Disposable vapes ban to come into force in bid to improve health and cut litter
The crackdown on the devices, also known as single-use vapes, makes it illegal for any retailer – ranging from corner shops to supermarkets – to sell them.
The ban applies to both online and in-store sales across England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and all disposable vapes whether or not they contain nicotine.
Retailers are still allowed to sell reusable vapes.
It follows the soaring use of disposable vapes in schools and a flood of plastic rubbish from the discarding of the devices.
Disposable vapes are non-refillable and unable to be recharged, and are typically thrown away with general waste in black bins or littered rather than recycled.
Even when they are recycled, they need to be taken apart by hand, while their batteries are a fire risk to recycling facilities and can leak harmful chemicals into the environment.
Rogue traders who continue to sell them risk a fine of £200 in the first instance, followed by an unlimited fine or jail time for repeat offending.
Figures from the charity Action on Smoking and Health (Ash) suggests the number of vapers in Great Britain who mainly use single-use devices fell from 30% in 2024 to 24% in 2025, while the use of disposables by 18 to 24-year-old vapers fell from 52% in 2024 to 40% in 2025.
The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) said usage among young vapers remained too high, and the ban would 'put an end to their alarming rise in school playgrounds and the avalanche of rubbish flooding the nation's streets'.
Circular economy minister Mary Creagh said: 'For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine. That ends today.
'The Government calls time on these nasty devices.'
Ash deputy chief executive Caroline Cerny said: 'It's promising to see that many people switched away from disposable vapes to re-usable products well ahead of the ban. This is particularly marked among young people, who were more likely to use disposable products due to their attractiveness, affordability, and heavy marketing.
'This new law is a step towards reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking. It will be up to manufacturers and retailers to ensure customers are informed and able to reuse and recycle their products securing a real change in consumer behaviour and a reduction in environmental waste.
'If behaviour does not change then further regulations will be possible following the passage of the Tobacco and Vapes Bill.'
Association of Convenience Stores chief executive James Lowman said: 'We have been working with retailers, the Government and Trading Standards for months on providing detailed guidance that sets out how to spot non-compliant vapes after the ban comes into force, as well as advising retailers on what they need to do with any stock of disposables left over on June 1.
'We strongly support robust enforcement activity, starting with the businesses that are already openly flouting the rules by selling illicit product and who will continue to sell disposable vapes once they're outlawed.
'It is essential that Trading Standards teams are given the resources they need to get illegal vapes and other products off the streets, as these rogue businesses undermine the work of responsible retailers across the country.'
The UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) said its members had moved quickly to bring new fully compliant products to market well ahead of the June 1 deadline, but warned of 'serious unintended consequences' of bans as a regulatory measure.
UKVIA director general John Dunne said: 'Vaping was invented to help adult smokers quit and disposable products became the most successful vape products to do so because they are simple to use and most closely replicate the sensation of smoking.
'We are concerned that this ban will encourage former smokers who have already transitioned from cigarettes – which kill 220 people every day in the UK – to return to combustible tobacco or opt for unregulated vapes.
'We also have clear evidence, from countries including the USA and Australia, showing that black market, counterfeit and illicit vape sales spiked when vape bans and restrictions are introduced.'
The separate Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which is currently working its way through Parliament, also includes powers to potentially restrict the packaging, marketing and flavours of e-cigarettes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Calls to legally require supermarkets to reveal ‘shrinkflation' to customers
The Liberal Democrats want government legislation amended to legally require large supermarkets to inform shoppers when the quantity of goods within a pre-packaged product has decreased thereby increasing the price per unit of measurement. Details of the changes would need to be attached or placed alongside the product for a 60-day period, according to the amendment tabled to the Product Regulation and Metrology Bill. Digestive biscuits, butter, crisps and chocolate bars were among the items found to have decreased in size while their unit cost increased, according to 2024 research by Compare the Market. MPs could be asked to vote on the Lib Dem proposal on Wednesday when the Bill returns to the Commons for its report stage. Lib Dem trade spokesman Clive Jones said: 'The scourge of shrinkflation needs to be exposed. 'Shoppers have been hammered during a cost-of-living crisis all while massive companies and big supermarket chains are forcing them to pay more for less to protect their bottom lines. 'They need to be called out on it and for shoppers to know when they are at risk of being ripped off. 'The Government should accept this Liberal Democrat amendment so that we can help protect shoppers and their already stretched household budgets from another round of shrinkflation.' The Bill as a whole gives powers to ministers to regulate the marketing and use of goods in the UK after Brexit. It was previously amended in the House of Lords to provide protections to the imperial pint measure to ease fears over its future. The changes accepted by the Government would bar ministers from preventing or restricting the use of the pint in relation to draught beer, cider or milk in returnable containers. It also provides a definition of a pint as 0.56826125 cubic decimetres. A Department for Business and Trade spokesman said: 'We're committed to protecting consumers from unfair commercial practices and making sure they have all the information they need to make informed decisions on purchases. 'That's why we're bringing in strict new laws next year to make sure businesses use clearer labelling for prices on supermarket shelves, and retailers show all unit prices in either kilograms or litres to improve clarity for shoppers.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Our obsession with spoiling pets has gone too far: your dog doesn't care if its collar is from Burberry
A delightfully fluffy expenses controversy emerged in Queensland in the past week. The ABC reported that the chair of a Queensland government-owned company 'faced questions' after billing the taxpayer for a hotel stay with a luxury accommodation package for his dog. The energy company chair, his 'fur-baby Vito' and his wife (unnamed) allegedly enjoyed a $500-a-night stay at the Ovolo hotel in Fortitude Valley when a board meeting obliged his attendance in Brisbane, 100km away from his Sunshine Coast home. The 'luxury pet-friendly accommodation' offered at the five-star Ovolo includes a 'super comfy' dog bed, treats, premium dog food, mealtime mat and water bowl, as well as a take-home dog toy 'because who doesn't love a present?' According to the report, although the stay last year was approved, the cost was queried by the company's operations director who feared it was 'above the state's recommended rate of $181 a night for stays in Brisbane'. The story provokes two immediate responses. The first is: should the people of Queensland really be subsidising some suit's puppycation when the state's youth justice system cries out for reform? The second response is, alas: 'Honey, grab the dog. Ovolo are doing a puppy package. We're going to Brisbane.' If the suit wants to move on from the story, I'd suggest they merely outline to the Queensland government the efficiency dividends delivered by choosing dogcommodation over the alternatives. The productivity impact on leaving one's dog behind for a business trip is considerable. The phone costs of being told by a partner on solitary dog duty at home that 'he keeps sniffing the door, waiting for you to come back' may be negligible, but consider the data costs of watching breed-specific Instagram videos from your lonely hotel room to make moony, sooky faces over. Forty-eight percent of Australian households own dogs; to those of us on the outlay for food, treats, toys, grooming, kennels, vets and puppy school, $500 seems like a rare bargain. While the suit declined to comment to the ABC, a company spokesperson said his travel with his dog involved extenuating circumstances related to 'personal family circumstances, which are private'. They said the trip complied with the corporation's policies and that he 'strongly rejected the assertions made against him'. The 'VIPooch' story isn't this nation's only political dog-indulgence expenses controversy. In 2016, it came out that the Victorian corrections minister, Steve Herbert, had used his taxpayer-funded ministerial car to chauffeur his dogs, Patch and Ted, the 97km between his Melbourne residence and his Trentham country home – notably, without him. Herbert insisted he'd done this only 'once, possibly twice', but the backlash at the time was enough for him to resign his ministry and, soon after, leave parliament. One wonders if he'd be obliged into such a dramatic apology now. In the almost 10 years since the 'dog chauffeur scandal', the century-long shift of pets from household roles of utility to those of companionship has ratcheted up rapidly. Australians have always been pet people, but we are now living in the wake of a post-pandemic pet proliferation that between 2019 and 2021 raised the proportion of Australian households with pets from 61% to a goggling 69%, marking the largest increase in decades. Australians are now – officially – more pets than people, with 28.7 million fluffy, furry, scaly and feathery pals spread across the population. (Notably, households own over 11 million fish. Someone really should tell the Ovolo marketing department.) Other western countries are similar; 94 million Americans owned a pet in 2024, which is more people than voted for Donald Trump. Half of European households are now pet owners. The existence of Petfood Industry magazine itself suggests an expanding 'pet economy' that's estimated to be worth $157bn in the US alone – yet the figures this august journal supplies are also a revelation: gen Z are building a pet empire. In 2024, 18.8 millions American households from this cohort were pet owners – a staggering 43.5% increase from only the previous year. It has long been observed that the size of every market spawns a proportional online influencer community to grift from it; the word 'petfluencer' has entered the dictionary. Those horrified by the concept of a dog-positive hotel stay should block their eyes here. Harrods will sell you a designer diamond dog collar for £500,000; 'pet-focused fashion' is a real term invented by real human beings to describe brands that hawk pet accessories from raincoats to jewellery made of precious gems and leather. 'Barkitecture' is now also a word, used in the 'designer dog house' biz; you can DIY or invest in 'doggy mansions' – even a dog castle – with a build that costs more than a human house. You can charter a private plane for your pet. Send them off to a spa. There's dog yoga, custom cakes and an 'aesthetic cat furniture solution' for those whose problems obliging it are truly beyond my imagination. The problem with late-stage capitalism is its indulgences are so extreme that fancier pet food, a BarkBox delivery or the odd commonwealth-sponsored dog chauffeur seem positively humble in comparison. As the birth rate continues to decline, 'pet parenting' has emerged as a household-building alternative, expanding the content of family, if not the definition, as a place of mutual love and togetherness. Problem is, we are making our pets the new projection surface for all the fucked-up materialistic status performance infecting us elsewhere – this time, in the most clownish of ways – because your dog does not care if its collar's from Burberry or its hotel really deserves its five-star accreditation. What makes it most like a human child, my friends, is that it just needs to be fed, needs to be safe – and to spend time with you. Van Badham is a Guardian Australia columnist
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan to raise foreign direct investment target to $1 trillion by mid-2030s, sources say
TOKYO, June 2 (Reuters) - Japan is set to raise its 2030 foreign direct investment target by 20% and push the figure as high as 150 trillion yen ($1.05 trillion) by the middle of the decade, people familiar with the matter told Reuters. The mid-decade goal, almost triple the current level of investment of some 50 trillion yen, underscores Japan's push to revitalise its economy by attracting foreign firms to pump money into key growth sectors such as decarbonisation. The new targets, to be formally included in the government's upcoming fiscal and economic policy guidelines in June, represent a sharp escalation from the previous goal of 100 trillion yen by 2030. The plan is to revise the 2030 goal to 120 trillion yen which will set the stage for accelerated effort in the years beyond to reach 150 trillion yen before 2035, said the people, who declined to be identified as the matter is still private. The expanded foreign direct investment strategy is also aimed at stimulating regional economies and creating jobs outside major urban centres, the people said. To this end, they said, the government is considering the use of new grants and enhanced public-private collaboration frameworks to support the establishment of foreign facilities in local areas. ($1 = 143.4300 yen)
