logo
Scientists redid an experiment that showed how life on Earth could have started. They found a new possibility

Scientists redid an experiment that showed how life on Earth could have started. They found a new possibility

CNN28-03-2025

Summary
Scientists suggest microlightning in water droplets could have sparked the creation of Earth's earliest organic molecules.
The new research, published in Science Advances, builds upon the landmark 1953 Miller-Urey experiment.
Electrical exchanges between oppositely charged water droplets can result in the production of amino acids, the researchers found.
This process could have been more frequent than lightning on ancient Earth, creating abundant building blocks for life.
Alternative theories on life's origins suggest organic molecules originated at hydrothermal vents or arrived from space via asteroids.
'It's alive! IT'S ALIVE!'
In the 1931 movie 'Frankenstein,' Dr. Henry Frankenstein howling his triumph was an electrifying moment in more ways than one. As massive bolts of lightning and energy crackled, Frankenstein's monster stirred on a laboratory table, its corpse brought to life by the power of electricity.
Electrical energy may also have sparked the beginnings of life on Earth billions of years ago, though with a bit less scenery-chewing than that classic film scene.
Earth is around 4.5 billion years old, and the oldest direct fossil evidence of ancient life — stromatolites, or microscopic organisms preserved in layers known as microbial mats — is about 3.5 billion years old. However, some scientists suspect life originated even earlier, emerging from accumulated organic molecules in primitive bodies of water, a mixture sometimes referred to as primordial soup.
But where did that organic material come from in the first place? Researchers decades ago proposed that lightning caused chemical reactions in ancient Earth's oceans and spontaneously produced the organic molecules.
Now, new research published March 14 in the journal Science Advances suggests that fizzes of barely visible 'microlightning,' generated between charged droplets of water mist, could have been potent enough to cook up amino acids from inorganic material. Amino acids — organic molecules that combine to form proteins — are life's most basic building blocks and would have been the first step toward the evolution of life.
'It's recognized that an energetic catalyst was almost certainly required to facilitate some of the reactions on early Earth that led to the origin of life,' said astrobiologist and geobiologist Dr. Amy J. Williams, an associate professor in the department of geosciences at the University of Florida. For animo acids to form, they need nitrogen atoms that can bond with carbon. Freeing up atoms from nitrogen gas requires severing powerful molecular bonds and takes an enormous amount of energy, according to Williams, who was not involved in the research.
'Lightning, or in this case, microlightning, has the energy to break molecular bonds and therefore facilitate the generation of new molecules that are critical to the origin of life on Earth,' Williams told CNN in an email.
To recreate a scenario that may have produced Earth's first organic molecules, researchers built upon experiments from 1953 when American chemists Stanley Miller and Harold Urey concocted a gas mixture mimicking the atmosphere of ancient Earth. Miller and Urey combined ammonia (NH3), methane (CH4), hydrogen (H2) and water, enclosed their 'atmosphere' inside a glass sphere and jolted it with electricity, producing simple amino acids containing carbon and nitrogen. The Miller-Urey experiment, as it is now known, supported the scientific theory of abiogenesis: that life could emerge from nonliving molecules.
For the new study, scientists revisited the 1953 experiments but directed their attention toward electrical activity on a smaller scale, said senior study author Dr. Richard Zare, the Marguerite Blake Wilbur Professor of Natural Science and professor of chemistry at Stanford University in California. Zare and his colleagues looked at electricity exchange between charged water droplets measuring between 1 micron and 20 microns in diameter. (The width of a human hair is 100 microns.)
'The big droplets are positively charged. The little droplets are negatively charged,' Zare told CNN. 'When droplets that have opposite charges are close together, electrons can jump from the negatively charged droplet to the positively charged droplet.'
The researchers mixed ammonia, carbon dioxide, methane and nitrogen in a glass bulb, then sprayed the gases with water mist, using a high-speed camera to capture faint flashes of microlightning in the vapor. When they examined the bulb's contents, they found organic molecules with carbon-nitrogen bonds. These included the amino acid glycine and uracil, a nucleotide base in RNA.
'We discovered no new chemistry; we have actually reproduced all the chemistry that Miller and Urey did in 1953,' Zare said. Nor did the team discover new physics, he added — the experiments were based on known principles of electrostatics.
'What we have done, for the first time, is we have seen that little droplets, when they're formed from water, actually emit light and get this spark,' Zare said. 'That's new. And that spark causes all types of chemical transformations.'
Lightning is a dramatic display of electrical power, but it is also sporadic and unpredictable. Even on a volatile Earth billions of years ago, lightning may have been too infrequent to produce amino acids in quantities sufficient for life — a fact that has cast doubt on such theories in the past, Zare said.
Water spray, however, would have been more common than lightning. A more likely scenario is that mist-generated microlightning constantly zapped amino acids into existence from pools and puddles, where the molecules could accumulate and form more complex molecules, eventually leading to the evolution of life.
'Microdischarges between obviously charged water microdroplets make all the organic molecules observed previously in the Miller-Urey experiment,' Zare said. 'We propose that this is a new mechanism for the prebiotic synthesis of molecules that constitute the building blocks of life.'
However, even with the new findings about microlightning, questions remain about life's origins, he added. While some scientists support the notion of electrically charged beginnings for life's earliest building blocks, an alternative abiogenesis hypothesis proposes that Earth's first amino acids were cooked up around hydrothermal vents on the seafloor, produced by a combination of seawater, hydrogen-rich fluids and extreme pressure.
Yet another hypothesis suggests that organic molecules didn't originate on Earth at all. Rather, they formed in space and were carried here by comets or fragments of asteroids, a process known as panspermia.
'We still don't know the answer to this question,' Zare said. 'But I think we're closer to understanding something more about what could have happened.'
Though the details of life's origins on Earth may never be fully explained, 'this study provides another avenue for the formation of molecules crucial to the origin of life,' Williams said. 'Water is a ubiquitous aspect of our world, giving rise to the moniker 'Blue Marble' to describe the Earth from space. Perhaps the falling of water, the most crucial element that sustains us, also played a greater role in the origin of life on Earth than we previously recognized.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?
These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?

The advocacy and watchdog organization Environmental Working Group has released its annual 'Dirty Dozen' list of the produce items with the highest levels of pesticides Topping the list is spinach, which EWG says includes a pesticide that's banned in Europe Potatoes were also found to have a pesticide that's banned in EuropeAn annual list of of produce items with high levels of pesticides says leafy greens and fruit are loaded with toxins — including some that are banned in Europe. Dubbed the 'Dirty Dozen,' twelve popular produce items were found to contain high levels of pesticides and fungicides, according to a new report from nonprofit activist and watchdog group, Environmental Working Group. Topping the list was spinach; EWG's report says they found an average of seven pesticides on the leafy greens sampled, and 76% of the samples contained permethrin, which was banned in Europe in 2002. As the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says, it's 'classified permethrin as 'Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans' by the oral route' and is restricted to use on crops and farms only. Rounding out the list were strawberries, kale (and mustard greens and collards), grapes, peaches, cherries, nectarines, pears, apples, blackberries, blueberries and potatoes. The spuds also include a pesticide that's banned in Europe, chlorpropham, which the EPA says is used to 'inhibit sprouting in stored potatoes.' The research was conducted using data from the 53,692 samples of 47 fruits and vegetables from the USDA, and found that 75% of the non-organic samples contained pesticides. Blackberries made the list for the first time, with EWG saying one sample had 14 different pesticide residues. The advocacy group's vice president of science, Alexis Temkin, told CNN, 'The guide is there to help consumers eat a lot of fruits and vegetables while trying to reduce pesticide exposure … One of the things that a lot of peer-reviewed studies have shown over and over again [is] that when people switch to an organic diet from a conventional diet, you can really see measurable levels in the reduction of pesticide levels in the urine.' The group also releases a list of the 'Clean Fifteen' — aka, the produce items with the lowest amount of pesticides. These include pineapples, sweet corn (both fresh and frozen), avocados, papaya, onions, frozen sweet peas, asparagus, cabbage, watermelon, cauliflower, bananas, mangos, carrots, mushrooms and kiwis. Most of these produce items do not have an edible skin, which is a common thread with the fruit and vegetables that the group says have high pesticide levels. The Alliance for Food and Farming's executive director, Teresa Thorne, told CNN, 'consumers should be reassured by decades of toxicology studies, government data and nutrition research which underscores the importance of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables on health and the safety of both organic and conventionally grown produce.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Read the original article on People

These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?
These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

These 12 Fruits and Vegetables Have the Most Pesticides — Does Your Family Eat Them?

The advocacy and watchdog organization Environmental Working Group has released its annual 'Dirty Dozen' list of the produce items with the highest levels of pesticides Topping the list is spinach, which EWG says includes a pesticide that's banned in Europe Potatoes were also found to have a pesticide that's banned in EuropeAn annual list of of produce items with high levels of pesticides says leafy greens and fruit are loaded with toxins — including some that are banned in Europe. Dubbed the 'Dirty Dozen,' twelve popular produce items were found to contain high levels of pesticides and fungicides, according to a new report from nonprofit activist and watchdog group, Environmental Working Group. Topping the list was spinach; EWG's report says they found an average of seven pesticides on the leafy greens sampled, and 76% of the samples contained permethrin, which was banned in Europe in 2002. As the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency says, it's 'classified permethrin as 'Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans' by the oral route' and is restricted to use on crops and farms only. Rounding out the list were strawberries, kale (and mustard greens and collards), grapes, peaches, cherries, nectarines, pears, apples, blackberries, blueberries and potatoes. The spuds also include a pesticide that's banned in Europe, chlorpropham, which the EPA says is used to 'inhibit sprouting in stored potatoes.' The research was conducted using data from the 53,692 samples of 47 fruits and vegetables from the USDA, and found that 75% of the non-organic samples contained pesticides. Blackberries made the list for the first time, with EWG saying one sample had 14 different pesticide residues. The advocacy group's vice president of science, Alexis Temkin, told CNN, 'The guide is there to help consumers eat a lot of fruits and vegetables while trying to reduce pesticide exposure … One of the things that a lot of peer-reviewed studies have shown over and over again [is] that when people switch to an organic diet from a conventional diet, you can really see measurable levels in the reduction of pesticide levels in the urine.' The group also releases a list of the 'Clean Fifteen' — aka, the produce items with the lowest amount of pesticides. These include pineapples, sweet corn (both fresh and frozen), avocados, papaya, onions, frozen sweet peas, asparagus, cabbage, watermelon, cauliflower, bananas, mangos, carrots, mushrooms and kiwis. Most of these produce items do not have an edible skin, which is a common thread with the fruit and vegetables that the group says have high pesticide levels. The Alliance for Food and Farming's executive director, Teresa Thorne, told CNN, 'consumers should be reassured by decades of toxicology studies, government data and nutrition research which underscores the importance of a diet rich in fruits and vegetables on health and the safety of both organic and conventionally grown produce.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Read the original article on People

PFAS exposure before birth could put your teen at risk for high blood pressure, study finds
PFAS exposure before birth could put your teen at risk for high blood pressure, study finds

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

PFAS exposure before birth could put your teen at risk for high blood pressure, study finds

Get inspired by a weekly roundup on living well, made simple. Sign up for CNN's Life, But Better newsletter for information and tools designed to improve your well-being. Prenatal exposure to a class of dangerous, widely used chemicals could be linked to your child having high blood pressure as a teen, according to a new study. Perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS — sometimes called 'forever chemicals' because they don't fully break down in the environment — are a class of about 15,000 human-made chemicals linked to cancers, endocrine-related conditions and developmental problems in children. New data shows the synthetic compounds could also be linked to a teen's risk of developing cardiovascular disease later in life, according to the study published Thursday in the Journal of the American Heart Association. Researchers looked at data from 1,094 children over an average of 12 years. The study team compared measurements of eight types of PFAS chemicals in maternal plasma samples 24 to 72 hours after birth and the children's blood pressure from medical records, according to the study. The kids who were exposed to higher levels of PFAS chemicals in utero were more likely to have higher blood pressure in childhood and adolescence, the research found. The connection was particularly strong in adolescents, male children and Black children, said senior study author Dr. Mingyu Zhang, assistant professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center. The study is observational, meaning that while it shows associations, it cannot prove that PFAS exposure is the cause of the elevated blood pressure, Zhang said. While researchers did adjust for other factors that could be at play, there could be other elements driving the connection between PFAS and blood pressure, he added. That said, the results are strong because this study is one of the largest and most diverse while also using rigorous methods, said Dr. Carmen Marsit, Rollins Distinguished Professor of Research at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health in Atlanta. He was not involved in the research. The topic is important to investigate because if a child has high blood pressure, they are more likely to also have higher blood pressure later on, Zhang said. And that is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, the No. 1 cause of death in the United States. The largest effects were shown in adolescents who were exposed to a mixture of different PFAS chemicals during pregnancy compared with those who were not, which implies that there may be a synergistic impact on cardiometabolic health, Marsit said. 'Most children will be exposed to multiple different PFAS chemicals, so this is worrisome,' he said. The fact that adolescence is the age when prenatal exposure to PFAS is most linked with higher blood pressure suggests that some of the PFAS chemicals could take a long period of time to show their impacts, Marsit said. A long latency of the effects would mean that people don't just need to worry about reducing exposures, but interventions also need to be developed to prevent the health outcomes in people who were exposed earlier, he added. Not only are PFAS forever chemicals –– they also are everywhere chemicals. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey shows that this class of chemicals can be found in nearly every person in the United States, Marsit said in a previous CNN story. There are things you can do to reduce your exposure, however, he added. Major sources of exposure include food, water, and waterproof or stain-resistant items, Marsit said. Helpful steps include drinking filtered water –– using filters like those listed by the Environmental Working Group –– out of metal or glass containers, he said. Plastics contain PFAS and other toxic chemicals, Marsit said. A focus on fresh food can also help, as packaging for foods are often coated in PFAS chemicals, he added. And avoid using nonstick cookware, opting instead for metal, cast-iron or ceramic pots and pans, he said. Dusting, vacuuming, and washing your hands before eating or drinking can also reduce PFAS exposure, Marsit said. Healthy lifestyle choices can reduce the risk of high blood pressure for children who have been exposed to PFAS, Zhang said. 'These include maintaining a healthy weight, eating a balanced diet, reducing salt intake, and encouraging physical activity,' he added. But ultimately, an individual cannot solve PFAS exposure alone, Zhang said. 'We also need policy-level actions to limit and phase out PFAS use in products and industry, and to strengthen monitoring and regulation of PFAS in water systems,' he added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store