Controversial flag bill banning certain flags in classrooms passes House
SALT LAKE CITY (ABC4) — A bill that would allow a select few flags to be displayed inside of public classrooms has passed the Utah House.
H.B. 77 — or Flag Display Amendments — would limit what flags could be displayed on government property by government employees or entities. Violation of this law could result in a $500 fine 'per violation per day' until the flag is removed.
The bill has been subject to scrutiny as it has moved through the Utah House. If enacted, the bill would prevent political flags from being shown, pride flags, and any flag that is not listed within the exceptions in the bill. Those exceptions include:
The official flag of the United States
An official Utah state flag
The current and official flag of another country, state, or political subdivision of another country or state
A flag that represents a city, municipality, county, or political subdivision of the state,
A flag that represents a branch, unit, or division of the United States military
The National League of Families POW/MIA flag
A flag that represents an Indian tribe defined by federal law
An officially licensed flag of a college or university
A historic version of a flag temporarily displayed for educational purposes
An official public school flag
An official flag of the United States Olympic Committee, United States or Paralympic Committee, International Olympic Committee, or International Paralympic Committee;
An official flag of an Olympiad or Paralympian that occurred or will occur within the state
A flag of an organization authorized to use a public school facility at the location and during the time in which the organization is authorized to use the public school facility.
These would be the only flags allowed to be displayed on government property. All others would be prohibited.
Initially being circled for further debate in a morning session of the legislature, after passing an amendment to the bill, it later passed in a 49-20-6 vote in the afternoon voting session on Friday.
Rep. Trevor Lee (R-Davis), the bill's sponsor, told lawmakers during debate that his bill was about maintaining political neutrality in schools and government properties.
'What we are trying to do here is make sure is that we have neutrality as it pertains to politics,' Lee told law makers on Friday. 'As many flags have become symbols of ideologies or political agendas from the left and the right. We would like to keep that stuff out of the classroom.'
The debate on the floor was limited, however when the bill was in committee, concerns were raised about the bills impacts the free speech of government workers. Ellie Menlove, policy councilor of ACLU Utah, told the House Education Committee that this bill targets the rights of LGBTQ people, and a pride flag wasn't a political symbol.
'The legislature should not stop teachers and cities from displaying flags that signal acceptance and support to their students and community members,' Menlove began. 'Respectfully, the bill sponsor is mistaken; pride flags are not political symbols.'
After the bill was passed, Utah House Democrats released a statement condemning the bill, saying, 'This harmful bill, which received bipartisan opposition, seeks to censor Pride and Transgender flag displays in public schools and government buildings. H.B. 77 is yet another example of unnecessary legislation aimed at silencing expressions of support and pride for our LGBTQ+ communities.'
The bill still has some ways to go before it can become law in the state. Having passed the House, it will go to a vote through the Senate after it goes through Senate standing committee. It will then need to be signed by the Governor.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Utah senator looks to resuscitate Nevada-Utah federal lands sale proposal
Organizations from around the country signed a letter on Monday urging U.S. senators not to include a controversial proposal to sell thousands of acres of federal land in Congress' budget bill. The letter comes in the wake of reports that Utah Sen. Mike Lee is considering reviving an amendment to the bill originally proposed by Republican U.S. Reps. Mark Amodei of Nevada and Celeste Maloy of Utah that would dispose of nearly 11,500 acres of Bureau of Land Management land in southwestern Utah, and about 450,000 acres in Nevada. Lee, when asked by a Politico reporter last week if he intended to reintroduce the disposal, responded, 'I gotta go vote, but yes.' Lee's office did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, and it's unclear whether Utah's senior GOP senator is considering bringing back an exact copy of the amendment, or something different. Amodei outrages NV congressional colleagues with 'dead of night' federal land sales amendment But more than 100 organizations and nonprofits around the country are sounding the alarm, telling Senate leaders to 'heed how dramatically unpopular this idea is and reject any misguided attempt to get public lands sales back in this bill.' 'Decisions about the future of public lands should remain in public hands. Leaders in the House and Senate, extractive industry, and private developers are using the reconciliation process to sell off federal lands to pay for billionaire tax cuts. But such moves are deeply unpopular. Polling has repeatedly shown that the public — especially westerners — strongly believes in keeping public lands in public hands and, across partisan lines, rejects any efforts that would lead to the sale of these shared and cherished lands,' reads the letter, signed by Utah groups like the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Conserve Southwest Utah, Save Our Canyons, Great Basin Water Network and Back Country Horsemen of Utah. The letter is addressed to Lee, who chairs the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, New Mexico Democrat Martin Heinrich, the committee's ranking member, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, a South Dakota Republican, and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a New York Democrat. The House amendment backed by Amodei and Maloy was dropped from the budget bill after it received pushback from all sides of the aisle. That includes Montana Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke, who previously said selling public lands is a line he would not cross and rallied support from a bipartisan group of lawmakers to strip the proposal from the bill. 'The public had no opportunity to participate in the process of identifying these parcels, let alone time to understand the long-term effect of selling off these public lands,' the letter reads. This story was originally published in Utah News Dispatch.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DoJ urged to investigate US group accused of working as Modi-backed ‘foreign agent'
One of the largest Sikh houses of worship in the US is calling on the Trump administration to investigate a non-profit it has alleged is working as a 'foreign agent' on behalf of the the Indian government and prime minister Narendra Modi. The Fremont Gurdwara Sahib, which said it draws 5,000 Sikh worshippers every week and is a 'fulcrum' of the Sikh community in the US and around the world, has asked the Department of Justice to launch a national security investigation into the Hindu American Foundation (HAF), to determine whether the Pennsylvania-based non-profit should be required to file as an Indian foreign agent. Under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, any such determination by the DoJ would require the HAF to publicly disclose details of its activities, including meetings with lawmakers, and any contracts and financial arrangements it has with the Indian government. 'The HAF has facilitated meetings between foreign principals and US lawmakers, platformed foreign principals at their own events, and consistently and unequivocally advocated for the interests of the BJP on both domestic and foreign policy matters,' a representative for the Gurdwara wrote in a letter last week to Pam Bondi, the US attorney general. The HAF denied the claims. In a statement the group said it was a non-partisan tax-exempt charity that is wholly independent and American and has 'absolutely no affiliation or ties to any organization or political parties in the US or abroad'. It also hit out against what it called 'coordinated campaigns' against the HAF by the Khalistan separatist movement, which is seeking to establish an independent Sikh state. 'To discuss these dangerous and false accusations against us from activists supporting transnational violent separatist movements focused on India, [the] HAF welcomes the opportunity to meet with attorney general Pam Bondi, FBI director Kash Patel, director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, as well as all homeland security officials,' the HAF said. The allegations and counter-claims come at a tense time between Sikhs who support an independent state and the Indian government. Individuals connected to the Indian government have been accused in both Canada and the US of waging a campaign of transnational repression against Sikhs outside of India after the 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian advocate for Khalistan. The Canadian government has said there were 'credible allegations' that 'agents of the Indian government' were behind Nijjar's death. In the US, prosecutors have alleged that at agent of the Indian government directed the attempted assassination of an American citizen who is also a Sikh activist. A recent investigation by Al Jazeera, the news outlet, reported that when the HAF emerged two decades ago it was a voice for the Hindu community in the US, and not a 'champion' of the Indian government. That, Al Jazeera reported, changed since Modi became prime minister in 2014, when HAF is alleged to have 'ramped up its political activities in favour of the Indian government'. The HAF has not faced accusations that it is involved in violent campaigns against Sikhs. In its letter to Bondi, the Gurdwara said the HAF 'has facilitated meetings between foreign principals and US lawmakers, platformed foreign principals at their own events, and consistently and unequivocally advocated for the interests of the Bharatiya Janata party on both domestic and foreign policy matters'. Any determination by the DoJ that the HAF was in fact working on behalf of the Indian government would require the HAF to publicly disclose details of its activities, including meetings with lawmakers, and any contracts with the Indian government. The Indian embassy in Washington did not respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
South Korea's Ruling Party Unveils Plan to Allow Stablecoins
(Bloomberg) -- South Korea's new President, Lee Jae-myung, is moving quickly to deliver on his campaign pledge to allow local companies to issue stablecoins, giving a further boost to one of the world's most active digital-asset markets. Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! Trump Said He Fired the National Portrait Gallery Director. She's Still There. Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World NYC Mayoral Candidates All Agree on Building More Housing. But Where? US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn Lee, a progressive leader who defeated his conservative rival in last week's presidential election, has been a vocal proponent of stablecoin adoption. On Tuesday, Lee's ruling Democratic Party proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, aimed at improving transparency and encouraging competition in the crypto sector. Under the act, South Korean companies can issue stablecoins if they have at least 500 million won ($367,876) in equity capital while ensuring that refunds are guaranteed through reserves. South Korea is already a hotbed for crypto activity. More than a third of the population, or around 18 million people, participate in digital-asset markets. On some days, trading volume on local crypto exchanges surpasses turnover on the Kospi and Kosdaq stock indexes. Stablecoins are cryptocurrencies pegged to another asset, typically the US dollar. They are gaining global momentum as regulatory frameworks develop. In the US, Congress is set to vote Wednesday on key stablecoin legislation, and President Donald Trump has identified the sector as a policy priority via executive order. South Korea's act also stipulates asset-linked digital assets, including stablecoins, must be approved by the Financial Services Commission, a text of the act released by the ruling party said. Stablecoin trading is surging in South Korea. Transactions involving USDT, USDC and USDS on five major domestic exchanges reached 57 trillion won in the first quarter, Yonhap News reported, citing Bank of Korea data. Still, Lee's initiative is facing some resistance from the central bank. Bank of Korea Governor Rhee Chang-yong warned last month that stablecoins issued by non-bank entities could weaken the effectiveness of monetary policy. He argued that the central bank should take the lead in regulating a won-pegged stablecoin. Read: South Korea Crypto Industry to Gain No Matter Who Wins Election The global financial industry is also taking note. Banks including Deutsche Bank and Santander, along with major tech firms, are exploring stablecoin issuance. Shares in the world's second-largest stablecoin issuer Circle have soared after its IPO last week. Read: Stablecoin Firm Circle Surge From IPO Hits 247% on Day Two (1) South Korea's push is fueling a rally in local digital-asset stocks. Shares of KakaoPay Corp. jumped as much as 18% on Tuesday, the highest since January 2024, on expectations Lee's administration will back a won-based stablecoin. Still, some analysts are cautious. 'The rally in Kakao-related shares is fundamentally unjustifiable, as any concrete benefit from Lee's stablecoin policy remains uncertain,' JPMorgan analysts Stanley Yang and Jihyun Cho wrote in a note. South Korea continues to bear the scars of the TerraUSD collapse in 2022, which wiped out $40 billion in value and remains a cautionary tale as the country re-engages with stablecoins. New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The SEC Pinned Its Hack on a Few Hapless Day Traders. The Full Story Is Far More Troubling Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again What America's Pizza Economy Is Telling Us About the Real One America Cast Itself as the World's Moral Leader. Not Anymore ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
