Trump cuts threaten free vaccine program for kids amid measles outbreak
Dr. Ali Sherif normally gives about 50 doses of the measles vaccine to children each month at his clinic in Hobbs, New Mexico, near the Texas state line.
The number of shots at his clinic has surged about 25%, however, in recent weeks as local parents seek immunizations to protect their toddlers and school-age children from a growing measles outbreak that has infected more than 600 people and led to three deaths.
Like thousands of other doctors across the country, Sherif relies on a little-known federal program to ensure he has those shots on hand for families at no cost to them.
The Vaccines for Children program is funded by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and administered by state public health officials. With an annual budget of roughly $5 billion, the vaccines program is responsible for about half the jabs administered to U.S. children every year.
The initiative funds vaccine purchases from drug manufacturers including Merck and GlaxoSmithKline at a discount, while state health departments implement the program and enroll medical providers. A dose of MMR vaccine costs about $26 under the program compared to $95 in the private sector, according to a CDC price list.
But ongoing cuts in federal health funding and personnel could jeopardize the effectiveness of this longstanding program that's become a key cog in America's disease-fighting machinery, according to disease experts and former CDC officials.
The Trump administration recently fired about 10,000 employees at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including significant reductions at CDC that are part of a massive downsizing of the federal workforce. HHS has said another 10,000 left voluntarily.
The CDC employees who staff the children's vaccine program were largely untouched, three sources familiar with the situation said. However, about 20 others were fired who comprised a unit that helped promote the program in communities at high risk of infectious disease, including during the current outbreak, these sources said. These employees helped bolster the confidence in the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, they said.
At the same time, HHS canceled about $11 billion in COVID-related grants to state and local health departments that were used for a wide variety of vaccine-related clinics and outreach activities, including for measles. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the cuts in some states.
Dr. David Sugerman, a senior scientist leading the CDC's measles response, highlighted COVID-19 funding cuts before a federal advisory panel last week. "We are scraping to find the resources and personnel needed to provide support to Texas, and other jurisdictions,' he said.
U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has overseen these significant reductions in force and budget after casting doubt on vaccine safety for years. During the current measles outbreak, he has promoted unproven treatments while giving a tepid endorsement of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine.
HHS and the White House did not respond to requests for comment, nor did GlaxoSmithKline. A Merck spokesman declined to comment.
FREE SHOTS
Congress created the Vaccines for Children program in 1993 after a U.S. measles epidemic had killed dozens of children a few years earlier. The CDC found that more than half of the children who got measles then were unvaccinated. The cost of the immunization was a primary reason families had skipped the shot even though they were seeing doctors regularly, according to the agency.
At one large pediatric clinic in Albuquerque, manager Shawna Maestas said she orders about $100,000 worth of various vaccines each month through the federal program.
'We've had quite a big uptick in vaccine administration lately,' she said. 'But if families had to pay for it, they would push it off.'
Over the past decade, Texas has administered 5.6 million doses of the MMR vaccine through the program, according to state data provided to Reuters. New Mexico has received nearly 364,000 doses of the MMR vaccine over the same time period, records show.
A spokesman for the New Mexico health department said 'vaccine supply and distribution have continued with no interruptions.'
Texas officials said on Tuesday that the state's measles outbreak had grown to 624 cases, including 64
who were hospitalized. Two unvaccinated children with no underlying health conditions have died in the state, including an 8-year-old girl who died earlier this month.
New Mexico officials have tallied 65 cases and one death of an unvaccinated adult. These are the first deaths from measles in the United States since 2015.
Dr. Alex Cvijanovich, a pediatrician in Albuquerque, said New Mexico has one of the nation's highest rates of childhood poverty and says she is terrified about what could happen if the children's vaccine program is scaled back.
As a doctor in training more than 20 years ago, she cared for a teen boy who died from a degenerative neurological condition linked to his measles infection as an infant, when he was too young to be vaccinated.
'There are really bad, scary things that we can protect our children from,' she said.
In Hobbs, New Mexico, Sherif says about 85% of his patients are on Medicaid, the federal and state health insurance program for low-income Americans. His clinic orders about $50,000 worth of measles, chickenpox and other vaccines per month through the program, he says, an amount of money impossible for his small clinic to afford if not covered by the federal program.
'If I were to buy them by myself, I would not get enough for my patients,' he said.
(Reporting by Dan Levine in San Francisco and Chad Terhune in Los Angeles; Editing by Michele Gershberg and Michael Learmonth)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
4 days ago
- Gulf Today
Study finds lifting school mask fueled COVID deaths
Michael Hiltzik, Tribune News Service Someday we Americans may stop quarreling over our response to the COVID-19 pandemic — lockdown orders, social distancing and so forth — but one category of debate may never become immune to second-guessing. That's the impact of anti-pandemic measures on schools and schoolchildren. According to popular opinion, these were almost entirely mistaken or ineffective. A newly published study from data scientists at Michigan State University knocks one pillar out from under this claim. It finds that the abrupt removal in 2022 of mandates that children wear masks in school contributed to an estimated 21,800 COVID deaths that year — a shocking 9% of the total COVID deaths in the US that year. 'We were surprised by that too,' says Scott A. Imberman, a professor of economics and education policy at Michigan State and a co-author of the paper. On reflection, he says, given the mixing of children and staff in the close quarters of a classroom, 'it's pretty easy to see how COVID could propagate to the wider community.' In February 2022, about 50% of public school children, or more than 20 million pupils, were in districts with mask mandates; then, over a period of six weeks, almost all those districts rescinded their mandates. "You can see how that would create a pretty substantial surge in infections." Most of the surge, Imberman told me, was a "spillover effect" in the communities outside the schools themselves. The Michigan State finding undermines several myths and misrepresentations about COVID spread by the right wing. These include the claim that children are virtually impervious to COVID, which has been refuted by the injury and death toll among children. A related misrepresentation was that children can't pass on the infection to adults. In fact, because many children didn't show symptoms of the infection or had only mild, flu-like symptoms, they functioned almost like an undetected fifth column in spreading the virus to adults. Among those who vociferously promoted these myths is Jay Bhattacharya, the former Stanford medical professor who is now director of the National Institutes of Health, a subagency of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services. In a July 2022 op-ed originally published in the Orange County Register, for example, Bhattacharya and a co-author asserted that 'COVID-19 is less of a threat to children than accidents or the common flu'; that's debatable, and irrelevant, since those are themselves major threats to child health. The article advocated discontinuing mask-wearing for all children, regardless of their vaccination status. But it was self-refuting, since it also acknowledged that the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that mask mandates in school had produced 'a roughly 20% reduction in COVID-19 incidence.' The authors also acknowledged that masking in schools could help to shield adults from COVID. But they asked, 'Since when is it ethical to burden children for the benefit of adults?' That was the wrong question. Reducing COVID infections for children was certainly not a "burden" on them, but a sound public health goal. How heavy was that "burden," anyway? Bhattacharya and his co-author posited that "masking is a psychological stressor for children and disrupts learning," and "it is likely that masking exacerbates the chances that a child will experience anxiety and depression." This sounds like guesswork derived from pop psychology, since the authors didn't point to any actual research to validate their conclusions about masking. Nevertheless, they argued that the drawbacks of masking exceeded the benefits. Yet the Michigan State estimate that the removal of mask mandates in the schools contributed to 21,800 deaths in 2022 alone turns the balance of costs and benefits on its head. I asked Health and Human Services for Bhattacharya's response to the study but received no reply. Much of the mythmaking about our pandemic response — indeed, the global pandemic response — is rooted in the absurd conviction that everything we now know about COVID was self-evident from the outset. But COVID was a novel human pathogen. As I wrote in 2022, there was little consensus about how it spread, at what stage of sickness it was most contagious, or who was most susceptible. As a result, most anti-pandemic policies in 2020-22 arose from an excess of caution. Mitigation measures were uncertain, but it did make sense to limit gatherings in small spaces, i.e., classrooms. Many such steps turned out to be effective, including social distancing and, yes, mask-wearing. The subsequent hand-wringing over school closings, accordingly, has the unmistakable smell of hindsight. Not 20/20 hindsight, mind you, but hindsight clouded by ideology, partisan politics and persistent ignorance. For example, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican champion of letting COVID-19 freely rip through his population, crowed that the results "prove that we made the right decision" to keep schools open. Is that so? When Florida reopened its schools in August 2021 and banned remote teaching, child COVID deaths in the state more than doubled. One month into the reopenings, the heightened spread of COVID prompted districts across the state to shut down schools again and impose quarantines affecting thousands of pupils. This is how manifestly deadly decisions get redefined as "the right decision" in the partisan narrative. The Michigan State team documented the speed at which school mask mandates were dropped. The timeline begins in July 2021, when the CDC recommended universal masking in schools to enable a return to in-person instruction rather than fully remote or hybrid classes. The CDC's guidelines, the Michigan State study says, applied to all students whether they were vaccinated or not and all school districts, whatever the levels of COVID infection and transmission within their community. In the fall of 2021, about 65% of all students were subject to a state or local mask mandate. The mask mandates were highly controversial: "Many schools encountered pushback from politicians, parents, and community members" who questioned the efficacy of masking, the study relates. The districts that rejected the mandates tended to be "less urban, less diverse, and more likely to have voted for Trump in the 2020 election." On Feb. 25, 2022, the CDC eliminated its recommendation for universal school masking. Its rationale was that the exceptionally contagious Omicron variant of COVID had passed its peak and thus immunity had increased. But many districts had removed their mandates starting several weeks before the CDC revised its guidance, suggesting that the CDC was following, rather than leading, state and local preferences. The removal of mask mandates ran counter to scientific evidence that masks did indeed reduce the spread of COVID. Indeed, a study from Boston and Chelsea, Mass., found that the removal of mask mandates resulted in an increase of 45 COVID cases per 1,000 students and school staff — nearly 12,000 new cases — over the following four months. But in this particular, as in others related to pandemic policies, politics and ideology trumped the hard evidence, warping the public health response. Bhattacharya's record as an authority on pandemic measures is not encouraging. He was one of the original three authors of the "Great Barrington Declaration," a manifesto for herd immunity published in October 2020. The core of the declaration was opposition to lockdowns. Its solution was what its drafters called "focused protection" — allowing "those who are at minimal risk of death to live their lives normally to build up immunity to the virus through natural infection, while better protecting those who are at highest risk," chiefly seniors. Focused protection, the drafters wrote, would allow society to achieve herd immunity and return to normality in three to six months.


Gulf Today
4 days ago
- Gulf Today
India's active COVID-19 cases cross 6,000; Kerala remains most affected
India's Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) reported that the number of active COVID-19 cases in the country rose to 6,133 on Sunday. In the past 24 hours, the country has recorded six new deaths related to COVID-19 — two in Karnataka, three in Kerala, and one in Tamil Nadu. Kerala remains the most significantly impacted state, with active cases surging to 1,950 after 144 new infections were reported over the last day. This rise highlights the ongoing challenges faced by public health authorities in the state that reported India's first case of COVID-19 on Jan.30, 2020. Upon arriving in Kochi, the medical student who returned from the Chinese epicentre of Wuhan tested positive for the virus. She survived the attack. Kerala stopped publishing the daily coronavirus infection data on April 10, 2022, saying the pandemic was under control and relaxed the mask rule. The new surge in cases in India is primarily attributed to new Omicron sub-variants, including JN.1, NB.1.8.1, LF.7, and XFC. These variants have demonstrated increased transmissibility while typically causing mild symptoms. The World Health Organisation (WHO) classifies these as "variants under monitoring,' indicating they are not yet a cause for serious concern, but warrant vigilance and care. SARS-CoV-2, the virus responsible for COVID-19, has not been eradicated. However, its behaviour has shifted, Its status has changed from unpredictable emergency to a more manageable public health challenge, resembling a recurring cycle of illnesses, like the seasonal flu. Authorities say this evolving landscape underscores the significance of continued public health efforts and community engagement in mitigating the spread of the virus. Following Kerala, other states with notable active cases include Gujarat, West Bengal, and Delhi. The national capital has documented 21 fresh cases in the last 24 hours, bringing its cumulative total to 686. Meanwhile, West Bengal reported 71 new cases, increasing its active case count to 693. In terms of recovery, 53 individuals were cured, discharged, or transferred from hospitals across West Bengal during this period. As of Sunday morning, data from nationwide indicated that 753 patients have successfully recovered, been discharged, or migrated. Authorities said this statistic is crucial in assessing the overall effectiveness of ongoing treatment plans. Since the beginning of the year, the total fatalities have reached 65, with 15 occurring in Kerala alone. In response to the increasing number of COVID-19 cases, multiple technical review meetings were convened on June 2 and 3. These discussions involved various stakeholders, including representatives of the Disaster Management Cell and the Emergency Management Response (EMR) Cell. These meetings aimed to evaluate the current COVID-19 situation and enhance preparedness measures critically. The National Centre for Disease Control (NCDC), the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP), along with officials from federal government hospitals in Delhi and representatives from all states and Union Territories (UTs), are monitoring its behaviour.


Sharjah 24
5 days ago
- Sharjah 24
WHO warns of rising COVID-19 cases linked to new variant
No increased health risk, but caution urged Although the WHO has confirmed that the new variant does not present a higher health risk compared to earlier strains, it stressed that the virus's continued evolution could trigger new waves of infection in the future. Seasonal pattern and immunity help limit severe cases The organisation noted that the current increase in cases is consistent with the virus's seasonal trends. However, the need for hospitalisation or intensive care remains limited, thanks to strong community immunity and widespread vaccine coverage. WHO calls for vigilance and stronger surveillance Despite the limited severity, the WHO has classified the global risk level as 'high' and called on countries to enhance health surveillance, integrate COVID-19 into seasonal respiratory illness planning, counter misinformation, and encourage the public to follow preventive guidelines.