logo
To access Ring of Fire, Ontario needs to build a road. Internal docs say it's years away

To access Ring of Fire, Ontario needs to build a road. Internal docs say it's years away

Global News2 days ago

A major portion of the road to the Ring of Fire won't be ready to begin technical permitting and construction until at least 2028, internal government documents concede, in a potentially major delay for the province's high-priority plan.
A road to the mineral-rich Ring of Fire in northern Ontario is at the centre of the Ford government's economic strategy, relying on mining contracts to create jobs and prosperity in the face of tariffs from the United States.
It is also a key reason cited for the province's controversial Bill 5, which is likely to become law by the end of the week, despite protests and the threat of blockades from First Nations leaders.
The minerals Ontario wants to access in the Ring of Fire, which include copper, platinum, palladium and nickel, are buried in an area more than 300 km north of the province's existing highway network.
Story continues below advertisement
In order to access them, the government will need to construct a massive series of new roads. Documents obtained by Global News using freedom of information laws show the government is currently a long way from achieving that.
A briefing binder written by civil servants for Minister of Energy and Mines Stephen Lecce this year lays out the plan to build a three-part road network to the Ring of Fire. The plan involves the Webequie Supply Road, the Northern Road Link and the Marten FAlls Community Access Road.
The documents show the 126-km northern link portion of the route won't finish its studies and assessments until the beginning of 2028, 'at the earliest.' Once the assessments are approved, technical permitting would then need to take place, followed by construction.
View image in full screen
A slide presented to Minister Stephen Lecce outlining the timelines for a road to the Ring of Fire. Global News
The Ford government has said it is frustrated with the current timeline to open mines and complete major projects, the justification it has offered for tabling Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act.
Story continues below advertisement
That legislation allows for the creation of so-called Special Economic Zones, where cabinet would be allowed to exempt projects from a variety of environmental and potentially labour laws. Those zones, the government argued, are necessary to speed up projects.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
In order to get closer to creating those areas, and in turn to speed up projects, the government said it is bypassing some debate and fast-tracking the proposed legislation.
Ontario NDP MPP Jamie West said the fact that a road to the Ring of Fire can't currently begin construction for roughly three years suggests the mineral-rich area is not the reason for the law.
'Although Premier Ford continues to use the Ring of Fire as the main purpose for Bill 5, it's not a valid excuse for rushing it through the legislature,' Ontario NDP MPP Jamie West said in a statement.
'The Conservative government's own documents state that the Northern Link Road for the Ring of Fire can't begin construction until 2028.'
The government did not address whether it would consider designating the road to the Ring of Fire as a special economic zone to allow it to bypass parts of the assessment process and begin construction earlier.
While the province has said the Ring of Fire itself will eventually be designated, ministers have been keen to stress that decision won't be rushed.
Story continues below advertisement
Last week, Minister of Indigenous Affairs and First Nations Economic Reconciliation of Ontario Greg Rickford said it was too early to discuss what would be designated as a special economic zone.
'We're not talking about the designation of an economic zone at this point,' he told reporters on May 28. 'I don't think it adds anything right now to speculate on anything.'
Lecce, whose briefing binder contains the warning that the road is years away from beginning construction, said the powers wouldn't be used until consultation was complete.
'We're also committing to not utilizing the authority of the special economic zones, for example, in the Ring of Fire until we've consulted; that's an important process that's been raised from the communities,' Lecce said, also on May 28, speaking alongside Rickford.
'The regulatory process allows us to literally assess the nature of how we develop legislation, get out there, launch a public transparency opportunity for feedback and for governments to take those perspectives.'
The internal government documents show just how long the process of developing a road to the Ring of Fire has been. Work on the three-part road began in 2018, with final submission of the environmental assessments for one part in 2026 and the other in 2028.
The government did not answer questions about the timeline or whether Bill 5 could be used to speed up — or entirely bypass — the assessment process for the road.
Story continues below advertisement
Last Friday, Ford suggested the Ring of Fire, along with Highway 401 and nuclear power generation stations, could be designated.
West and the NDP contend the three-year lead time for construction of a road — which must be done before minerals can be extracted from the area at any scale — shows Bill 5 has not been introduced to access the area.
'Bill 5 isn't about getting shovels in the ground. It's not about supporting mining or economic growth in the North,' West said.
'If it was, we'd see real consultation with Indigenous communities and local workers, not more behind-closed-doors decisions. This Bill is all about sweeping powers to sidestep protections and silence opposition. It has nothing to do with building up the North and everything to do with helping Ford's friends get their way.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ford government to open public clean energy fund to support nuclear power
Ford government to open public clean energy fund to support nuclear power

National Observer

timean hour ago

  • National Observer

Ford government to open public clean energy fund to support nuclear power

The Ford government introduced legislation Tuesday that would open Ontario's public clean energy fund to support nuclear power — a move critics say redirects resources away from faster, cheaper renewable options such as wind and solar. The Protect Ontario by Securing Affordable Energy for Generations Act proposes expanding eligibility for the Future Clean Electricity Fund (FCEF) to include nuclear generation and transmission infrastructure. The fund was originally created to support the development of new non-fossil fuel electricity projects in Ontario, using proceeds from the sale of clean energy credits. These credits are generated by wind, solar, hydro, bioenergy and nuclear facilities and sold to businesses seeking to meet corporate sustainability targets. Revenue from those sales flows into the FCEF to help fund future clean energy projects. Until now, the fund has focused on renewable energy. But under the new legislation, the government plans to expand its eligibility to include nuclear generation and transmission infrastructure — a shift the province says is necessary to meet soaring electricity demand. Ontario's Minister of Energy and Mines, Stephen Lecce, said the legislation aims to address rising demand and economic uncertainty by prioritizing local investment and job creation amid global competition and trade tensions with the US. 'As global competition intensifies, energy demand surges, and affordability becomes more important than ever, Ontario isn't standing still — we're stepping up,' Lecce said. The province expects electricity demand to rise 75 per cent by 2050. Critics argue the province is backing the wrong solution, pointing to nuclear projects as expensive and much slower to complete. The Ford government introduced legislation Tuesday that would open Ontario's public clean energy fund to support nuclear power — a move critics say redirects resources away from faster, cheaper renewable options such as wind and solar. 'The Ford government's nuclear plans do not make sense since they will raise our electricity rates and make our industries less competitive,' said Jack Gibbons, chair of the Ontario Clean Air Alliance. 'Unfortunately, the Ford government continues to prioritize fossil fuels and nuclear energy. Their decisions don't make sense for consumers, the climate or national security.' In recent months, the Ford government has announced billions in investment for new nuclear power generation and refurbishing existing plants. The province says these investments will create tens of thousands of jobs in the sector. Early this year, the government announced plans for a 21st-century nuclear megaproject at Port Hope, aiming to establish Ontario as North America's nuclear powerhouse. Described as one of the largest nuclear plants in the world, the project is expected to generate up to 10,000 megawatts of electricity — enough to power 10 million homes. However, the government has yet to disclose the total cost or timeline. But a new report released Wednesday by the Ontario Clean Air Alliance suggests wind and solar could meet the same energy needs much sooner and at a much lower cost — potentially saving Ontario up to $19 billion annually in electricity costs. The report also highlights Ontario's potential for offshore wind development in the Great Lakes and large-scale solar at the Port Hope site. It argues that renewables, paired with energy storage and stronger grid connections with provinces like Quebec, would offer cleaner, faster and cheaper solutions than building a massive nuclear plant that may not be ready until 2045. Gibbons warned that expanding nuclear power would deepen Ontario's reliance on US nuclear technology and enriched uranium fuel, exposing the province to geopolitical risks at a time when trade tensions with the US are escalating.

New Brunswick's 3% rent cap to remain through end of fiscal year: housing minister
New Brunswick's 3% rent cap to remain through end of fiscal year: housing minister

Global News

timean hour ago

  • Global News

New Brunswick's 3% rent cap to remain through end of fiscal year: housing minister

New Brunswick's housing minister says the province's three per cent rent cap will remain throughout this fiscal year after going into effect in February. Noting its importance, Minister David Hickey said, 'we're offering that stability for renters, while at the same time committing to review the Residential Tenancies Act.' At an economic policy meeting last December, housing researchers and a tenants' advocate asked for a unit-based cap. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy At the time, Hickey said the province wouldn't have enough time to create unit-based caps before the rent cap took effect. On Wednesday, he clarified that basing the cap on the unit is not a priority at this time. 'It's largely not on the table, and not something we're considering now, as was consistent with what we had said throughout the winter,' he said. Story continues below advertisement It's something Green MLA Megan Mitton wants to see in the future. 'Linking (the rent) to the unit would be a way to again keep rents more affordable,' said Mitton. However, she's praising the continuation of the cap as it is now. 'I'm hoping that it does remain permanent because I think it's still necessary to preserve what affordable housing we do have left,' she said. For more on this story, watch the video above.

'DIPLOMACY ENDS TODAY:' First Nations warn of protests over mining law
'DIPLOMACY ENDS TODAY:' First Nations warn of protests over mining law

Toronto Sun

time7 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

'DIPLOMACY ENDS TODAY:' First Nations warn of protests over mining law

Published Jun 04, 2025 • 3 minute read Protesters and community members chant and wave signs as they listen to speakers during a demonstration opposing Bill 5, outside the Ontario Legislature at Queen's Park in Toronto, Monday, June 2, 2025. Photo by Cole Burston / THE CANADIAN PRESS Premier Doug Ford's government has given itself the power to suspend provincial and municipal laws for chosen projects in areas it deems to have economic importance, citing the need to speed up development of mines, but First Nations warn confrontation is brewing. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Known as Bill 5, the legislation sparked a firestorm of anger among First Nations communities, who say it tramples their rights and ignores their concerns. It may have passed in the legislature Wednesday, but Indigenous leaders say the fight is just beginning. 'Our diplomacy ends today,' said NDP deputy leader Sol Mamakwa, who represents the northern Ontario riding of Kiiwetinoong that is home to many First Nations and the mineral-rich Ring of Fire region. 'You cannot trample on the rights of the people that live on these homelands and get away with it.' Ford has said the bill is needed to speed up large projects, particularly mines, in the face of U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war. Jeers from dozens of First Nations members echoed in the legislature as the bill was passed into law. Ford was not there for the final vote. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Nishnawbe Aski Nation Grand Chief Alvin Fiddler called the premier a 'coward. 'This fight is not over, but we will meet you on the ground,' Fiddler said. 'He did not even have the guts to show up for the vote.' Ford was on a call with a Republican congressman during the vote, his office said. Lake Huron Regional Chief Scott McLeod said that shows where the premier's priorities lie. 'His priorities are not with the Indigenous people in this province,' he said. 'They're with business people, and he wants the resources that are in our territories. He's selling our minerals and our resources to Americans, to the world, without our permission and that is what we're not going to stand for.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The government had tried to amend the bill to explicitly include duty to consult provisions, but delay tactics at the committee stage by the Liberals meant that the Progressive Conservatives passed the legislation without that. Ford said earlier in the day that they would consult with First Nations over the summer, but that may now be in question. From now on, Fiddler said, Nishnawbe Aski Nation will not take him or his government seriously, nor will they engage with Indigenous Affairs Minister Greg Rickford. Fiddler called for his resignation. 'He is supposed to be representing Indigenous affairs for our nation, but he failed at every turn, and we will not work with him,' Fiddler said. 'We will not engage with him at all moving forward.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The legislation will create so-called 'special economic zones,' where the province could suspend laws to speed up projects such as mines, and the government has said the Ring of Fire would be the first such zone. Chris Moonias, the former chief of Neskantaga First Nation, suggested action will begin by preventing mining companies and others' access to their lands. 'We're going to shut down the Ring of Fire,' he said. 'Whatever that means, whatever we can do, we're going to shut it down. I promise you that.' Earlier in the day, Ford said blockades wouldn't be 'very wise. 'You can't break the law,' Ford said. 'Simple as that. … They need to move on or they'll be dealt with appropriately.' When asked to clarify his comments, Ford said he doesn't direct the police and any enforcement would be up to the Ontario Provincial Police or local police services. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The premier wouldn't say if he would use the notwithstanding clause to save Bill 5 if it ends up being challenged and found unconstitutional in court. But he said that he would 'cross that bridge' when he comes to it. Civil liberty groups are livid at the prospect of effectively lawless zones, and unions have warned that labour laws would be under threat. The measure is part of an omnibus bill that makes a slew of other changes, including stripping protections for endangered and threatened species. Environmental groups and the Toronto Zoo have warned this will lead to extinctions. Farmers, who largely support the Progressive Conservative government, have also spoken out against the bill. The Ontario Federation of Agriculture said the broad powers 'could override vital protections for farmland and agricultural systems.' Celebrity Canada Columnists Canada Toronto & GTA

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store