Future of bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis Ltd could have 'profound impact' on West Lothian communities
Gregor Poynton MP urged the Scottish Government to take immediate action
Gregor Poynton MP has urged the Scottish Government to take immediate action to safeguard the future of bus manufacturer Alexander Dennis Ltd and the livelihoods of its workers.
The Livingston MP has written to Scotland's First Minister John Swinney and Cabinet Secretary for Transport, Fiona Hyslop.
The move follows the announcement that Alexander Dennis, based in Falkirk, intends to shift manufacturing operations to England—placing hundreds of skilled Scottish jobs at risk.
In recent years, Alexander Dennis Ltd has played a critical role in delivering low and zero-emission buses for public transport networks across the UK.
The company has supplied over 160 vehicles for Greater Manchester's Bee Network, while the Scottish Government has placed an order for 44 buses out of a potential 252 under its own zero-emission bus scheme. The majority have been awarded to manufacturers based outside Scotland.
However, Deputy Fist Minister Kate Forbes confirmed that Alexander Dennis Ltd has received £58 million of Scottish Government subsidies for zero-emissions buses since 2020 under the scheme and its predecessor.
In his letter, Mr Poynton said: 'The potential loss of these highly skilled jobs would have a profound impact on local communities, including many constituents within the Livingston constituency.
'The transport industry is a cornerstone of our economy and an essential service in the daily lives of people across Scotland. Supporting a Scottish-based manufacturer of low-emission and zero-emission buses aligns not only with economic priorities but also with our shared goals around sustainability, skills retention, and fair work.
'Beyond the immediate impact on jobs, we must also consider the wider ramifications for Scotland's industrial future. The loss of another major employer represents a setback for our national economy and undermines the skills and experience we have worked so hard to foster. It is vital that a comprehensive strategy is put in place to support the workforce, safeguard jobs, and prevent further industrial decline.'
The MP emphasised the far-reaching implications of further industrial decline for communities across the central belt.
He added: 'We must act swiftly and decisively to support Alexander Dennis and secure the future of bus manufacturing in Scotland.
'It is astounding that a company so clearly aligned with the Scottish Government's policies on net zero, green jobs, and sustainable transport is not being prioritised in public procurement. Instead, contracts are being awarded to firms based outside of Scotland, risking the future of our own workforce.'
Scotland's Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes responded: 'The absolute focus right now is on supporting Alexander Dennis Ltd its workforce, as well as the families and communities they support. We also recognise the significance of the company within the local economy and across the wider supply chain.
'The Scottish Government has committed to exploring all viable options throughout the consultation period to allow the firm to retain their hard-working employees and manufacturing and production facilities at Falkirk and Larbert.
'We will continue to work in close collaboration with the company, trade unions, Scottish Enterprise, Transport Scotland and the UK Government.
'Since 2020, Alexander Dennis Ltd secured orders for more zero emission buses than any other single manufacturer through the Scottish Zero Emission Bus Challenge Fund and its predecessor the Scottish Ultra Low Emission Bus Scheme. Alexander Dennis Ltd has received £58 million of Scottish Government subsidy for vehicles under these programmes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South Wales Argus
22 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
No 10 says abortion law change must be ‘safe and workable'
The Commons voted by a majority of 242 to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral. But Downing Street said that now MPs had made that decision, the Government had a responsibility to ensure that if it makes it to the statute book it is in an effective form. Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi, who led the amendment to change the law on abortion (Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament) The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. 'But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.' The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.' Gower MP Ms Antoniazzi said the change will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. Kate Ellis, joint head of litigation at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: 'It is high time that these outdated, Victorian laws were removed from the statute books. 'This proposed change in the law will only impact a relatively small number of women each year who find themselves – in already desperate circumstances – threatened with imprisonment for a criminal offence they probably didn't know existed.' The changes do not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
Leader Live
22 minutes ago
- Leader Live
No 10 says abortion law change must be ‘safe and workable'
The Commons voted by a majority of 242 to back Labour MP Tonia Antoniazzi's amendment to the Crime and Policing Bill. The issue was treated as a matter of conscience, with MPs given a free vote and the Government remaining neutral. But Downing Street said that now MPs had made that decision, the Government had a responsibility to ensure that if it makes it to the statute book it is in an effective form. The Bill still has further stages to go through in Parliament and changes could be made to the measures in the House of Lords. A No 10 spokesman said: 'We'll look at this in detail, considering whether any changes are necessary to make it workable and safe. 'But, of course, this would not change the intent of the amendment passed.' The spokesman added: 'As with all laws, the Government has a responsibility to ensure it is safe and workable.' Gower MP Ms Antoniazzi said the change will remove the threat of 'investigation, arrest, prosecution or imprisonment' of any woman who acts in relation to her own pregnancy. She pushed for the change in the law after cases of women being investigated by police over suspected illegal abortions. Medics or others who facilitate an abortion after the 24-week time limit could still face prosecution if the change becomes law. Though the Government took a neutral stance on the vote, several Cabinet ministers were among the MPs who backed the amendment. They included Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, Defence Secretary John Healey, Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander, Environment Secretary Steve Reed, Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn, Scotland Secretary Ian Murray, Wales Secretary Jo Stevens and Commons Leader Lucy Powell. Kemi Badenoch and many members of the Conservative frontbench voted against it, but shadow education secretary Laura Trott voted in favour. Abortion in England and Wales currently remains a criminal offence unless with an authorised provider up to 24 weeks into a pregnancy, with very limited circumstances allowing one after this time, such as when the mother's life is at risk or the child would be born with a severe disability. It is also legal to take prescribed medication at home if a woman is less than 10 weeks pregnant. Efforts to change the law to protect women from prosecution follow repeated calls to repeal sections of the 19th century law the 1861 Offences Against the Person Act, after abortion was decriminalised in Northern Ireland in 2019. Kate Ellis, joint head of litigation at the Centre for Women's Justice, said: 'It is high time that these outdated, Victorian laws were removed from the statute books. 'This proposed change in the law will only impact a relatively small number of women each year who find themselves – in already desperate circumstances – threatened with imprisonment for a criminal offence they probably didn't know existed.' The changes do not cover Scotland, where a group is currently undertaking work to review the law as it stands there.
The Herald Scotland
25 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Scottish Government hit out at DWP welfare overhaul
Sir Keir Starmer will also likely face a sizeable rebellion from many of his own backbenchers when MPs vote at second reading, due at some point in the next two to three weeks. READ MORE In a news release published alongside the Bill, Labour said it inherited a 'broken social security system' when it came into government last year, 'with costs spiralling at an unsustainable rate and millions of people trapped out of work.' The DWP said almost one million young people are not in education, employment or training, while one in 10 people of working age are now claiming a sickness or disability benefit. They added that without reform, the number of working-age people on disability benefits is set to more than double this decade to 4.3 million. Meanwhile, spending on working-age disability and incapacity benefits is up £20 billion since the pandemic and is projected to rise by nearly as much again by the end of this Parliament, to around £70bn a year. DWP offices in LondonThe DWP said the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, introduced to Parliament on Wednesday, would deliver 'peace of mind' for around 200,000 people with the most severe and lifelong health conditions, as they will be exempt from further assessments and guaranteed the higher health element of Universal Credit, currently worth £97 per week. The Government has also confirmed a 13-week transition period payment for people who are losing PIP, or their eligibility to carers allowance and the carer's element of Universal Credit. But the UK Government is also pushing ahead with plans to tighten eligibility for PIP, which is expected to reduce the number of claimants in England and Wales by hundreds of thousands. The benefit has been mostly devolved to the Scottish Government, which began replacing it with Adult Disability Payment (ADP) in 2022. As of January this year, more than 433,000 people in Scotland were receiving ADP, while just 35,000 remained on PIP. The SNP has ruled out replicating the changes, however, any changes to PIP spending will have an impact on the block grant to the Scottish Government. If UK spending falls due to tighter eligibility rules, so too does the money available to ministers in Edinburgh. The Scottish Fiscal Commission forecast in December that by the end of the decade, ADP would cost £381 million more per year than Scotland receives through the block grant adjustment for PIP — a shortfall that could grow significantly if UK reforms deliver the savings ministers expect. Announcing the Bill, Ms Kendall said: 'Our social security system is at a crossroads. Unless we reform it, more people in Scotland will be denied opportunities, and it may not be there for those who need it. 'This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity. 'This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot — putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change.' Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville described the reforms as 'exceptionally detrimental'. 'We will not let disabled people down or cast them aside as the UK Government has done. We will not cut Scotland's Adult Disability Payment,' she said. 'The UK Government should follow our lead and protect the social security safety system, rather than dismantling it. If they do not, then disabled people can draw no other conclusion than the UK Government remain content to balance the books on the backs of the most vulnerable.' READ MORE Citizens Advice Scotland head of social justice, Emma Jackson, said they were 'deeply concerned that the UK Government is not sufficiently considering the unique impact of these proposed reforms on people in Scotland.' She said: 'Around two-thirds of the people accessing support from the Scottish CAB network have a disability or health condition, and our evidence shows that people already cannot afford the essentials. These cuts will force more people into debt, destitution and despair. 'From what we understand, alongside reducing incomes, there is a high risk that welfare reforms could make the claims process even more complicated for people in Scotland, increasing the likelihood that they will not access their full support entitlements. 'It is crucial that the UK Government halts and reconsiders these reforms. Meaningful consultation is required with the Scottish Government, disabled people and the third sector in Scotland. We strongly urge MPs to vote against the proposed welfare reforms because they will expose sick and disabled people in Scotland to significant harm.'
