logo
Expect to see Premier League teams going longer more often next season

Expect to see Premier League teams going longer more often next season

The Guardian6 hours ago

Long-ball football has, for better or worse, been on the decline for years. Football was once a kick-and-run game, shaped by long balls and the thinking that getting the ball close to the opposition's goal as quickly as possible increased the chances of scoring, well, more quickly.
That was swiftly disproved and left further and further in the rear-view mirror as the game sped off into the Premier League era and further still in the Pep Guardiola-inspired 2010s. As the technical standard of players increased, the ball was kept on the floor more and more. The laws of the game have even been changed to allow teams to play passes so short from goal-kicks that they do not even leave the penalty area.
Long balls are never coming back in the way they were once used. The use of them has steadily declined over the past two decades, from a high of 19.4% of passes being played long in 2006-07 to a low of 10.5% this season. Here, long passes are defined as at least 32 metres in length, and it is worth noting that they do not include crosses or corners. But there is also clearly an acceptance that going long is still sometimes necessary. Even Manchester City go long from time to time.
In the stands, there has always been a view that playing out from the back is more trouble than it is worth. A major reason for fans preferring their team not to play a short-passing game near their own goal is confirmation bias. Premier League watchers are predisposed to agree with a better-safe-than-sorry attitude to defending. By and large, they do not want defenders messing around on the ball and, every time someone makes a glaring mistake that leads to a goal being conceded, that view is further cemented.
There was plenty of snobbish pleasure at the initial failure of Guardiola's incessant passing when he joined City. Every time they passed their way into trouble, the belief grew that his tiki-taka style would not work in England. Nine seasons and six Premier League titles later, he has won that battle and proved his doubters wrong.
Football in England is vastly different from the game that was played when Guardiola arrived. Playing out from the back is now the norm. As a result, pressing has become more important, and as everyone has worked to become better and more synchronised pressing units, playing out from the back has become more and more difficult.
In the last two seasons, two promoted clubs have been roundly derided and branded as naive for having the temerity to think they could play their passing game in the harsh surroundings of the Premier League. Burnley and Southampton were both relegated in their first season back in the top flight while playing the same possession-based game with which they stormed the Championship.
The best teams can get away with playing the type of football they want. If you are good enough to keep the ball on the floor even when up against a ferocious press, doing so is more likely to end positively than lumping the ball up the pitch and hoping for the best. But numbers from the most recent Premier League season show there is a correlation between short passing and mistakes. Overplaying can cause lots of problems.
The teams that play more short passes tend to make more errors that lead to an opposition chance, and the teams that go long more tend to avoid them, as the below graphic shows.
Not all errors that lead to an opposition shot are the result of trying to play out from the back, but the correlation fits with the idea that overplaying can lead to teams taking unnecessary risks. For example, Chelsea (45), Aston Villa (43) and Tottenham (41) were behind only Southampton (51) for errors leading to an opposition shot in the Premier League this season, and they make up three of the six teams to play the lowest proportion of their passes long. The other three were City, Arsenal and Liverpool, the three best teams in the country, who have better players to play a short-passing game.
But, while those three made significantly fewer errors than Chelsea, Villa and Spurs, they still each made more than 30. As did Newcastle, who ranked seventh behind those six teams for the lowest proportion of passes played long.
That means that the seven teams who most consistently stuck to playing short passes all made more than 30 errors leading to an opposition shot. Meanwhile, of the eight teams that played the highest proportion of their passes long, only one made 30 or more such errors (Ipswich, 39). Crystal Palace made fewer errors leading to an opposition shot (19) than any other team in the Premier League while ranking second for proportion of passes played long (14.5%). There is also a relationship between playing a short-passing game and the opposition forcing more high turnovers (winning the ball within 40 metres of the goalline).
As this graphic shows, there are a couple of outliers: Arsenal and City are among the teams who play the most short passes but they rarely give away high turnovers. That is because they have the best ball-playing defenders, which in turn has two consequences: they can consistently play their way out of defence and, knowing how good their defenders are on the ball, opponents press them less. Otherwise, the teams that play short passes tend to give the ball away within 40m of their own goal more often than teams who are happier to go long.
There is a balance to be struck, though. Even the teams that go long most often (Everton, 16.3% of passes long) do so less than many teams did a decade ago, and that is because keeping the ball on the floor is best if it is possible. But it is also important to be practical about it.
Tottenham's decision to replace Ange Postecoglou with Thomas Frank could be indicative of where Premier League football is going. Only City (6.0%) played a lower proportion of their passes long in the top flight this season than Spurs (7.3%), but Postecoglou's team lost the ball within 40m of their own goalline more times (354) than any other team. They also finished lower (17th) than they ever had before in the Premier League.
Frank is a pragmatist, and his Brentford side were consistently happy to go long. Only four teams played a higher proportion of their passes long this season than them (13.1%), and that was Brentford's lowest rate in any of the Danish manager's four seasons at the club. He probably will not play quite as many long balls at Spurs, but there will be less messing about on the ball than there was under Postecoglou.
We are not heading back to a long-ball era, but there could be a shift towards teams accepting the need to be smarter with their passing in defence, and that could mean defenders clearing their lines more when under pressure close to their own goal.
This is an article by Opta Analyst, who have a weekly football newsletter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It would be remarkable to drop Ollie Pope after 171
It would be remarkable to drop Ollie Pope after 171

The Independent

time24 minutes ago

  • The Independent

It would be remarkable to drop Ollie Pope after 171

Ben Stokes insists Ollie Pope was never in danger of being dropped for this week's opening Test against India, claiming it would be 'remarkable' to leave his vice-captain out. Jacob Bethell is pushing hard for a place in the red-ball side as he continues his sharp ascent through the ranks but while he was at the Indian Premier League last month, Pope firmed up his spot at number three with a knock of 171 against Zimbabwe. If there were ever any doubts over him holding on to his shirt, that innings at Trent Bridge extinguished them and he remains the man in possession heading into a huge five-match series that begins on Friday at Headingley. Stokes, who has been steadfast in his support for Pope, said: 'The 'big selection' (idea) did not come from us. It would be remarkable to choose someone else if their last knock was a 170, and that's pretty much all I need to say on that. 'Scoring 170 definitely doesn't do anyone any harm, but having him at number three since I've been captain over a three-year period, averaging over 40, it speaks for itself.' The presence of Bethell, who deputised impressively in New Zealand before Christmas and turned in some highly accomplished performances in the recent white-ball games against the West Indies, means there is at least an element of added pressure on Pope to continue producing. Stokes acknowledges the noise is growing but is relaxed about Pope's ability to navigate it. 'In this day and age it's very tough not to see all that speculation, just because of how easily accessible things are. You don't even have to go and hunt for it,' he said. 'But I think scoring 170 in his last Test match has sort of shown how well he's handled that extra scrutiny. 'When you're a kid you dream about playing for England and obviously it's an unbelievable thing, but then the other side of it is that you come under the pump a little bit and that's part of the territory.'

Who is Celtic target Nygren?
Who is Celtic target Nygren?

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Who is Celtic target Nygren?

In the last week Celtic have been heavily linked with Nordsjaelland forward Benjamin Nygren, and reports this morning suggest the deal is all but Swede would be Brendan Rodgers' second signing this summer after Kieran Tierney returned to the know what they're getting with the Scotland international, but Nygren is a little more who is Nygren, and what are Celtic - potentially - getting?Primarily a right winger, 23-year-old Nygren is a versatile forward who has 35 goals in 106 appearances for the Danish Superliga career kicked off in his homeland with IFK Goteborg where he made his debut as a fresh-faced 16-year-old, and after impressing, earned a big-money move to Belgian side Genk at struggled for game time, though, and spent two seasons on loan with Dutch outfit Heerenveen before rejuvenating his career with netted six goals in his first full league campaign - where Nordsjaelland finished second behind Copenhagen - 12 in his second and 16 in his third. Not bad numbers for a wide good form earned him a first international call-up, after appearing for Sweden's youth teams, and he scored his first goal for his country in a friendly against Northern Ireland in March and his second earlier this month against his tag as a winger, he exhibited great striker's instinct for his maiden Sweden goal - a tap-in within the six-yard box - before bending in a beauty against the can sometimes be a little misleading, but a look at Nygren's ought to have Celtic fans excited.

Wimbledon 2025 prize money: how much do winners of men's, women's and doubles finals get?
Wimbledon 2025 prize money: how much do winners of men's, women's and doubles finals get?

Reuters

time33 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Wimbledon 2025 prize money: how much do winners of men's, women's and doubles finals get?

June 19 (Reuters) - The four Grand Slams offer a trophy and place in the history books as well as significant prize money. Here is what you need to know about the prize pot on offer at Wimbledon 2025, the third major of the year: * The Championships will run from June 30 to July 13. * The total prize money is a record 53.5 million pounds ($71.63 million), a 7% increase on 2024 and double what they offered a decade ago. * First round: 66,000 pounds * Second round: 99,000 pounds * Third round: 152,000 pounds * Round of 16: 240,000 pounds * Quarter-finals: 400,000 pounds * Semi-finals: 775,000 pounds * Runner-up: 1,520,000 pounds * Champion: 3,000,000 pounds HOW DOES THE WINNER'S PRIZE COMPARE TO WIMBLEDON 2024? * The winners of the men's and women's singles in 2024, Spaniard Carlos Alcaraz and Czech Barbora Krejcikova, received 2.7 million pounds ($3.61 million) each in prize money. * Australian Open 2025 singles champions, Italian Jannik Sinner and American Madison Keys, received A$3.5 million ($2.26 million) each in prize money. * French Open 2025 singles champions, Alcaraz and American Coco Gauff, took home 2.55 million euros ($2.92 million) each. * U.S. Open 2024 singles champions, Sinner and Belarusian Aryna Sabalenka, received $3.6 million each. * Significant pay hikes at the Grand Slams were central to the demands of the world's top players in their letter to the four majors recently. * First round: 16,500 pounds * Second round: 26,000 pounds * Third round: 43,750 pounds * Quarter-finals: 87,500 pounds * Semi-finals: 174,000 pounds * Runners-up: 345,000 pounds * Champion: 680,000 pounds WHAT IS THE PRIZE MONEY ON OFFER IN MIXED DOUBLES AT WIMBLEDON 2025? * First round: 4,500 pounds * Second round: 9,000 pounds * Quarter-finals: 17,500 pounds * Semi-finals: 34,000 pounds * Runners-up: 68,000 pounds * Champion: 135,000 pounds ($1 = 0.7469 pounds) ($1 = 1.5475 Australian dollars) ($1 = 0.8732 euros)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store