Gretchen Whitmer says she spoke to Trump after he said he was considering pardoning men who plotted to kidnap her
Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said Tuesday that she spoke to President Donald Trump after he said last week he was considering potentially pardoning the men who plotted to kidnap her.
'I will just confirm that I have connected with the president directly on this subject and made my thoughts known," Whitmer told reporters at an event in Detroit, according to her office.
"Beyond that, I'm not going to share more about our conversation but hopefully he'll take some of those things into consideration when he makes a decision," she said.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed later Tuesday that Trump and Whitmer, a Democrat, had spoken. She declined to disclose any additional details about the conversation but said, "I will reiterate what he said publicly when he was asked by one of the journalists in this room in the Oval Office a couple of weeks ago about the pardons. He said it's something he would look at, nothing more, nothing less.'
The president told reporters at a press event in the Oval Office that he would "take a look" at potential pardons for the men who were convicted in the kidnapping plot.
"I'm going to look at it. I will take a look at it. It's been brought to my attention. I did watch the trial. It looked to me like somewhat of a railroad job," he said after a reporter asked about it.
Whitmer, who has met with Trump in person multiple times this year, told NBC affiliate WOOD last week that she was 'very disappointed' that he was considering it. 'I'll be making my thoughts known to the White House and I hope they take it into consideration," she said.
Over a dozen men were initially charged in the kidnapping scheme, though not all of them were tried in federal court (Trump doesn't have the power to intervene in state cases).
Barry Croft Jr., who prosecutors said was the ringleader, is currently serving a nearly 20-year sentence in federal prison. A key co-conspirator, Adam Fox, was given a 16-year prison sentence.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Germany's Merz to meet Trump with Ukraine war high on agenda
Update: Date: 15:58 BST Title: Merz's trip comes one day after 50% steel tariffs kick in Content: Tariffs are likely to be high on the German chancellor's agenda. Merz's trip to Washington DC comes just one day after a 50% tariff on steel and aluminium imports kicked in. The move hikes import taxes on the metals, which are used in everything from cars to canned food, for the second time since March. Trump says the measures are intended to secure the future of the American steel industry. Critics say the protections could wreak havoc on steel producers outside the US, spark retaliation from trade partners, and come at a punishing cost for American users of the metals. The UK has been temporarily spared from the tariff. Trump said in the order that the UK needed "different treatment" because of the US-UK Economic Prosperity Deal (EPD) signed on 8 May 2025. Trump later added that the US might increase the tariff on the UK "on or after 9July 2025" if it "determines that the United Kingdom has not complied with relevant aspects of the EPD". Update: Date: 15:51 BST Title: Merz says he is 'well prepared' for Trump talks Content: Bernd Debusmann JrReporting from the White House Merz is staying at Blair House, just across from the White House. Just a short while ago, Chancellor Merz held a short press briefing for traveling German journalists at Blair House, the location just across the street from the White House where he's staying. In his remarks, Merz said he was "looking forward" to the visit and is "well-prepared". "Nato will be a major topic," Merz told reporters. "As will trade and Ukraine." Merz also suggested he's ready for any potential ambush if Trump or his team bring up Germanys far-right AfD or freedom of speech issues in Germany. "When we talk about German domestic politics, I will use clear words," he said. Update: Date: 15:46 BST Title: The good, the bad and the ugly of President Trump's bilaterals Content: A meeting between two world leaders or representatives isn't always front page news. However, the way President Trump's bilateral meetings have gone in the past few months, the outcomes are harder to predict. Back in February, Indian Prime Minister Modi hailed a "mega partnership" with the US during a two-day visit, as he and Trump agreed on a deal for Delhi to import more American oil and gas. Later in the month, Trump told a joint news conference with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer: "We like each other, frankly, and we like each other's country.' He seemed dazzled when Starmer presented him with a letter from King Charles in the Oval Office. The next day, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky faced an extraordinary dressing down in front of the world's media, after Trump and Vice-President JD Vance demanded that he show more gratitude for US support in its fight against Russia's invasion. And in May, Trump ambushed South African President Cyril Ramaphosa during a live news conference with widely discredited claims of a "white genocide" in South Africa. Update: Date: 15:45 BST Title: What's on the agenda for Trump and Merz? Content: Though there isn't an official list of topics that Trump and Merz plan to address at their first bilateral meeting, the German embassy in Washington has said that war and trade will be on the agenda. 'Key topics will include bilateral relations as well as international issues such as Russia's war of aggression against Ukraine, the situation in the Middle East, and trade policy,' the embassy said. Merz has been a hard-line supporter of Ukraine and its president Volodymyr Zelensky, someone with whom Trump has had his fair share of contention. Germany has also pushed back on Trump's tariffs, particularly those on steel and cars, which would heavily impact German manufacturers. As other world leaders have visited Washington for similar meetings over the last few months, that's been a major talking point. Update: Date: 15:40 BST Title: German chancellor to meet Trump in the Oval Office Content: Welcome to our live coverage of the bilateral meeting between US President Donald Trump and newly elected German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Merz, a member of the Christian Democratic Party (CDU), was elected on 6 May, and this is the first official meeting between the two leaders. After initial greetings, Trump and Merz will head to the Oval Office where they will hold what's known as a "spray" - when reporters are invited to shout questions at the two. Stay with us as we bring you the latest.
NBC News
23 minutes ago
- NBC News
Here's what to know about Trump's new travel ban
President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday night that nationals from 12 countries would be banned from entering the United States. Trump said that the ban, which primarily targets countries in Africa and the Middle East, was necessary in the name of preserving national security and to prevent terrorism in the U.S. "As President, I must act to protect the national security and national interest of the United States and its people," t he proclamation reads. "I remain committed to engaging with those countries willing to cooperate to improve information-sharing and identity-management procedures, and to address both terrorism-related and public-safety risks." Who is banned? Citizens of the following countries will be blocked from entering the United States: Afghanistan, Chad, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Myanmar, the Republic of Congo, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. In addition to the 12 countries listed above, nationals of the following seven countries will be barred from coming to the country permanently or entering under several visa programs: Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. When does the ban take effect? The executive goes into effect at 12:01 am Eastern Daylight Time on June 9, 2025. Why now? A similar policy implemented during the first Trump administration, which barred foreigners from six Muslim-majority countries from entering the country, was reversed by former President Joe Biden. On the campaign trail, Trump promised he would revive the ban. In a Wednesday video the White House posted on YouTube, Trump cited the recent attack in Boulder as justification for a travel ban renewal. "The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas," Trump said. We don't want them." On Sunday, a man was accused of using a "makeshift flamethrower" and Molotov cocktails on a group of people peacefully calling for the release of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The suspect in connection with the incident, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, entered the U.S. from Egypt on a tourist visa, according to officials. Egypt is not one of the countries affected by the policy. Are there any exceptions? Yes. The travel ban will not affect nationals who are already lawful permanent residents of the U.S. In other words, the proclamation will not apply to nationals from the list of banned countries who have green cards or who are living in the U.S. with a visa. It will also not affect citizens of the banned countries who have citizenship in a second country and are entering the U.S. with a passport from an unrestricted nation. Other exemptions include Afghans who helped the U.S. government during the war in Afghanistan, ethnic and religious minorities facing persecution in Iran, athletes from banned countries who are entering the U.S for the World Cup or the Olympics, and children who are being adopted.
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
How Trump's first buddy Elon Musk became enemy number one
On the surface, it was a dream reciprocal alliance. Musk reportedly contributed some $250m to support Trump and other Republicans in the November elections, while Trump, impressed with the disruptive energy of the tech billionaire, got him to head up the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). But just five months later, their relationship appears to be blowing up in a spectacularly explosive fashion. This week, Musk, whose Tesla business has been hit hard by his association with the president, slammed Trump's flagship tax and spending bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination'. The outburst came just days after an Oval Office send-off from the president, which was attended by Musk sporting a black eye. Trump presented him with a brown box containing a large golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia, which he said he only gave to 'very special people'. Less than a week has passed and that special relationship is now becoming one of enmity and rage. Musk's resentment toward Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act', was on full display on X/Twitter when the tech billionaire wrote: 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore, this massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong.' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged that Trump was aware of Musk's stance on the bill, a package that cuts trillions in taxes while scaling back programmes like Medicaid and subsidies that benefit Tesla. Leavitt tried to downplay the conflict, saying Musk's view 'doesn't change the president's opinion' of him, though tensions have clearly been simmering. The Independent noted this week that concerns Musk raised about the administration's crackdown on immigration (he wanted access to the world's best scientific brains, regardless of where they're from) were routinely ignored. And the frustration between him and the Republicans has been stewing for months. Now that Musk has fired the first public shot, his critics aren't holding back. 'He's a complete joke. He had no idea what the f*** he was doing,' one republican told Axios anonymously, fearing retaliation from Musk. 'Nobody really wanted him here. We couldn't wait to get rid of him.' Axios also reported that House speaker Mike Johnson told House Republicans in a closed-door conference meeting on Wednesday that Trump himself is 'pi**** off' at Musk. Johnson said at a press conference after the meeting that he talks to Trump 'multiple times a day' and that the president is 'not delighted that Elon did a 180'. Another republican, backed up that assertion, told Axios: 'I knew it was a matter of time before the two alpha males would explode, fight each other.' Elsewhere, Trump's former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, a bitter enemy of Musk, has suggested that the first schism in their relationship came in March when the president refused to show the billionaire the Pentagon's attack plans for a hypothetical war with China. Speaking to The Atlantic last month, Bannon said of that moment: 'You could feel it. Everything changed. The fever had been broken.' Others believe the final nail came when Trump abruptly decided over the weekend to withdraw the nomination of Musk ally and investor, Jared Isaacman, to be Nasa's next administrator. Appearing on the All-in Podcast yesterday, Isaacman said he was disappointed when he learned that his nomination had been revoked, noting that the fact it coincided with Musk's departure from the White House wasn't a coincidence. 'There were some people who had some axes to grind, and I was a good visible target,' he said. This claim has been disputed, however, with complaints from Republican senators about Isaacman's track record as a Democratic donor also given as a reason for the decision. That Musk now feels angry and disillusioned is no surprise to those who have long believed that such oversized egos were destined to collide. But the roots of this volatile dynamic go beyond tariffs and immigration. Some say the toxicity of their relationship stems from the formative paternal influences that shaped both men. For Donald Trump, the blueprint for leadership was laid by his stern and demanding father, Fred Trump Sr. From a very young age, Donald was taught that there were only 'winners – or 'killers' – and losers', a lesson his father relentlessly imparted. According to Tony Schwartz, who co-authored The Art of the Deal with Trump, Fred was a 'very brutal guy' with 'very, very little emotional intelligence'. 'I strongly suspect that he had a relationship with his father that accounts for a lot of what he became,' Schwartz told PBS's Frontline website. Trump's niece, Mary, a clinical psychologist who wrote the bestselling book Too Much and Never Enough: How My Family Created the World's Most Dangerous Man, says Fred Sr 'destroyed' Donald by hindering his 'ability to develop and experience the entire spectrum of human emotion'. Elon Musk 's own childhood was similarly difficult and his relationship with his father, Errol Musk, was fraught with tension. Musk said in a 2022 TED Talk: 'I did not have a happy childhood, to be frank. It was quite rough.' His father is said to have taken the side of his son's school bullies, calling him 'worthless', something which he has denied. When Elon Musk moved to America, Errol allegedly told him: 'You'll be back in a few months. You will never be successful.' Being raised in environments where dominance, ruthlessness, and an inability to show weakness are paramount is unhelpful, particularly when it comes to father son relationships. 'In my field,' says Dr Frank Ochberg, a pioneering psychiatrist and trauma expert who helped define PTSD, 'if you have been abused by a parent when you're very young, that's of consequence. And there are various ways in which people who eventually had a powerful impact on the world for better or worse are evaluated in terms of parental impact. 'It doesn't take a rocket scientist – although Elon is a rocket scientist – to say having a bully as a father can make you a bully as a man, and an effective one at that. And if you do have the combination of Musk and Trump together, you can also empower other bullies, male and female – and they have.' Ochberg says Trump and Musk have both succeeded in bringing bullies and bullying tendencies into what we might consider sacred spaces – the workplace and, in Trump's case, one we associate with high morality such as the seat of government. But, he says, 'I think seeing them publicly disagreeing with each other diminishes the moral and political force of each of them.' It seems that a long-term, equitable partnership between the two was always an impossibility, especially one where one, Trump, demands utter loyalty, which Musk, a man his biographer Walter Isaacson points out engages 'Demon Mode', a state of intense focus and anger while working on projects, is unwilling to give. Cornell law professor Sarah Kreps notes, there's simply 'not room at the centre of politics for two such massive egos'. It was only November when Trump's son Eric, dismissing reports of a breakdown in his father's relationship with Musk, said his dad 'loves' and 'adores' the SpaceX owner, and considers him a 'super genius'. In the end, perhaps this was always the only way it could go: two men raised in the shadow of domineering and difficult fathers with something to prove; both intoxicated by their own authority, colliding in drama and chaos of their own making. The rift between Trump and Musk may read like a celebrity feud, but it's far more consequential. For now, Trump and Musk remain locked in a game of egos, and the rest of us are just along for the ride.
