US risks hard-won soft power by alienating Chinese students
While the US has resumed processing of student and exchange visitor visas, the future of Chinese students who are attending Harvard remains uncertain.
The resumption followed a federal judge's decision last week to temporarily block a ban on Harvard's qualification to enroll international students.
The judge set a June 16 hearing for further arguments in the case.
Harvard also vowed to continue its legal battle, while working to ensure its international students and scholars can 'fully' pursue their academic work.
While many have highlighted how hard
Chinese students have been hit by the ban, since they account for one-fifth of Harvard's international enrollment, the visa restrictions imposed by the White House have sent mixed messages.
In a phone call last week with Chinese President Xi Jinping, Donald Trump said the 'US loves to have Chinese students coming to study in America'.
Earlier, Trump said he welcomed Chinese students, but not those who caused 'troubles'. It is still not clear what he meant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
21 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Step in right direction as US and China ease trade war tensions
Cautious optimism that China and the United States can further de-escalate the trade row Washington started has peaked and may soon be vindicated. It rose when the two sides, meeting in Geneva last month, agreed on a 90-day pause in new sky-high bilateral tariffs to allow for negotiations, fell with more US tech export bans and rose again after last week's phone call between presidents Xi Jinping and Donald Trump. Advertisement Now hopes have received a major boost after top economic and trade officials from each side, meeting in London, reached agreement in principle on a 'framework' to implement the consensus between Xi and Trump. Indeed that is what Trump alluded to yesterday when he said: 'Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me.' That, however, is easier said than done, as seen by the extent and acrimony of chilled relations between the two sides. The agreement follows two days of trade talks between top officials in London in the first meeting of what is now called the China-US economic and trade consultation mechanism. Vice-Premier He Lifeng led the Chinese delegation. China's top trade negotiator, Li Chenggang, said it was hoped progress at the London meeting would be conducive to increasing trust between China and the US. That achievement on its own would be significant bilaterally, regionally and globally. The world will be watching for final approval of the framework from the top level. Expectations have been shaped by official accounts from both sides of the Xi-Trump call regarding sensitive issues. They include restrictions on Chinese exports of rare earths – an issue that has been resolved according to US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick – and US visas for Chinese students. Importantly, the talks have gained momentum without serious setbacks, building on foundations laid on neutral ground in the initial talks in Geneva. News of the 'framework' agreement broke the same day the People's Daily published an interview with the founder of multinational Huawei Technologies, Ren Zhengfei, which seemed more than a coincidence. Ren said Americans overestimated the importance of his company, which owed its success to hard work and research over the years. Advertisement The interview was a timely signal that no matter how the US restricted China's tech development, it would not stop China from developing its own core technology.
South China Morning Post
43 minutes ago
- South China Morning Post
Hong Kong TV stations should boost English content
Hong Kong prides itself as Asia's world city. Yet there is no shortage of examples to show that the city may not live up to that reputation. The glaring inadequacy of television programmes in English for international audiences is a case in point. With a public consultation for the renewal of the three free TV licences due later this year, some lawmakers have called for more local productions in English, saying the current content is diminishing and lacks variety. Advertisement Local TV stations have been running more programmes in Mandarin after the cap for non-English programmes on English channels was raised from 20 per cent to 45 per cent in 2023 following a midterm license review. They may also show programmes in Mandarin with Chinese subtitles on Chinese channels for up to 10 per cent of the total broadcasting time. While it is understandable to show more programmes in Mandarin these days, it also means less content and fewer choices for many non-Chinese speakers. Admittedly, fewer people watch TV these days. The growing popularity of online media is also posing significant challenges to traditional broadcasting. But it remains the responsibility of the broadcasters to fulfil the licensing requirements. Expatriates feel they are increasingly being marginalised or alienated, saying there is little TV content that relates to them. A search on the internet for 'Hong Kong TV programmes in English' yields many results diverting users to watch programmes on overseas live streaming platforms via VPN, or virtual private network. The dearth of local and quality programmes in English is not new. Not only is this unconducive to social integration, it may also weaken Hong Kong's status as an international and inclusive city. Both Chinese and English are official languages in Hong Kong. Together with Mandarin, the biliteracy and trilingual policy is pivotal to the city's international competitiveness and national integration. The coming license review should ensure broadcasters will cater to the needs of all. Separately, some licensing rules are dated. They should be reviewed regularly to reflect present circumstances and enable broadcasters to cope with challenges arising from new technology and changing viewership.
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
Judge says US must release Columbia University protester Mahmoud Khalil
A US federal judge has ruled that the government must release Mahmoud Khalil, the former Columbia University graduate student whom the Trump administration is trying to deport over his participation in pro-Palestinian demonstrations. Advertisement But Khalil, a legal US resident, will remain in custody until at least Friday morning while the government decides whether to appeal, US District Judge Michael Farbiarz said Wednesday. He was detained by federal immigration agents on March 8 in the lobby of his university-owned apartment, the first arrest under US President Donald Trump's crackdown on students who joined campus protests against the war in Gaza. He was then flown across the country and taken to an immigration detention centre in Jena, Louisiana, thousands of miles from his lawyers and wife, a US citizen who gave birth to their first child while he was in custody. Khalil's lawyers challenged the legality of his detention, accusing the Trump administration of trying to crack down on free speech. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio says he has the power to deport Khalil because his presence in the US could harm foreign policy. Advertisement Farbiarz had ruled earlier that expelling Khalil from the US on those grounds was likely to be unconstitutional.
