logo
Trump's Nippon Steel bid support boosts Japan's trade talk hopes

Trump's Nippon Steel bid support boosts Japan's trade talk hopes

Japan Timesa day ago

U.S. President Donald Trump's pivot to champion Nippon Steel's bid to buy U.S. Steel raises the prospect of fresh positive momentum for Japan's sluggish negotiations with the U.S. over tariff relief.
While the contours of the proposed steel deal remain vague, Trump is set to hold a rally in Pittsburgh on Friday to tout the deal as a victory for his tariff strategy and American workers. As part of the expected deal, the U.S. government would hold de facto veto rights on some company decisions through a so-called golden share.
The apparent breakthrough, and the opportunity it gives Trump to present it as a win, raises the possibility that Japan could get some new traction in its bid to get tariffs on autos and other exports removed, some analysts say.
"If the Nippon Steel deal progresses, it could be viewed as one of Trump's achievements. In that sense, I think things are moving in a favorable direction,' said Tomohisa Ishikawa, chief economist at the Japan Research Institute.
After three rounds of talks in Washington since Trump launched his global tariff offensive, Japan's negotiation team has had little to show for its efforts to win an exemption from a 25% levy on auto exports and a 10% across-the-board tariff that's set to rise to 24% in early July barring a trade agreement.
Japan's top negotiator Ryosei Akazawa is scheduled to fly to the U.S. again for another round of talks on Friday. On Tuesday, he suggested that Trump and Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba are likely to meet on the sidelines of the Group of Seven summit in Canada in mid-June, a potential moment to announce a deal.
To be sure, there are few signs of an agreement on the horizon. Akazawa has repeatedly insisted that he will continue to press for the complete removal of tariffs, but hasn't given any indications of compromises by either side.
"We will proceed with a sense of urgency while maintaining a steady pace,' he said on Tuesday.
While Japan initially moved quickly to strike up talks with the U.S., it has since been overtaken by rival China, which adopted a much tougher approach and imposed its own tariffs on the U.S.. Beijing and Washington agreed a deal earlier this month to drop their most punitive tariffs for 90 days.
Japan's hope will be that the U.S. Steel breakthrough adds weight to the message that Tokyo has carried throughout negotiations of seeking mutual economic benefits. Japan has been the largest foreign investor in the U.S. in the last three years and employs thousands of American workers at car plants and other facilities in the U.S.
So far, Japanese government officials have declined to comment on the impact of the expected U.S. Steel deal as they seek more information about it.
Tatsuhiko Yoshizaki, chief economist at Sojitz Research Institute, said that the expected steel deal could segue into an agreement over cooperation in shipbuilding, a sector in which the U.S. is seeking to expand capacity. Japan is the world's third largest shipbuilder by output, behind China and South Korea.
However, Yoshizaki cautioned that it's far from clear that Japan should expect anything other than more difficult negotiations with the U.S.
"When I speak with former officials from the Foreign Ministry and the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, they all express concern — they say Japan is being far too bullish,' he said.
At the same time, Yoshizaki said that current officials appear confident.
"Maybe they know something we don't,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump
China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump

Nikkei Asia

timean hour ago

  • Nikkei Asia

China has 'totally violated' agreement with US on tariffs: Trump

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, holds up a chart next to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick as Trump delivers remarks on tariffs in the White House's Rose Garden in Washington on April 2. © Reuters WASHINGTON (Reuters) -- U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday said China had violated an agreement on tariffs with the United States. "China, perhaps not surprisingly to some, HAS TOTALLY VIOLATED ITS AGREEMENT WITH US. So much for being Mr. NICE GUY!" Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform.

The next great job churn is already starting
The next great job churn is already starting

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

The next great job churn is already starting

The geography of employment in the U.S. is being shaped by two distinct trends. The first is low levels of housing churn and, therefore, interstate migration, a normal part of the business cycle that should eventually turn around. More consequential are signs that artificial intelligence is beginning to suppress hiring in some of the most technology-centric parts of the country such as the San Francisco Bay Area — a shift that may portend a structural change in the labor market. This is a useful time to look at changes in employment growth in different parts of the country and compare these with the pre-pandemic economy, since overall job growth is currently only a touch lower than it was in 2019. U.S. employment grew 1.2% in April from a year earlier, close to the 1.3% growth seen in 2019. Let's start with the reduced migration from cold states to warm states that is showing up in the employment data of the metros most affected. House prices are a useful proxy for interstate migration. The two large metros with the weakest home price growth are Dallas, Texas, and Tampa, Florida, according to the S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller indices. Employment in Dallas grew 1.4% in March from a year earlier, roughly half its 2019 pace, while in Tampa, it grew just 0.9%, a third of its 2019 pace. Reduced outmigration from the Northeast and Midwest, on the other hand, helps explain why job growth is above the pre-pandemic pace in Buffalo, New York and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. In theory, less interstate migration should also boost the fortunes of the San Francisco Bay Area, a region famous for people leaving to get away from high housing costs. Yet employment in the region has been declining since its post-pandemic peak in November 2022 — coincidentally, the month OpenAI's ChatGPT launched. This could be chalked up to tech companies laying off workers in 2023 and early 2024 to preserve profitability after a hiring binge in the years previous. Meta Platforms's headcount fell by 22% on a year-over-year basis in its "year of efficiency' push in 2023. But that post-COVID-19 culling is behind us — big tech companies are collectively investing hundreds of billions of dollars into AI, and Meta's headcount has grown 10% over the past year. So, it's noteworthy that employment in the country's tech heartland continues to decline at a time when, in theory, the Bay Area has the tailwinds of massive investment and fewer people leaving the region. The most likely culprit is the impact that AI is having on labor demand. The types of white-collar jobs shrinking the fastest in the U.S. include categories such as software engineers, data engineers and application engineers. On recruitment site Indeed, job postings for software engineers are currently lower than they were in the spring of 2020. Some of this drop is likely due to efficiency gains from AI, while some may be due to companies needing to control headcount where they can while they pile huge sums of money into advanced chips and data centers. Boston is another knowledge job-centric metro area showing signs of labor market softness, with its unemployment rate rising from 3.5% to 4.5% over the past year, the highest level outside of the pandemic period since 2015. The education hub may be more vulnerable than some other cities to AI adoption since the technology tends to be good at the kind of work that would typically be offered to young college graduates. These are dynamics we should expect to see, according to "From San Francisco to Savannah? The Downstream Effects of Generative AI,' a paper by researchers at Louisiana State University and Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Metro areas with both high educational attainment and high costs of living are the most vulnerable to AI disruption. These metros have many of the kinds of jobs AI can replace and cuts there help reduce headcount expenses more quickly. Authors Scott Abrahams and Frank S. Levy highlight parallels with the 1980s when manufacturing-centric communities with a low share of educational attainment were hit hardest by the negative shock of automation and globalization. This doesn't mean that San Francisco will turn into a technological Rust Belt — the region is at the forefront of AI innovation, after all, and even if it ends up with fewer software development jobs, those could be replaced by different kinds of AI-enhanced knowledge work. Abrahams and Levy point out that the manufacturing shock benefited the southern U.S., not just Asian exporting countries, and it's possible an AI shock will lead to more balanced economic development across the U.S. That may take time, though, particularly while interstate migration remains constrained by a dysfunctional housing market. Given our experience with manufacturing job losses and signs that another labor-market reordering is coming, it's time policymakers at the local and national level start to take the potential for AI disruption seriously. Conor Sen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist.

Western businesses will not return to Russia
Western businesses will not return to Russia

Japan Times

timean hour ago

  • Japan Times

Western businesses will not return to Russia

In recent weeks, Russian officials have promoted the idea that once the war in Ukraine ends, Western businesses — particularly American companies — would be welcome to return to Russia. The administration of U.S. President Donald Trump has responded with interest. But how realistic is that prospect? Would Western investments and joint ventures really come back? The Greek philosopher Heraclitus once famously observed, 'No man ever steps into the same river twice, for it's not the same river, and he's not the same man.' The same could be said of Russia. In the 1990s, following the Soviet Union's collapse, Western businesses poured into the country. Over the next 30 years, these businesses invested hundreds of billions of dollars in Russia, bringing not just capital but also expertise and institutional connections. In many ways, they helped integrate Russia into the global economy. That legacy has been largely erased. On paper, several thousand Western companies still operate in Russia, but most are little more than mailboxes or fronts for Russian business entities. The few remaining Western firms with meaningful operations are effectively trapped: they either cannot exit the market or are being pressured to sell their assets — often at huge losses — to well-connected Russians.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store