Israel attacks Yemeni ports, warns Houthi leader could be target
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Photo:
Nir Elias / AFP
Israel struck Yemen's Red Sea ports of Hodeidah and Salif on Friday, continuing its campaign to degrade Houthi military capabilities and warning that the group's top leader could be targeted if attacks on Israel persist.
The Houthis have continued to fire missiles at Israel in what they say is solidarity with Palestinians in Gaza, although they have agreed to halt attacks on US ships.
Israel has carried out retaliatory strikes in response, including one on 6 May that damaged Yemen's main airport in Sanaa and killed several people.
On Friday, the Israeli military said it dropped over 30 munitions on Houthi targets in its eighth such attack. It said the ports of Hodeidah and Salif were being used to transfer weapons, reiterating its warnings to residents of those areas to evacuate.
The Israeli strikes killed at least one person and injured nine, the Houthi-run health ministry said in a statement.
Residents in Hodeidah said they heard four loud booms and saw smoke rising from the port following the strikes.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a joint statement that they would hunt down the Houthis' top leader, Abdul Malik al-Houthi.
"If the Houthis continue to fire missiles at the State of Israel, they will be severely harmed, and we will also hurt the leaders," they said, adding that al-Houthi could join the list of militant figures killed by Israel, such as Hamas' Yahya Sinwar and Hezbollah's Hassan Nasrallah.
A Yemeni lifts a portrait of Huthi leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi during a ceremony marking the birth anniversary of Islam's Prophet Mohammad, in Sanaa on 27 September, 2023.
Photo:
MOHAMMED HUWAIS / AFP
Mohammed Ali al-Houthi, a senior group figure, described the Israeli threats as "illusions", saying on X that they were aimed at buying time by setting "unattainable goals."
The Houthis are part of Iran's so-called "Axis of Resistance" against Israeli and U.S. interests in the Middle East, alongside Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. About 60 percent of the Yemeni population lives under their control.
Since the start of the Israel-Hamas war in October 2023, the Houthis have launched dozens of missile and drone attacks toward Israel, most of which have been intercepted or landed short.
- Reuters
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
16 hours ago
- RNZ News
UN chief calls for probe into deaths near Gaza aid site
By AFP team in Gaza City with Stuart White in Jerusalem Palestinian rescuers evacuate injured people after an Israeli drone reportedly opened fire on civilian gatherings near an aid distribution point. Photo: EYAD BABA UN chief Antonio Guterres has called Monday for an independent investigation into the killing and wounding of scores of Palestinians near a US-backed aid centre in Gaza the day before. Gaza's civil defence agency said Israeli gunfire killed at least 31 people and wounded 176 near the aid distribution site in the southern city of Rafah on Sunday, with medics at nearby hospitals also reporting a deluge of gunshot wound victims. The Israeli military denied firing at people "while they were near or within" the site. But a military source acknowledged "warning shots were fired towards several suspects" overnight about a kilometre away. "I am appalled by the reports of Palestinians killed and injured while seeking aid in Gaza yesterday. It is unacceptable that Palestinians are risking their lives for food," Guterres said in a statement, without assigning blame for the deaths. "I call for an immediate and independent investigation into these events and for perpetrators to be held accountable." Israel's foreign ministry called the statement "a disgrace", and faulted Guterres for not criticising Hamas. The Israeli government has worked with the group running the site, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), to introduce a new mechanism for distributing aid in Gaza that has bypassed the longstanding UN-led system. The UN has declined to work with the group out of concerns about its neutrality. One 33-year-old who was present on Sunday told AFP it was "around 5 or 5:30 am, before sunrise" when the gunfire broke out at a spot known as the Al-Alam roundabout, where a crowd had gathered from the early hours of the morning to wait before heading to the GHF centre about a kilometre away. "Of course it was the Israeli army who shot live bullets," said the witness, who declined to be named for fear of Israeli reprisals. "Thousands of people were waiting at Al-Alam roundabout... but the army fired and everyone ran away. There was fear and chaos. I saw with my own eyes martyrs and wounded in the area." Another witness elsewhere in the crowd, 35-year-old Mohammed Abu Deqqa, said "at first, we thought they were warning shots". "But it didn't take long before the shooting intensified. I began to see people lying on the ground, covered in blood. That was around 5:30 am , " he said. "People started running, but many couldn't escape. The bullets were chasing people even as they tried to flee." AFP photos taken around 5.40 am showed civilians loading bodies onto donkey carts shortly after sunrise. Gaza civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said teams of rescuers arrived around 6am and began assisting with the dead and wounded, though civilians and other paramedics had already taken some to Nasser hospital and a Red Cross field hospital. The military on Sunday said an initial inquiry indicated its troops "did not fire at civilians while they were near or within the humanitarian aid distribution site", and urged "media to be cautious with information published" by Hamas. But according to an Israeli military source, "warning shots were fired towards several suspects who advanced towards the troops" overnight. The incident took place "approximately one kilometre away" from the GHF distribution centre, outside of operating hours, the source said. Army spokesman Effie Defrin said Sunday that "Hamas is doing its best, its utmost, to stop us from" distributing aid, and vowed to "investigate each one of those allegations" against Israeli troops. A GHF spokesperson also accused Hamas of circulating "fake reports", saying: "All aid was distributed today without incident." In a video message from Nasser hospital later on Sunday morning, visiting British surgeon Victoria Rose described a scene of "absolute carnage", saying "all the bays are full, and they're all gunshot wounds". The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said that its field hospital in Rafah received 179 people, including 21 pronounced dead on arrival. The ICRC reported that all the wounded "said they had been trying to reach an aid distribution site", adding that "the majority suffered gunshot or shrapnel wounds". GHF said that as of Monday, it had distributed more than 5.8 million meals' worth of food from its centres. Israel has come under increasing international pressure to improve the humanitarian situation in Gaza following a more than two-month blockade on aid that was only recently eased. The UN has warned the entire population is at risk of famine, and has also reported recent incidents of aid being looted, including by armed individuals. Talks aimed at reaching a ceasefire have so far failed to produce a breakthrough. Civil defence spokesman Bassal said 14 people were killed on Monday in an Israeli strike on a house in Jabalia, in the north. Asked for comment, the army said only that "strikes were conducted toward terror targets in northern Gaza". The Israeli military also issued an evacuation order for parts of Khan Yunis on Monday. The health ministry in Hamas-run Gaza says at least 4201 people have been killed in the territory since Israel resumed its offensive on 18 March, taking the war's overall toll to 54,470, mostly civilians. Hamas's 2023 attack on Israel resulted in the deaths of 1218 people, also mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures. -AFP
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Judith Collins tells security summit NZ setting up space squadron
Defence Minister Judith Collins. Photo: RNZ / Calvin Samuel The Defence Minister has told a security summit New Zealand is setting up a space squadron against a backdrop of rising threats. Judith Collins told the high level Shangri-La inter-governmental conference in Singapore the Air Force's 62 Squadron would be reactivated. She also told the summit that as New Zealand doubled its defence spending, "We need to ensure that we are building capabilities that are effective into the future and this is particularly true for the domains of space, cyber and undersea warfare." In World War Two 62 Squadron ran radar operations in the Pacific in Bougainville and the Solomon Islands, including in the Guadacanal campaign. "The 21st century 62 Squadron will again turn to the skies, it's just going to be a little bit higher this time," Collins said, appearing on a panel talking about cyber, undersea and space challenges. Reuters previously reported the squadron would be reactivated in July with 15 personnel in what was a symbolic step to formalise the significance of the space work the Air Force was already doing. Collins told the summit New Zealand was also working with its partners to "leverage out launch capabilities and our other unique advantages such as a lack of immediate neighbours, to support our shared security interests". The United States recently confirmed it was in talks with several partner countries, including New Zealand, about the potential for more military satellite launches in future - though Collins had said she was not "directly" engaged with that, and the NZ Defence Force said launch contracts were a matter for the US and private company Rocket Lab that has spaceports at Mahia and in the US. "No nation can work on space alone," Collins told the summit, while pointing out "we beat Russia" for the number of rocket launches last year. Transparency around space, cyber and undersea developments was key to avoid misunderstandings, she said. China's senior colonel Shen Zhixiong said the militarisation of space and other emerging technology domains had accelerated, undermining collective security, asking the panel how the international community should resolve that. Collins herself had noted New Zealand's reliance as a small state on a rules-based order. Also, she noted satellites were increasingly crucial and "increasingly attractive targets for hostile action" despite the big downsides of using weapons in space. She singled out Russia, and claims from US lawmakers that Moscow was developing a nuclear weapon for use in space, for special mention. The $12 billion defence capability plan that covered till 2029, and aimed by 2032 to double New Zealand defence spending, would make the NZDF "increasingly lethal", she told the summit. The plan featured investment in space systems (up to $600m by 2029), cyber (up to $300m) and "for the very first time" in maritime surface and subsea drones (up to $100m) to surveil what was happening in New Zealand's vast ocean surrounds, she said. However, Budget 2025 provided only $30m for space shared with a range of other "small-scale" projects; it had no funding for maritime drones , only for aerial counter-drone systems. There was an undisclosed amount for "an initial uplift to the defensive cyber capabilities" from 2025-29, Budget 2025 said. A lot of money is still having to be poured into conventional kit - replacing both the Navy's maritime helicopters, and the old, breakdown-prone two 757 planes operated by the Air Force. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Otago Daily Times
a day ago
- Otago Daily Times
Clarity needed on our Gaza stance
New Zealand's foreign policy stance on Palestine lacks transparency, John Hobbs writes. It is difficult to understand what sits behind the New Zealand government's unwillingness to sanction, or threaten to sanction, the Israeli government for its genocide against the Palestinian people. The United Nations, human rights groups, legal experts and now genocide experts have all agreed it really is "genocide" which is being committed by the state of Israel against the civilian population of Gaza. It is hard to argue with the conclusion genocide is happening, given the tragic images being portrayed across social and increasingly mainstream media. Prime Minister Netanyahu has presented Israel's assault on Gaza war as pitting "the sons of light" against "the sons of darkness". And promised the victory of Judeo-Christian civilisation against barbarism. A real encouragement to his military there should be no-holds barred in exercising indiscriminate destruction over the people of Gaza. Given this background, one wonders what the nature of the advice being provided by New Zealand's Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade to the minister entails? Does the ministry fail to see the destruction and brutal killing of a huge proportion of the civilian people of Gaza? And if they see it, are they saying as much to the minister? Or is the advice so nuanced in the cloak of "diplomatic language" it effectively says nothing and is crafted in a way which gives the minister ultimate freedom to make his own political choices. The advice of the officials becomes a reflection of what the minister is looking for; namely, a foreign policy approach that gives him enough freedom to support the Israeli government and at the same time be in step with its closest ally, the United States. The problem is there is no transparency around the decision-making process, so it is impossible to tell how decisions are being made. I placed an Official Information Act request with the Minister of Foreign Affairs in January 2024 seeking advice received by the minister on New Zealand's obligations under the Genocide Convention. The request was refused because while the advice did exist, it fell outside the timeline indicated by my request. It was emphasised if I were to put in a further request for the advice, it was unlikely to be released. They then advised releasing the information would be likely to prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand and the international relations of the government of New Zealand, and withholding it was necessary to maintain legal professional privilege. It is hard to imagine how the release of such information might prejudice the security or defence of New Zealand or that the legal issues could override the public interest. It could not be more important for New Zealanders to understand the basis for New Zealand's foreign policy choices. New Zealand is a contracting party to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Under the convention, "genocide, whether committed in time of peace or in time of war, is a crime under international law which they [the contracting parties] undertake to prevent and punish". Furthermore: The Contracting Parties undertake to enact, in accordance with their respective Constitutions, the necessary legislation to give effect to the provisions of the present Convention, and, in particular, to provide effective penalties for persons guilty of genocide. (Article 5). Accordingly, New Zealand must play an active part in its prevention and put in place effective penalties. Chloe Swarbrick's private member's Bill to impose sanctions is one mechanism to do this. In response to its two-month blockade of food, water and medical supplies to Gaza, and international pressure, Israel has agreed to allow a trickle of food to enter Gaza. However, this is only a tiny fraction of what is needed to avert famine. Understandably, Israel's response has been criticised by most of the international community, including New Zealand. In a carefully worded statement, signed by a collective of European countries, together with New Zealand and Australia, it is requested that Israel allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza, an immediate return to ceasefire and a return of the hostages. Radio New Zealand interviewed the Foreign Minister Winston Peters to better understand the New Zealand position. Mr Peters reiterated his previous statements, expressing Israel's actions of withholding food as "intolerable" but when asked about putting in place concrete sanctions he stated any such action was a "long, long way off", without explaining why. New Zealand must be clear about its foreign policy position, not hide behind diplomatic and insincere rhetoric and exercise courage by sanctioning Israel as it has done with Russia over its invasion of Ukraine. As a minimum, it must honour its responsibilities under the Convention on Genocide and, not least, to offer hope and support for the utterly powerless and vulnerable Palestinian people before it is too late. — John Hobbs is a doctoral student at the National Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies, University of Otago.
