
Microsoft Officially Retires 'Blue Screen of Death' After 40 Years of Frowny-Faces
Another 1980s icon is gone, like Pudding Pops and Benetton sweaters. After 40 years of delivering the tragic news of a PC crash to Windows users, Microsoft's infamous "blue screen of death" will be going away. But not to worry -- a black screen of death will be replacing it, albeit without the sad emoticon face.
The infamous "blue screen of death" has been around since the very first version of Windows in 1985. Named for its bright blue color, it's a critical error screen that pops up on computers using the Microsoft Windows operating system when the system crashes. The text on the screen varies, but it's sometimes accompanied by a frowning face made up of a colon and a left parenthesis. :(
Microsoft says the new black screen of death, which it calls a "simplified UI for unexpected restarts," will appear in its place starting later this summer on all Windows 11, version 24H2 devices.
Meet the new black screen of death.
Microsoft
The black screen of death will show the stop code and faulty system driver, allowing IT admins to more quickly identify the issue that caused the crash, rather than having to use debugging software.
It's not just a cosmetic change, it's part of Microsoft's Windows Resiliency Initiative, which is designed to increase resiliency and security in Windows systems. In a blog post on Thursday, Microsoft said that the new black screen of death is part of "streamlining the unexpected restart experience" and aiding in "quick machine recovery." The aim is to reduce recovery time to 2 seconds following a PC crash.
The Windows Resiliency Initiative was launched following 2024's CrowdStrike outage, which caused systems to go offline for numerous businesses, airports and governmental services. More than 8 million devices were impacted.
Over 40 years, the blue screen of death worked its way into pop culture, with a subreddit devoted to it, and T-shirts and other items bearing its image.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Girl Authority
36 minutes ago
- Geek Girl Authority
Ethereum vs. Bitcoin Online Games: What Are the Key Differences?
Last month, I made what I thought was a simple decision – switching from Bitcoin to Ethereum for my online casino sessions. Boy, was I wrong about it being simple. Three weeks and several confusing transactions later, I finally understand why this choice matters more than most players realize. Let me save you the headache I went through. The Transaction Speed Reality Check Here's something nobody tells you upfront: Bitcoin transactions can take forever. I'm talking 10-45 minutes on busy days. Last Tuesday, I waited 38 minutes for a withdrawal to process while watching my friends already celebrating their wins. Ethereum? Different story entirely. Most transactions clear in 2-5 minutes. Sometimes faster. But here's the catch – and there's always a catch. Ethereum's gas fees can spike randomly. I once paid $47 in fees for a $200 withdrawal. Bitcoin's fees are usually more predictable, even if the wait time isn't. Smart Contracts vs. Traditional Transactions This is where things get interesting. Ethereum casinos can use smart contracts for automatic payouts. Sounds fancy, right? It is, actually. I discovered this during a poker tournament last month. The Bitcoin Casino Bonus Codes website explained how traditional Bitcoin casinos require manual processing for complex bets. With Ethereum, the smart contract handled everything automatically. No waiting for human verification. No 'processing delays.' Just instant, automated payouts based on predetermined rules. The Fee Structure Nightmare Let's talk money – specifically, how much you'll lose to fees. Bitcoin fees are straightforward but can be expensive during network congestion. I've paid anywhere from $3 to $25 per transaction, depending on how busy the network was. Ethereum fees are… complicated. Gas prices fluctuate based on network demand. Early morning transactions might cost $2. Evening transactions during NFT drops? I've seen $80 fees for simple transfers. Pro tip I learned the hard way: Check gas prices before making any Ethereum casino transactions. There are websites that track this stuff in real-time. Game Variety and Platform Options Here's something interesting I noticed: Bitcoin casinos have been around longer, so they often have more established game libraries. Slots, poker, blackjack – the classics are well-developed. Ethereum casinos, being newer, tend to experiment more. I've found unique games that don't exist on Bitcoin platforms. Decentralized poker rooms, prediction markets, even some weird hybrid games I can't fully explain. The downside? Ethereum platforms sometimes feel less polished. I encountered three different bugs last week that required customer support intervention. Security Considerations Nobody Mentions Both networks are secure, but they handle security differently. Bitcoin's security comes from its massive mining network and decade-plus track record. It's the 'boring but reliable' option. I've never worried about the Bitcoin network itself being compromised. Ethereum's security is more complex because of smart contracts. The network itself is solid, but individual smart contracts can have bugs. I've read about casino smart contracts getting exploited, though I haven't experienced this personally. The Bonus Code Situation This might surprise you: bonus structures differ significantly between Bitcoin and Ethereum casinos. Bitcoin casinos often offer traditional percentage bonuses. Deposit 1 BTC, get 0.5 BTC bonus. Simple math. Ethereum casinos get creative with their bonuses because smart contracts allow for complex conditions. I've seen bonuses that unlock gradually based on play time, or bonuses that change based on game performance. Some new bitcoin casino platforms are starting to offer hybrid approaches, accepting both currencies with different bonus structures for each. Which Should You Choose? After three months of testing both extensively, here's my honest take: Choose Bitcoin if you value stability and don't mind waiting. The ecosystem is mature, fees are predictable (if sometimes high), and you're less likely to encounter technical issues. Choose Ethereum if you want faster transactions and don't mind complexity. The games are often more innovative, smart contracts enable unique features, but you'll need to understand gas fees and accept some platform instability. My Personal Recommendation I ended up using both, actually. Bitcoin for large deposits and withdrawals where I can plan ahead. Ethereum for quick sessions where I want immediate access to funds. It's not the simple answer I wanted when I started this journey, but it's the practical one I've landed on. The crypto casino landscape is evolving rapidly. What works today might change next month. But understanding these fundamental differences will help you make better decisions regardless of how the technology develops. Just remember to always gamble responsibly, regardless of which cryptocurrency you choose. The End Is Here in Explosive First Trailer for THE SANDMAN Season 2 RELATED: Everything Coming to Netflix in July 2025
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Kalshi Joins Polymarket in Unicorn Club With Latest Fundraise: Report
Prediction market Kalshi, a federally regulated competitor to Polymarket, has raised $185 million at a valuation of $2 billion, according to a press release. This round brings the company's total funding to date to $415 million, the release says. Kalshi said it plans to use the funding to scale the engineering team, launch new market structures, and collaborate with new partners. This comes less than a day after reports emerged that Polymarket was raising $200 million at a valuation of $1 billion, led by Peter Thiel's Founders Fund. Publicly available data from Kalshi's API curated by Polymarket Analytics (not affiliated with Polymarket) shows that Kalshi has around $113 million in current active trading volume across all open markets, while Polymarket has just under $600 million. Kalshi now hosts more active markets than Polymarket, but remains behind in open interest, a key metric that reflects liquidity and trader conviction in prediction markets. A Dune dashboard shows that Polymarket has around 186,000 active traders. Paradigm led Kalshi's latest round. The crypto-focused VC recently led the Series A round for GTE, a decentralized exchange (DEX) that looks to rival HyperLiquid in speed. In January, Donald Trump Jr. announced he was joining Kalshi as a senior advisor. UPDATE (June 25, 2025, 20:00 UTC): Updates with figures based on a release sent by Kalshi versus Bloomberg reporting. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Centrus Energy Stock Plunged Today
Oklo has an agreement in principle to buy enriched uranium from Centrus. Today, Oklo announced a partnership with Hexium and TerraPower to source a separate stream of highly enriched uranium. Is Oklo breaking up with Centrus? No one yet knows. 10 stocks we like better than Centrus Energy › Shares of Centrus Energy (NYSEMKT: LEU), a specialist in enriching uranium for use as fuel in nuclear reactors, tumbled 4.7% through 12:50 p.m. ET Wednesday after one of its partners announced some disconcerting news. Nuclear power plant start-up Oklo, which had previously signed a memorandum of understanding agreeing to accept high-assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) supplies from Centrus once its reactors are running, is now teaming up with two other nuclear start-ups. Privately held Hexium and privately held and Bill Gates backed TerraPower, will, along with Oklo, "leverage advanced laser enrichment technology to build a scalable U.S. nuclear fuel supply for advanced reactors." Oklo's desire to team up with a heavyweight like TerraPower is understandable. For a cash-strapped nuclear start-up, it may pay to be on the same team as a company with a backer as well heeled as Gates. Also, Hexium's new technology for enriching uranium may hold advantages over Centrus'. That being said, Oklo's joining a new team does have the potential to leave Centrus in the lurch. We don't know at this time whether Hexium's tech will pan out nor, if it does, whether Oklo will still proceed to buy HALEU uranium from Centrus as well as from Hexium. But if it doesn't then this could mean Centrus has just lost a customer that it was counting on keeping. Don't be too quick to pull the sell trigger on Centrus, though. Just because Oklo thinks Hexium will work out as a partner doesn't mean it's right. Centrus is at least a known quantity and an established enriching company already. It's also profitable, earning more than $100 million over the last 12 months, generating positive free cash flow, free of net debt -- and potentially, a buy. Before you buy stock in Centrus Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Centrus Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $689,813!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $906,556!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 809% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 175% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Centrus Energy Stock Plunged Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio