ATO reveals 10 highest paying jobs in Australia: ‘$472,475 a year'
The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has revealed the highest paying jobs in Australia, with the top job raking in more than $470,000 per year on average. The list is based on the tax return data of millions of Aussies and gives a sneak peek into the huge incomes some professions are banking.
Surgeons have retained the top spot, earning an average of $472,475 a year. There are only 4,247 surgeons in the country. For context, that means they are earning more than six times the average taxable income of $74,240 over the same period.
Medical professionals dominated the list, with anaesthetists taking second place with average earnings of $447,193. There are just 3,658 workers across the country.
RELATED
Tradie apprentice shocks with $100,000 salary as she reveals reality of lucrative job
Centrelink $836 cash boost for 'very real' truth facing thousands of Aussies
ATO issues July 1 warning to Aussies waiting on $1,500 tax refunds
Financial dealers were the highest-paid non-medical role, earning an average of $355,233 a year based on 5,147 people in the profession. Financial dealers conduct financial market transactions on behalf of clients and include stockbrokers.
The highest-paying job with the most people was chief executive officers and managing directors.
There were a whopping 231,103 people in this job, earning an average of $194,987 a year.
The ATO data, released today, is based on tax returns from the 2022-23 financial year.
The list of highest paying jobs has stayed the same over previous income years, but notably, incomes have gone up for most professions.
Here are the top 10 highest-paid jobs and how much their incomes have increased since the previous year's tax statistics.
Surgeon $472,475 (up $12,119)
Anaesthetists $447,193 (up $16,000)
Financial dealer $355,233 (down $18,500)
Internal medicine specialist $342,457 (up $1,728)
Psychiatrist $286,146 (up $9,601)
Other medical practitioners $259,802 (up $4,048)
Mining engineer $206,423 (down $7,942)
Judicial or other legal professional $206,408 (up $1,474)
Chief executive officer or managing director $194,987 (down $2,733)
Financial investment advisor or manager $191,986 (up $6,152)
The fresh ATO data also revealed the average Australian income was $74,240 a year. This was up from $72,327 a year.
The median income, which is the middle point, was $55,868 for the 2022-23 income tax. This was up from $53,041 per year from the year prior.
It's worth bearing in mind that more up-to-date earnings data have been released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
It found average weekly ordinary time earnings for full-time adults had increased 4.6 per cent annually to $1,975.80 in November 2024. That works out to $102,741.60 a year.
The ATO data found the majority of Australians (44.9 per cent) fall into the $45,001 to $120,000 tax bracket.
Only 5.3 per cent of the population fall into the $180,001 and over bracket, but are responsible for 37 per cent of net tax.
The average superannuation account balance increased to $172,834, up from $164,126. While the median went up to $60,037, up from $57,912.Sign in to access your portfolio
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Alkane Resources Third Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: AU$0.013 (vs AU$0.003 loss in 3Q 2024)
Revenue: AU$63.2m (up 108% from 3Q 2024). Net income: AU$8.10m (up from AU$2.00m loss in 3Q 2024). Profit margin: 13% (up from net loss in 3Q 2024). The move to profitability was driven by higher revenue. EPS: AU$0.013 (up from AU$0.003 loss in 3Q 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Looking ahead, revenue is forecast to grow 17% p.a. on average during the next 3 years, compared to a 6.4% growth forecast for the Metals and Mining industry in Australia. Performance of the Australian Metals and Mining industry. The company's share price is broadly unchanged from a week ago. You should learn about the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Alkane Resources. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.1% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
With 53% ownership, Universal Store Holdings Limited (ASX:UNI) boasts of strong institutional backing
Institutions' substantial holdings in Universal Store Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders have been selling lately Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. A look at the shareholders of Universal Store Holdings Limited (ASX:UNI) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 53% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait. In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Universal Store Holdings. View our latest analysis for Universal Store Holdings Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. Universal Store Holdings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Universal Store Holdings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Universal Store Holdings is not owned by hedge funds. Bennelong Funds Management Group Pty Ltd is currently the largest shareholder, with 14% of shares outstanding. Spheria Asset Management Pty Ltd is the second largest shareholder owning 6.7% of common stock, and Lennox Capital Partners holds about 6.0% of the company stock. Furthermore, CEO Alice Barbery is the owner of 2.4% of the company's shares. We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 50% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat. While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future. The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO. I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions. Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Universal Store Holdings Limited. Insiders own AU$82m worth of shares in the AU$584m company. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 27% stake in Universal Store Holdings. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run. We can see that Private Companies own 4.3%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company. It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Universal Store Holdings better, we need to consider many other factors. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Universal Store Holdings that you should be aware of before investing here. Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Lynas Rare Earths Limited's (ASX:LYC) institutional investors lost 4.3% last week but have benefitted from longer-term gains
Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lynas Rare Earths' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions The top 8 shareholders own 50% of the company Insiders have sold recently We've found 21 US stocks that are forecast to pay a dividend yield of over 6% next year. See the full list for free. If you want to know who really controls Lynas Rare Earths Limited (ASX:LYC), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company. Losing money on investments is something no shareholder enjoys, least of all institutional investors who saw their holdings value drop by 4.3% last week. However, the 50% one-year return to shareholders might have softened the blow. But they would probably be wary of future losses. Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Lynas Rare Earths, beginning with the chart below. See our latest analysis for Lynas Rare Earths Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index. As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Lynas Rare Earths. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Lynas Rare Earths' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story. Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Lynas Rare Earths is not owned by hedge funds. Australian Super Pty Ltd is currently the company's largest shareholder with 9.5% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.2% by the third-largest shareholder. On further inspection, we found that more than half the company's shares are owned by the top 8 shareholders, suggesting that the interests of the larger shareholders are balanced out to an extent by the smaller ones. While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily. The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves. Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances. Our information suggests that Lynas Rare Earths Limited insiders own under 1% of the company. However, it's possible that insiders might have an indirect interest through a more complex structure. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own AU$33m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying. The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 31% stake in Lynas Rare Earths. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies. We can see that Private Companies own 12%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company. While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Lynas Rare Earths you should be aware of, and 1 of them is a bit unpleasant. But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future. NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
