Controversial flag bill banning certain flags in classrooms passes House
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) — A bill that would allow a select few flags to be displayed inside of public classrooms has passed the Utah House.
H.B. 77 — or Flag Display Amendments — would limit what flags could be displayed on government property by government employees or entities. Violation of this law could result in a $500 fine 'per violation per day' until the flag is removed.
The bill has been subject to scrutiny as it has moved through the Utah House. If enacted, the bill would prevent political flags from being shown, pride flags, and any flag that is not listed within the exceptions in the bill. Those exceptions include:
The official flag of the United States
An official Utah state flag
The current and official flag of another country, state, or political subdivision of another country or state
A flag that represents a city, municipality, county, or political subdivision of the state,
A flag that represents a branch, unit, or division of the United States military
The National League of Families POW/MIA flag
A flag that represents an Indian tribe defined by federal law
An officially licensed flag of a college or university
A historic version of a flag temporarily displayed for educational purposes
An official public school flag
An official flag of the United States Olympic Committee, United States or Paralympic Committee, International Olympic Committee, or International Paralympic Committee;
An official flag of an Olympiad or Paralympian that occurred or will occur within the state
A flag of an organization authorized to use a public school facility at the location and during the time in which the organization is authorized to use the public school facility.
These would be the only flags allowed to be displayed on government property. All others would be prohibited.
Initially being circled for further debate in a morning session of the legislature, after passing an amendment to the bill, it later passed in a 49-20-6 vote in the afternoon voting session on Friday.
Rep. Trevor Lee (R-Davis), the bill's sponsor, told lawmakers during debate that his bill was about maintaining political neutrality in schools and government properties.
'What we are trying to do here is make sure is that we have neutrality as it pertains to politics,' Lee told law makers on Friday. 'As many flags have become symbols of ideologies or political agendas from the left and the right. We would like to keep that stuff out of the classroom.'
The debate on the floor was limited, however when the bill was in committee, concerns were raised about the bills impacts the free speech of government workers. Ellie Menlove, policy councilor of ACLU Utah, told the House Education Committee that this bill targets the rights of LGBTQ people, and a pride flag wasn't a political symbol.
'The legislature should not stop teachers and cities from displaying flags that signal acceptance and support to their students and community members,' Menlove began. 'Respectfully, the bill sponsor is mistaken; pride flags are not political symbols.'
After the bill was passed, Utah House Democrats released a statement condemning the bill, saying, 'This harmful bill, which received bipartisan opposition, seeks to censor Pride and Transgender flag displays in public schools and government buildings. H.B. 77 is yet another example of unnecessary legislation aimed at silencing expressions of support and pride for our LGBTQ+ communities.'
The bill still has some ways to go before it can become law in the state. Having passed the House, it will go to a vote through the Senate after it goes through Senate standing committee. It will then need to be signed by the Governor.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland business looted, vehicle set on fire hours after peaceful anti-ICE protest ended
Two businesses in Oakland's Fruitvale district were reeling Wednesday morning after a group of people allegedly looted a shoe store following a peaceful anti-ICE protest Tuesday night. One person was arrested on suspicion of stealing merchandise, police said. A crowd ransacked a Shiekh shoe store near International Boulevard and 34th Avenue on Tuesday night, according to videos reported by KTVU and police. A car parked on 34th Avenue was set on fire, and trash cans on the sidewalk were knocked over, spilling garbage onto the sidewalk. The looting and vehicle fire occurred after a peaceful protest denouncing arrests of immigrants by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers had ended, according to businesses owners and Fruitvale residents. Oakland police said officers responded to a car crash at 34th Avenue and International Boulevard at 8:40 p.m., where 'several people threw objects at the officers' and damaged a police vehicle. No officers were injured, police said. People then set the crashed vehicle on fire. An hour later, around 9:30 p.m., officers were called to the 3400 block of International Boulevard for a report of a business that was burglarized. Approximately 30 people ransacked the Shiekh store, police said. An unidentified person was arrested on suspicion of possessing stolen merchandise and a burglary tool. 'Looting and violence in any form or the destruction of property will not be tolerated in the city of Oakland,' Mayor Barbara Lee said in a statement. 'To the business owners, we are committed to accountability, safety and protecting the well-being of our communities. Our commitment to peaceful protest does not extend to rioting, or the destruction of property,' Lee said. On Wednesday morning, workers inside the Shiekh store were cleaning up the mess left behind. Clothing racks were empty and merchandise and shards of glass from the shattered front door were sprawled on the floor. The store's manager declined to be interviewed. Next door, Deep Singh, owner of Oakland Discount Liquor and Market, arrived to find his garbage cans knocked over and trash spread on the sidewalk in front of his business. 'It's a mess,' he said. 'Who wants to walk into a store (like that) now?' Some businesses on East 12th Street, in front of Fruitvale Village where the protest was held, remained boarded up Wednesday morning. None appeared to be burglarized. Norma Orozco, the communications manager at the Ella Baker Center for Human Rights, said she returned to the nonprofit's headquarters at International Boulevard and 34th Avenue at about 8 p.m. after the protest ended and saw an abandoned vehicle that had crashed into a parked car on 34th Avenue. Neighbors moved the car from the crosswalk to the side of the road. She said nearby police officers did not immediately respond to the scene of the crash and fire. About an hour later, groups of people tried breaking into the car and later set the car on fire, she said. Firefighters responded and put the fire out, but the vehicle was later set on fire again, Orozco said. 'Everything that happened last night was completely preventable,' she said. 'There were multiple points of intervention, and there were multiple people who saw this happening and not a single step was taken to prevent this.' Victor Moreno, a Fruitvale resident, was walking his two dogs along International Boulevard on Wednesday morning when he stopped to observe the workers cleaning inside the Shiekh store. Moreno said he saw black smoke from his apartment window at about 8 p.m. after arriving home from the protest. He said the demonstration was peaceful. 'What I'm afraid of is that people will start to blame the protesters for what happened,' Moreno said in Spanish, referring to the alleged looting. Singh, the liquor store owner, said he supported the ICE protests and did not believe demonstrators took any part in the destruction. . 'I don't think you should hurt the business owners that are supplying you in the community,' he said.
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Ex-Pakistan foreign minister warns full-scale war with India closer than ever after recent skirmishes
WASHINGTON — Pakistan's former foreign minister warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' for war between his nation and India is lower than ever following clashes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. 'We're incredibly grateful for the role that the US government — President Trump, Secretary [of State] Marco Rubio — created throughout this crisis in helping us all achieve this cease-fire,' Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the current chairman of the Pakistan People's Party, told The Post in a recent interview. 'But our message has been that the cease-fire is a start, but it is only a start, and what we seek is assistance in our pursuit of peace through dialogue and diplomacy.' 4 Ex-foreign minister of Pakistan Bilawal Bhutto Zardari warned US lawmakers and diplomats last week that the 'threshold' of war between his nation and India is closer than ever following skirmishes in the disputed region of Kashmir last month. AFP via Getty Images Advertisement 'We're all a lot less safe as a result of this conflict than we were before,' added Zardari, the son of the late Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. 'The threshold of full-out military conflict between India and Pakistan has been drastically lowered — the lowest it has ever been in our history, as a result of this conflict.' The US-brokered truce between the nuclear-armed nations took effect May 10 after weeks of fighting. India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by supporting an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. Advertisement 4 India accused Pakistan of sparking the conflict by backing an April 22 terror attack that left 26 civilians dead in the segment of Kashmir under New Delhi's control. AP Most of those killed were Hindus, and Indian Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri pointed the finger at the Kashmir-based terror group Lashkar-e-Taiba for the carnage in the resort town of Pahalgam. The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to coordinate with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Islamabad was involved in any way with the attack. 'The Prime Minister of Pakistan offered an impartial international inquiry because we were confident that Pakistan is not involved in this terrorist incident,' Zardari said. 'The international intelligence community endorses this view.' Advertisement 4 The Pakistani delegation that came to Washington expressed a desire to discuss coordinating with India on counter-terrorism — but rejected that Pakistan was involved in any way with the attack. AP 'As things stand now, if there's a terrorist attack anywhere in India,' he went on, 'it immediately means war, and the law of reciprocation means, therefore, if there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan, we are to also treat it as an act of war.' Zardari also said that India's threat to cut off Pakistan's water was 'an existential matter' that would be considered 'an act of war.' 'If we are to engage in a new dialogue with India, make new promises with one another that could potentially lead to new treaties, then it's very important that they abide by the old treaties like the Indus Water Treaty,' he said. Advertisement 4 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States,' Zardari said of Trump. 'Pakistan is obviously ready.' AP The delegation from Islamabad met with officials in the State Department and Congress and is headed this week to meet with UK and European diplomats in hopes of brokering a more lasting peace. 'We had a military upper hand when we agreed to the cease-fire. We did so on the stipulation that the cease-fire would be the first step,' Zardari said. 'I'm optimistic that the president is passionate about peace and that he will be successful in pushing that message here in the United States. Pakistan is obviously ready.' Reps for the Indian embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
USA Today
4 hours ago
- USA Today
Viral Newark airport video sparks outrage, US Embassy says visiting not a right
Hear this story AI-assisted summary A person was detained at Newark Airport, prompting the U.S. Embassy in India to reiterate that visiting the U.S. is a privilege, not a right. A witness recorded the incident and shared it on social media, alleging the detainee, possibly an Indian student, was treated harshly. The Consulate General of India in New York is investigating the situation and is in contact with local authorities. The U.S. Embassy in India is reminding travelers that visiting the U.S. is not a right, days after images surfaced of a person being pinned to the ground at New Jersey's Newark Liberty International Airport. 'The United States continues to welcome legitimate travelers to our country. However, there is no right to visit the United States,' the embassy posted across social media platforms on Tuesday. 'We cannot and will not tolerate illegal entry, abuse of visas, or the violation of U.S. law.' While the statement wasn't tied to a particular incident, it comes on the heels of video shared by Kunal Jain, a longtime U.S. resident and self-described Indo-American social entrepreneur who moved back to India last year, according to his profile on X, formerly Twitter. 'I witnessed a young Indian student being deported from Newark Airport last night— handcuffed, crying, treated like a criminal. He came chasing dreams, not causing harm,' Jain posted on X on Sunday, along with videos and photos that have amassed more than 1.7 million views. In interviews with India's NewsX and NDTV, Jain said he was preparing to board a United Airlines flight to New Delhi, when he spotted the person in custody. Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle. 'Initially that boy was sitting on the chair, but then later on what he started doing is he started (hitting) his head to the wall, and that's when I think these authorities realized that he may hurt himself or he may do something crazy,' Jain told NewsX. 'They have pinned him down on the floor and they sit on him, and that's when he started yelling and screaming.' Jain added that authorities wanted to board the person on the plane, but the pilot said, 'No, I cannot allow as of this moment because he's violent and he could be a threat to the existing passengers.' Jain added that he and a doctor offered to speak to the person in Hindi, but were not allowed. He doesn't know what happened next, but he and others on social media have called on the Indian government to step in and bring the person 'home.' On Monday, the Consulate General of India, New York shared on X, 'We have come across social media posts claiming that an Indian national is facing difficulties at Newark Liberty International Airport. We are in touch with local authorities in this regard. The Consulate remains ever committed for the welfare of Indian Nationals.' A State Department official said they've also seen the reports but don't have any additional information and referred USA TODAY to local authorities. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, which oversees the airport, referred USA TODAY to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which has not yet replied. While it's unclear if the person in custody was a student, the Trump administration has been cracking down on international students and on entering the U.S. in general. Additionally, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban, which took effect Monday, bans or heavily restricts travel to U.S. by foreign nationals from nearly 20 countries – though India is not one of them. Coming to America? What happens if you're denied entry into the US 'They don't want any foreigners unauthorized illegal foreigners to come into the country and take the advantage of the resources,' Jain told NDTV, calling that a 'great policy.' However, he added that even with foreign students legally allowed in the country, 'They are becoming more and more watchful, and every act is being monitored.' Jain has said he isn't trying to get into politics or legal matters, but wants to see justice and human dignity.
