47 million-year-old bug is the oldest singing cicada fossil from Europe
Pressed into a piece of rock is the flattened, 47 million-year-old body of a cicada. Measuring about 1 inch (26.5 millimeters) long with a wingspan of 2.7 inches (68.2 millimeters), its fossilized form is nearly intact, with its veined wings spread wide.
Scientists recently described the insect as a new genus and species, using this fossil and one other that was nearly as well preserved, from the same site. Even though the specimens are female, their location on the cicada family tree suggests that males of this species could sing as modern cicadas do. Found in Germany decades ago, their presence there reveals that singing cicadas dispersed in Europe millions of years earlier than once thought.
The fossils are also the oldest examples of 'true' singing cicadas in the family Cicadidae, researchers reported April 29 in the journal Scientific Reports. Most modern cicadas belong to this family, including annual cicadas that appear every summer worldwide, as well as broods of black-bodied and red-eyed periodical cicadas, which emerge from May to June in eastern North America in cycles of 13 or 17 years. Brood XIV, one of the biggest broods, emerges across a dozen US states this year. Cicadas are found on every continent except Antarctica, and there are more than 3,000 species.
The fossil record for insects in general is abundant in just a few dozen locations, and while modern cicada species are numerous today, paleontologists have documented only 44 Cicadidae fossils. The earliest definitive fossil of a singing cicada was discovered in Montana and dates from 59 million to 56 million years ago, said lead study author Dr. Hui Jiang, a paleontologist and researcher with the Bonn Institute of Organismic Biology at the University of Bonn in Germany. Its newly described relative is the earliest singing cicada from Europe, Jiang told CNN in an email.
Related card
Cicadas rising: A visual guide to 2024's rare dual appearance
Because the body structures of the European fossils were so well preserved, scientists were able to assign the ancient insect to a modern tribe of cicadas called Platypleurini, 'which is today primarily distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of sub-Saharan Africa and Asia, but is absent from Europe,' Jiang said.
Prior research suggested that this lineage evolved in Africa about 30 million to 25 million years ago and dispersed from there, according to Jiang. 'This fossil pushes back the known fossil record of sound-producing cicadas in the tribe Platypleurini by approximately 20 million years, indicating that the diversification of this group occurred much earlier than previously recognized,' the researcher added.
The discovery hints that this group of cicadas evolved more slowly than prior estimates from molecular data proposed, said Dr. Conrad Labandeira, a senior research geologist and curator of fossil arthropods at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History in Washington, DC.
'This suggests that older fossils of the Platypleurini are yet to be discovered,' said Labandeira, who was not involved in the research. 'Such discoveries would assist in providing better calibrations for determining a more realistic evolutionary rate.'
Researchers named the cicada Eoplatypleura messelensis. Its name refers to where the specimens were discovered: the Messel Pit in Germany, a rich fossil site dating to the Eocene epoch (57 million to 36 million years ago). Excavated in the 1980s, the fossils have since been in the collection of the Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum Frankfurt in Germany, said senior study author Dr. Sonja Wedmann, head of Senckenberg's paleoentomology department.
A very deep volcanic lake, with a bottom where no oxygen penetrated, once filled the Messel Pit. That environment created ideal conditions for fossilization, and fine-grain sediments from this former lake bed hold a variety of Eocene life, Wedmann told CNN in an email.
'The excellent preservation not only of insects, but of all groups of organisms, is the reason why Messel is an UNESCO world heritage site,' a designation it earned in 1995, Wedmann said.
The more complete of the two cicada fossils 'is one of the best preserved insects from the Messel pit fossil site,' Wedmann added. 'Senckenberg has a collection of over 20,000 fossil insects from Messel, and among these it stands out because of its really beautiful and complete preservation.'
In its overall head and body shape, E. messelensis strongly resembles modern cicadas. Its rostrum — a snoutlike mouth — is intact, but closer analysis is needed to tell whether it used the rostrum for feeding on plant tissues called xylem, as most modern cicadas do, Labandeira said.
E. messelensis also shows hints of colors and patterns in its wings. This feature camouflages modern cicadas as they cling to tree trunks, and it may have served a similar purpose for E. messelensis, according to Jiang.
However, E. messelensis differs from modern cicadas in subtle ways. For example, its forewings are broader and less elongated than those of species alive today, which may have affected how it flew.
Would the ancient cicada's call have sounded like those of its modern relatives? 'We can't know the exact song,' Jiang said. However, based on the cicada's body shape and placement in the singing cicada group, 'it likely produced sounds similar in function to modern cicadas.'
When Brood XIV emerges in the billions in the late spring and early summer of 2025, their calls will measure from 90 to 100 decibels — as loud as a subway train. Other types of cicadas produce an even bigger ruckus: Songs of the African cicada Brevisana brevis peak at nearly 107 decibels, about as loud as a jet taking off.
The volume of the ancient species' songs may have been even louder than that, Jiang said. The abdomen of E. messelensis is broader and larger than those of its modern relatives, suggesting that males could have had a larger resonating cavity. This cavity may have amplified sound from the vibrating structures in their abdomens, called tymbals, to produce a louder buzz.
'Of course, this is only a hypothesis,' Jiang added. 'Future studies on how morphology relates to sound production in modern cicadas will help to test it.'
Mindy Weisberger is a science writer and media producer whose work has appeared in Live Science, Scientific American and How It Works magazine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How do painkillers actually kill pain? From ibuprofen to fentanyl, it's about meeting the pain where it's at
Without the ability to feel pain, life is more dangerous. To avoid injury, pain tells us to use a hammer more gently, wait for the soup to cool or put on gloves in a snowball fight. Those with rare inherited disorders that leave them without the ability to feel pain are unable to protect themselves from environmental threats, leading to broken bones, damaged skin, infections and ultimately a shorter life span. In these contexts, pain is much more than a sensation: It is a protective call to action. But pain that is too intense or long-lasting can be debilitating. So how does modern medicine soften the call? As a neurobiologist and an anesthesiologist who study pain, this is a question we and other researchers have tried to answer. Science's understanding of how the body senses tissue damage and perceives it as pain has progressed tremendously over the past several years. It has become clear that there are multiple pathways that signal tissue damage to the brain and sound the pain alarm bell. Interestingly, while the brain uses different pain signaling pathways depending on the type of damage, there is also redundancy to these pathways. Even more intriguing, these neural pathways morph and amplify signals in the case of chronic pain and pain caused by conditions affecting nerves themselves, even though the protective function of pain is no longer needed. Painkillers work by tackling different parts of these pathways. Not every painkiller works for every type of pain, however. Because of the multitude and redundancy of pain pathways, a perfect painkiller is elusive. But in the meantime, understanding how existing painkillers work helps medical providers and patients use them for the best results. A bruise, sprain or broken bone from an injury all lead to tissue inflammation, an immune response that can lead to swelling and redness as the body tries to heal. Specialized nerve cells in the area of the injury called nociceptors sense the inflammatory chemicals the body produces and send pain signals to the brain. Common over-the-counter anti-inflammatory painkillers work by decreasing inflammation in the injured area. These are particularly useful for musculoskeletal injuries or other pain problems caused by inflammation such as arthritis. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories like ibuprofen (Advil, Motrin), naproxen (Aleve) and aspirin do this by blocking an enzyme called COX that plays a key role in a biochemical cascade that produces inflammatory chemicals. Blocking the cascade decreases the amount of inflammatory chemicals, and thereby reduces the pain signals sent to the brain. While acetaminophen (Tylenol), also known as paracetamol, doesn't reduce inflammation as NSAIDs do, it also inhibits COX enzymes and has similar pain-reducing effects. Prescription anti-inflammatory painkillers include other COX inhibitors, corticosteroids and, more recently, drugs that target and inactivate the inflammatory chemicals themselves. Because inflammatory chemicals are involved in other important physiological functions beyond just sounding the pain alarm, medications that block them will have side effects and potential health risks, including irritating the stomach lining and affecting kidney function. Over-the-counter medications are generally safe if the directions on the bottle are followed strictly. Corticosteroids like prednisone block the inflammatory cascade early on in the process, which is probably why they are so potent in reducing inflammation. However, because all the chemicals in the cascade are present in nearly every organ system, long-term use of steroids can pose many health risks that need to be discussed with a physician before starting a treatment plan. Many topical medications target nociceptors, the specialized nerves that detect tissue damage. Local anesthetics, like lidocaine, prevent these nerves from sending electrical signals to the brain. The protein sensors on the tips of other sensory neurons in the skin are also targets for topical painkillers. Activating these proteins can elicit particular sensations that can lessen the pain by reducing the activity of the damage-sensing nerves, like the cooling sensation of menthol or the burning sensation of capsaicin. Because these topical medications work on the tiny nerves in the skin, they are best used for pain directly affecting the skin. For example, a shingles infection can damage the nerves in the skin, causing them to become overactive and send persistent pain signals to the brain. Silencing those nerves with topical lidocaine or an overwhelming dose of capsaicin can reduce these pain signals. Nerve injuries, most commonly from arthritis and diabetes, can cause the pain-sensing part of the nervous system to become overactive. These injuries sound the pain alarm even in the absence of tissue damage. The best painkillers in these conditions are those that dampen that alarm. Antiepileptic drugs, such as gabapentin (Neurontin), suppress the pain-sensing system by blocking electrical signaling in the nerves. However, gabapentin can also reduce nerve activity in other parts of the nervous system, potentially leading to sleepiness and confusion. Antidepressants, such as duloxetine and nortriptyline, are thought to work by increasing certain neurotransmitters in the spinal cord and brain involved in regulating pain pathways. But they may also alter chemical signaling in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to an upset stomach. All these medications are prescribed by doctors. Opioids are chemicals found or derived from the opium poppy. One of the earliest opioids, morphine, was purified in the 1800s. Since then, medical use of opioids has expanded to include many natural and synthetic derivatives of morphine with varying potency and duration. Some common examples include codeine, tramadol, hydrocodone, oxycodone, buprenorphine and fentanyl. Opioids decrease pain by activating the body's endorphin system. Endorphins are a type of opioid your body naturally produces that decreases incoming signals of injury and produces feelings of euphoria – the so-called 'runner's high.' Opioids simulate the effects of endorphins by acting on similar targets in the body. Although opioids can decrease some types of acute pain, such as after surgery, musculoskeletal injuries like a broken leg or cancer pain, they are often ineffective for neuropathic injuries and chronic pain. Because the body uses opioid receptors in other organ systems like the gastrointestinal tract and the lungs, side effects and risks include constipation and potentially fatal suppression of breathing. Prolonged use of opioids may also lead to tolerance, where more drug is required to get the same painkilling effect. This is why opioids can be addictive and are not intended for long-term use. All opioids are controlled substances and are carefully prescribed by doctors because of these side effects and risks. Although cannabis has received a lot of attention for its potential medical uses, there isn't sufficient evidence available to conclude that it can effectively treat pain. Since the use of cannabis is illegal at the federal level in the U.S., high-quality clinical research funded by the federal government has been lacking. Researchers do know that the body naturally produces endocannabinoids, a form of the chemicals in cannabis, to decrease pain perception. Cannabinoids may also reduce inflammation. Given the lack of strong clinical evidence, physicians typically don't recommend them over FDA-approved medications. While sounding the pain alarm is important for survival, dampening the klaxon when it's too loud or unhelpful is sometimes necessary. No existing medication can perfectly treat pain. Matching specific types of pain to drugs that target specific pathways can improve pain relief, but even then, medications can fail to work even for people with the same condition. More research that deepens the medical field's understanding of the pain pathways and targets in the body can help lead to more effective treatments and improved pain management. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Rebecca Seal, University of Pittsburgh and Benedict Alter, University of Pittsburgh Read more: How do drugs know where to go in the body? A pharmaceutical scientist explains why some medications are swallowed while others are injected What is fentanyl and why is it behind the deadly surge in US drug overdoses? A medical toxicologist explains Sepsis is one of the most expensive medical conditions in the world – new research clarifies how it can lead to cell death Rebecca Seal receives funding from National Institutes of Health Benedict Alter receives funding from National Institutes of Health, Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research, and the International Anesthesia Research Society.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists develop tiny aquatic drones with mind-blowing features: 'A world of opportunities'
Small eco-friendly drones have been developed to monitor water quality, and when their mission is done, they can serve as fish food. A team of scientists at Switzerland's École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne designed these 5-centimeter-long, motorboat-shaped craft to glide across the surface powered by nontoxic chemical reactions, according to Interesting Engineering. Not only do they collect data on water quality, but they're also safe for fish to eat once the job is done. They're constructed from ground-up fish feed pellets, which are freeze-dried into shape. Inside this edible hull, a small chamber contains a harmless mix of citric acid and baking soda that generates carbon dioxide as water slowly seeps in through a semipermeable gel plug. That reaction then pushes out a stored supply of nontoxic propylene glycol, which helps propel the drone swiftly through the water at a rate of up to three times its body length per second. The report explained that expelled glycol helps drive the craft forward through a process called the Marangoni effect. This alters the surface tension of the water and is commonly used by insects such as the water strider. Underwater drones have already been deployed in some areas to help people manage fish populations and prevent overfishing. However, those are controlled remotely and must be collected after scanning the area. A previous project from EPFL researchers involved a tiny aquatic robot that was inspired by marine flatworms to help explore marine environments without disturbing them. This new development aims to send out these tiny biodegradable drones for data-gathering missions, and when equipped with sensors, they could measure things such as water temperature, pH levels, and pollutant concentrations and transmit the data back wirelessly. With 4 billion people on the planet lacking access to potable water, eco-friendly research on water quality is critical for human health. The key here is that when the job is done, the drones will absorb water, soften, and eventually sink, leaving behind a small feast that's safe for fish to eat. Would you want to live in a home made from recycled trash? Heck yeah Sure Depends on the material No thanks Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The development of biodegradable sensors for ecological monitoring has yet to be resolved, although there has been promising research in the field. In 2022, the world generated over 68 million tons of electronic waste, and that number is rapidly increasing. At the current rate, it's on track to rise another 32% to 90 million tons annually by 2030. Only about 9% of that e-waste is being recycled, with most of it ending up in landfills. Not only are billions of dollars' worth of resources being squandered, but toxic materials can leach into waterways and soil, causing health issues and ecological damage. "The replacement of electronic waste with biodegradable materials is the subject of intensive study, but edible materials with targeted nutritional profiles and function have barely been considered, and open up a world of opportunities for human and animal health," said professor Dario Floreano, who led the EPFL study, per Interesting Engineering. Join our free newsletter for easy tips to save more and waste less, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make game-changing breakthrough that could dramatically boost electric vehicle performance: 'A previously unknown mechanism'
Wouldn't it be great if batteries were more powerful, charged faster, and lasted longer? Well, that may be a reality in the very near future, and it could have a huge impact on the electrical vehicle industry. Researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Medical Research in Germany have discovered how to do just that by reimagining how electrodes work, per a summary published on Tech Xplore. Electrodes are made up of two main parts: The contact material, which is generally made of copper or aluminum foil, moves the electrical charge in and out of the battery, and the active material absorbs or releases that charge. Today, battery makers are faced with a dilemma. If they make the electrode thicker, it stores more energy but charges more slowly. If they make the electrode thinner, the battery will charge faster but not hold as much energy. The team at Max Planck figured out how to get the best of both worlds using a metal fleece in place of the flat foils. The metal fleece allows charged ions to move much faster. Max Planck director Joachim Spatz compared the incredibly thin strips of metal that make up the fleece to "a kind of motorway for the metal ions." "The basis for this is a previously unknown mechanism that we discovered in ion transport in electrodes," Spatz said, per the summary. The study showed that using this method, ions moved about 56 times faster than in a standard electrode. And because the fleece allows the electrode to be ten times thicker than usual, it can store up to 85% more power than a regular foil electrode. Batteries with faster charging times and more power, meaning more range, could convince people to make the change from a gas-powered car to an EV, greatly reducing carbon pollution that's one of the main drivers of the planet overheating. But it gets even better. According to Spatz, manufacturing batteries using the metal fleece is about 30-40% cheaper than current methods. Rather than the current process, which is complex and sometimes uses toxic solvents, this new method introduces the active material to the fleece in the form of dry powder. One can only hope that the savings on batteries would be passed on to customers. There's no telling yet when these batteries will come to market, but Spatz has already founded a startup and is currently working with car manufacturers to further develop the technology. If you were going to purchase an EV, which of these factors would be most important to you? Cost Battery range Power and speed The way it looks Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
