
From robots making kebabs to FINALLY ending the McDonald's McFlurry machine malfunctions – how AI is changing fast food
We explain how AI is affecting your takeaway order
ROBOCHOP From robots making kebabs to FINALLY ending the McDonald's McFlurry machine malfunctions – how AI is changing fast food
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
DRIVING up to an ordering kiosk at a Popeyes drive-thru, you would easily think you're being served by a friendly American staff member.
But the voice you're hearing actually belongs to 'Al', the US chain's AI robot that has been programmed to take orders at all of its UK drive-thru locations.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
5
Popeyes has rolled out AI ordering kiosks at all of its UK drive thrus
Credit: Scoop
Popeyes is one of several fast food giants adopting Artificial Intelligence in its operations, and many more could follow suit in the next few years.
Restaurant chains have started rolling out the technology to do a range of jobs, from figuring out what new menu items customers want, to even helping make the food in the kitchen.
If you're wondering whether robots might be serving you up your next cheeseburger or kebab, these are all the fast-food chains joining the AI revolution.
German Doner Kebab
5
We've used a mocked up image to illustrate the how GDK is planning to use robots to cut its meat
German Doner Kebab is planning on replacing humans with robots to slice up its doner meat at all its restaurants within the next year.
The major kebab chain, which has almost 150 sites in the UK, is currently trialling robotic meat shavers in a handful of its restaurants.
The firm's boss Simon Wallis previously told The Sun the robots actually do a better job than humans, as they "shave the meat more consistently and improve productivity".
McDonald's
5
McDonald's is using AI technology to prevent its McFlurry machine from breaking down
Credit: Alamy
The world's most famous fast food chain has some big plans to roll out AI, and is even using the technology to prevent its McFlurry machines from breaking down.
McDonald's announced earlier this year that it wants to introduce the technology to over 40,000 restaurants around the world to help improve its customer experience.
Sensors are being added to its fryers and ice-cream machines to help staff predict when they might break down and get them serviced more quickly - which could see an end to the running joke among McDonald's fans that the McFlurry machine is never working.
Cameras could also be installed in restaurants, which would use AI facial recognition technology to make sure customers are given the right orders.
Burger King Unveils Major Upgrades to 400 Locations in 2025
It's not the first time McDonald's has tried out AI in its restaurants.
The chain ended up removing AI ordering from its US drive-thrus last year after videos of the robots' order blunders went viral, from bacon-topped ice cream to customers being served hundreds of dollars' worth of chicken nuggets.
Popeyes
Popeyes was the first fast food chain to bring AI ordering to UK drive-thrus, rolling it out to its five drive-thru locations last summer.
Orders are taken by a robot with a friendly American accent dubbed 'Al', named after the firm's founder Al Copeland, which is trained to understand accents from all around the UK.
Al can answer questions from customers such as "what sauces are available?", and is even trained to handle customers changing their mind halfway through their order.
It can even recommend meal combos, and explain what's in every Popeyes item.
Unlike's McDonald's drive-thru robot mishap, Popeyes said the technology was 97% accurate after a trial at its Northampton drive-thru, with no customer complaints.
The fried chicken chain is also looking at other ways it can use AI, including to predict how many orders it expects to have so it can improve efficiency.
Domino's
5
Domino's has plans to use AI to figure out what its customers want next
Credit: Getty
Also hopping on the AI bandwagon, Domino's is planning on using the technology to figure out what customers want next, from new pizza flavours to improvements to its service.
The pizza chain plans to use cutting-edge Generative AI technology to analyse what its customers are saying about Domino's on social media platform Reddit.
It also wants to expand the rollout so it can see what customers are saying on other social media platforms.
However, the plans are only for the US, and Domino's said it's not currently planning to implement the technology for UK customers.
Starbucks
5
Starbucks is trialling a virtual AI assistant in 35 US stores
Credit: Starbucks
Starbucks has recently introduced a virtual AI assistant to help its baristas while they take orders and make coffees.
Employees can use in-store iPads to ask the assistant questions, such as what ingredients are in a new drink on the menu, and it will answer them immediately.
Starbucks said the technology would give its staff more time to focus on crafting beverages and connecting with customers, instead of flipping through manuals to search for answers.
The scheme, called Green Dot Assist, is being piloted across 35 of its US stores.
Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.
Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
4 minutes ago
- BBC News
Pound touches near 4-year high as Trump rattles dollar
The pound briefly hit its highest level against the dollar for almost four years after markets were unnerved by a report that US President Donald Trump could bring forward the naming of the new head of the US central bank. Sterling rose above $1.37, which is the strongest since October dollar weakened after the Wall Street Journal reported Trump had considered naming Jerome Powell's replacement as head of the Federal Reserve by September or US Fed is independent from the government and Mr Powell chairs a committee that decides on interest rates which have remained unchanged this year, prompting a series of angry outbursts from Trump. On Wednesday, Trump called Mr Powell "terrible" and said he was looking at "three or four people" who could replace him. Mr Powell's term is due to end in May are concerns the US president could install someone who is sympathetic to his this week, Mr Powell told US lawmakers the Fed would wait and see how the American economy reacts if Trump's so-called retaliatory tariffs against a range of countries come into force next month, after being paused until 9 July. The Fed is concerned that the levies, which are paid by the businesses importing the goods, might push up US economy shrank in the first three months of this year - the first decline for three years - as government spending fell and imports rose as firms raced to get products into the country before the tariffs went Morgan, the investment bank, has lowered the chance of the US economy falling into recession this year but at 40% the probability of a slowdown remains comparatively Hense, a senior portfolio manager at RBC BlueBay Asset Management, said traders were betting the dollar would fall "in this environment, where there is an erosion of institutions".While Kit Juckes, chief FX strategist at Societe Generale, said: "I think the market is pricing in President Trump appointing someone who at least at first sight appears more sympathetic to his cause."Mr Powell was himself a Trump appointee. During Trump's first term in the White House, Mr Powell replaced the then Fed chair Janet had criticised Ms Yellen for keeping interest rates too low, stating: "I think she should be ashamed of herself."Ms Yellen went on to become the US Treasury Secretary under President Joe Biden and said she did not think that Trump had a grasp of macroeconomic policy.


NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump administration moves to count crypto as a federal mortgage asset
In a landmark shift for the U.S. housing finance system, the Federal Housing Finance Agency has issued a directive ordering Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to formally consider cryptocurrency as an asset in single-family mortgage loan risk assessments. The move, signed by FHFA Director William J. Pulte on Wednesday, signals a new era of crypto integration into traditional financial infrastructure — this time within the core of American home lending. The order directs both housing finance giants to develop proposals that include digital assets — without requiring borrowers to liquidate them into U.S. dollars prior to a loan closing. Pulte said in a post on X that the move aligns with President Donald Trump 's vision 'to make the United States the crypto capital of the world.' Historically, cryptocurrency has been excluded from underwriting frameworks due to volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and the inability to easily verify reserves. This directive changes that. The decision comes at a time of increasing institutional embrace of crypto across banking, payments, and federal policy. 'Cryptocurrency is an emerging asset class that may offer an opportunity to build wealth outside of the stock and bond markets,' the order states, acknowledging crypto's growing role in household financial portfolios. The directive restricts consideration to digital assets that are stored on U.S.-regulated, centralized exchanges and can be clearly evidenced. It also requires Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to develop internal adjustments to account for crypto's market volatility and ensure that any risk-weighted reserves comprised of crypto do not compromise underwriting standards. Under the directive, both enterprises must submit their assessment proposals to the boards of directors for approval and then to the FHFA for final review. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were put under government control in September 2008 as entities that are known as government-sponsored enterprises, or GSEs.


Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
Breakingviews - Europe will struggle to get Big Tech off its cloud
LONDON, June 26 (Reuters Breakingviews) - European businesses have an unanticipated and undesirable problem. Just as the continent has long depended on the military heft of the United States, its companies rely on U.S. cloud computing providers. The huge networks of servers and data centres, used to store information and run critical software, are dominated by a trio of American firms known as hyperscalers. To CEOs, and even governments, that may seem increasingly risky. President Donald Trump has an uneasy relationship with Europe, and U.S. law permits Washington in certain cases to access foreign data stored on hyperscalers' cloud services. The problem, however, is that breaking away is tough. (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab and Alphabet's (GOOGL.O), opens new tab Google control around two-thirds of the European Union's cloud market, according to a report, opens new tab on the bloc's competitiveness by former Italian Prime Minister Mario Draghi. That's largely because the multitrillion-dollar tech giants have the capital to sink into massive data centres, allowing them to offer reliable and relatively low-priced services. Yet U.S. words and deeds arguably make this dependence imprudent. Think of Vice President JD Vance's now-infamous Munich Security Conference speech in February, Trump's reluctance to express full-throated support for Ukraine, and the ongoing uncertainty around his reciprocal tariffs. One CEO of a major European company told Breakingviews that it now makes sense to consider alternatives. No wonder. The U.S. government could in theory access European data stored by the hyperscalers through two legal routes. Courts can issue orders to cloud providers and ask them to hand over customer data to aid criminal investigations. Separately, Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) gives Washington's National Security Agency the power to request access to stored information via a special court. It can then share the data it receives with intelligence agencies, meaning the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Central Intelligence Agency. They could conceivably target companies, individuals or institutions that the administration has a problem with. In an even more extreme scenario, the U.S. government could theoretically put political pressure on hyperscalers to shut off cloud services in countries that the White House doesn't like, via a so-called kill switch. Hyperscalers could push back on these concerns by pointing out that FISA, first enacted in 1978, is nothing new. It's supposed to curb international terrorism rather than steal business secrets or help the government pursue political grudges. Europeans have in the past tacitly accepted the possibility of surveillance by a powerful ally in exchange for cutting-edge technology. Yet transatlantic relations are testier now, and even a small possibility of political cloud interference is arguably scary enough to justify action. That's especially true since hyperscalers' data centres also help to power artificial intelligence models, which could in theory play a role in future national defence. European companies have a few options, none of which are perfect. A belt-and-braces approach would involve mobilising local talent and resources to undertake a mass buildout of strategic digital infrastructure. This is essentially the proposal of the EuroStack, opens new tab initiative, an industry coalition pushing for total tech sovereignty in the region. But doing everything from chipmaking to data centre construction won't be fast, easy or cheap. U.S.-based tech trade group Chamber of Progress estimated that building a fully European ecosystem could cost 5 trillion euros, opens new tab. Though a report from the EuroStack group suggests that total investment should be more like 300 billion euros over 10 years, that's still a huge undertaking. Only slightly more plausible is the option of switching to European-made cloud software hosted entirely in European-owned data centres, while accepting that much of the underlying equipment may have a U.S. origin. Companies like $2 billion OVHcloud ( opens new tab or Scaleway, part of French telecoms group Iliad, can provide the servers and data centre resources, for example. But it would be costly and time-consuming to ditch popular subscription software tools, like the Microsoft 365 suite or Google Workspace, and shift away from cutting-edge hyperscaler data centres. Queen Mary University of London researcher Johan David Michels interviewed, opens new tab industry experts for a report – and one heard from a bank that switching cloud provider could cost hundreds of millions of dollars. It's also not clear that the European alternatives have capacity to meet local demand. Mindful of their clients' worries, the big three cloud providers are touting alternatives of their own. Microsoft launched, opens new tab a suite of so-called 'sovereign solutions' last week, stating that these options allow EU customers to control their own data access. Amazon, opens new tab and Google, opens new tab have both flaunted similar products. Whether these services offer Europeans the level of control that they're after is another matter. One EU-based cloud provider told Breakingviews that the flurry of recent hyperscaler launches amounts to 'sovereignty washing', because they can't guarantee that U.S. security agencies won't get sight of sensitive data. That assessment probably goes too far, not least because some of the hyperscalers' options are more secure than others. A relatively palatable one, for Europeans, involves local companies using Microsoft's cloud technologies in a controlled 'walled garden' environment, where the client owns the underlying infrastructure. An example is Bleu, a joint venture between French groups Orange ( opens new tab and Capgemini ( opens new tab. It provides data centres and servers, but lets customers use Microsoft's Azure cloud service and 365 productivity applications, like Outlook and Teams. All the data is stored and managed in France, according to French law. U.S. tech giants have no way of gaining access to the information stored by Bleu on behalf of its clients. But walled gardens, which align with local data protection regulations, require a lot of skilled people to build and maintain, potentially raising the cost compared with standard public clouds. An alternative is 'client-side encryption', where customers' data is cryptographically protected and only clients have the keys to read it. Amazon, Microsoft and Google can also take comfort from the fact that major European clients are locked up in multi-year contracts, and many have more pressing matters than switching. Some continental cloud providers are also subject to U.S. jurisdiction by virtue of their operations in the country. Even the European Commission has bemoaned the lack of local offering to reduce its own reliance on Microsoft 365, according to a report, opens new tab by news website Euractiv that cited internal documents. The upshot is that deep-pocketed clients who are particularly exercised about security – perhaps those in strategically important areas like defence or state agencies – may use more elaborate offerings like Bleu. Hyperscalers still get a slice of the action in those cases. Europe quite literally runs on U.S. tech. Breaking away is easier said than done. Follow Jennifer Johnson on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab. Follow George Hay on Bluesky, opens new tab.