Court dismisses request for judicial review in case of Windsor police officer who made convoy donation
An Ontario court has upheld a decision made by the Ontario Civilian Police Commission in the case of a Windsor officer who was found guilty of discreditable conduct over a $50-donation to convoy protesters in 2022.
In May 2023, after a six-day hearing, a Windsor Police Service (WPS) hearing officer ordered Const. Michael Brisco to forfeit 80 hours of pay as a penalty for his donation to the 2022 protest against pandemic mandates.
The donation was made on Feb. 8, 2022, the day after protesters began blocking access to Windsor's Ambassador Bridge.
Brisco's name was found in a database of donors made public after the crowdfunding website GiveSendGo was hacked.
Brisco appealed to the Commission, challenged the finding of discreditable conduct, saying the hearing officer failed to apply a standard of "clear and convincing evidence" in arriving at the finding. The Commission dismissed Brisco's appeal.
Brisco subsequently sought judicial review of the Commission's decision. In his request, Brisco raised four submissions in this court:
That the WPS did not meet its burden of demonstrating on clear and convincing evidence that the Freedom Convoy protests were "illegal", as described in the notice of hearing, at the time of his donation.
That the Commission unreasonably concluded the limitation on his freedom of expression under the Charter was proportionate.
That the Commission erred in failing to address his abuse of process argument.
That the Commission erred in failing to recognize and consider the s. 2(c) Charter value of freedom of peaceful assembly.
In a ruling on Wednesday the Ontario Superior Court of Justice dismissed Brisco's application.
Justice J. O'Brien says the Commission did not err in accepting the hearing officer's finding that the protests were "illegal", as described in the notice of hearing.
"Because Mr. Brisco's challenge to the Commission's Charter s. 2(b) balancing rested on his argument that the protests were not "illegal", the second ground of review also fails," O'Brien wrote in the ruling.
"I further conclude the Commission's decision not to hear the abuse of process argument for the first time on appeal was reasonable. Finally, the Commission was not required to consider the Charter value of freedom of assembly."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Federal Trade Commission Regulatory Overreach Should Be Trump Administration's Next Target
President Donald J. Trump has a dynamic record of repealing government overregulation that has plagued the United States for decades. The first Trump Administration announced at the end of his initial term that they had eliminated eight regulations for every new one adopted, and reduced the direct cost of regulatory compliance by $50 billion. More recently, in January 2025, the President issued an Executive Order requiring that whenever an agency promulgates a new rule, regulation, or guidance, it must also identify at least ten existing rules, regulations, or guidance documents to be repealed. These types of reforms have a beneficial impact for all Americans. The focus on deregulation must now target the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC has long abandoned its historic mandate of not 'burdening legitimate business activity.' The FTC, while a cornerstone of consumer protection and fair competition in the United States, wrongheadedly relies on a one-size-fits-all policy that imposes a 20-year term for compliance obligations under its administrative consent decrees and court settlement orders that can and often do extend into perpetuity. This policy falls squarely into the category of overregulation that unnecessarily stifles competition, innovation, and economic growth. FTC orders often result from settlements or enforcement actions that are theoretically designed to prevent companies from engaging in alleged unfair or deceptive practices. However, the current policy of indefinite or long-term orders arising from consent decrees does not accomplish that goal. The FTC must modernize its policy on consent decrees and court settlement orders, which will benefit U.S. consumers and businesses and will bring the Commission's policies more in line with the Trump Administration's pro-growth, pro-competition economic agenda. Each consent order becomes its own judicially approved private law imposed on industry by the administrative agency that creates it. FTC consent orders become inflexible administrative and judicial rules, fixed in time and incapable of adaptation to changing circumstances. The business landscape is breathtakingly dynamic, with rapid technological advancements and evolving market conditions. Yet consent decrees are static and unresponsive to evolutionary mandates and conditions. Companies must often comply with draconian requirements untethered to their current markets, business practices and technologies. These requirements are often incompatible with consumers' evolving expectations in the applicable marketplace. Consent orders from the past stand as artificial and displaced barriers that force companies to be hesitant to create and invest in new products, processes, or compliance techniques that may be of great benefit to consumers, the marketplace, and the economy. Developing a fairer and more responsive process – including one that allows for earlier termination (sunsetting) and easier modification of orders – is critical to protecting consumers and promoting competition while furthering legitimate business activity. The administrative burden on companies subject to never-ending consent decrees harms the American economy while promoting inefficiency within the FTC and the federal courts. Indefinite orders require resource-intensive ongoing monitoring and enforcement by the FTC in derogation and waste of the intended purposes of the agency. By implementing shorter, more flexible sunset policies on all consent decrees, the FTC can reduce the administrative burden associated with long-term oversight. This would allow the agency to allocate its resources more efficiently, focusing on emerging issues and new cases rather than maintaining outdated orders. The FTC policy that encourages long-term consent decrees is inconsistent with the practices of other agencies. No other agency has administrative or other orders that last as long as the FTC's. The CFPB, for example, sunsets its orders after 5 years. The Department of Justice routinely has even shorter Deferred Prosecution Agreements, typically in the 3-year range. The FTC should align their approach with other agencies to promote fairness and clear-headed approaches to compliance. The goal of the FTC should be to advise businesses about anti-competitive conduct. John Villafranco and Andrea de Lorimier wrote for the Washington Legal Foundation on May 30, 2025, '20-year and indefinite order terms are simply not sensible or desirable. Specifically, long-term orders are (i) incongruous with the FTC's evolution, resulting in order terms that are not necessary to deter recidivism; (ii) inconsistent with, and far longer than, the order terms used by other federal agencies; (iii) unduly burdensome in today's competitive environment; and (iv) a hindrance to innovation.' They suggest a flexible approach that includes differing sunset terms depending on circumstances, a 5-year sunset or a 10-year sunset policy. Indefinite FTC orders fall into the category of regulatory overreach – the very overreach that the Trump Administration attacked in the first term. A shorter, more flexible sunset would provide a balanced approach to regulation that fosters competition and protects consumers. It will mitigate the risk of overreach, while allowing the FTC to enhance its adaptability, encourage compliance and innovation, reduce administrative burden, and promote enhanced fairness and legal certainty in the U.S. economy. President Trump's legacy mandates reformation of the FTC as his next challenge.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Augusta charter committee proposes first major changes for city government
AUGUSTA, Ga. (WJBF) – The heavy lifting is now underway for the Charter review committee. It's the first proposal altering the government structure. 'That way, our city administrator or manager, if you will, doesn't have to be pulled 11 different directions to decide what she should be doing,' said Steve Foushee of the Charter Review proposed new organizational chart would have just the Mayor Pro-Tem, elected by the commission, provide direction to the administrator. Right now, it's the mayor and ten commissioners.'It's not a bad idea when you have too many voices trying to exert their influence it does make it very complicated to do your job,' said Sheffie Robinson, Committee member.'The first reading is always going to have some controversy with it this one has some so we'll work our way through it,' said Lonnie Wimberly, Committee proposal also calls for the mayor to have veto power over commission actions.'There are many effective forms of government that give the mayor veto power and I think if he had veto power, the commission would work better with him to accomplish objectives,' said Foushee.'I don't think the citizens would stand for that right now. I think you're going to have to convince them to give the mayor a veto,' Wimberly. This committee's job is to recommend changes to the charter, but is one too big to be proposed this early? 'Not at all, spent the last two and a half months reading through several thousand pages. Big legalese stuff. It's time to get on with the duty,' said Committee Chair Marcie starting now, change is in the wind when it comes to the city Charter. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Fahey named new state's attorney in Windham
WINDHAM — At a meeting on Monday, the honorable Andrew J. McDonald, Chair of the Criminal Justice Commission, appointed John F. Fahey as the State's Attorney for the Judicial District of Windham. Fahey, who currently serves as a supervisory assistant state's attorney at the Division of Criminal Justice, was appointed by a unanimous commission vote. The eight-year term will commence on July 1. 'On behalf of the Commission, I would like to extend my congratulations to Attorney Fahey on his appointment as State's Attorney for the Judicial District of Windham,' said Andrew J. McDonald, chair of the Criminal Justice Commission. 'Attorney Fahey is an accomplished prosecutor, and his experiences as an effective leader, particularly in his supervisory role at the Division of Criminal Justice, have positioned him well to succeed in this role.' Fahey will succeed Anne F. Mahoney, who has served in the position since May 2016. Fahey joined the Division of Criminal Justice in 1994 as a deputy assistant state's attorney in Harford. He was promoted to the Hartford Judicial District in less than a year and served for 23 years. During this time, he tried numerous cases to verdict, ranging from murder to sexual assault, robbery, arson, assault and weapons violations. In addition, he served as liaison to the Hartford Shooting Task Force and worked as a Special Assistant United States Attorney. Fahey was honored in 2014 by the Connecticut Criminal Justice Educational and Charitable Association as the Prosecutor of the Year. In 2018, he became the Supervisory Assistant State's Attorney of the Cold Case Unit in the Office of the Chief State's Attorney. During that time, Fahey led the unit through numerous investigations and prosecutions, utilizing innovative scientific techniques and investigatory grand jury presentations for unsolved crimes. Fahey graduated from Fairfield University and earned a law degree from Western New England University School of Law. The position of State's Attorney is the chief law enforcement officer in the Judicial District of Windham. The district serves the towns of Windham, Ashford, Brooklyn, Canterbury, Chaplin, Danielson, Eastford, Hampton, Killingly, Plainfield, Pomfret, Putnam, Scotland, Sterling, Thompson and Woodstock.
