How Trump's 'big, beautiful' immigration door got a lot smaller
You don't hear much about the 'big, beautiful door' anymore. During Donald Trump's first presidential campaign, when some Republicans were queasy about building a 1954-mile border wall, he liked to add a caveat. There would be a wall, but it would have a door — big, beautiful, and sometimes even 'fat' — for the people 'coming in legally.'
That never happened in Trump's first term. Running again in 2024, after the Biden-era backlash to millions of new asylum-seekers, Trump never mentioned the 'door.' The closest he came was an interview on the 'All In' podcast, when co-host Jason Calacanis asked if Trump would 'promise' to 'import the best and brightest around the world' once he closed the border. Trump agreed. 'You graduate from a college,' he said, 'I think you should get automatically, as part of your diploma, a green card to be able to stay in this country.'
The campaign walked most of this promise back, limiting it to the 'most skilled graduates who can make significant contributions to America.' But that didn't happen, either. Right now, any aspiring foreign student who didn't already have a visa can't get one; the president, conducting an ad hoc war on Harvard, is spitballing potential caps for how many foreign students the private university should be allowed to take. Eventually.
In the elite media, tech, and business conversations, this is an obvious outrage, totally self-defeating, a threat to an American advantage that everybody took for granted. In Republican politics, it just makes sense: There is no issue that doesn't cut their way if framed as a choice between American citizens and non-citizens.
They're selling the 'big, beautiful bill' around its impact on immigration: Half a billion dollars in new immigration law enforcement, and cuts to Medicaid funding in states whose plans cover non-citizens. They're delighted to see Democrats defending Rep. LaMonica McIver after she was charged for allegedly assaulting ICE officers. Most of the DOGE cuts that the administration will ask Congress to approve next month were to foreign aid, another fight Republicans love having.
To mass confusion from Democrats, Republicans are offering both zero-sum scarcity and endless abundance. In that story, Chuck Schumer's party wants to keep you poor. Every dollar, job, or university spot that doesn't go to a non-citizen can go to an American — and Democrats don't like that. Cryptocurrencies will create endless wealth for Americans with zero downsides or risk — and Democrats don't like that, either. This is all more popular than the wall-with-a-door compromise Trump used to run on. Democrats, unsure how to counter this, are waiting for it to stop being so politically effective.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump appears to undercut US proposal to Iran, declaring he won't allow any uranium enrichment
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Monday appeared to undercut a proposal that was offered by his special envoy to Iran, saying he will insist that Tehran fully dismantle its nuclear enrichment program as part of any deal to ease crushing sanctions. Trump and Steve Witkoff, who is leading the negotiations for the U.S., have repeatedly offered inconsistent public messages about whether Iran would be allowed to retain the capacity to enrich uranium to lower levels for civilian purposes. The Trump administration maintains that it will not allow Iran to develop a nuclear weapon. The negotiations have been framed by Trump as both countries' best chance to avoid direct military conflict over Iran's nuclear program. Tehran, which denies seeking a nuclear weapon, has insisted that it will not agree to any deal that fully scraps its enrichment program. 'Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Trump wrote on social media. The White House didn't elaborate on the post. Trump's post comes after media reports that Witkoff's latest proposal to Tehran would allow Iran to retain low levels of enrichment for civilian uses like nuclear medicine and commercial power if it agrees to shut down its heavily protected underground sites for a period of time. The U.S. and Iran have engaged in several rounds of direct nuclear talks for the first time in years. Senior officials — including Witkoff and Trump himself — have said within the last few weeks that Iran would not be able to keep enriching uranium at any level. The proposal, reported by Axios and confirmed by two U.S. officials, called for the creation of a regional consortium to handle uranium enrichment for civilian uses — a plan first studied more than a decade ago in negotiations that led to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. Trump was sharply critical of that agreement — which also allowed set limits on uranium enrichment but permitted Iran to maintain such a capacity — and withdrew the U.S. from it in 2017 during his first term. The officials spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity to discuss private diplomatic negotiations. The International Atomic Energy Agency found that Iran has further increased its stockpile of uranium enriched to near weapons-grade levels since its last update in February, according to a confidential report released by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on Saturday. Iran has maintained that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only, but Iranian officials have increasingly suggested that Tehran could pursue an atomic bomb. 'President Trump has made it clear that Iran can never obtain a nuclear bomb,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement before Trump's post. 'Special Envoy Witkoff has sent a detailed and acceptable proposal to the Iranian regime, and it's in their best interest to accept it. Out of respect for the ongoing deal, the Administration will not comment on details of the proposal to the media.' The proposal that Trump appeared to undercut on Monday evening included significant concessions by the administration certain to anger Israel along with pro-Israel lawmakers in the United States. Several of the main points were essentially the same or very similar to conditions outlined in the 2015 nuclear deal. Early iterations of that agreement negotiated by the Obama administration also suggested the possibility of a regional consortium that would put Iranian uranium enrichment above a certain level under the control of Iran and its neighbors. The idea was scrapped, however, because of Gulf Arab nations' objections and Iranian suspicions of the ultimate aims of the consortium. People who were involved in the 18-month negotiations for the 2015 deal reacted immediately to reports that the Trump administration might allow Iran to continue with an enrichment program at any level, particularly after senior officials repeatedly said Iran would not be able to retain such programs. 'This proposal poses a moment of truth for critics of previous Iran nuclear negotiations/agreements (and) those who have called for a no-enrichment, full-dismantlement deal,' Dan Shapiro, Obama's former ambassador to Israel, wrote on X. 'Will they hold Trump to the same standard?'
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Honduran man sentenced for immigration crime in West Virginia
LEWISBURG, WV (WVNS) — A Honduran citizen was sentenced in West Virginia for an immigration crime. According to a press release from the United States Department of Justice, on Thursday, May 29, 2025, 43-year-old Nolvin Alfredo-Diaz, also known as 'Alfredo Diaz' and 'Nolvin Alfredo Diaz,' who was a Honduran citizen, was sentenced to three years in prison for reentry of a removed alien. Honduran man pleads guilty to immigration crime in West Virginia The press release stated that Alfredo-Diaz was illegally living in the Lewisburg area of Greenbrier County, and at the end of his sentence he will be given to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation proceedings. According to the press release, Alfredo-Diaz was arrested in Lewisburg by ICE agents on August 21, 2024, and he revealed that he was in the U.S. illegally and was a Honduran citizen. Alfredo-Diaz also acknowledged that he was deported from the U.S. in the past and that he did not have any documents in his possession that would legally allow him to be in the U.S. The press release stated that Alfredo-Diaz's fingerprints matched two previous removals from the U.S. to Honduras. He was removed from the U.S. on December 27, 2006 after a felony conviction for heroin possession on September 25, 2006 and felony cocaine possession on December 20, 2007, in Denver County, Colorado. Raleigh County man arrested after reportedly rear-ending an unmarked sheriff's car On July 21, 2010, he was found in Canon City, Colorado, and on August 5, 2010 he was removed from the United States to Honduras, according to the press release. The United States Department of Justice's press release stated that Alfredo-Diaz did not have the Secretary of U.S. Homeland Security's permission to reapply for admission to the United States for the previous times he was removed, and he did not look to find other legal ways to reenter the U.S. The announcement was made by Acting United States Attorney Lisa G. Johnston, who thanked the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for their work on the investigation. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal officials identify two 'sanctuary cities' in NH
A federal Department of Homeland Security report identified the city of Lebanon and adjacent town of Hanover as the only communities in New Hampshire it identifies as being 'sanctuary' communities for immigrants in the country illegally. The report comes less than two weeks after Gov. Kelly Ayotte signed two bills (SB 62 and HB 511) to outlaw sanctuary city policies in the state and to block local officials from preventing police departments or county jail administrations from reaching cooperative agreements with federal immigration authorities. DHS officials said its report complies with President Donald Trump's executive order titled, 'Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens.' The report listed the 35 states and the District of Columbia where at least one community had an ordinance blocking or altering cooperation with federal officials about suspected, illegal immigrants. Maine and New Hampshire are the only states in New England not identified as sanctuary states. In Maine, the sanctuary status exists in two counties and the city of Portland, according to the report. A federal court order created the sanctuary treatment in Rhode Island while officials in Massachusetts, Connecticut and Vermont adopted their own language, DHS officials said. The Franconia Board of Selectmen earlier last month endorsed a sanctuary community ordinance. Ayotte said the bills she signed would nullify that town's actions. Legislative critics charged the legislation would worsen the relationship local law enforcement has with legal immigration advocates in their hometowns and was an unfunded mandate as it could impose unreimbursed costs on communities. The new laws the governor signed take effect Jan. 1 except for one anti-sanctuary city provision that would apply starting in late July. Legislative leaders sent out letters last Friday thanking the sheriffs in Rockingham and Hillsborough Counties for signing so-called Section 287G agreements with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Two other counties, six towns and New Hampshire State Police have applied for their own agreements. klandrigan@
