
Habitat loss fuelling rise in human-wildlife conflicts
GUA MUSANG: The shrinking of wildlife habitats is a major contributor to the rising number of human-wildlife conflicts in this district, with several incidents causing injuries among villagers.
Galas assemblyman Mohd Syahbuddin Hashim said the issue, especially in Orang Asli settlements in the interior, had become increasingly worrying.
"One of the main causes is uncontrolled logging and agricultural activities that encroach on forest areas," he said when contacted.
"This conflict involves not just elephants entering villages, but also tigers attacking livestock and bears roaming through settlements.
"We need a serious investigation into the root cause. However, it cannot be denied that unregulated logging and encroachment into wildlife habitats are major factors.
"When the forests where these animals live continue to shrink, they have no choice but to enter human settlements in search of food and shelter," he said.
Syahbuddin called on authorities to review the issuance of logging permits and establish buffer zones to protect villages from wildlife intrusion.
Syahbuddin said he would continue to raise the issue to ensure concrete measures are taken before more lives and property are threatened.
"Money can be given, but without monitoring and enforcement, it is the people who will suffer the consequences. Elephants don't enter villages because they want to, but because their forests have been invaded.
"Development must go hand in hand with environmental sustainability. I will continue to speak out for the people of Gua Musang to ensure our forest heritage is not lost to short-term greed," he added.
Meanwhile, Kelantan Wildlife and National Parks Department (Perhilitan) director Mohamad Hafid Rohani said continuous monitoring and advisory services were being provided to residents affected by human-wildlife conflicts.
Mohamad Hafid added that immediate action was taken in areas where elephants, bears, and tigers were reported to have disturbed or entered villages.
"We advise the public not to provoke wild animals if they encounter them, as this could aggravate the situation. Prioritise your safety.
"For every complaint we receive, our officers will go on-site to carry out inspections and monitoring," he said.
This month alone, the media reported a tiger attack on livestock in Rancangan Kemajuan Tanah (RKT) Kesedar Meranto, which caused nearly RM300,000 in losses, and wild elephants were spotted at Sekolah Kebangsaan Chalil.
On Monday, a plantation supervisor at Felda Aring 11 was reportedly attacked by an elephant.
In another case, Orang Asli villagers were forced to take turns staying up at night to guard their homes against wild elephants.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![News@9: Today's top headlines - May 30, 2025 [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75)
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
News@9: Today's top headlines - May 30, 2025 [WATCH]
Here are today's biggest stories. 'I'm not a dictator' Stressing the need for an all-out war against corruption, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim said any prosecution related to corruption must be based on evidence, not arbitrary instructions. Police have, to date, frozen RM3.8 billion in assets in connection with an investment scam linked to Mobility Beyond Imagination. The East Coast Rail Link project, which stretches across Kelantan, Terengganu, Pahang and Selangor, is expected to be 90 per cent complete by year-end. RM400k for defamation Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh has won RM400,000 in damages in her defamation suit against UUM lecturer Dr Kamarul Zaman Yusoff over two Facebook posts published in 2017. That's it for News@9.


Rakyat Post
6 hours ago
- Rakyat Post
Hannah Yeoh Awarded RM400k After Winning Defamation Suit Against Kamarul Zaman Yusoff
Subscribe to our FREE Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh has been The court awards RM400,000 as general and aggravated damages to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff and RM80,000 in costs. Kamarul claimed that Yeoh was promoting a ''Christian agenda'' through her personal memoir titled ''Becoming Hannah: A Personal Journey.'' He claimed she was using her political platform to advance Christianity and turning Malaysia into a Christian nation. Yeoh filed the lawsuit in 2022 over two of Kamarul's Facebook posts. READ MORE: High Court judge Justice Aliza Sulaiman said Yeoh had proven that the posts were defamatory and painted her as a threat to Islam. In a multiracial and multireligious country where the issue of religion is, of course, very sensitive, this would surely expose the plaintiff to hatred, ridicule and contempt. Judge Aliza The judge additionally dismissed Kamarul's claim that his comments were aimed at DAP as a political party because he had explicitly named Yeoh in both his pleadings and the title of one of his posts. Hannah Yeoh. Image: Malay Mail The court also dismissed Yeoh's application for Kamarul to issue a public apology, saying the act could be seen as insincere, but granted her an injunction to restrain the defendant, his servants, or agents from republishing the impugned words or similar statements. When met by reporters, Yeoh expressed her gratitude to her legal team, adding that justice finally prevailed. She reiterated that the allegations were entirely false and hopes no one will resort to ''exploiting religious sentiments or spreading baseless accusations'' about her or her book. The court has acknowledged that the issue at hand involved religious sentiment. In a multiracial and multireligious country like ours, invoking such sentiments is akin to playing with fire. It is dangerous, especially when it involves slander. I believe slander is prohibited in Islam. Youth and Sports Minister Hannah Yeoh Meanwhile, Kamarul asserted that his statements were justified and will file an appeal to the Court of Appeal in the near future to challenge the decision. READ MORE: READ MORE: Share your thoughts with us via TRP's . Get more stories like this to your inbox by signing up for our newsletter.


The Sun
9 hours ago
- The Sun
Hannah Yeoh menang saman fitnah
KUALA LUMPUR: Mahkamah Tinggi hari ini membuat keputusann yang memihak kepada Ahli Parlimen Segambut Hannah Yeoh, dan mengarahkan pensyarah Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) Dr Kamarul Zaman Yusoff, membayar ganti rugi sebanyak RM400,000 berikutan kenyataan fitnah yang dibuatnya lapan tahun lepas. Keputusan itu dibacakan oleh Hakim Datuk Aliza Sulaiman yang membenarkan tuntutan Hannah selepas menolak hujah defendan bahawa beliau tidak mempunyai locus standi untuk memulakan saman tersebut. Saman fitnah yang difailkan pada 2022 itu tercetus daripada dua hantaran Facebook oleh Kamarul Zaman antara 10 dan 17 Mei 2017, dengan beliau mendakwa Hannah mempunyai agenda memurtadkan dan menggunakan platform politiknya untuk mempromosikan agama Kristian. Beliau juga merujuk kepada autobiografi Hannah bertajuk Becoming Hannah: A Personal Journey sebagai bukti kepada agenda Kristian yang didakwa, serta mendakwa Hannah berhasrat untuk menjadikan Malaysia sebagai sebuah negara Kristian. Dalam penyataan pembelaannya, Kamarul Zaman menafikan bahawa hantaran tersebut adalah fitnah dan menegaskan kenyataannya adalah berasas. Judge Aliza further held that if the defendant genuinely believed the plaintiff had committed an offence, lodging a police report would have been sufficient. Instead, the defendant chose to publish it on Facebook. She noted that the publication was not in dispute, and it was evident from both the titles and content that the statements were directed specifically at the plaintiff. The judge also rejected the defence's contention that the first publication was aimed at DAP as a political party, rather than the plaintiff personally. 'Even the defendant's own pleadings mentioned the plaintiff by name, and the title of the article made the target unmistakable. The defendant's personal understanding of the book is not relevant, as what matters is how an ordinary reader would interpret the statements. 'The readers would reasonably believe that the plaintiff was spreading Christianity unlawfully and, by implication, committing a crime,' she said. Judge Aliza allowed the plaintiff's claim upon finding that the plaintiff had established her case on a balance of probabilities and that the defendant had acted with malice. 'The court awards RM400,000 as general and aggravated damages to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff. This means, RM200,000 per publication and RM80,000 in costs,' she said. The judge, however, dismissed Hannah's application for Kamarul Zaman to issue a public apology, saying that such an apology could be seen as insincere. She also granted an injunction to restrain the defendant, his servants, or agents from republishing the impugned words or similar statements. Hannah was present in court today, accompanied by her counsel, Sangeet Kaur Deo, while the defendant, Dr Kamarul Zaman Yusoff, was not in attendance.