There's a real dichotomy there for Trump and the MAGA base - you're letting the world in but at the same time you're trying to shut the world out," Zerafa added. "Those two things are very difficult to co-exist, and which one is going to win the day? I can certainly envisage examples of fans applying for tickets, but not being granted visas. And you only need a couple of those stories to emerge in the runup to the World Cup to start painting a difficult backdrop for FIFA and the US.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
A riveting, action-packed year awaits Modi 3.0 on the diplomatic front
The first year of Modi 3.0 will be remembered most for Operation Sindoor, thrusting Pakistan back to the centrestage of Indian foreign policy. By striking terrorist infrastructure deep inside Pakistan, India not only imposed unprecedented costs upon Islamabad for its support to cross-border terrorism but also raised the stakes for the international community's indulgence of Pakistan's duplicity in addressing a core Indian concern. The year also saw milestones being delivered like the India-UK FTA and the India-EU end-of-2025 deadline set by both sides for a similar agreement that the EU has described as the largest deal of its kind anywhere in the world. PM Modi's visit to the US within a month of President Trump's return to the White House, along with the launch of negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement, was also one of the high points. There were other foreign policy pluses, none perhaps more significant than the breakthrough with China in the form of the successful settlement of the five-year-old border standoff. The thaw in the relationship after the Modi-Xi meeting in Oct in Russia saw India resuming bilateral visits to Beijing and agreeing on a host of measures to normalise ties. Among the highlights was the upgrade in ties with the Taliban with the first political contact in the form of external affairs minister S Jaishankar's talks with the acting Afghan foreign minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi. Modi also garnered international attention for his back-to-back visits to Russia and Ukraine, during which he stressed the importance of direct talks to end the war - something the two sides are engaged in currently. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 임플란트 고민 중이라면? 인천 시민이 주목한 33만원 시술 플란치과 더 알아보기 Undo However, many of these foreign policy hits remain an unfinished business and will test India's resolve in the days ahead. On Pakistan, the challenge will be to ensure the global community, particularly the UN Security Council where Pakistan is a member, shows understanding about the punitive terms India has set out in the 'new normal' against Pakistan-sponsored cross-border terrorism. This will be critical in the event of another terrorist attack from across the LoC. The all-party delegations have made a beginning but there's more to be done, while being mindful of the risks of India-Pakistan re-hyphenation that such an exercise might entail. Managing the relationship with the US will be another pressing challenge in the second year of Modi 3.0. This has arisen unexpectedly from Trump's constant needling of India on bilateral trade and perhaps even more damaging utterances on the India-Pakistan conflict, like his use of the term mediation - a big taboo in Indian foreign policy lexicon - and his drawing an equivalence between India and Pakistan. India is hoping that not just the US but also its other Quad partners will be more liberal in their support for India on cross-border terrorism, like in the form of a joint statement when the foreign ministers and leaders meet this year. The third significant challenge in the next few months will be to decide whether it's time to reinforce the improvement in ties with Beijing by resuming direct air and normal visa services with and, more importantly, with a visit to the country by Modi for SCO summit. Despite China's ties with Pakistan acting as a deterrent, India has kept the door open for continued engagement. Modi has also shown interest in rebuilding ties with Canada by accepting his counterpart Mark Carney's delayed invitation for the G7 but this will be subject to Ottawa's handling of Khalistani separatists and also the probe into Nijjar murder that wrecked the relationship. Signs of improvement in Pakistan-Taliban ties and the proposal to expand CPEC into Afghanistan might pose a few problems too. All in all, a riveting, action-packed year is what awaits Modi 3.0.
Time of India
14 minutes ago
- Time of India
India will strike deep inside Pak if provoked with terror attacks: Jaishankar in Belgium
NEW DELHI: India will go deep into Pakistan to hit terrorists if they provoke the Indian govt with terror attacks, foreign minister S Jaishankar said while stressing that India will not live with terrorism anymore. In an interview in Brussels, he said Pakistan had trained thousands of terrorists and was ready to unleash them on India. Asked about China's support to Pakistan, the minister warned against double standards on the issue of terrorism. "They have had close ties for decades. But on an issue like terrorism, you cannot afford ambiguity or double standards. In the end, it's a problem that concerns all of us," said the minister. The message to the terrorists, he said, is that there is going to be retribution, and that retribution will be against the terrorist organisations and the terrorist leadership. "We don't care where they are. If they are deep in Pakistan, we will go deep into Pakistan," he said, adding that India's fighter aircraft and missiles had inflicted far more damage on the Pakistani Air Force than vice versa, forcing Pakistan to sue for peace in the conflict that followed India's Operation Sindoor against the terrorists. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Switch to UnionBank Rewards Card UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo "As far I'm concerned, how effective the Rafale was or frankly, how effective other systems were - to me the proof of the pudding are the destroyed and disabled airfields on the Pakistani side," he said. "The fighting stopped on the 10th for one reason and one reason only, which was that on the 10th morning, we hit these eight Pakistani, the main eight Pakistani airfields and disabled them," he said, adding that images are available in Google showing runways and those hangars which have taken the hit. The minister also said that the issue in Kashmir is about terrorism. "It has become an India-Pakistan issue because Pakistan harbours and supports terrorists. The conflict is between India and terrorism, not with a specific terrorists attack India, we will hunt them down wherever they are, including in Pakistan," he said.
