
Davy Fitzgerald's son receives suspended sentence after stealing €35,000 from former employer Bank of Ireland
A son of Clare hurling legend Davy Fitzgerald was given a fully suspended 12-month prison sentence after he admitted stealing €35,000 from his then employer, Bank of Ireland, to feed his 'out-of-control gambling addiction'.
Colm Fitzgerald, (28), Castlequinn, Sixmilebridge, Co Clare, stole the money while employed to be in charge of cash at a cash counter, at Bank of Ireland, Shannon Industrial Estate, Shannon, Co Clare, on seven separate dates in 2023.
Advertisement
Fitzgerald, who immediately resigned from the bank, after the thefts were discovered during an internal audit, told the bank and gardaí that he stole the cash to sustain a gambling addiction.
Fitzgerald's barrister, Kenny Kerins, told Ennis Circuit Criminal Court that 'steeped in GAA' Fitzgerald, had paid all of the money back with the support and assistance of his family.
Mr Keirns said Fitzgerald was caught in a 'serious' grip of addiction to sports gambling and that he had 'expressed relief' when the thefts were discovered.
Fitzgerald admitted stealing the cash in bundles of €5,000 on seven separate dates in 2023.
Advertisement
Mr Kerins told the court: 'He was living a life of secrets, he has remorse, he has shame. This young man had everything going well in his life, he was engaged in sport, he had a job, and in seven actions he absolutely destroys his career."
The barrister told the sentencing hearing last Friday that, prior to the discovery of the cash thefts, Fitzgerald's gambling had gotten so serious, the well known bookmaker chain Paddy Power banned him from betting with them.
'They were so concerned that they wrote to him and banned him from gambling with them... this was a serious addiction for Mr Fitzgerald,' Mr Kerins said.
'His life was completely out of control, so much so that he sees all this as a positive thing, he sees it as a disengagement from his addiction.'
Advertisement
Mr Kerins said when Bank of Ireland's auditors discovered €35,000 was missing, Fitzgerald prepared a document that would have concealed 'his deceit' but he 'cancelled it almost immediately'.
'He was about to further his criminal endeavour, but he stopped it. He went home and told his grandfather and close family, he knew the jig was up and he came forward, he met with bank officials and made admissions, he resigned and met with gardai by appointment,' said Mr Kerins.
'That is to his credit, he faced up to it, he is a gentleman,' said the barrister.
Mr Kerins said Fitzgerald was 'aware' thefts from his employer were 'unacceptable' but he said Fitzgerald had taken responsibility for his offending as well as measures not to return to gambling.
Advertisement
'He and his family are steeped in GAA, which was perhaps how he became involved in (sports) gambling. He has great passion for sport and he is still involved in coaching which is a great pride to him.'
Mr Kerins said Fitzgerald had 'engaged with therapeutic services and had worked as courier' to pay his family back the money they reimbursed to the bank.
The barrister said Fitzgerald has, along with his partner, opened a coffee shop business in Sixmilebridge, employing four people, and that Fitzgerald had 'taken careful steps' to limit his own 'access to the business's finances and cash, so there is oversight that'.
Detective Garda Paddy Bourke, Shannon Garda Station, told the court he believed Fitzgerald had done all he could to cooperate with the garda investigation as well as trying to tackle his addiction, 'and I hope to continues to do so', added Garda Bourke.
Advertisement
CCTV
CCTV footage located at the bank's cash counters, which may have led them to Fitzgerald, had expired by the time the bank discovered the thefts and alerted gardai, and so Fitzgerald's pleas were valuable to the prosecution, the court heard.
Mr Kerins said Fitzgerald had 'no previous convictions', had engaged in a residential therapy programme run by the Bushypark Addiction Treatment Centre, and he continues to attend regular meetings of Gamblers Anonymous (GA).
'He's not seeking to blame anyone, he developed a low level gambling addiction which snowballed and got out-of-control while he was working as an employee of the bank — the court is aware of the compulsive nature of gambling addiction.'
Prosecuting barrister, Sarah-Jane Comerford, said the prosecution 'accepted (Fitzgerald) was suffering from a gambling addiction at the time'.
Outlining his judgement, Judge Francis Comerford said Fitzgerald 'took bundles of cash from his employer each worth €5,000' and that he considered a two-year headline sentence to be appropriate.
'It was a significant breach of trust, it was a significant offence, and the aggravating factor is that it was theft by an employee from their employer, it was an abuse of trust to steal from them.'
The judge told Fitzgerald: 'Gambling is not an excuse for theft, and one should seek help without having to resort to this.'
However, taking into account Mr Keirns mitigation plea, the judge said he accepted that persons in addiction who 'have the compulsion to do this (steal), does reduce culpability somewhat'.
'Need for money'
The judge said there was an air of desperation about Fitzgerald's actions: 'It was not a sophisticated fraud, it was a response to a need for money for gambling.'
Reducing Fitzgerald's sentence to 12 months, the judge continued: 'It wasn't a commercial calculated crime, so that tends to put it at a lower level, and it was discovered very quickly, following an internal audit.'
Judge Comerford fully suspended the 12-month jail term for a period of 18 months, and directed that Fitzgerald continue to engage with gambling support services.
'While the amount of money is significant, it would have been more serious if it was someone vulnerable that was preyed upon,' said the judge.
'This was not done for a high lifestyle or to accrue wealth, but, it was for a gambling addiction.'
Afterwards, Colm Fitzgerald hugged family members outside the court.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BreakingNews.ie
39 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
HSE and National Screening Service apologies for failings to woman battling cervical cancer
The HSE and the National Screening Service has apologised for 'failings' to a young mother of two who is battling cervical cancer. The 38-year old hairdresser had sued over two cervical smear tests, one in 2016 and one in 2020, two years after the controversy around the screening programme broke and which it was claimed were incorrectly reported as negative. Advertisement The apology was read to the court as the young mother Leona Macken and her husband Alan from Artane, Dublin settled a High Court action against the HSE. The 38-year old mother from Artane, Co Dublin outside the Four Courts said it felt great to get an apology from the HSE and National Screening Service but after the Vicky Phelan case nobody expected this to happen. 'I am fighting this since 2023 . I started asking questions and Thank God I did. We are told to trust the process . Something is not working in the system. Something needs to be fixed. This was 2020 for me and it is still happening; It is not good enough,' she said. In the letter of apology from the chief executive of the National Screening Service Fiona Murphy it said on behalf of the Service and the HSE, it wished to apologise to Leona, and her family ' for the failings that have occurred and led to your diagnosis.' Advertisement It added: ' I wish to express our deep regret to you and your family and acknowledged the many challenges that you have faced as a result of your diagnosis.' It concluded: ' I appreciate that this has been a very difficult time for you and your family and I hope you find some solace with the resolution and conclusion of this process. I hope that this settlement will give you and your family some level of comfort, peace of mind and security.' Leona Macken's case before the High Court was fast tracked through the courts system because of the urgency of her diagnosis. Her counsel Jeremy Maher SC instructed by Cian O'Carroll solicitors told the court it was a truly tragic case. Counsel said it was their case because of failings in the CervicalCheck programme the two smears in 2016 and 2020 were incorrectly reported and Leona Macken was not diagnosed with cervical cancer until 2023. Advertisement He said Ms Macken has now a limited life expectancy and 'what should have been stopped in its tracks was not.' In the proceedings it was claimed that there was an alleged failure to correctly report or diagnose Ms Macken's smear samples in March 2016 and January 2020 and her cancer was allowed to develop and spread unidentified, unmonitored, and untreated until she was diagnosed with cervical cancer in May 2023. It was claimed that the smears taken in March 2016 and 2020 had been incorrectly reported as negative. It was further contended there was an alleged failure to have effective oversight of the CervicalCheck programme and a failure to have regard to the numbers of women developing cervical cancer despite a history of clear smear tests. Advertisement Noting the settlement Mr Justice Paul Coffey said he wished to acknowledge the plea from counsel that the lacuna identified in the Ruth Morrissey case by the Supreme Court be legally filled . This referred to what a husband can claim in such a case. The judge said there was a clear gap in the law. In the Ruth Morrissey case the Supreme Court upheld an appeal by a testing laboratory against damages awarded to her husband for services which would have been provided to the family by Mrs Morrissey were it not for her shortened life expectancy.


Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
I tried McDonald's new Big Arch burger - one thing made it better than a Big Mac
McDonald's have launched a brand new burger to their menu - and it is advertised as the next generation of burgers. The fast food giant unveiled their brand new Big Arch burger, perfect for those craving something new from the beloved fast food chain. Despite being renowned for their Big Macs, McDonald's have crafted the Big Arch burger with a brand new secret sauce and it has totally revamped the burger game. This burger is built for serious hunger, with two beef patties, three cheese slices, crispy onions, fresh onions, gherkins, lettuce and the brand new sauce. Thomas O'Neill, head of menu at McDonald's UK & Ireland told the Mirror that the fast food chain's fame served as their own inspiration for the new burger, saying: "[We've been] famous for beef burgers for so many years, but we wanted to take our customers to the next generation of beef burgers so it feels new but feels contemporary. "The sauce is what makes it different, this sauce is designed just for this burger. It's also bigger to help for those who have that 'McDonald's hunger'. The bun is new, which gives a flavour and texture difference, there is also two different types of onion, two quarter pounder patties, three slices of white cheddar which melts with the beef and gives it the classic McDonald's taste," he added. I was lucky enough to try the Big Arch for myself and here's what I thought... I wasn't sure what to expect, as I didn't really think there could be much else you can change when it comes to a cheese burger - but I was wrong. The first thing I noticed was that the bun was completely different, it was a seeded bun with poppy seeds which was a nice touch. I also learned how the new Big Arch sauce was applied differently, it was put on the top and bottom bun instead of just the top bun like the Big Mac, which is to coat your whole mouth with sauce rather than just the top - and the sauce is absolutely delicious. It has more of a kick to it than the Big Mac sauce, and is a lot tastier. While the sauce was a great new addition and interesting to have it on both buns, it made it very messy. I had sauce all over my hands and I got through quite a lot of napkins, so I don't think it's one you could eat in the car from a drive thru. There are two beef patties and three mild cheddar slices which gives it a nice creamy taste, and the iconic gherkins and lettuce give it the extra crunch. It's clear McDonald's have designed the Big Arch burger for those who don't do things by halves. Overall, I'm a huge fan of the new burger, it's definitely something different and exciting for the McDonald's menu and I would recommend everyone to try. However I do wish it wasn't as messy. Any McDonald's fan will know all of the best menu items are limited editions, however Thomas said if the Big Arch proves to be a big hit, it could stay on the menu permanently, fingers crossed! The Big Arch is available in restaurants and via McDelivery® from Wednesday, 18th June.


BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
BBC must pay damages and legal costs to Gerry Adams pending any appeal
A High Court judge has directed the BBC to pay €50,000 damages, plus €250,000 legal costs, to former Sinn Féin president Gerry Adams pending a possible appeal by the broadcaster against the full costs and damages orders made in his defamation case. On those conditions, Mr Justice Alexander Owens agreed on Monday to give the BBC a stay on payment of the full €100,000 damages awarded to Mr Adams by a High Court jury. Advertisement The stay also applies to the judge's order for the BBC to pay Mr Adams legal costs, estimated at up to €3 million. Eoin McCullough SC, for the BBC, said it is still considering whether to bring an appeal against the jury decision and award made last Friday. When counsel asked about a further stay on the conditions of the stay imposed by the judge, the judge told him he would have seek any such further stay from the Court of Appeal. The judge was told the BBC is still considering whether to appeal last Friday's finding by a High Court jury that it defamed Mr Adams by publishing a claim that he sanctioned the murder of a British agent. The jury awarded Mr Adams €100,000 damages to vindicate and restore his reputation. Advertisement Following the verdict, Mr Justice Owens made costs orders in favour of Mr Adams. The amount of costs, yet to be decided, has been estimated at up to €3 million for the 21 day action. Mr Adams claimed the 2016 Spotlight programme and a related article defamed him by falsely accusing him of giving 'the final say' in the murder of MI5 informant Denis Donaldson by dissident republicans at a cottage in Glenties, Co Donegal, in 2006. The jury agreed, as Mr Adams had pleaded in his claim, that words published in the programme and article were understood to mean he sanctioned and approved the murder. The BBC had argued the claim against Mr Adams was couched as an allegation but the jury rejected the BBC's defence that the publication of the allegation was fair, reasonable and in the public interest. Advertisement On Monday, Mr McCullough outlined a number of possible grounds of appeal, including concerning the treatment of evidence from the family of Mr Donaldson and a decision to exclude evidence of Austin Stack, whose father was shot by the IRA in 1993. The judge said he was 'not really persuaded' there was anything in any but one of the grounds set out. He said he was 'partly' with counsel on a point concerning how the jury had considered defences by the BBC that the publication was in good faith and was fair and reasonable. There was a point concerning whether the jury should have been asked to consider whether the publication was done in good faith prior to considering whether it was fair and reasonable, he agreed. Advertisement He did not think there was anything in the other points, the judge said. Mr McCullough said his side regarded the jury's award of €100,000 as unsustainable for a broadcast of 'very small circulation'. The judge said it was obvious a broadcast like that would be picked up and there was publicity about the allegation made against Mr Adams. To accuse anyone of murder, of sanctioning a murder, 'is right up there at the top in my view', he said. Advertisement Mr McCullough said Mr Adams had not pleaded a case for damages on the basis of republication elsewhere. The judge suggested the plaintiff's side could have argued the BBC would have known something 'as nefarious as that' would be immediately picked up. Earlier, Thomas Hogan SC, for Mr Adams, said there was a 'low bar' for an appeal, that an appellant had to show a ground was arguable. Counsel said he did not propose to fight any appeal point at this stage. There was a 'very significant inequality of arms' between the sides but his side, with very limited resources, had managed to prevail, he said. Mr Hogan said the BBC was seeking the stay without even saying it was going to appeal the jury outcome. That suggested the stay application was strategic and any stay should have conditions attached, including for payment of something towards the award and costs. Mr McCullough said he wholly rejected any suggestion of bad faith in the stay application. The BBC wanted to take advice and had not yet decided on an appeal, he said. It was likely any appeal would be heard promptly, he added. The judge, who said he did not regard the stay application as a strategic one, granted a stay on payment of the full award and legal costs on condition the BBC pay out €50,000 of the award to Mr Adams and €250,000 towards his legal costs. In other submissions, Mr Hogan accepted his side could not seek some extra-territorial injunction which would 'geoblock' the disputed publication. When counsel referred to concerns in some quarters last weekend about the prospect of geo-blocking 'the entire BBC', the judge laughed and said he had read those. There was no jurisdiction to do that, he said. The jury award of damages was made on the basis of it being told an injunction was not an available remedy, the judge added.