Why people with ADHD and autism fear stigma will get worse under Trump and RFK Jr.
As an angel investor, Peter Shankman has made millions investing in startups, yet it wasn't easy getting to the top of the ladder. He's also a person with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and as such still bears the psychological scars of navigating a society that punishes people who aren't neurotypical.
'Growing up, I spent my entire life being told I talked too much,' Shankman told Salon. 'My middle name was 'sit down, you're disrupting the class.' I scraped by in school and college through the skin of my teeth, and have spent the last 25 years in therapy trying to undo the damage that constantly being told I was broken my entire childhood did to me as an adult.'
Despite starting five companies, selling three, and becoming quite successful, Shankman says 'not a day goes by where I don't believe that it's all bulls**t, and I'm a complete fraud.'
While Shankman has put together a decent life for himself despite these stigmas, he is concerned that the policies being pushed by America's newly-elected leaders will make life even harder for neurodiverse people today than it was for him growing up.
For every story of excellence in neurodiversity there are those that play into unflattering stereotypes — such as attorneys for alleged quadruple murderer Bryan Kohberger considering introducing his autism into his defense. Systematic reviews in scientific journals repeatedly find that stigma against autistic people is prevalent and causes real-world harm, with one scholar concluding that policymakers who want to help neurodivergent people should start by 'identifying active ingredients of interventions, measuring reliable changes in behaviors and attitudes, and targeting structural stigma.'
By contrast, President Donald Trump and his new Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert Kennedy Jr., are stirring controversy among disabled people through executive orders targeting supposed initiatives related to diversity, equity, inclusion and accessibility. They are also slashing social programs like Medicare and the Department of Education, which many disabled people require for health care and other important social services.
Kennedy has repeatedly mischaracterized autistic people by falsely claiming autism is caused by vaccines while attacking life-saving medications like antidepressants, insisting that instead force people with mental illness would benefit from 'healing' farms.
'How dare RFK Jr. punish people for being different, instead of helping them understand that their differences are what make them better?' Shankman said. 'It's the last thing we should be doing. 'You're different, and that's wrong' doesn't help people, doesn't help our country, and doesn't help us heal.'According to experts who specialize in autism, ADHD and other neurodiverse conditions, the traditional, and invariably reactionary, approach to neurodiversity embraced by the administration reinforces and exacerbates pre-existing stigmas that have long made life painful for neurodivergent individuals. These stigmas are not simply harmful — they are also unscientific.
'Scientific evidence shows these conditions are not 'threats' but rather neurological differences that can lead to positive outcomes when given appropriate support,' Dr. Eliza Barach, a cognitive psychologist and ADHD coach and consultant, told Salon, adding that ADHD is one of the most easily treatable conditions in the DSM-5, the handbook for diagnosing psychological conditions approved by the American Psychiatric Association.
'While individuals with ADHD/autism face unique challenges, they can thrive when their traits are properly understood and supported,' Barach added. 'The true threat is in failing to recognize and support neurodivergent folks,' especially as the scientific community moves toward viewing autism, ADHD and similar conditions as natural variations in human brain development. This means, inevitably, moving away from lenses that depict neurodivergent conditions as pathologies.
'A 'clinical' diagnosis typically occurs when someone experiences significant difficulties functioning in environments designed for neurotypical minds,' Barach said. 'Research has revealed that these neurotypes often come with distinct strengths, including exceptional pattern recognition, hyperfocus abilities, creative problem-solving, and innovative thinking.'
By contrast, the reactionary approach to neurodivergent conditions seems destined to increase prejudices which downplay or ignore these nuances. This strategy highlights so-called 'weaknesses' that (quite often) are nothing more than manifestations of societal intolerance. Dr. Monique Botha, a professor of psychology at Durham University, argued that people who advocate cutting services for neurodivergent people and removing legal protections usually doubt or deny the underlying reality of those disabilities.
'Autism and ADHD are heritable disabilities, and both communities do not pose a threat to anyone by virtue of being autistic or having ADHD,' Botha told Salon. 'It is a group of people, however, who have been demonized and stigmatized, and RFK is clearly choosing to endorse some of the most reckless and negative beliefs about the group because they do not have easily recognizable disabilities. This means that it's a group where it's easier to doubt the veracity of the claims about disability, in favor of a narrative of pulling yourself up by the bootstraps and 'getting over it.''
Botha explained that there is already extensive evidence demonstrating that by and large anti-depressants and ADHD medications are safe, that access to medication for ADHD can prevent early mortality for diagnosed patients and that vaccines do not cause autism. In fact, molecular biologists believe that neurodivergent conditions arise due to a combination of heritable and environmental factors.
'We are coming to terms with the wide variation amongst autistic people, the fact that more than white boys can be autistic,' Botha said. 'To pretend that we've been held back by a lack of funding on biological research ignores the reality of the vast majority going on it (as per actual research on this topic) and it ignores that autistic people and their families couldn't often care about the biology of it all — they want access to evidence-based care and support, both of which are drastically underfunded.'
In addition to studying autism and ADHD, Barach has ADHD and Botha has both conditions. Each of them reflected on how the new government's philosophy toward neurodiversity intersects with their own lived experiences.
'My own research tackles the disparities facing neurodivergent people,' Botha told Salon. 'Both disabilities run in my family. I've worked with teams in the U.S. and attend a big autism conference that is most years, held in the U.S.' Instead of being able to tout her country as a forerunner in research or practice, the anti-science resurgence has forced Botha to ask whether it is even safe to attend American conferences.
'Personally, as someone who is both a researcher, and neurodivergent, I also wonder about it,' Botha said. She observed that autistic people are an easy group to stigmatize, and 'are more likely to have negative judgments made about them based on small interactions.'
Barach, who has a PhD in psychology, told Salon that the revival of anti-ADHD stigmas has caused her and other patients with ADHD to feel as if they must 'mask' their behavior in public.
'Myself and my clients have often walked through life hiding and masking our neurodivergence in order to fit in and avoid exclusion and judgment,' Barach said. 'It's exhausting to wear a mask all the time and be told that who you are is not enough — that you need to fundamentally change in order to be accepted. While it's understandable to make modifications to behavior to promote success, it's entirely different when we're asking people to modify their entire being and self, instead of offering environmental accommodations in conjunction with behavioral adaptations.'
Becca Lory Hector, an autistic speaker and researcher and author of "Always Bring Your Sunglasses,' told Salon that her work bringing belonging and equality to the lives of neurodivergent individuals has been directly undermined by Kennedy's efforts.
'I've seen how rhetoric like this leads to harmful policies, whether in education, employment, or healthcare, where support is cut, services are denied, and Autistic people are further marginalized,' Hector said. 'His statement isn't just offensive; it's a call to action for those of us fighting for the right to exist without being treated as a threat.'
Sol Smith coaches people with both autism and ADHD, running support groups for them and is the author of the upcoming book 'Autistic's Guide to Self- Discovery: Flourishing as a Neurodivergent Adult.' He said that the current culture of contempt for autistic individuals directly and negatively impacts their lives.
'My whole job is to increase the public's education about autism and ADHD, to reduce stigma, and to help autistics and ADHDers find themselves in this society,' Smith said. 'How ADHDers and autistics feel about themselves is downright awful; they've lost touch with themselves as they've tried to hide in a society not made for them. They struggle with the very social constructs that define our culture — and that's without politicians suggesting they be wiped out as some kind of internal threat.'
IngerShaye Colzie, an ADHD executive leadership coach and founder of the ADHD Black Professionals Alliance, observed that as a Black woman with ADHD, she knows that prejudices against people with disabilities can easily intersect with other forms of bigotry, including racism and misogyny.
'For years, I internalized the idea that my brain was 'wrong' and that I had to work twice as hard, overcompensate and mask my symptoms to be taken seriously in professional spaces,' Colzie said. 'This led to burnout, imposter syndrome, and deep self-doubt.' People already held her to a higher standard because of her race and sex; when her ADHD caused her to struggle with basic organization and time management, people wrote her off as lazy and unprofessional regardless of the creative solutions she brought to the table.
'I found myself in a confusing situation where my ideas were celebrated, still my work style was criticized, leaving me feeling simultaneously valued and deeply flawed until I finally understood what was really going on,' Colzie said. 'Masking is exhausting. It means constantly monitoring yourself, trying to fit into a world that wasn't built for you, and hiding your struggles, even when it's costing you your mental and physical health.'
If America wants to help its neurodivergent citizens, advocates like Smith believe they need to accept that the disabilities are social, not medical — that is, 'we are disabled by our social climate and the expectations that we will think and work in the same ways that neurotypicals do.'
Instead of encouraging society to broaden its perspective about acceptable behavior, Smith believes the current trend is to move in the opposite direction, with 'people kindling our ancient fears is a powerful political move that distracts us from real social reforms that we should be addressing.'
This is in stark contrast to the RFK Jr. approach.
'Why the hell is a non-doctor unilaterally deciding to rip this lifeline away from people who rely on it to thrive?' Shankman asked. 'It's mind-boggling, reckless and if enacted, will devastate countless lives — many of whom will never fully recover.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Dave Ramsey sends major message to Americans on IRAs, Roth IRAs
Americans preparing for retirement encounter various challenges, primarily centered on maintaining financial security and sustaining the lifestyle they envision after leaving the workforce. Key concerns involve estimating potential Social Security payments and evaluating how much they will be able to depend on their accumulated retirement funds. Dave Ramsey, bestselling personal finance author and radio host, offers important words for Americans on traditional IRAs, Roth IRAs and some key advice on ways to achieve a financially comfortable retirement. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Making sure retirement funds can adequately cover future expenses is a top priority for many Americans. With rising life expectancies and the uncertainty of financial markets, retirees must strategize how to extend their savings throughout their retirement years. To build financial security, individuals wisely invest in 401(k)s, IRAs, and similar accounts while factoring in tax considerations. Another significant concern is health care costs, which tend to increase as medical needs grow with age. Although Medicare helps alleviate some expenses, it does not cover everything, requiring retirees to account for out-of-pocket costs such as medications, long-term care, and some additional medical services. Related: Dave Ramsey warns Americans on Social Security The impact of rising inflation is a significant concern, as it reduces the purchasing power of fixed retirement incomes. Many retirees worry that inflation could hinder their ability to maintain their preferred lifestyle, especially those who depend heavily on Social Security benefits. While Social Security remains a crucial source of retirement income, relying on it entirely brings uncertainty. Questions surrounding its long-term viability, cost-of-living adjustments, and possible benefit reductions due to solvency concerns add to the financial stress many retirees face. Recognizing these challenges, Ramsey issues a caution regarding traditional IRAs and Roth IRAs, offering Americans guidance on setting financial priorities and navigating the complexities of retirement planning. Ramsey explains that both Roth IRAs and traditional IRAs are valuable tools for retirement savings, but the key distinction lies in how they are taxed. A Roth IRA is funded with after-tax dollars, allowing investments to grow tax-free. When retirement arrives, withdrawals from the Roth IRA remain tax-free, providing financial flexibility. In contrast, a traditional IRA is funded with pretax money, offering an immediate tax advantage. However, when funds are withdrawn during retirement, both the contributions and their accumulated growth are subject to taxation. "While a Roth IRA doesn't offer any current-year tax benefits like a traditional IRA, it gives you something even better: tax-free growth and tax-free withdrawals once you retire," Ramsey wrote. "Now, that's a sweet deal!" More on retirement: Dave Ramsey sounds alarm for Americans on Social SecurityScott Galloway warns Americans on 401(k), US economy threatShark Tank's Kevin O'Leary has message on Social Security, 401(k)s Another significant difference between these accounts is the income limits. A traditional IRA has no income restrictions, meaning individuals can contribute regardless of how much they earn annually. A Roth IRA, on the other hand, has specific eligibility requirements. In 2025, those filing as single or head of household can contribute the full amount if their gross income is below $150,000. For married couples filing jointly, the threshold is $246,000. Related: Dave Ramsey sends strong message to Americans on 401(k)s Once a person turns 59-and-a-half and has held their Roth IRA for at least five years, they are free to withdraw both contributions and earnings without facing taxes or penalties - an excellent advantage for retirees. However, if one's Roth IRA has been open for less than five years, any earnings they take out will be subject to taxes. In 2025, the Roth IRA contribution limit remains $7,000 for those under 50, translating to a monthly contribution of $583.33 when divided over 12 months. Individuals aged 50 and older can contribute up to $8,000, which allows for monthly contributions of $666.67. These limits require savers to plan smartly, ensuring steady growth in their retirement accounts while optimizing tax advantages, Ramsey explains. By making consistent contributions, individuals can build financial security for their future while taking advantage of tax-free growth. Related: Shark Tank's Kevin O'Leary makes bold prediction on U.S. economy The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


CBS News
6 hours ago
- CBS News
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill White House National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett said Sunday the Trump administration is not targeting Medicare in its sweeping budget proposal, but signaled the administration would be open to changes if senators uncover fraud or abuse as they look at the bill. "If somebody finds waste, fraud and abuse in Medicare, then of course we would look at it," Hassett said on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan." "But there have been a lot of false stories about Medicare being on the table, and it's totally not on the table." Senate Republicans this week are working on the House-passed budget bill, dubbed the "One Big Beautiful Bill" by President Trump, which includes deep tax cuts, border security measures, and changes to Medicaid and food assistance programs. Hassett on Sunday pushed back against the idea that Republicans are targeting Medicare for cuts. "That story that got out last week was covered as our intent to go after Medicare," Hassett said bluntly. "And it was just a big fake news story." National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 2, 2025. CBS News Asked whether the administration would revisit the Medicare provision if the Senate identifies abuse, Hassett said they would. "I've seen a massive amount of waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, and I've not been briefed on Medicare waste, fraud and abuse. But if they find something then, of course, we would look at it," he said. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated earlier this week that the bill will add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Sen. Thom Tillis told Charlotte's WCNC on Thursday that he supports legislation that would address waste in the Medicare Advantage Program. This addition, he said, would not touch beneficiaries but would focus on "eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse of the Medicare Advantage program, including costly government overpayments to insurance companies." To pay for some of Mr. Trump's tax reforms, such as extending his 2017 tax cuts and eliminating tax on tips, there are cuts to several programs. Republicans have insisted they are not cutting Medicaid, and reductions in the low-income entitlement program have become one of the most charged parts of the bill. In a closed-door session with members of the Republican conference days before the bill's passage, sources in the room told CBS News Mr. Trump said, "Don't f*** around with Medicaid." House Republicans passed the bill late last month on a 215–214 vote, sending it to the Senate where GOP leaders are weighing revisions to secure enough votes under budget reconciliation rules. "What we want to see done now is we want the Senate to pass the bill, and then we want the House and Senate to work out their differences," Hassett said. "So right now, the Senate has to get the votes they need to pass the bill, and we're supporting them in that process." Some Republican senators, including Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, and Josh Hawley of Missouri, have voiced concerns about Medicaid provisions in the bill, particularly new monthly premium requirements for low-income recipients. Their opposition highlights ongoing uncertainty as Senate GOP leaders work to secure enough votes. The bill can't afford to lose more than four votes in the Senate, granted that all Democrats vote against it. Hawley has called the Medicaid work requirements "both morally wrong and politically suicidal." When asked about Hawley's concerns, Hassett said, "I'd have to go see what he has and talk to him about it. And I also would want to talk to the president about the specific matter. So I can't speak to that one." The administration has repeatedly argued that failure to pass the legislation could hurt the broader economy. "If we don't pass this bill, then we lose 6 to 7 million jobs and 4% GDP," Hassett said Sunday. "If we create the jobs that we have in the bill, then we're going to create a heck of a lot more insurance than what we're talking about in waste, fraud and abuse." Senate Republicans are expected to release their version of the bill in the coming days. If there are significant changes, it will then have to go back to the House for final passage before landing on Mr. Trump's desk.


CBS News
10 hours ago
- CBS News
Transcript: Kevin Hassett, National Economic Council director, on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan," June 8, 2025
Kevin Hassett says if Senate finds Medicare abuse, then "we would look at it" in Trump bill Hassett on possible Medicare cuts Hassett on possible Medicare cuts The following is the transcript of an interview with Kevin Hassett, National Economic Council director, that aired on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on June 8, 2025.