logo
A data-driven approach to addressing fashion waste

A data-driven approach to addressing fashion waste

Fast Company5 hours ago

Recent images of fire ripping through the world's largest resale clothing market in Accra, Ghana, provided shocking evidence of overproduction in the global fashion industry. Clothing waste is ending up in our oceans and landfills, including one in Chile that is large enough to be visible from space. And if the environmental price is high, so is the cost to brands—excess inventory that represents $140 billion in lost sales and increased reputational risk.
Pressure to address this is increasing, and regulations are tightening. By 2030, apparel and textile producers in California must join a 'producer responsibility organization' that is charged with creating and developing plans for the collection, repair, and recycling of their goods. Meanwhile, European clothing and footwear brands must now report on their excess stock and, from 2026, can no longer dispose of unsold inventory.
But while companies have compelling sustainability and business reasons to address the problem, where do they start?
Understanding the challenges is key to solving the problem. Today's supply chains are long, global, and complex, particularly in the fashion industry. From the sourcing of raw materials to their conversion into a fabric or polymer, their assembly in a garment factory, and their transportation to retailers, the clothes we wear pass dozens of touchpoints before reaching the fashion store checkout counter.
Other factors lie behind fashion industry waste. These include the drive for economies of scale, the risk of missing sales because of stock-outs, and the relentless consumer demand for new styles. This leads fashion companies to overproduce. In 2023, for example, the industry produced between 2.5 billion and 5 billion items of excess stock.
Even if companies want to step up and take remedial action, the complexity of sustainability challenges and production variables means they face tough tradeoffs through which addressing a negative impact in one part of the supply chain may end up having a negative impact elsewhere.
What's clear is that acting after the fact is not a solution. In fashion, the sheer scale of overproduction and waste means we cannot recycle our way out of this particular sustainability challenge. Instead, waste needs to be addressed before it enters the supply chain by curbing overproduction through smarter inventory planning. This is where the fashion industry can turn to a powerful tool: technology.
AI AND ML TOOLS ENABLE MORE PRECISE PLANNING
First, planning solutions enable companies to understand the problem. By applying artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to comprehensive, timely, and high-quality data, companies can capture sustainability information and supply-demand data that is based on real activity in the supply chain—not assumptions. They can also see where sustainability and production tradeoffs are occurring.
This gives them the visibility needed to make planning decisions across departments internally and with suppliers and trading partners externally, while aligning those decisions with their sustainability goals.
Scenario planning can then be applied to different demand patterns and inventory management to model how different strategies might influence production plans, as well as carbon emissions and waste. This enables companies to manage and track their progress towards both sustainability and business objectives.
Key to this holistic approach is having a single platform that brings together sustainability and supply chain data, providing end-to-end visibility on the company's activities and those of its supply partners. This enables collaborative planning and the ability to execute on insights from data and analytics, all in one place.
By integrating data on demand, supply, inventory, and logistics on such a platform, companies can avoid overproduction and overstocking—and the waste that goes with that—while reducing costs, increasing capital resource efficiency, and lowering their carbon footprint. Brands can also respond faster with more relevant solutions to the disruptions that will inevitably come their way.
DATA-DRIVEN INSIGHTS INCREASE RESILIENCY
In the world of fashion, knowledge is power. Armed with new data-driven insights, companies gain more market agility. Moving swiftly and precisely, they can react to everything from sudden changes in the weather to fashion micro-trends and shifts in popular culture—all based on specific, segmented, and highly localized information.
Critically, all this data feeds back into the supply chain in the form of production orders that more accurately reflect demand signals. This means that the right amount of product can be directed to the right place at the right time. Better decisions can then be made around logistics, whether that's load optimization or the selection of routes and modes of transport that generate the lowest emissions levels.
With better data, companies can also do more to manage a growing logistical and cost headache: returns. Customers can be offered more convenient, self-service drop-off locations, which speed up the returns process and enable returned goods to be resold in the same season, while there is still demand. This reduces the need for markdowns and minimizes waste.
Meanwhile, improved supply chain visibility enables companies to build resilience in a time of increasing frequency and severity of weather volatility, geopolitical uncertainty, trade tariffs, and other supply disruptions.
Data and analytics solutions make it possible to break down traditional silos between sustainability data and data on supply chain operations, informing decisions that are better for the company and for the environment.
This comes at a critical moment. We are at a point where securing the health of the planet and its people means we have to act with more urgency and on a greater scale than we have in the past. For the fashion industry, pressure is mounting to align commercial strategies with the needs of a fragile global ecosystem.
Once equipped with a single, integrated real-time platform for planning and execution, and that includes all trading partners, brands can acquire the agility needed to predict and respond to demand at a time when fashion trends are moving faster than ever. They can build the resilience needed to withstand today's growing range of supply chain shocks. They can ensure that sustainability decision-making goes hand in hand with inventory management and production planning. By harnessing technology, companies can continue to thrive while also respecting planetary boundaries.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

French striker Olivier Giroud is parting ways with MLS club LAFC after 1 disappointing year
French striker Olivier Giroud is parting ways with MLS club LAFC after 1 disappointing year

Yahoo

time20 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

French striker Olivier Giroud is parting ways with MLS club LAFC after 1 disappointing year

Chelsea's Cole Palmer, right, kicks a ball challenged by Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud during the Club World Cup group D soccer match between Chelsea and Los Angeles FC in Atlanta, Monday, June 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson) Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud (9) warms up before the Club World Cup Group D soccer match between Chelsea and Los Angeles FC, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart) Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud warms up before the Club World Cup Group D soccer match between Los Angeles FC and Flamengo in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (AP Photo/John Raoux) Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud warms up before the Club World Cup Group D soccer match between Los Angeles FC and Flamengo in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (AP Photo/John Raoux) Chelsea's Cole Palmer, right, kicks a ball challenged by Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud during the Club World Cup group D soccer match between Chelsea and Los Angeles FC in Atlanta, Monday, June 16, 2025. (AP Photo/Brynn Anderson) Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud (9) warms up before the Club World Cup Group D soccer match between Chelsea and Los Angeles FC, Monday, June 16, 2025, in Atlanta. (AP Photo/Mike Stewart) Los Angeles FC's Olivier Giroud warms up before the Club World Cup Group D soccer match between Los Angeles FC and Flamengo in Orlando, Fla., Tuesday, June 24, 2025. (AP Photo/John Raoux) LOS ANGELES (AP) — Olivier Giroud is parting ways with Los Angeles FC after one disappointing year with the Major League Soccer club. The 38-year-old Giroud and LAFC announced the decision Friday on social media. He will play in his final match Sunday night at home against Vancouver. Advertisement After scoring only five goals in 37 matches for LAFC, Giroud will become a free agent after his departure. He is widely expected to join Lille, which finished fifth in the French league last season, on a free transfer. 'I want to thank all of the fans, my teammates and the staff at LAFC for making this an enjoyable stop in my career,' Giroud said in a statement. 'I am happy to have played a part in the success of LAFC. From winning a trophy last season to participating in the Club World Cup, this has been a great experience in LA for me and my family.' Giroud joined LAFC in July 2024 as a designated player after a long European career highlighted by prolific tenures with Arsenal and Chelsea. The top goal-scorer in the history of France's national team was expected to provide dynamic offense alongside MLS stars and fellow Frenchmen Denis Bouanga and Hugo Lloris. Instead, Giroud clearly struggled to adapt to the MLS game and to LAFC's counter-attacking style under coach Steve Cherundolo. LAFC also failed to figure out ways to involve Giroud in the offense consistently, unable to provide service to one of the sport's most dangerous finishers earlier in his career. Advertisement Giroud usually played as a substitute for LAFC, and he didn't score his first MLS goal until last April 19. He did find the net in big moments, scoring in the U.S. Open Cup final last season and in the Leagues Cup final. 'Olivier has been an exemplary professional during his time at LAFC,' general manager John Thorrington said. 'He brought humility and a winning mentality that helped elevate everyone around him. Olivier has been a tremendous ambassador for the club on and off the field. We are grateful for his contributions.' LAFC is suddenly a team in full transition after a winless three-game run at the Club World Cup earlier this month. Cherundolo already has announced he will leave the club to move back to Germany after the season, and LAFC could be down to Bouanga as its only designated player by next month. LAFC added Dutch winger Javairô Dilrosun on loan from Club América earlier this month, but the loan is only through July 24. Dilrosun replaced Cengiz Ünder, whose disappointing MLS tenure ended this month. Advertisement LAFC's lengthy pursuit of Antoine Griezmann also came up fruitless earlier this month when the French star extended his contract with Atlético Madrid through 2027. LAFC (7-4-5) still sits sixth in the Western Conference standings with two or three games in hand on every club above it, and it has an infusion of cash from beating América in a play-in match to reach the Club World Cup. ___ AP soccer:

Sky Sports: Sunderland in ‘Advanced Talks' to Sign £18m Ligue 1 Star
Sky Sports: Sunderland in ‘Advanced Talks' to Sign £18m Ligue 1 Star

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Sky Sports: Sunderland in ‘Advanced Talks' to Sign £18m Ligue 1 Star

Sunderland Eye Premier League Stability with Bulka Talks Underway Fresh from their dramatic 2-1 victory over Sheffield United in the Championship Play-Off Final, Sunderland are wasting no time preparing for life back in the Premier League. According to Sky Sports News' Keith Downie, the club have opened talks with French side OGC Nice over the signing of Marcin Bulka, signalling clear intent to strengthen their squad in key areas. Advertisement The 25-year-old Polish international has been identified by the Black Cats as a key target to challenge Anthony Patterson for the No.1 shirt. Towering at 6ft5in, Bulka's profile certainly fits the bill for a Premier League goalkeeper, and with only one year left on his contract, Sunderland appear poised to make a shrewd move. 'Talks surround a deal in the region of £18m, but no agreement is in place between the two clubs at this stage,' Sky Sports reported. Photo: IMAGO Prioritising Premier League Readiness It is clear that Sunderland's recruitment strategy has shifted since their Wembley triumph. With the top flight looming, the need to bolster the core of the squad is more urgent than ever. Sky Sports notes that the club are 'looking to strengthen the spine of their team,' and bringing in Bulka would do just that. Advertisement There's a tactical intelligence behind this move. While Patterson has impressed during Sunderland's promotion campaign, adding experienced top-flight competition between the posts could be vital to their survival ambitions. Bulka, who previously worked with soon-to-be-confirmed Sporting Director Florent Ghisolfi at Nice, has a blend of European experience and physical presence that Premier League clubs often demand from their shot-stoppers. Contract Situation Presents Opportunity What adds intrigue to this transfer is Bulka's contract situation. The Polish keeper has 'rebuffed a renewal' from Nice, effectively putting the Ligue 1 side in a position where selling him now may be their best option. From Sunderland's perspective, it could be a calculated move to land a high-potential player at a reasonable fee. At £18 million, it's certainly not a budget deal, but it reflects both the ambition of the club and the pressing need to ensure they don't make the common mistake of underinvesting upon promotion. Familiar Faces and Strategic Moves Bulka's previous relationship with Ghisolfi, who has yet to be officially unveiled by Sunderland, adds another layer to this developing story. Ghisolfi is expected to bring a data-driven, continental approach to recruitment, and this potential signing could be a sign of what's to come. That Ghisolfi and Bulka have worked together before suggests trust and mutual understanding — qualities that can fast-track adaptation in a new environment. Advertisement 'Bulka, a Polish international, has just a year left on his contract at Nice and has rebuffed a renewal.' It remains to be seen whether the deal gets over the line, but if Sunderland are to avoid becoming another yo-yo club, signings like this could prove critical. Our View – EPL Index Analysis Let's be honest, it still feels surreal. We're back in the Premier League! And not even a month later, we're hearing that Sunderland are negotiating an £18 million deal for a Polish international goalkeeper from Nice. If you'd told me this a year ago, I'd have laughed you out of the pub. The fact that we're going for someone like Bulka — someone with height, experience and European pedigree — shows that this club isn't just happy to be back. We're here to compete. It's also a massive show of ambition that we're not resting on our laurels with Patterson. He's been brilliant, but competition breeds excellence, and Bulka coming in could push him even further. From the outside looking in, £18m might raise eyebrows. But with the money sloshing around the top tier and considering the importance of a reliable keeper, it might end up looking like a bargain. If we pull this off, it'll be a serious statement to the rest of the league — Sunderland are not just back, they're building something.

Richard Marles' 'ridiculous' position on defence funding comes at a bad time as NATO nations vow to ramp up their budgets
Richard Marles' 'ridiculous' position on defence funding comes at a bad time as NATO nations vow to ramp up their budgets

Sky News AU

time31 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Richard Marles' 'ridiculous' position on defence funding comes at a bad time as NATO nations vow to ramp up their budgets

Why didn't Richard Marles explain to Donald Trump and the other 31 leaders of NATO nations that they don't need to invest more in their nations' defence to deal with an aggressive Russia enabled by China? Instead, they only need to focus on the quality of their existing two per cent of GDP spend. Surely they would be delighted to know that the actual amount of money they allocate to their military is a mere distraction. I suspect the reason Mr Marles kept this theory to himself is because he knows it's ridiculous. It's a manoeuvre that can justify sitting on his hands while our nation faces dangerous times. Politicians are used to using arguments of convenience to get through their days and avoid uncomfortable facts, but when it comes to Australia's security, we've reached new high points of sophistry and avoidance. Unlike our own leader Mr Albanese and his deputy Richard Marles, NATO leaders apparently do think the headline budget for defence matters. That's why the national leaders of this 32 nation grouping have just agreed to lift defence spending from two per cent of GDP to five per cent (made up of 3.5 per cent on defence and another 1.5 per cent on defence-related investments like roads and bridges that can support heavy military equipment). Mr Marles must also have known that the Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez had been trying out the other line on defence spending that the Albanese government uses here at home to hide the fact they're leaving our military short. Mr Sanchez had tried to convince other European leaders that 2.1 per cent of GDP on defence was enough because Spain knew the capabilities it needed and this determined their spend. Sound familiar? Except that we're not even matching Spain, we're stuck at two per cent (and Spain isn't trying to afford nuclear submarines in their budget). The reaction to this ploy by the Spanish leader in Europe was best captured by an official who simply said 'I have no words to express my disgust'. So, no surprise Mr Marles would have been delighted to be squashed up in the back corner of the formal leaders' photo well out of the way. He must have been even more delighted to not have to meet Donald Trump or any other senior US administration figure and be forced into a serious conversation. Reacting to the Spanish government's position, Trump has since said he's considering doubling US tariffs on Spain to shift their thinking. One other point on the 'we fund the capabilities we need rather than setting some arbitrary top line number' nonsense from our government. The government's own strategic review, by Angus Houston and Stephen Smith, recommended a list of capabilities Australia's military needed and quick as a flash, the government didn't fund them. They set an arbitrary top line budget – two per cent of GDP – and cancelled plans the review supported on key systems like air and missile defence and support ships to let our Navy operate at range. The hypocrisy is so thick it's getting hard to breathe. Now, what about Mr Marles' new manoeuvre – the money you budget to spend isn't what matters, it's the quality of how you spend it? I tried that out at home, but my partner told me our budget was what determined what we can and can't buy. And Joseph Stalin famously said 'quantity has a quality all its own'. That's still true. But beyond that, the way the Australian Defence organisation spends the $59 billion taxpayers are giving it annually is wasteful and profligate. The last thing it could be described as is quality. So, we're in the worst of worlds: not spending enough and spending what we do have badly. In international defence circles, the extravagance and delay in Australia's acquisition of three Hunter class frigates ranks near the top of scandal-plagued defence programs. The frigates were chosen back in 2018, but it's taking until 2032 for the first ship to be delivered to the Navy. And each ship is costing $9 billion (our three better armed air warfare destroyers cost less than $3 billion each). The Hunter frigates are so lightly armed that when we have the first three sometime in the late 2030s, they would all be outgunned and overmatched by the single Chinese cruiser that circumnavigated Australia earlier this year. The Americans are thinking about cancelling their own frigate program that's buying Constellation class ships similar to our Hunters because it's taking nine years to get the first ship (not 14 years like us) and each ship is costing $AUD1.8 billion (not $9 billion). The Americans think this is outrageously delayed and expensive, but our Navy's Hunter program makes it look like a beacon of efficiency. Our Navy has more admirals than it does warships – and Admirals are meant to command fleets. The Hunter frigates are Faberge egg level of luxurious self indulgence. And those Faberge eggs were the high point of extravagance and decay in the Russian empire of the czars on its way to being toppled by the Russian Revolution. If only the same was in prospect in the halls of Defence Headquarters in Canberra, without the violence. One other example from a completely different part of our Defence organisation shows the Hunter scandal is not a lonely phenomenon. Back in 2020, the then Morrison government's Force Structure Update said that being able to build at least some of the missiles our military would need in time of war was an urgent and essential thing and instructed Defence to act. Defence responded, rapidly forming a new internal bureaucratic outfit within Defence it called the Guided Weapons and Explosive Ordnance enterprise. Five years on its 900 person staff have however, not proven to be terribly enterprising. There is one piece of good news: they have managed to give one company a contract to build a missile factory in Newcastle. But apart from that, the primary other outcome from what must be at least a $100 million per annum staff bill so far seems to be funding a study about where a large shed – grandly named the Australian Weapons Manufacturing Complex - might eventually be located that Lockheed Martin can then use to assemble short range land missiles made in America (the government has talked about this as 'production'). Do we need 900 people in a new organisation within the already bloated Defence organisation to sign contracts with companies? Everything it is doing looks just like business as usual for Defence before it even existed. And can we afford to be so sleepy about an essential input for our military that we know they will run out of in weeks if there is a war? Plenty of other nations get much better value for what they spend on defence. Finland, Norway, Singapore, Poland and South Korea are examples, let alone Ukraine and Israel. So, change is possible. The money Defence is getting is delivering a weaker military right at the time Australia needs a stronger one. The huge expense of the very slow projects the government is allowing Defence to spend our taxpayer funds on – Hunter frigates and nuclear powered submarines – is sucking all the money out of the rest of our force and doing nothing for our security for the next 15 years. This is what Mr Marles describes as doing what is necessary to 'meet the strategic moment'. Australia deserves better from our government and our defence bureaucracy. And so do the men and women of our defence force. Michael Shoebridge is a contributor and the founder and director of Strategic Analysis Australia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store