'Substantial changes' made to Wymeswold solar farm project
Concerns raised by residents have prompted an energy company to make "substantial changes" to plans for a solar farm.Exagen Development wants to build the farm on the edge of Wymeswold, near Loughborough, and has submitted a planning application for the scheme to Charnwood Borough Council (CBC).The company held a public consultation earlier this year over the 240-acre Mantle Solar Farm development, off Narrow Lane.The developer said there had been a "significant reduction" in solar panels near public rights of way amid concerns about the scale of the farm.
During the consultation, residents raised fears the project might interfere with views of the countryside and the potential impact it will have on nearby homes, said the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS).
'Visual impact'
The company said the consultation has "resulted in substantial changes to the development", including landscaping and biodiversity "enhancements".There will also be an additional two paths to link existing public rights of way. The company will also plant new hedgerows and add to existing hedgerows, the LDRS said.The planning documents stated: "There were concerns raised around the scale of the project, visual impact and effect on the nearest residential properties, ecology and biodiversity impacts. "Exagen has taken into account of all comments and made changes to the design and layout in response to these."The company claims the site would power almost 20,000 homes.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
32 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Hedge fund orders London-based analysts back to office five days a week
Man Group has ordered its London-based analysts to return temporarily to the office five days a week, as the world's biggest listed hedge fund seeks to recover from a period of poor performance sparked by Donald Trump's tariff war. Quantitative analysts working at Man AHL, the company's computer-run fund that aims to identify and follow momentum in markets, have been told they are expected to be in its offices daily until the end of July as part of an 'all hands on deck' project. The edict applies to about 150 staff in London, just under 10% of the overall group's 1,700 global employees, the Financial Times reported. 'Man AHL has asked its staff in London to work in the office five days a week for a three-month period to support an 'all hands on deck' cross-team research project,' the company said. 'While these cross-team initiatives are infrequent, experience has shown that a period of highly focused, in-person collaboration allows significant research progress to be made in a relatively short amount of time.' The company, which has been a champion of flexible working arrangements including working from home, said that its 'broader agile working policy remains unchanged'. Employees tend to be in the office three days a week, on average. However, this varies by role. Trump's destabilising tariff war has resulted in significant volatility in global markets, which has made it difficult for computer-based funds such as AHL to predict market trends. The company's most recent financial statement showed that the start of Trump's trade war in April wiped out all of the assets under management gains made by Man Group in the first quarter. Its holdings were up $4bn in the first three months of the year but plummeted by $5.6bn in the first two weeks of April. The AHL Alpha programme, Man's institutional trend-following strategy, has lost 10% so far this year. Man Group's share price is down more than 30% over the past year. Man Group is the latest major financial services company to revisit its flexible working policies. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Last month, BlackRock, the world's biggest asset management company, told its approximately 1,000 managing directors globally that they were expected to work from the office full time. The New York-based company last told staff in 2023 that they had to go into the office at least four days a week. Earlier this year, JP Morgan Chase summoned all its workers back into the office. Jamie Dimon, the head of the bank, has long been a proponent of restoring pre-pandemic working patterns. Barclays also hardened its stance on remote working earlier this year, saying that all staff should work from the office at least three days a week, up from a previous requirement of two days.
The Independent
40 minutes ago
- The Independent
M&S hackers sent abuse and ransom demand directly to chief executive
The Marks & Spencer hackers reportedly sent an abusive email to the retailer's boss, gloating about the hack and demanding ransom payment. M&S CEO Stuart Machin was sent an email on 23 April from a hacker group called DragonForce, using the email account of an employee, which confirms that the British high street retailer was targeted by a ransomware group, something they have refused to acknowledge. The email, seen and reported on by the BBC, says: 'We have marched the ways from China all the way to the UK and have mercilessly raped your company and encrypted all the servers "The dragon wants to speak to you so please head over to [our darknet website]." A darknet link shared in the email connected to a portal for DragonForce victims to negotiate a ransom fee. The criminal organisation said: 'let's get the party started. Message us, we will make this fast and easy for us.' They ended the email with an image of a dragon breathing fire, according to the BBC. The blackmail message reportedly included a racist term and was sent to Mr Machin and several other executives. As well as bragging about installing ransomware across the M&S IT system to render it useless, the hackers said they have stolen the private data of millions of customers. Three weeks later, M&S informed their customers that their data may have been stolen. The email was apparently sent using the account of an employee from IT company Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), which has provided IT services to M&S for over a decade. The IT worker had an M&S email address, but is a paid TCS employee. It is believed that he himself was hacked in the attack. The IT company has previously said it is investigating whether it was a gateway for the cyberattack and since told the BBC the email was not sent from its system and has nothing to do with the breach. M&S told The Independent: 'We cannot comment on details of or speculation on the cyber incident, and we have been advised not to.' DragonForce is the second hacking group to be linked to the M&S cyberattack; the Scattered Spider network, a group of young hackers across the UK and US, was also connected to the incident. Marks & Spencer has predicted that the cyberattack will disrupt its operations into July and will take an estimated £300 million hit to profits this year.
Daily Mail
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Pregnant accountant wins £30k payout after her 'spiteful' boss cut her hours when she called in with morning sickness before she was sacked in 'sham' redundancy
A pregnant accountant has won more than £30,000 after her boss cut her hours when she called in with morning sickness before sacking her just as she was due to go on maternity leave. Sadia Shakil was told by property boss Mohammed Saleem 'it would be best if you only come into work for two days per week' after she told him she was pregnant and experiencing sickness, a tribunal heard. This forced Mrs Shakil to take on another full-time job to cope with the financial pressures of an upcoming baby - and still had to find time in evenings and at weekends to fulfill the two days work for her 'spiteful' boss. The burden of money worries weighed on her so heavily she questioned if it was the 'right thing to have a baby' and didn't enjoy pregnancy. However, Mr Saleem ignored her throughout her pregnancy and sacked her just as she was due to go on maternity leave in a 'sham' redundancy. Now a tribunal has ordered Mr Saleem's property development company to pay Mrs Shakil £31,860 after she sued him for maternity discrimination. 'Hateful' Mr Saleem even described Mrs Shakil's pregnancy as 'embarrassing' during tribunal proceedings, it was heard. Birmingham Employment Tribunal was told Mrs Shakil joined Mr Saleem's company Samsons Ltd, based in Bedford, Beds, in October 2020. She became pregnant in early 2021 and in March 2021 called Mr Saleem to say she was unwell due to morning sickness as she was pregnant. The following day he 'unilaterally reduced her hours of work from full-time to two days per week', it was heard. He told Mrs Shakil: 'After careful thought and deliberation especially considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for two days per week.' It was a 'financial struggle' for Mrs Shakil to only work two days per week because her husband was out of a job at the time so she was the main source of their income. A tribunal report said: 'She was motivated to stay with [Samsons Ltd] as she had accrued sufficient pre-pregnancy service to qualify for maternity leave, which would not be the case with new employment. '[She] experienced stress, anxiety and panic from the time that [Mr Saleem] reduced her hours to part-time. 'She did not know how she and her husband were going to manage financially and how she would be able to afford all the things needed for a new baby. '[Her] anxiety manifested itself over the period after April 2021 in sleepless nights, low self-esteem, frequent tearfulness, rumination and being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts day and night', including doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable. 'She experienced panic attacks and had feelings of fear that she would not be able to obtain alternative or additional work if prospective employers found out she was pregnant. 'This led her to set about concealing her pregnancy with baggy clothes or by asking for interviews to be conducted remotely. 'This inhibited [her] enjoyment of her pregnancy because she felt she had to conceal it much of the time. During interviews she would feel embarrassed and anxious.' After just over a month, Mrs Shakil obtained a full-time job in a second finance role. The report said: 'She hoped that, if she did this job alongside the part-time hours she still had with [Samsons Ltd] to make ends meet, she would be able to return to full-time hours with [the company] once she returned from maternity leave.' While pregnant, she had to work 8.30am to 5pm five days per week, had to commute 45 minutes to that job once a week, then fit in two days of work with Samsons Ltd and travel to the office to do paperwork in evenings and at weekends. As her pregnancy progressed she felt 'confused' by a lack of correspondence from Mr Saleem about her maternity leave. She suffered complications and was booked in to be induced so informed Mr Saleem she was going to begin her maternity leave on October 1. But a couple of days before, he sacked her due to 'redundancy'. He also claimed he had no idea she was pregnant. After the arrival of her newborn son, Mrs Shakil and her husband had to move in with her parents after she lost her job and the early weeks with her baby were 'marred' by trying to resolve her money issues. The tribunal found that Mr Saleem sacked Mrs Shakil because she was pregnant, not redundancy. Employment Judge Vereena Jones said: 'The discrimination took place at a time in [Mrs Shakil's] life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy - the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. 'There was evidence that her confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. 'The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of her ongoing financial struggles. '[Mrs Shakil] had to take a second job to mitigate the effects of the discrimination. This meant she has to work very long hours during what was a difficult pregnancy. '[She] was confused and distressed by Mr Saleem's behaviour... Mr Saleem was someone known to [her] family and considerably senior to her in age and authority in the organisation and in her community. '[Mrs Shakil's] feelings were further hurt by her dismissal on the sham basis... that her job was redundant. 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because [she] is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'
