logo
How one Just Stop Oil supporter's net zero obsession tore a church apart

How one Just Stop Oil supporter's net zero obsession tore a church apart

Telegraph15-04-2025

Just Stop Oil's paint-throwing activists have blocked motorways, sabotaged petrol pumps and glued themselves to priceless art.
Now, The Telegraph can reveal that the environmental group's influence has reached a rural Peak District parish – leaving a historic church in the cold.
St John the Baptist in Tideswell has been without central heating since Storm Babet wrecked its gas boilers in October 2023.
Peter Robinson, the 79-year-old church warden, and his associate Mike Burrell, 75, have blamed the cold on the Diocese of Derby's strict interpretation of Church law – which they claim has been driven by the views of an 'activist' energy adviser who openly supports Just Stop Oil.
The Telegraph revealed on Saturday that the Church of England's pledge to achieve net zero by 2030 has left at least two dozen parishes without heating for months at a time.
In July 2022, the General Synod, the Church of England's legislative body, introduced new rules that will make it harder for churches to install new gas and oil boilers.
Although not intended as a total ban, a Telegraph investigation has found that some dioceses are interpreting it that way.
The Diocese of Derby has not supported a single request for a new fossil fuel boiler since the rule change.
The Telegraph can reveal that John Beardmore, the diocese's volunteer energy adviser and an engineer who helps officials implement the Church's net zero policy, is a supporter of both Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion.
Mr Burrell described Mr Beardmore as 'an activist on all sorts of fronts' and said he 'didn't consider it was ethical' for him to have taken on such an integral role.
In 2019, the adviser signed a 'Scientists for Extinction Rebellion' declaration, pledging support for 'non-violent direct action' even if it 'goes beyond the bounds of the current law'.
But Mr Beardmore reserves his strongest support for Just Stop Oil – the soup-throwing activists planning their final protest later this month.
On LinkedIn, Mr Beardmore defended Just Stop Oil activists who were jailed for bringing the M25 to a standstill, writing that it 'may be perfectly ethical to commit a crime if a law is sufficiently inappropriate'.
Speaking to The Telegraph, Mr Beardmore said he was not an active member of Extinction Rebellion or Just Stop Oil.
'I've never been to a protest, but I can understand the motives of those that do,' he said. 'I'm perfectly willing to say I've written character references for people who have been on trial for things which have been done by Just Stop Oil.'
The volunteer said he was not required to formally disclose his support for either group to the diocese, but added: 'There is nothing secret about it. When I wrote a character reference for the Just Stop Oil protesters, I gave a copy of it to the Dean.
'Nobody is hiding this stuff under a bush.'
The church wardens met Mr Beardmore last year after diocesan officials refused to support their second application for new boilers.
'The DAC [Diocesan Advisory Committee for the Care of Churches] responded saying we needed to speak to their environmental adviser – a chap called John Beardmore,' recalled Mr Burrell.
'They said he thought he could find us more electricity, which was interesting, because [the] National Grid had already told us that they couldn't give us any more.'
Mr Beardmore proposed digging a trench through the ancient churchyard to lay cables to power air-source heat pumps — a plan Mr Burrell condemned as 'completely against any Christian philosophy you can think of'.
'If you go back a few hundred years, if people didn't come to church, they wouldn't get buried in the churchyard – but the families might want them buried in the churchyard. So in the deep of night, they'd come and dig a hole and put the grave in it. So there will be bones everywhere,' he said.
Parishioners were also troubled. 'It's absolutely barbaric,' said Lynne Burns, 53. 'It's not humane. It's people's relatives and loved ones.'
Mr Beardmore told The Telegraph that his plan had involved following the route of the current power supply to the church, which he said 'wouldn't be disturbing [graves] any more than [what's] already been done'.
But the wardens had other objections. 'What you see now is what you saw in 1380 – there's no way I could stick an air-source heat pump just outside the church,' said Mr Burrell. 'And actually, when you do the calculations, it wouldn't be just one air-source heat pump. It will be a row of them all going all the way down. It is a huge undertaking.
'And fundamentally that still wouldn't give me enough power to heat the church through electricity.'
The cost would also be prohibitive. A new gas boiler would be £10,000 – mostly covered by insurance – while heat pumps would cost around £100,000. Even the diocese's heating adviser, who worked alongside Mr Beardmore, concluded gas was their 'only option'.
Wardens complained when they learnt Mr Beardmore had attended the DAC, which decides on boiler applications.
'He's not a member of the DAC,' objected Mr Burrell. 'They've got the heating adviser who formally advises on that committee and is invited to do so. He says one thing. And the environmental adviser is clearly saying something different. And because of the Church of England Synod directive, the DAC decides to look to the environmental adviser.'
The wardens claimed that the Rev Canon Matt Barnes, the chairman of the DAC, admitted that he had to 'rely on others' on the issue of church heating as he 'didn't understand' the topic.
Mr Burrell suggested the chairman 'must be leaning on Mr Beardmore, mustn't he?'
Mr Beardmore told The Telegraph he saw nothing improper in him attending DAC meetings.
He said the committee makes decisions by collective vote and 'is not just slavishly following some rabid activist'.
A spokesman for the Derby diocesan board of finance said they were 'hugely sympathetic' to the church's situation and had been 'working closely with them on their faculty application for a working heating system and will continue to do so'.
They added that the board would not recommend trenching the churchyard if 'after assessing the risk it felt it would disturb graves'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two young sisters killed in Air India crash after going to surprise their gran
Two young sisters killed in Air India crash after going to surprise their gran

Daily Mirror

time11 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

Two young sisters killed in Air India crash after going to surprise their gran

A Boeing Dreamliner plane bound for London Gatwick and carrying 242 people tragically crashed and exploded shortly after take-off from Ahmedabad Airport yesterday Two sisters killed in the Air India tragedy had flown to India to visit their grandmother for her birthday. Dhir and Heer Baxi, who were both in their 20s, travelled from London to Ahmedabad to visit their family for the special day. But on their return to London Gatwick, the plane barely managed to get off the runway before smashing in to a nearby medical college, exploding into a fiery ball and killing 241 of the 242 people on board. Their family described the girls as "young talents" as they spoke of their heartbreak today. ‌ ‌ Dhir was studying to become a fashion designer, while her sister worked in an investment and renewable energy company as a project director. Previously, she worked in Singapore, which is where it's understood the sisters grew up. Speaking to The Telegraph, their older brother Ishan said: "I can't express what my complete family is going through – shell shocked, not coming to terms is what I can say right now "Both had a natural aura of helping and always cared about family values. They both had aspirations to be successful enough to roam around the world, tension-free. Along with their parents, they both had a proclivity towards modernisation without changing traditional values. "Both my sisters know what is right and what is wrong, thus whatever work they carried out, in academics or fashion, they always got success with no conflicts amongst peers or seniors." A loved one also wrote "RIP young talent" under the last Instagram post on Heer's feed. ‌ In another tragic tale from the horrific crash yesterday, a bride who was meeting her husband for the first time since their wedding was also named as one of the victims. Khushboo Rajpurohit, 21, was on board yesterday when the Boeing Dreamliner plane tragically crashed and exploded shortly after take-off - killing her and 240 other people. ‌ Ms Rajpurohit, who was from a small village called Araba in Rajasthan, India, had married husband Manfool Singh, who studies in London, back in January. She had taken a smiling selfie with a relative at the airport shortly before take-off - but would never reach her destination. ‌Also thought to have died is four-year-old Sara Nanabawa, who was travelling with her parents Akeel and Hannaa when the aircraft smashed into a doctors' hostel in Ahmedabad, India. A family of five from Rajasthan who were relocating to London are also feared dead. In one selfie taken seconds before take-off, Komi Vyas and husband Prateek Joshi, both doctors, were seen smiling as they sat on the aisle opposite their children. Joshi had moved to London a few years ago, and his family were set to join him. Four medical students inside the struck building are believed to have been killed, along with four relatives who were in the building. One man - a British national - miraculously survived the disaster.

Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?
Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?

Daily Record

time2 days ago

  • Daily Record

Shipwreck carrying £16bn found in Caribbean - but who should own 300 year old treasure?

The San Jose is a Spanish galleon that was sunk in 1708 by the Royal Navy, carrying a serious amount of treasure A shipwreck believed to contain one of history's hugest bounties of treasure- amounting to around £16 billion- has been confirmed by researchers, sparking a fiery legal battle over who should own the cash. The Spanish galleon San Jose is packed with gold, silver and emeralds, and it had been lost beneath the Caribbean waters for more than 300 years. But the location of this long-lost ship has now reached the surface, as academics in Colombia have now definitively identified the wreckage. A wreck found near Baru Island, off the coast of Cartagena, in 2015, has now been confirmed as the legendary ship that sank in 1708 following a fierce battle with the Royal Navy, according to The Telegraph. ‌ Now known as the "holy grail of shipwrecks" for its bountiful riches, the San Jose was transporting treasure from Peru to Spain to finance the Spanish side of the War of the Spanish Succession. But on its journey, the vessel was intercepted by a British squadron led by Charles Wager, who later became First Lord of the Admiralty. ‌ During the clash, the ship's powder magazines detonated, sending it and its valuable cargo to the murky depths, reports the Express. Finding the ship had been deemed a lost cause until an expedition in 2015 used underwater drones to capture images of the wreckage on the seabed. Now, experts believe that the mystery has finally been solved after 300 years. "This body of evidence substantiates the identification of the wreck as the San Jose Galleon, a hypothesis that has been put forward since its initial discovery in 2015," the academics concluded. "The finding of cobs created in 1707 at the Lima Mint points to a vessel navigating the Tierra Firme route in the early 18th century. The San Jose Galleon is the only ship that matches these characteristics. ‌ "This find presents a rare opportunity to explore an underwater archaeological site and deepen our understanding of colonial maritime trade and routes." But as the discovery makes headlines, a legal row has ensued on where (and with whom) the treasure belongs. ‌ Photographs of the undersea wreck show dazzling artefacts including silver coins minted in 1707 at the Lima Mint, exquisite Chinese porcelain from the Kangxi period (1662-1722), and ancient cannons emblazoned with markings tracing back to 1665. Colombia, Spain and Peru are all gunning for the treasure, with each nation laying historical claims over the sunken bounty that dates back centuries. Indigenous groups along with descendants of the miners who originally extracted the gold and silver from Peruvian soil also demand recognition and rights to the wreck's riches. ‌ Adding to the high seas drama is Glocca Morra, a determined treasure-hunting outfit asserting that it pinpointed the wreck years ago, as early as 1981. The enterprise's modern-day incarnation, Sea Search Armada, is seeking a whopping £7.9 billion, claiming that the current discovery falls within "a mile or two" of where they first detected something in the waters. ‌ A 2020 Colombian statute is also standing firm in its declaration that all galleon-bound remnants firmly belong to the state, a regulation that other treasure seekers firmly oppose. The sinking of the San Jose was a major setback for Spain's war effort in the 18th century. The War of the Spanish Succession concluded with Britain taking control of Gibraltar, Newfoundland and Nova Scotia, but the legendary treasure remained concealed. Now, after centuries submerged, the riches of the San Jose might finally be revealed - but only if an agreement can be reached on who will take ownership of the treasure. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store