Grangemouth closure risks fuel shortages and rationing, MP claims
Petroineos stopped refining crude oil at Grangemouth on Tuesday and now the area's MP has claimed this posed a major threat to fuel security.
The plan is to turn Grangemouth into a fuel import terminal, where refined oil from abroad is brought into Scotland for use.
But Alloa and Grangemouth MP Brian Leishman argued that the knock-on effects of 430 jobs at the refinery meant there was a greater chance of fuels being rejected, threatening supply.
He told the Sunday National: 'The job losses will not be exclusive to refinery workers either. The shared services workers in areas such as laboratories rely on the refinery for work and they are currently going through a redundancy consultation process.
'One of the consequences of this is that fuels will arrive at the replacement import terminal and will undergo a greatly reduced testing process. If the fuels fail these tests then they cannot be distributed – meaning that Scotland will therefore be susceptible to a fuel shortage and the very serious possibility of rationing or even running out.'
Bosses dismissed Leishman's warning as 'highly irresponsible and factually incorrect' while the UK Government said they were 'categorically false'.
(Image: Danny Lawson/PA Wire)
Leishman has also raised concerns about increased traffic on the North Sea, after an oil tanker crashed into a cargo ship outside the port of Hull earlier this year.
One crew member from the Solong container ship was assumed dead after smashing into the Stena Immaculate in March, sparking a huge inferno when its cargo – a shipment of jet fuel – caught fire.
Leishman said this incident should concern Scots if more vessels are travelling to and from Grangemouth to transport oil.
He added: 'The fact that an energy abundant country such as Scotland is now relying on importing fuels is utterly ridiculous. Especially at a time when there is war raging in Europe along with serious political upheaval throughout the world. The need for self-reliance is obvious.
'We are now at the mercy of European transport logistics and we know how precarious that can be, we saw this with the North Sea jet fuel spill off the coast of Humberside just the other month.'
The outspoken Labour backbencher also raised concerns that abandoning Grangemouth could be environmentally risky, arguing that using oil refined in the UK was less polluting than imported fuel.
He added: 'Both the UK or Scottish governments have been environmentally negligent in that neither have carried out an environmental impact assessment of Grangemouth stopping refining and instead relying on European shipping routes. It is my fear that we are shifting emissions from one part of the continent to another, and are not effectively tackling the climate issues we face.'
(Image: Office of Brian Leishman)
Leishman (above) said the refinery should be nationalised – but blasted the SNP's campaign on this point as 'nothing more than a performance'.
He added: 'Since being elected last July, I have called for the nationalisation of Grangemouth. It is wrong that my party in charge at Westminster refuses to even entertain the idea. It was rightly deemed good enough for Scunthorpe Steel. The same should also hold true for Grangemouth oil.'
A Petroineos spokesperson said: 'Casting aspersions on the security of Scotland's fuel supply in this manner is highly irresponsible and factually incorrect.
'As we have explained to Mr Leishman directly, Petroineos has invested £50 million in creating a modern import and distribution terminal. As part of this investment, tank storage and other infrastructure has been upgraded, ensuring our stock levels remain consistent with other refineries terminals and well able to meet Scotland's demand.
'Even before the cessation of refinery operations at Grangemouth we regularly operated in 'import only' mode for sustained periods without any variations in supply to our customers. As an organisation, we are vastly experienced in managing complex fuel supply chains and our approach has been validated by an industry expert and scrutinised and approved by the UK Government's energy security team.'
Scotland's acting Energy Secretary Gillian Martin (below) said that the decision to close the refinery was 'premature, fundamentally short-sighted and detrimental to the transition to net zero' and that she was 'disappointed' the SNP's calls for nationalisation had gone unheeded.
(Image: Web)
She added: 'Ministers could still act – just as they did at Scunthorpe.
'The UK Government has full responsibility for fuel security and we are actively working with them to ensure that Scotland's needs are met.'
A UK Government spokesperson said: 'These claims are categorically false and ignore the resilient systems in place to ensure we have sufficient fuel to meet demand.
'When this Government came to power, there was no overall plan for the future of the Grangemouth refinery.
'Within weeks, the Government delivered an unprecedented package of support for the community, including a £200 million commitment from the National Wealth Fund to invest in a viable industrial future for the site.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
28 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
Retailer with several Scots shops closing one of its venues
Signage has appeared on The Designer Rooms store on Campbell Street in Kilmarnock, East Ayrshire, revealing it will be shutting. READ MORE: Brand-new 'free' store opens in busy Glasgow shopping centre READ MORE: 'Established' & popular retailer announces closure of Glasgow Fort store Retailer with several Scots shops closing one of its venues (Image: Newsquest) The sign reads: "Closing down sale. This store only. Massive Reductions. Up to 80 per cent off everything." The firm, which is known for selling 'quality furniture', has multiple shops across the country, including in Renfrew, Coatbridge, Livingston, Ayr, Glasgow's Silverburn Shopping Centre, and Uddingston. It is unclear when the store will shut its doors for the last time.
The Guardian
30 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Flying shoes, a viral BLM speech and that leather jacket: Q+A's most memorable moments
After 18 years, the national broadcasters flagship program, Q+A, is dead. ABC confirmed the axing on Wednesday, a day after staff were warned of cuts. The ABC's news director, Justin Stevens, said it was time for the broadcaster to 'rethink how audiences want to interact and to evolve how we can engage with the public to include as many Australians as possible in national conversations'. The weekly discussion program was launched in 2007 by executive producer Peter McEvoy and host Tony Jones, and in its early years was highly influential, regularly making headlines and setting the news agenda. Let's reflect on some of its most memorable moments. Actor Meyne Wyatt's powerful monologue, in June 2020 at the height of global Black Lives Matter protests, recounted his experiences across the spectrum of racism – from micro-aggressions to outright hatred. 'Silence is violence. Complacency is complicity. I don't want to be quiet. I don't want to be humble. I don't want to sit down,' so part of his speech, pulled from his semi-autobiographical play, City of Gold, went. It racked up more than three million views, and saw him included on 2021's Time100 Next list of emerging leaders. 'It was last minute; George Floyd had died, #BlackLivesMatter was at its height. Q+A wanted to focus on the treatment of Aboriginal people here,' Meyne told Guardian Australia in 2022. 'I was aware I was representing – I had to bring it.' An audience member hurled his shoes at John Howard, the former prime minister who signed Australia up to the Iraq war, after demanding he defend his decision to send 2,000 troops to support the US-led 2003 invasion. 'That's for the Iraqi dead!' Peter Gray shouted as he flung the shoes during a 2010 episode of the program. Gray was then escorted from the studio. Howard had a close relationship with George W Bush and Australia was one of the first countries to commit troops to Bush's 'coalition of the willing'. 'I thought it was justified,' Howard said during the broadcast. 'I think there were errors made after the military operation ended. I think there were too few troops and I think a mistake was made in disbanding the Iraqi army. But I will continue to defend … the original decision on the basis on which it was taken.' At that point, Gray stood up and threw his shoes – mimicking the shoe-throwing protest against Bush in Baghdad in 2009. A criminologist and former detective in the audience lectured politicians in 2024 for failing women and putting politics above the reality of deaths caused by domestic violence. 'How dare you! How dare you go into politics, in an environment like this, when one woman is murdered every four days, and all you … can do is immediately talk about politics? That is just disgraceful,' Vincent Hurley said to federal senators Murray Watt and Bridget McKenzie, and NSW opposition leader Mark Speakman. 'For God's sake, how long do we have to listen to politicians like you … high-horsing about? 'I went to 20 domestics in one night when I was in the police. I held a 10-year-old child in my arms who died from the stabbing from her father … You don't need a royal commission. That money needs to go into frontline services – now.' The clip, shared on ABC's social media went viral, garnering millions of views. Germaine Greer's 2012 crack about former prime minister Julia Gillard is infamous. Greer was responding to an audience question about Gillard's image. She initially defended the first female prime minister as an administrator who got things done, then went on to say: 'What I want her to do is get rid of those bloody jackets! … They don't fit … You've got a big arse, Julia. Get over it.' In a later interview with Channel Nine, Gillard said the incident made her feel 'sorry' for Greer. From 'being the feminist for our times, to end up talking like that for cheap laughs about another woman was a really sad thing,' Gillard said in 2014. Q+A became the most complained about ABC program of 2023, with a single November episode on the war in Gaza receiving almost 1,000 complaints, most of which accused the show of pro-Israel bias. That episode was particularly sensitive, host Patricia Karvelas had said at the start, and was recorded without a live studio audience, and with heavy police presence outside. The tense episode featured Labor MP Tim Watts, former ambassador to Israel Dave Sharma, Israel & Jewish Affairs Council chair, Mark Leibler, Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president, Nasser Mashni, and UN special rapporteur, Francesca Albanese. After the program, Albanese told Crikey the standard of Australia's media discourse was 'very basic'. Many viewers accused Karvelas on social media of not questioning members of the panel – especially Mashni and Albanese – fairly, or giving them equal time to speak. An investigation by the ABC's ombudsman said the episode presented highly polarising views in a fair and balanced way. The program as a whole received 2,100 complaints in 2023, according to ABC's ombudsman. Audience member Duncan Storrar laid out his situation in 2016: 'You're gonna lift the tax-free threshold for rich people. If you lift my tax-free threshold, that changes my life. That means that I get to say to my little girls, 'Daddy's not broke this weekend. We can go to the pictures'.' His question to then assistant treasurer Kelly O'Dwyer continued: 'I've got a disability and a low education, that means I've spent my whole life working for minimum wage … Rich people don't even notice their tax-free threshold lift. 'Why don't I get it? Why do they get it?' The part-time truck driver then became the focus of savage media coverage, particularly in the Newscorp press. ABC broadcaster Jon Faine grilled the outlet on its 'value system'. Many rallied online in support of Storrar, who thanked them, but told ABC's Media Watch, 'I didn't want this'. National director of lobby group GetUp!, Simon Sheikh, lost consciousness live on air in 2012. He slumped over the desk, before sitting back up after a few seconds and being helped off stage. He later posted that he was in hospital. Labor's climate change minister at the time, Greg Combet, rushed over to help. Liberal MP Sophie Mirabella, sitting right next to Sheikh, looked on in surprise and was criticised on social media for her reaction. GetUp! urged people to stop criticising her. 'It was an extraordinary circumstance and everyone was shocked,' the group said in a statement shared online. Mirabella said later: 'I thought initially he was just bent over laughing, because that's what you see, and turned around to try and get a better look and I – like everyone else on the panel – was just stunned.' Yassmin Abdel-Magied and Jacqui Lambie clashed in 2017, after the Tasmanian senator said all Muslims who supported sharia law should be deported from Australia, in a Trump-style ban. The author and Youth Without Borders founder responded that she was frustrated by uninformed comments about Islam, and that people were 'willing to completely negate any of my rights as a human being, a woman, as a person with agency simply because they have an idea about what my faith is about'. Lambie said: 'There is one law in this country and it is the Australian law … it is not sharia law, not in this country. Not in my day.' To which Abdel-Magied protested: 'You don't know anything about my religion,' adding that Islam specified the precedence of 'the law of the land that you are on'. Then-host Tony Jones had to intervene: 'Can I say, shouting at each other does not help. So please stop.' Lambie told Abdel-Magied to 'stop playing the victim. Your ban got lifted, get over it.' Abdel-Magied later wrote about the furious public response to her comments, describing herself as 'the most publicly hated Muslim in Australia'. A pro-Putin member of the audience was dramatically booted out of the studio in 2022 by then host Stan Grant after he asked a pro-Russia question. The audience member asked: 'As someone who comes from the Russian community here in Australia, I've been pretty outraged by the narrative created by our media depicting the Ukraine as 'the good guy' and Russia as 'the bad guy'.' 'Believe it or not, there are a lot of Russians here and around the world that support what Putin is doing in the Ukraine, myself included. Since 2014, the Ukrainian government together with Nazi groups like the Azov Battalion have besieged the Russian populations in the Donbas killing an estimated 13,000 people according to the United Nations,' he went on, prompting shouts of 'lies' from the audience. 'My question is: where was your outpouring of grief and concern for those thousands of mostly Russians?' Grant corrected the figures, noting the UN figure referred to the number of people killed in the conflict on both sides to date, and after a brief discussion the program moved on to other issues. But a few minutes later, he brought the conversation back: 'Something has been bothering me, I have to admit … people here have been talking about family who are suffering and people who are dying. You supported what's happening, hearing that people are dying. Can I just say – I'm just not comfortable with you being here. Could you please leave?' The audience applauded, as the audience member initially resisted, then left the studio. Grant said the question was not vetted by producers. The pro-Russian audience member said it was 'not true' the question was unvetted, but that he had made an 'addition' when asking it. Malcolm Turnbull's famous leather jacket made frequent appearances with the former prime minister on the Q+A panel. When Turnbull appeared on Q+A without the jacket, it made headlines. He later auctioned it for charity on eBay and raised $1,800 for Sydney's Wayside Chapel.
The National
41 minutes ago
- The National
Why Scotland joining Efta or EEA is infinitely preferable to the EU
Since then, there has been an understandable desire expressed by many to rejoin the EU after independence, though how that is delivered remains to be seen. However, the debate thus far has not fully addressed other options: notably membership of Efta/the EEA, at least in the medium term. Efta is the European Free Trade Association. It was formed in 1960 as kind of an economic waiting room prior to EU accession. The UK was a member of Efta before 1973 when it passed legislation to become a member of the EU. Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, and Lichtenstein never left the waiting room, and currently comprise Efta. READ MORE: These key economic truths show how independent Scotland and Wales can succeed The EEA is the European Economic Area. This was a treaty signed in 1992 which enabled all the EU states and the Efta members (excluding Switzerland) to be part of the single market. This requires all members of the EEA to respect the four freedoms of movement – workers, goods, services, and capital. Switzerland has a series of bilateral treaties with the EU under which it must abide by these four freedoms, but it is much more complicated than EEA membership. I have attended two biennial seminars of the Efta/EEA council in Brussels, and was struck by the positive engagement between all EEA members, Efta and the EU. There is this slogan against Efta membership that Scotland would be 'rule takers, not rule makers'. This ignores the fact that within the EEA treaty, all EEA states must be closely consulted on any change in EU law pertaining to the EEA agreement. On many occasions, Efta/EEA members engaged in the process early and had a positive formative influence on the law. READ MORE: Assa Samake-Roman: What if we are wrong about reasons for rise in far-right support? While Efta/EEA members do not have a vote on laws, I asked Efta members if they had ever had EU laws forced on them against their will. They couldn't think of any such occasions. Many smaller EU states feel they have no influence at all. Upon a 'democratic event' affirming majority support for independence, Scotland could apply to join Efta. While I cannot speak on their behalf, I can safely say there is great support among Efta officials for Scottish membership. The three Efta/EEA members would then lobby to get an independent Scotland into the EEA. Again, I cannot speak on their behalf, but when I last spoke with Efta officials they saw no impediment to Scotland joining Efta and the EEA within a few short months. Compare this to the EU accession process. This could easily take 10 years. EU law (the acquis) comprises 35 chapters, all of which would need to be reflected in Scots law, and Scotland would have to demonstrate that it has the institutions in place to apply EU law. It doesn't, because the 'Scottish' civil service is merely an appendage of the UK state. File photo of a Yes for EU rally at the Scottish parliamentAll 27 EU member states have veto power at any stage in the process. Think Spain and Catalonia. At the recent SSRG conference in Dunfermline, we held a panel on Efta/EEA membership. I was in touch with @YesforEU, and asked if any known prominent advocate for Scotland in the EU would be willing to speak. We got zero responses. There seems to be a contrived prevailing assumption that, because Scots voted to remain in the EU in 2016, rejoining the EU after independence would be easy and preferable to Efta membership. I was in touch with a well-known purportedly pro-indy corporate lobbyist, who after changing his mind, assured me that the EU membership 'polled' better than Efta/EEA, therefore independence should be automatically linked with EU membership. However, that assumes Scots are well-informed about the pros and cons of membership of both, and can make an informed decision. This debate has yet to be held. This ignores the many independence supporters who, despite the Scottish vote to remain in 2016, take a dim view of EU membership. As an American with UK citizenship through my Scottish father, I have been able to carve out a career as a university teacher in France. When I came to France in 1995, I felt a genuine optimism towards the economic objectives of the EU, and have benefited from it. My view of the EU has changed drastically since then. The musician Frank Zappa famously remarked that '[US] Politics is the entertainment division of the military-industrial complex'. Regrettably, the same can increasingly be said of the EU and Nato, which are becoming indistinguishable. At the same time, the EU is increasingly authoritarian. Whether you agree with them or not, look at how Viktor Orban in Hungary and Robert Fico in Slovakia have been threatened because of their opposition to the EU approach to Russia and Ukraine. It also managed to get Calin Georgescu eliminated in Romania as a presidential candidate because he dissented from Ursula Von der Leyen's orthodoxy. Kaja Kallas is the High Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security PolicyAnd don't get me going on the incompetence and stupidity of Kaja Kallas, the EU foreign minister. She is openly Russophobic, speaks about defeating and carving up Russia, and laments that if the EU cannot defeat Russia, how can it defeat China? Does Scotland want to join THAT EU? What happens when that bile is directed at Scotland if it dissents from EU-manufactured consent? Maybe, over time, the EU leadership will regain some sanity, get back to its original economic purpose and stop violating its members' sovereignty and cultures. Until then, Scotland should join Efta/the EEA, recoup and exercise its popular sovereignty, and let the EU sort itself out. Whether it does or not, Scotland will be much better off as an Efta/EEA member, and will be warmly welcomed. Later, there is no obstacle to joining the EU, if that is what Scots democratically decide. Dr Mark McNaught is the founder of the Scottish Sovereignty Research Group and Maître de Conférences at the University of Rennes 2, France
