logo
Texas THC ban: The fight over hemp's future and a multibillion-dollar industry at stake

Texas THC ban: The fight over hemp's future and a multibillion-dollar industry at stake

Yahoo3 days ago

When patrons step into Planet K on Guadalupe Street, about a mile north of the University of Texas, it's immediately clear what its primary business is. Shelves fixed against the store's vibrant green walls are filled with a diverse array of consumable hemp products, most containing THC: gummies, vapes, infused beverages, smokable flowers, and accessories such as bongs, pipes and rolling papers.
Those shelves may soon look dramatically different after the Texas Legislature last week passed a bill that would ban all products containing THC, potentially delivering a costly blow to the state's booming cannabis industry.
If Gov. Greg Abbott signs Senate Bill 3 into law, Planet K's shelves come September would be limited to selections of nicotine products, such as pouches, cigarettes and some leaf tobacco, as well as counter-culture wearable buttons, T-shirts and sex toys.
SB 3, which would ban all THC products in Texas, makes exceptions only for hemp containing non-psychoactive compounds such as CBD and CBG. The measure was spearheaded by Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, a three-term Republican who presides over the Texas Senate and has described the legislation a "life and death issue." Sen. Charles Perry, a Lubbock Republican, authored the bill.
Some medical professionals, including a pediatrician spokesperson for the Texas Medical Association, share Patrick's concern that many potent THC products are too accessible to minors and those whose brains are still developing, a process the National Institutes of Health says may extend into a person's mid-to-late 20s.
'I've been a pediatrician for over 15 years, and there's a drastic difference with these new high-potency hemp-derived products sold at vape shops,' the TMA spokesperson said.
That pediatrician and her colleagues report a rise in Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) and Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome (CHS) — both of which are linked to early and chronic high-potency use. According to the Cleveland Clinic, those who use cannabis before age 18 are four to seven times more likely to develop CUD, while CHS can cause recurring vomiting in long-term users.
Since 2019, when Texas lawmakers legalized hemp production and retail, the legal age for consuming products with low levels of THC has been 21 in Texas. Patrick, 75, who previously alleged some shops were selling consumable hemp to minors, was seen on security footage being asked for identification at a store in Austin in March.
Opponents of SB 3 have advocated for tighter regulation of THC products, but Patrick has remained steadfast in pushing for an outright ban.
'We can't regulate it,' Patrick told NewsNation. 'We don't have enough police to check every store, when there are 8,000-9,000 of them. … To put it into perspective, we only have 1,100 McDonald's in the state of Texas; 1,300 Starbucks in the state of Texas. So, there are eight times more smoke shops selling this poison.'
Just minutes into a news conference Patrick held at the Capitol on Wednesday, the lieutenant governor tossed a bag of THC-infused cereal bites to a reporter, after asking if anyone wanted some, before making clear his opposition wasn't limited to underage use.
'We don't want adults to have this either,' Patrick said, holding up a different bag of infused cereal bites. 'What are you? Crazy? You want to go home and eat a bag of this tonight and see if you're here tomorrow?
"We don't want anybody buying anything off the shelf that could kill them or ruin their mental state for the rest of their lives.'
Patrick also claimed shoppers have no idea what ingredients were in the THC products that he displayed at the news conference. But Hometown Hero ATX, which makes the cereal bites Patrick threw to a reporter, fired back on X, saying the lieutenant governor 'blatantly lied on multiple occasions' about its products.
'If you turn it (the package) over, you'll find a full ingredients list as well as nutritional information and a certificate of analysis on every product,' the brand posted.
But it was a legislative loophole, not an influx of bad actors, that drove Texas' booming cannabis market.
In 2019, a law sponsored by Perry legalized the production, manufacturing and sale of hemp in Texas while approving consumable products with up to 0.3% THC, the primary psychoactive component in the cannabis plant. However, other intoxicating hemp derivatives such as THCa, Delta-8 THC and Delta-10 THC — compounds that can produce a "high" when heated or processed — inadvertently were legalized for sale and consumption.
'You would think that they (those concerned about the public's safety) would want it to go the other way,' said a Planet K employee. 'If they legalize it, then they can regulate it, and then you can figure out what is in them, and not just say 'proprietary THC blend.''
Since then, more than 8,000 retailers, including Planet K and its 17 locations in Central Texas, now sell THC products in Texas. As a result, the state's hemp business has grown like a weed, employing 53,000 people and having an estimated economic impact of $10 billion, according to Austin Monthly.
While some businesses, such as gas stations, convenience stores and some vape shops, will be able to withstand the ban, many others, like dispensaries and apothecaries, will likely be forced to close.
Brothers Todd and Mickey Harris, owners of the Happy Cactus Apothecary in South Austin, the same shop in which Patrick was carded, believe the legislation would 'effectively shut down our business' and hurt the local economy.
'It mainly affects small, Texas-based, family-owned businesses,' Todd Harris said. 'It won't affect those huge companies that have a few shops in Texas but have shops all over. They'll just move all their money to other states, which will then take more money away from the commerce here in Texas.'
All four states that border Texas have legal cannabis in some form. New Mexico's billion-dollar legal market brought in $32.7 million from its 12% excise tax in fiscal year 2024, while Oklahoma, Arkansas and Louisiana have medicinal markets, with the latter also having decriminalized the drug.
Estella Castro, who owns Austinite Cannabis Co. on East Cesar Chavez Street, also owns two locations in Southern Oklahoma and anticipates a boom in business for any smoke shops in the states bordering Texas.
Within Texas' borders, the economic impact of the hemp industry extends far beyond the state's progressive cities, as many hemp farmers, some of whom live in Perry's West Texas district, are facing a threat to their livelihoods.
'Charles Perry says he has an open-door policy. That is an absolute lie,' Ann Gauger, co-owner of Caprock Family Farms in Lubbock, told the Texas Tribune. 'We've gone to his office in Austin, but he refuses to see us.
'We wouldn't be in the hemp business in a million years if they hadn't passed that bill. Now we're one of the largest hemp producers in the U.S., and their ban is going to shut that down.'
Some farmers don't grow the drought-resistant crop to be used for cannabis products, as the plant has many industrial purposes, such as textile production, but farmers and Katharine Harris, a fellow in drug policy at Rice University, contend that legal hemp production without traces of THC is impossible.
'There are thousands of cannabinoids in the hemp plant, many of them non-impairing,' she said. 'Chemistry experts testified during the State Affairs Committee hearing that this language will make manufacturing and testing of remaining legal products nearly impossible.'
Perry disagrees with this argument, maintaining that SB 3 doesn't interfere with industrial hemp production allowed under federal law.
'If you're under compliance with the federal law and you're doing stuff for fiber and stock and production for those other products that we hope to do, you didn't get affected by this,' Perry said at a news conference Wednesday. 'But if you're doing hemp that ultimately ended up as a Delta-8 (product) or Delta-10 (product), you're out of business, and you should be.'
The potential ban comes after years of scientific study suggesting medicinal benefits of cannabinoids for many people, from veterans to cancer patients to insomniacs. A year-long peer-reviewed study published by the academic journal Frontiers of Molecular Neuroscience found that veterans exhibiting post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms who used cannabis were 2.57 times more likely to no longer meet the diagnostic criteria for PTSD during the study period compared with non-users.
Anecdotally, Castro and the Harris brothers maintain that a large portion of their customer base consists of older individuals seeking relief, rather than a high.
'Our clientele is pretty expansive, but I'd say most of them are looking for help with sleep, chronic pain or PTSD,' said Mickey Harris, a former massage therapist who as a smoke shop owner has become knowledgeable about cannabis compounds. 'We have a pretty large 55 (years old) and up clientele base.'
Castro told the American-Statesman in April that she has seen many senior citizens and veterans 'stock buying' consumable hemp products in anticipation of SB 3 becoming law.
'It's terrible to have somebody thinking that (these products) are going to go away and they're on a fixed income, and they have to budget that gummy or that tincture in there,' Castro said, noting the shop has been giving some veterans discounts.
For Kaymon Thomas, who has worked at Planet K for a decade, his job is about providing an affordable solution to customers' ailments.
'We always make a joke that we're kind of underpaid therapists,' Thomas said. 'They'll tell us all their problems, and it's like, 'Maybe try this.' Sometimes they come back and say, 'That helped a lot,' which is cool.'
In an effort to grease the wheels for one of his biggest legislative priorities, Patrick brokered a deal on Sunday with Rep. Tom Oliverson, a Republican from Cypress and anesthesiologist, to support House Bill 46. That bill, authored by Rep. Ken King, R-Canadian, will expand the Texas Compassionate Use Program, the state's limited medicinal marijuana program, to Texans suffering from chronic pain, illnesses such as Crohn's disease, and those who are terminally ill.
'The Senate and my concern has always been that we don't want to go back to the days of doctors writing prescriptions for anyone who paid them for a prescription for pain pills,' Patrick announced on X. 'The Texas Medical Board has put in strong guidelines to prevent that from happening over the last decade. Dr. Oliverson presented a new thoughtful plan that the Senate and I can support that will help those in true need of relief."
Patrick noted that the bill would increase the number of licenses to 12 from three and add satellite locations in each public health region of the state for the first time.
HB 46, which was amended and passed by the Senate on Tuesday, also awaits a signature from Abbott, whose office declined to comment on pending legislation when contacted by the American-Statesman.
There has been considerable debate about whether Abbott, who has never had a THC ban on his list of top legislative priorities, will sign SB 3 into law.
In March, he offered tacit support for marijuana decriminalization, telling the Houston Chronicle that "small possession of marijuana is not the type of violation that we want to stockpile jails with."
'Look, I'm not going to speak for the governor,' Patrick said on Wednesday. 'He will do what he's going to do. I have total confidence in the governor.'
In April, polling by UT's Texas Politics Project found that 50% of Texas voters opposed an outright ban, including 35% who expressed strong opposition — more than double the 17% who said they strongly supported a ban. In total, just 34% expressed support.
'The thing that's the most surprising about this is that Lt. Gov. Patrick usually follows his political antenna, and on this, he did not,' Scott Braddock, the editor of the Quorum Report, a Texas political newsletter, told KVUE. 'His own pollster found that only about 30% of Texas Republican voters agree with a full ban.'
Abbott has until June 22 to veto any bill that advances to his desk from the current legislative session, which ends Monday.
'This is a jump ball, 50/50 chance on this,' Braddock told KVUE. 'Abbott could sign this into law at the urging of Lt. Gov. Patrick, or he could veto it, and he'd make a lot of the MAGA crowd, the Trump supporters, really happy because they don't agree with a full ban.'
Meanwhile, many THC product advocates and business owners like the Harris brothers are still holding onto hope that their $10 billion industry won't go up in smoke.
'We've been dealing with a bunch of bills like this for four years,' Todd Harris said. 'Each time the community comes out and speaks (against it), so we've been able to keep this industry alive and booming.'
This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Texas THC ban threatens burgeoning cannabis industry, local businesses

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Rand Paul Rips Lindsey Graham Over Gargantuan Budget Bill
Rand Paul Rips Lindsey Graham Over Gargantuan Budget Bill

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Rand Paul Rips Lindsey Graham Over Gargantuan Budget Bill

Kentucky Senator Rand Paul threw shade at his South Carolinian colleague Lindsey Graham while excoriating Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' on Fox Business. In an appearance Wednesday night, Paul argued that Graham had his own reasons for rubber-stamping Republicans' gargantuan budget bill, which will add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next 10 years, according to an estimate from the Congressional Budget Office. The bill is expected to cut $1.3 trillion in spending but also cut $3.7 trillion in total revenue, leading to the massive deficit. 'This bill is really a vehicle for Lindsey Graham to secretly explode beyond on the military budget,' Paul said. 'They want to explode the military budget beyond the caps. That's really what the bill is about. So there is a lot of new spending in this bill. If the new spending weren't in there, it truly would be a bill that would be saving money.' The legislation would dramatically increase military and border spending, bringing $150 billion to the Pentagon over the next 10 years. Graham, a longtime war hawk, has urged the Trump administration to take a tougher stance on Iran. Paul also said he didn't think Congress was mature enough to raise the debt ceiling. 'If you have teenage children and you gave them a credit card and they maxed out $2,000 on booze and gambling, would you give them a bigger credit line or a smaller credit line?' the Kentucky Republican said. 'Congress is worse than a bunch of drunken teenagers. They have a history of not being fiscally responsible. You should give them a very short debt ceiling increase and say, 'Show me and prove to me you'll act responsibly, and I'll give you more money.'' Paul told CNN Wednesday that he could understand Elon Musk's frustration with the gargantuan spending bill. 'The new spending in this bill actually exceeds all the work he did to try to find savings, so I can understand his disappointment,' he said. Earlier that day, Paul had quote-tweeted Musk, arguing that Congress knows adding another $5 trillion to the national debt would be a 'huge mistake.'

China says Trump and Xi hold telephone call amid tariffs spat
China says Trump and Xi hold telephone call amid tariffs spat

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China says Trump and Xi hold telephone call amid tariffs spat

US President Donald Trump has spoken by telephone with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, China's state news agency Xinhua said on Thursday. No specific details about the content of the conversation have been disclosed but it comes amid the ongoing trade spat between the two countries. The White House has yet to confirm the phone call. On Wednesday, Trump stated on his online platform Truth Social: "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" This is the first known phone call between the two presidents since Trump took office again in January. In recent months, Trump has been non-committal when asked about any potential conversations with Xi, leaving open the possibility of direct exchanges that may not have been disclosed. But typically, governments publicly announce such calls between heads of state. Since retaking office, Trump has pursued a hard-line trade policy against China, significantly escalating the long-standing dispute. The US president has imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese imports, raising them in several steps to a 145%. Beijing has responded with counter-tariffs. Although both sides agreed in mid-May to pause the escalation and temporarily lower some tariffs, tensions have recently flared again, and the underlying disagreements remain unresolved. Meanwhile, the US Senate is preparing a new sanctions package against Russia, which, according to Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, is aimed at countries that continue to purchase Russian oil, gas, and other energy products. China would be particularly affected by the proposed measures, which come after Moscow failed to stop its over three-year war on Ukraine.

Trump, Xi hold long-awaited phone call on trade war
Trump, Xi hold long-awaited phone call on trade war

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump, Xi hold long-awaited phone call on trade war

US President Donald Trump held a long-awaited phone call with Chinese President Xi Jinping Thursday as the leaders of the world's two biggest economies tried to avoid an all-out trade war. Trump said that the call reached a "very positive conclusion" and that they agreed to meet in person -- but Beijing issued a more muted readout saying that Xi spoke of a need to "correct the course" of ties. The call -- the first to be publicly announced since Trump returned to power in January -- comes after Beijing and Washington had accused each other of jeopardizing a trade war truce agreed last month in Geneva. "The call lasted approximately one and a half hours, and resulted in a very positive conclusion for both Countries," Trump said on Truth Social, adding that US and Chinese trade teams would hold a new meeting "shortly." "President Xi graciously invited the First Lady and me to visit China, and I reciprocated. As Presidents of two Great Nations, this is something that we both look forward to doing," Trump added. Trump said they would announce the time and place of the "soon to be meeting" later. The two leaders did not, however, discuss Russia's invasion of Ukraine, Trump said, despite long-standing US hopes that Beijing could exert influence on Moscow to end the war. "The conversation was focused almost entirely on TRADE," said Trump, adding that they hoped to have resolved issues over crucial rare earth minerals used in tech products. Relations between superpower rivals Beijing and Washington have been fraught ever since Trump in April introduced sweeping worldwide tariffs that targeted China most heavily of all. At one point the United States hit China with additional levies of 145 percent on its goods as both sides engaged in tit-for-tat escalation. China's countermeasures on US goods reached 125 percent. Trump had accused Xi as recently as Wednesday of being "extremely hard to make a deal with." Chinese state media said Trump had requested the call. There was no immediate confirmation from the White House. - 'Correcting the course' - In its more restrained readout, Beijing said that relations needed more work. "Correcting the course of the big ship of Sino-US relations requires us to steer well and set the direction, especially to eliminate all kinds of interference and even destruction, which is particularly important," Xi told Trump according to state news agency Xinhua. It said Xi told Trump he was welcome to visit China again -- following an earlier visit during his first term in 2017. Until Thursday, the two leaders had not had any confirmed contact more than five months since the Republican returned to power, despite frequent claims by the US president that such a call was imminent. Trump said in a Time Magazine interview in April that Xi had called him -- but Beijing insisted that there had been no call recently. Beijing and Washington agreed in Geneva last month to slash their staggeringly high tariffs for 90 days, but the two sides have since traded blame for derailing the deal. Trump argued last week that China had "totally violated" the agreement, without providing further details. China's commerce ministry hit back this week, saying the Trump administration had since introduced "discriminatory restrictive measures", including revoking Chinese student visas in the United States. Trump then dialed up tensions this week. "I like President XI of China, always have, and always will, but he is VERY TOUGH, AND EXTREMELY HARD TO MAKE A DEAL WITH!!!" he posted Wednesday on his Truth Social platform. Washington has meanwhile targeted Chinese nationals who entered the United States both legally and illegally, with the president vowing to aggressively revoke Chinese student visas. Trump has separately ramped up tensions with other trade partners, including the European Union, by vowing to double global tariffs on steel and aluminum to 50 percent from Wednesday. dk/md

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store