Bill to support rural grocers and local food advances from House
Produce at a grocery store. (Photo by Cami Koons/Iowa Capital Dispatch)
A bill to create grocery reinvestment and local food processing grant programs advanced Thursday from the Iowa House of Representatives.
House File 1032 aims to help rural areas of the state retain grocery stores and expand local food systems with the goal of preventing rural food deserts.
Rep. Shannon Latham, R-Sheffield, said rural grocery stores are often just 'one freezer breakdown or one cooler breakdown away from having to close their doors.'
'This bill can help bridge the gap between local producers, processors and consumers,' Latham said.
Through the grocery reinvestment program, existing or new grocery stores could apply for funds to expand capacity, upgrade utilities, purchase equipment or technology and cover professional costs.
Recipients must provide matching funds and financial assistance could not exceed $100,000. Grocery chains with 10 or more stores would not be eligible.
The bill also creates a program for local food processing grants that would expand the availability, access, efficiency and capacity of local food processing in a community.
The local food processing grant program would have $100,000, or 10% of the total allocated fund, annually to award to eligible local processing projects that source goods from more than one Iowa farm.
Earlier versions of the bill, House File 59, and House File 550, included an appropriation of $2 million, from the general fund, to the programs.
This section was not in the version of the bill that passed on the floor. Advocates of the bill said they have been told by lawmakers that an appropriation is expected, though it likely won't be the full amount from the initial bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The bill had three proposed amendments, the first of which was introduced by Rep. Austin Harris, R-Moulton, to amend the definition of a rural grocery store.
'The intent of this bill is to make sure that our rural areas, that are more prone to be food desert areas… are able to take advantage of this program,' Harris said.
The amendment, which was adopted, expands the definition of an eligible rural grocery store to a business where 50% of the retail space, or 30% of revenue, relate to general line food retail.
Harris said this would account for grocery stores that share space with other businesses, like a fuel stop or a diner, as is common in rural towns.
The second amendment, brought forth by Rep. J.D. Scholten, D-Sioux City, did not pass, but would have addressed the 'real problem' of price discrimination by distributors who favor corporate stores.
'For decades, we've had out-of-state corporations undercut local grocers — that's the problem,' Scholten said.
Scholten said it would stop suppliers from giving preferential pricing to established corporate stores over local grocers.
'This will allow your local grocer to play on an even field,' Scholten said.
Latham recommended a 'no' vote on the amendment because she did not have an opportunity to speak with the office of the attorney general or other noted offices in the amendment. The amendment failed 58-31.
The final amendment, brought forth by Rep. Chad Ingels, R-Randalia, moved the local processing element of the bill under the purview of the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship, instead of Iowa Economic Development Authority, where the rest of the program is managed.
The amendment would also prioritize funding for local facilities that process goods from three or more Iowa farms, participate in the Choose Iowa program or sell to a rural grocery store.
Rep. Ken Croken, D-Davenport, said all of the amendments made the 'good bill better and better.'
HF 1032 passed with no dissenting votes and moves to the Senate.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Stephen Miller hits Rand Paul over LA unrest
A top aide to President Trump took aim at Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Monday over Paul's objections to the president's agenda-setting tax and spending measure while protests are underway in Los Angeles over the administration's immigration crackdown. 'While ICE officers are battling violent mobs in Los Angeles, Rand Paul is trying to cut funding for deportations and border security,' White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller wrote in a post on the social platform X. Paul has emerged as one of the most vocal Republican opponents of Trump's megabill because of its price tag and increase to the federal debt. Paul and other GOP senators vowed to vote against the bill after narrowly passed the Republican-controlled House last month unless additional spending cuts are made. 'Congress is like drunken teenagers, they're terrible with money,' Paul said during an appearance this weekend on Fox News's 'Sunday Morning Futures.' 'This is literally out of control.' He reiterated his position on X after Miller's rebuke Monday. 'Don't fall for the Swamp's version of reality, where they claim we either borrow against our future to secure our border now, or we have wide-open borders,' he wrote. 'We can have BOTH border security AND fiscal responsibility; $75 billion is more than enough to accomplish both.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
Pres. Trump highlights $1,000 'Trump account' investments for American newborns in new budget bill
President Trump and House Speaker Mike Johnson delivers remarks on the $1,000 investment in children via the 'Trump Account'.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can $1,000 at birth change a child's future? A Republican proposal aims to find out
WASHINGTON (AP) — When children of wealthy families reach adulthood, they often benefit from the largesse of parents in the form of a trust fund. It's another way they get a leg up on less affluent peers, who may receive nothing at all — or even be expected to support their families. But what if all children — regardless of their family's circumstances — could get a financial boost when they turn 18? That's the idea behind a House GOP proposal backed by President Donald Trump. It would create accounts for all babies born in the U.S. over the next four years with $1,000 that would accrue interest until the children reach adulthood. At age 18, they could withdraw the money to put toward a down payment for a home, education or to start a small business. If the money is used for other purposes, it'll be taxed at a higher rate. It builds on the concept of ' baby bonds,' which two states — California and Connecticut — and the District of Columbia have introduced as a way to reduce gaps between wealthy people and poor people. Rep. Blake Moore, a Republican from Utah, spearheaded the effort to get the initiative into a massive House spending bill. In an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, he said wealth inequality has soured many people on capitalism. 'Trump Accounts,' as the proposal calls them, could be the antidote, he said. 'We know that America's economic engine is working, but not everyone feels connected to its value and the ways it can benefit them," Moore wrote. 'If we can demonstrate to our next generation the benefits of investing and financial health, we can put them on a path toward prosperity.' The bill calls for the money to be handled by investment firms. The bill would require at least one parent to produce a Social Security number with work authorizations, meaning the U.S. citizen children born to some categories of immigrants would be excluded from the benefit. But unlike other baby bond programs, which generally target disadvantaged groups, this one would be available to families of all incomes. 'When little baby is born they're gonna start off with a thousand dollars and if we do a good job of investing their money — we're going to go with one of the investing guidelines, who the hell knows if they're any good — but they have a chance to be very rich,' Trump said at a rally last week in Pittsburgh. 'It's going to be very cute to see.' Economist Darrick Hamilton of The New School, who first pitched the idea of baby bonds a quarter-century ago, said the GOP proposal would exacerbate rather than reduce wealth gaps. He envisioned a program that would be universal but would give children from poor families a larger endowment than their wealthier peers, in an attempt to level the playing field. The money would be handled by the government, not by private firms on Wall Street. 'It is upside down,' Hamilton said. 'It's going to enhance inequality.' Hamilton added that $1,000 — even with interest — would not be enough to make a significant difference for a child living in poverty. A Silicon Valley investor who created the blueprint for the proposal, Brad Gerstner, said in an interview with CNBC last year that the accounts could help address the wealth gap and the loss of faith in capitalism that represent an existential crisis for the U.S. 'The rise and fall of nations occurs when you have a wealth gap that grows, when you have people who lose faith in the system,' Gerstner said. 'We're not agentless. We can do something.' The proposal comes as Congressional Republicans and Trump face backlash for proposed cuts to programs that poor families with children rely on, including food assistance and Medicaid. Even some who back the idea of baby bonds are skeptical, noting Trump wants to cut higher education grants and programs that aid young people on the cusp of adulthood — the same age group Trump Accounts are supposed to help. Pending federal legislation would slash Medicaid and food and housing assistance that many families with children rely on. Young adults who grew up in poverty often struggle with covering basics like rent and transportation — expenses that Trump Accounts could not be tapped to cover, said Eve Valdez, an advocate for youth in foster care in southern California. Accounts for newborn children that cannot be accessed for 18 years mean little to families struggling to meet basic needs today, said Shimica Gaskins of End Child Poverty California. 'Having children have health care, having their families have access to SNAP and food are what we really need ... the country focused on,' Gaskins said. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Moriah Balingit, The Associated Press
