Behind the Port of Auckland: Ford utes, tractors and a 1525% fee hike
However, challenges in some sectors of the economy were obvious.
'Cement is flat, structured steel through multi-cargo is the worst it's ever been, cruise was okay this year, next year [cruise demand] drops by 30%,' Gray told Markets with Madison.
The volume of second-hand vehicle imports had already halved from its peak, he said.
'This trade of all has really been hit by the slowdown in the New Zealand economy.'
The cars that were coming in were more combustion engine conventional cars, not electric.
'I think what will also happen is, if the tariff situation stays with the US and China, I think China will start to look for free-trade markets,' Gray said.
'So rather than sending the BYDs into the West Coast, I'm expecting us to see some quite significant growth in the importation of BYDs into markets like ours.'
Gray said the company, which was owned but not controlled by the Auckland Council, planned to 'sell' back two of the port's wharves to the city for recreational use.
'Not give up, sell,' Gray explained, relating to a debate with the council about whether the land would change hands through a commercial transaction.
The port had guided that it would make a full-year net profit after tax of between $75 million and $80m in the financial year about to end.
'I've been quite open about starting to charge much more in access charges, because in my view, the city wasn't getting a fair return.'
The charge for a vehicle, such as a truck, to enter the container terminal was $8 when Gray arrived at the port in March 2022.
It now cost $130 per vehicle - a 1525% increase.
Advertise with NZME.
And Gray planned to keep increasing the cost, he said, to be more in line with Australian ports that charged around $350.
The company had paid down $100 million worth of debt in the past three years.
It scrapped a straddle software automation project, resulting in a write-off of $65 million.
'I don't think you should ever rule out automation, but what I would say is that automation project wasn't the right one.
'We don't have any capacity constraints now for at least the next 15 to 20 years.'
Go behind every aspect of the Port of Auckland operation in today's episode of Markets with Madison.
Sponsored by CMC Markets.
Disclaimer: The information provided in this programme is of a general nature, and is not intended to be personalised financial advice. We encourage you to seek appropriate advice from a qualified professional to suit your individual circumstances.
Madison Malone (nee Reidy) is host and executive producer of the NZ Herald 's investment show Markets with Madison. She joined the Herald in 2022 after working in investment, and has covered business and economics for television and radio broadcasters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Urgent Public Meetings Planned For Dunedin And Wānaka As Concern Over Fast-Tracked Goldmine Swells
Press Release – Sustainable Tarras Inc Suze Keith, chair of Sustainable Tarras Inc., says that there is a broad spectrum of issues people are very concerned about. She said that local communities are just coming to grips with the scale of the mine. As community concern about the planned fast-tracked open-pit gold mine in Central Otago grows, two urgent public meetings have been organised in Dunedin and Wānaka next week. Organisers have confirmed that there is already strong interest in both meetings. The meetings, in Dunedin on Tuesday 17 June and in Wānaka on Thursday 19 June, will include a panel of expert speakers to lay out the known facts about the fast-tracked gold mine, take audience questions and discuss what the community can do. The panelist line up is being announced later this week. Suze Keith, chair of Sustainable Tarras Inc., says that there is a broad spectrum of issues people are very concerned about. 'From the information released so far, there are numerous very worrying issues' she said. 'These include the size and scale of the mine right in the heart of an Outstanding Natural Landscape, the massive tailings dam which will hold 10,000 olympic swimming pools of toxic waste, and the extensive use and storage of large quantities of cyanide just upstream of the Clutha River. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.' Santana Minerals, an Australian company, is preparing its full fast-track application to file in June this year, and aims to 'strip the landcover by 2026.' Despite numerous requests for details and meetings, Santana is not being open and transparent with concerned locals. 'They're not providing us information we're reasonably asking for, and which we know they have got.' She said that local communities are just coming to grips with the scale of the mine. 'Even the cyanide-leaching processing plant will be 130m wide and a kilometer long. The mine will involve an estimated 200 million tonnes of waste rock and 13 million tons of toxic tailings. These numbers, and the likely impacts and risks, are mind-boggling.' The mine is also getting attention from people who are concerned that the fast-track process is being used inappropriately for a project which is not about public infrastructure or community benefit, but rather is solely about extraction of resources and maximising shareholder profits, most of which will go offshore. This mine would become the largest single earthworks in Otago since the Clyde Dam could be approved without the general public having any right of input into the proposal. People interested in attending meetings in Dunedin or Wānaka can register to find out more and secure a seat at The meetings are free to attend, but numbers are limited. Key, high-level facts we know about the planned mine so far: There is a lot of detail behind each of these points Santana Minerals is proposing to establish a giant open-cast gold mine along Thomson Gorge Road in the Dunstan Mountains, Central Otago. The mine would be located on land zoned as an Outstanding Natural Landscape in the Central Otago District Plan, and in a conservation-covenanted site. The site is highly visible from other locations in the upper Clutha basin, including Hawea, local highways and from the air. Four open pits are planned, the largest 1 km wide and 200-300m deep. Santana further proposes a tailings dam 2 km wide holding the equivalent of 10,000 olympic swimming pools of toxic waste. The mine will also require a cyanide-leaching processing plant 130 m wide and 1 km long. The mine will involve an estimated 200 million tons of waste rock and 13 million tons of toxic tailings. Under the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024, Santana is looking to file its full application with the EPA in June 2025. Santana claims it could be stripping the landcover by 2026. The mine would be the largest single earthworks in Central Otago since the Clyde Dam and could be approved without the general public having any right of input into the proposal. Santana Minerals Limited is an Australian company. If given the green light, it hopes to attract international investment partners to fund its proposal. Santana asserts high profits over a ten-year period, though no account has been taken of losses to be suffered by local industries such as viticulture and tourism, or the environmental costs. Locals are widely opposed, and see the mine as a destructive and unnecessary incursion on the area's virtues.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
Urgent Public Meetings Planned For Dunedin And Wānaka As Concern Over Fast-Tracked Goldmine Swells
As community concern about the planned fast-tracked open-pit gold mine in Central Otago grows, two urgent public meetings have been organised in Dunedin and Wānaka next week. Organisers have confirmed that there is already strong interest in both meetings. The meetings, in Dunedin on Tuesday 17 June and in Wānaka on Thursday 19 June, will include a panel of expert speakers to lay out the known facts about the fast-tracked gold mine, take audience questions and discuss what the community can do. The panelist line up is being announced later this week. Suze Keith, chair of Sustainable Tarras Inc., says that there is a broad spectrum of issues people are very concerned about. 'From the information released so far, there are numerous very worrying issues' she said. 'These include the size and scale of the mine right in the heart of an Outstanding Natural Landscape, the massive tailings dam which will hold 10,000 olympic swimming pools of toxic waste, and the extensive use and storage of large quantities of cyanide just upstream of the Clutha River. And that's just the tip of the iceberg.' Santana Minerals, an Australian company, is preparing its full fast-track application to file in June this year, and aims to 'strip the landcover by 2026.' Despite numerous requests for details and meetings, Santana is not being open and transparent with concerned locals. 'They're not providing us information we're reasonably asking for, and which we know they have got.' She said that local communities are just coming to grips with the scale of the mine. 'Even the cyanide-leaching processing plant will be 130m wide and a kilometer long. The mine will involve an estimated 200 million tonnes of waste rock and 13 million tons of toxic tailings. These numbers, and the likely impacts and risks, are mind-boggling.' The mine is also getting attention from people who are concerned that the fast-track process is being used inappropriately for a project which is not about public infrastructure or community benefit, but rather is solely about extraction of resources and maximising shareholder profits, most of which will go offshore. This mine would become the largest single earthworks in Otago since the Clyde Dam could be approved without the general public having any right of input into the proposal. People interested in attending meetings in Dunedin or Wānaka can register to find out more and secure a seat at The meetings are free to attend, but numbers are limited. Key, high-level facts we know about the planned mine so far: There is a lot of detail behind each of these points Santana Minerals is proposing to establish a giant open-cast gold mine along Thomson Gorge Road in the Dunstan Mountains, Central Otago. The mine would be located on land zoned as an Outstanding Natural Landscape in the Central Otago District Plan, and in a conservation-covenanted site. The site is highly visible from other locations in the upper Clutha basin, including Hawea, local highways and from the air. Four open pits are planned, the largest 1 km wide and 200-300m deep. Santana further proposes a tailings dam 2 km wide holding the equivalent of 10,000 olympic swimming pools of toxic waste. The mine will also require a cyanide-leaching processing plant 130 m wide and 1 km long. The mine will involve an estimated 200 million tons of waste rock and 13 million tons of toxic tailings. Under the Fast-Track Approvals Act 2024, Santana is looking to file its full application with the EPA in June 2025. Santana claims it could be stripping the landcover by 2026. The mine would be the largest single earthworks in Central Otago since the Clyde Dam and could be approved without the general public having any right of input into the proposal. Santana Minerals Limited is an Australian company. If given the green light, it hopes to attract international investment partners to fund its proposal. Santana asserts high profits over a ten-year period, though no account has been taken of losses to be suffered by local industries such as viticulture and tourism, or the environmental costs. Locals are widely opposed, and see the mine as a destructive and unnecessary incursion on the area's virtues.
Scoop
5 hours ago
- Scoop
BSA Upholds Complaint Against Central FM Re. Incorrect Labelling Of DoC Conservation Land As 'Stewardship Land'
The Broadcasting Standards Authority has upheld a complaint against Central FM regarding an interview with Mike Petersen, spokesperson for Ruataniwha v.2, where 22 ha. of DoC conservation land was inaccurately labelled as 'stewardship land'. The damning Broadcasting Standards Authority (BSA) decision, released today, found that Mike Petersen, lead proponent for Ruataniwha dam v.2, inaccurately labelled the 22 ha. DoC-owned land needed to build Ruataniwha v.2 as 'stewardship land', when in fact it comprises 93% conservation land. Wise Water Use Hawkes Bay spokesperson, Dr Trevor Le Lievre, says the finding raises a credibility issue for Mr Petersen, and is questioning his capacity to manage the build of the estimated-$500 million Ruataniwha dam v.2. The BSA found that Petersen '…made two definitive statements that it was not conservation land' on Central FM Radio, Waipukurau, in an interview held on 8 October last year with station part-owner and fellow dam-proponent, Steve Wyn Harris: [1] The BSA found: 'The Authority agreed the description of the 22 hectares of Department of Conservation land needed for the dam project as 'only stewardship land', when approximately 93% of it has 'conservation park status', was a material inaccuracy which the broadcaster had not made reasonable efforts to avoid.'[summary]; and 'The broadcast created a misleading impression about the 22 hectares of DOC land needed for the project as being 'stewardship' land and having inferior conservation values'. [para. 25] 'Mr Petersen is asking the community to trust him to build a $500 million dam, yet can't even correctly identify the status of the DoC land needed to build the dam. This begs the serious question as to what else Mr Petersen has got wrong?' said Le Lievre, adding: 'alarm bills should be ringing loudly for potential investors. 'Mike Petersen is selling the public a story about Ruataniwha v.2: a story about economic prosperity to be shared by all, about a solution to our depleted aquifer and rivers, and about restoring our water quality, and dealing with the vagaries of climate change: has anyone fact checked the story?' Wise Water Use is now questioning other statements made by Petersen: 'A number of statements have been made by Mr Petersen as part of the Ruataniwha v.2 story. We believe that in light of this recent ruling Mr Petersen now needs to provide evidence to back those statements,' said Le Lievre, who cited several unsubstantiated claims: 'This is a commercial project …we are not seeking public investment into this project at all' [2] Mike Petersen recently petitioned local lines company, Centralines, for money to develop another feasibility case for the dam, and received a commitment of $100,000. Wise Water Use argues this money is coming out of the pockets of CHB power consumers; The dam promoters are also wanting the public to pick up the cost of so-called 'environmental flows' which would allocate 20 Mm3 water annually for release down the main Tukituki River stem.[3] Wise Water Use calculates that should this cost fall to Regional Council ratepayers it would entail an average 10% rates increase and is running a petition asking the Regional Council to state publicly they won't assume the cost. 'There is a hydro generation component in the project as well, which appeals to those seeking green investment.' [4] Wise Water Use points out that there have never been any detailed plan for hydro generation presented in any public reports on the dam, nor other public forum, and that such a proposal doesn't stack up financially, and argues this is an attempt to greenwash the project by Mr Petersen. 'The proposal is completely different in focus and intent from the original Ruataniwha project, despite sharing the original project's site on the Makaroro river.' [5] Wise Water Use says that the renamed 'Tukituki Water Security Project' is no different to the Ruataniwha dam v.1: it would use exactly the same engineering design, rely on the same consents to take water, be located on the same part of the Makaroro River, still need the 22 ha. of DoC conservation land, and would remain an industrial-scale irrigation dam. 'Mike Petersen is fronting a $500 million dam project, which with associated on-farm infrastructure costs would cost more than $1 billion dollars. His inability to get the status of the DoC conservation land correct brings into question every other unsupported statement he has made in support of Ruataniwha v.2, and undermines the very viability of the project,' finished Le Lievre. [1] Petersen: 'This is not conservation land, this is DoC stewardship land'; and 'This is not part of the DoC conservation estate, it's owned by DoC but is classified as stewardship land'. Source: Central FM interview (8/10/2024) [2] Source: Central FM interview (8/10/2024) [3] Petersen was recently quoted as stating: 'I would argue that it's unreasonable to expect private investors to supply that (environmental flows) free of charge'. Source: Newsroom (15/5/2025). [4] Source: Farmers Weekly (8/10/2024)
