
Now that Musk has turned his chainsaw on Trump, what happens to all the government data he accessed?
For anyone who's seen the quintessential slasher classic 'The Texas Chainsaw Massacre,' the destructive power of a man wielding a chainsaw is the indisputable stuff of nightmares.
But the same could easily be said about this year's remake featuring Elon Musk, where the dancing chainsaw slasher reenacted, for Conservative Political Action Conference theatergoers, a scene eerily reminiscent of the original. I'm thinking, specifically, of that unforgettable final scene, where Leatherface fades to black swinging his gas-powered murder weapon wildly through the air as he helplessly watches his last potential victim make her last-minute daring escape, dangling from the back of a stranger's pickup truck.
Social Security? Gutted.
Veterans programs? Gutted.
Alzheimer's, cancer and climate research? Gutted.
School lunches, Head Start, the entire Department of Education? All gutted.
Air safety, food safety, consumer protections? Gutted. Gutted. Gutted.
Museums, libraries, hospitals, childcare? You get the drift.
And what about all those thousands of federal workers whose jobs were cut?
It'll take us years to recover from these self-inflicted wounds.
Not to mention the generational damage wrought to our standing in the global community by what is possibly Musk's proudest personal achievement: the decimation of America's foreign assistance programs feeding starving children, combating human trafficking, fighting malaria and reducing the transmission of HIV. All summarized, of course, by the heartless tweet: 'We spent the weekend feeding USAID into the wood chipper.'
While the long-term consequences of these actions may be difficult to gauge, conservative estimates are measured in the tens of thousands.
But now, apparently, our modern-day Leatherface has turned his power tool on the guy who gave him the chainsaw in the first place. Even implying that his former boss was involved in the Jeffrey Epstein sex trafficking conspiracy, and has since conspired to bury the evidence that would expose Trump's connections to Epstein's decades-long criminal activities — sort of hard to put that toothpaste back into the tube, wouldn't you say?
At first glance, this appears to have all the makings of an Ultimate Fighting Championship bout, fought in the middle of a monster truck rally. This calls to mind the 1990s Claymation TV show 'Celebrity Deathmatch,' where preposterously paired big-name personalities (Hillary vs. Monica? Prince Charles vs. Prince?) fought to the death. Promises to be one hell of a show!
What America may be in danger of losing sight of in the ensuing spectacle is the real threat to our national security posed by the world's richest man, who, until quite recently, enjoyed unfettered access to everything the government knows about you.
Never before has the data your federal government collects about every American been consolidated into a single database. It has always, religiously, been 'siloed' into disconnected data systems — some at the Treasury Department, some at the Education Department, some at the Veterans Affairs and the Social Security Administration, among other agencies — but always carefully stored and guarded by the separate entities collecting the data. The New York Times, for example, recently published a comprehensive story detailing 314 specific personal details your government potentially knows about you. I suggest giving that a read.
A week ago, this casual observer would have assumed these two men, Trump and Musk, were acting with a single motive. Assembling the master data that could make possible Trump's ambitions for sweeping dictatorial powers, and for Musk's ambitions.
The sheer volume of data, of course, far outstrips anything that social media titans like Mark Zuckerberg or Musk could legally monetize. And, in any event, certainly not the quid pro quo one might expect for a $288 million campaign contribution. Musk seemed, instead, to be carving himself a unique role in a near-future authoritarian oligarchy, as the undisputed Richelieu to Trump's Louis XIII.
But, alas, that was not to be.
What is to be, is the shocking revelation that a man who just days ago was given the ceremonial key to the White House — and in the weeks prior, the key to just about every federal government data base — has now cut all ties, and who we know talks regularly with Vladimir Putin, with whom he enjoys a reportedly friendly relationship, is now a free agent.
Did Musk take the data with him? To me, the answer seems obvious. The way his pot-smoking 'college dropouts' sauntered into agency after rarified government agency, enjoying open access to virtually anything they wanted — and then they were called out by a whistleblower for uploading huge troves of data to an unsecured server. Within minutes, after Russian hackers had apparently been tipped off, they tried to download it using the correct passwords.
We are told that in the end, the Russians were unable to access the data. Whether or not that denial is accurate and truthful, however, again, what should be obvious is that Musk's team successfully spirited your personal information from secure government databases to god knows where.
That is the reality to which we wake today, and now every day.
Let's hope that after those two Claymation figures have beaten the clay out of each other, someone comes up with a plan to clean up the mess they made. Before it's too late.
Brett Wagner, now retired, served as professor of national security decision making for the U.S. Naval War College and adjunct fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ben Crump Says Donald Trump's Spending Bill is Terrible Amid Elon Musk Feud
Ben Crump's picked his side in the Elon Musk and Donald Trump beef ... but, he's not backing a personality, he says he's backing the better idea -- and, he doesn't want the "One Big Beautiful Bill" to pass through the Senate. We caught up with the civil rights activist and attorney and asked him about the fight between POTUS and his former advisor ... and, he doesn't directly say he's on Elon's side -- but, he does think this spending bill is terrible. Crump rips the bill for making cuts to Medicaid -- the medical assistance program for people with lower incomes. BC says the world needs more humanity for all people ... instead of making the life of individuals struggling financially more difficult. As you know ... Elon lost his cool about this spending bill earlier this week -- firing off shots at the president and claiming Trump only won reelection because of his efforts. President Trump called BS on that idea ... but, Elon pushed on and claimed the real reason the administration hasn't released the so-called Epstein files is because the president's name is all over them. He's since deleted the post where he wrote that ... but, today Trump warned of serious consequences if Elon decides to support Dems who are running against Republicans who vote for the bill. BTW ... we also asked Crump about Trump potentially pardoning Diddy -- and, it sounds like Crump's staying out of that one, too. Bottom line ... back the idea, not the man -- that's the Ben Crump way!
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Musk flips on Trump, ‘big, beautiful' bill
Washington (DC News Now) — Tension rose this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk is aiming for Trump's 'big, beautiful' bill that is now in the hands of the Senate. Dr. Omekongo Dibinga joins Capitol Review this week to discuss what impact Musk could have on Trump. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
With the Musk-Trump divide, what is the future of DOGE?
WASHINGTON — Even as President Donald Trump and multibillionaire Elon Musk deal with the fallout of their public dispute, Republican lawmakers still believe the original mission of DOGE can be carried out. And the absence of Musk is not likely to hinder that progress, according to a Utah congressman. 'We've always been a little frustrated that there was such limited interaction from the DOGE administration to the DOGE caucus — we couldn't really identify where we were to lean in,' said Rep. Blake Moore, co-chair of the congressional DOGE caucus. 'And we had a ton of folks ready to support but there just wasn't that interaction.' Moore acknowledged that much of Musk's role over the Department of Government Efficiency and Trump's big ambitions to slash government spending amounted to a lot of 'over-promising (but) under delivering.' 'I think that people should recognize … most everybody knew Elon was exaggerating as to what he could do, right?' Moore told the Deseret News. 'I think people recognize that now, and we need to be willing to pick up the appropriations process right now and find some substantive work to reduce the juice, the overall expenditure burden that our nation has,' he added. 'I think there's still an opportunity there.' Moore declined to say whether he thought it was a mistake to put Musk in such a position of power — instead noting it would be better to 'just sit back and kind of see what happens. It's all sort of just spinning around right now.' Other Republicans also expressed interest in continuing DOGE's mission on Capitol Hill, including Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., who leads the House Oversight DOGE subcommittee. 'I think DOGE is great. Government efficiency is fantastic,' Greene told reporters on Friday. 'It's exactly what we need. The American people support it, and it must continue.'