logo
Rice crisis: Japan imports grain from South Korea for first time in more than 25 years

Rice crisis: Japan imports grain from South Korea for first time in more than 25 years

Yahoo19-05-2025

Japan has imported rice from South Korea for the first time in a quarter of a century in an attempt to address soaring prices and growing consumer anger.
South Korean rice arrived in Japan last month for the first time since 1999, according to media reports, as the price of domestically produced grain continued to rise, despite government attempts to relieve the pressure on shoppers.
The price of Japan-grown rice has more than doubled since this time last year, fuelling demand for cheaper foreign grain, despite the heavy tariffs imposed on imports.
The quantity of South Korean rice, which was sold online and at supermarkets, is still relatively low at just two tonnes, but there are plans to ship a further 20 tonnes in the coming days, the public broadcaster NHK said.
Related: 'Skyrocketing' demand for matcha raises fears of shortage in Japan
While Japanese consumers have traditionally been sceptical about the quality and taste of foreign rice – Thai rice imported after an unusually cool summer in 1993 largely went unsold – the current crisis has forced Japanese consumers to develop a taste for foreign rice.
South Korea's rice exports to Japan are expected to reach their highest since 1990, according to the Yonhap news agency, while the crisis has also opened up potential export opportunities for producers in the US.
Arata Hirano, who runs a restaurant in Tokyo, switched from Japanese to American rice last year when a shortage of the domestic grain triggered a steep rise in prices.
Hirano told Reuters that the price of the Californian product he now served had doubled since his first purchase last summer, but was still cheaper than homegrown rice.
And he has had no complaints from diners, including Miki Nihei, who was surprised to find out the rice she had eaten wasn't grown in Japan. 'I had no idea,' she said. 'I have no qualms about eating imported rice. Prices have gone up, so I'm always looking for cheaper options.'
In the week to 6 April, Japanese supermarket rice prices reached an average of ¥4,214 ($30/£22) for 5kg – more than double the same period a year earlier.
The trend has forced the Japanese government to take the unusual step of dipping into its vast rice reserves. In March it began releasing 210,000 tonnes of stockpiled rice in an attempt to arrest price rises caused by a combination of record summer heat, panic buying and distribution problems.
Related: Japan unveils first plan to evacuate 100,000 civilians from islands near Taiwan in event of conflict
Japan had previously dipped into its rice reserves in the aftermath of natural disasters or crop failures, but this was the first time it had intervened over distribution issues.
The measure has had little impact, however.
Last week the agriculture ministry said 'logistical problems' meant only a tiny quantity of the released rice had reached shops.
About 142,000 tonnes of stockpiled rice were released in the first auction held in mid-March, but as of the end of the month just 426 tonnes, or 0.3% of the total, had reached supermarkets and other outlets, the ministry said, blaming the bottleneck on a shortage of delivery vehicles and the time needed to prepare the grain for sale.
Japan's rice stockpiles had already depleted after record-breaking temperatures affected the 2023 crop. Stockpiles shrank again last year, partly due to a rise in consumption caused by record numbers of tourists. Supplies were also hit by panic buying in the wake of typhoon and earthquake warnings, forcing some retailers to restrict sales.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla's head of Optimus humanoid robot program to leave firm
Tesla's head of Optimus humanoid robot program to leave firm

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla's head of Optimus humanoid robot program to leave firm

(Reuters) -Milan Kovac, the head of Tesla's Optimus humanoid robot program, announced his plans to step down in a post on X on Friday. Kovac became the lead of the program in 2022 when he was appointed director of Optimus and Autopilot Engineering, and he took on the role of vice president in September last year. "I've been far away from home for too long, and will need to spend more time with family abroad. I want to make it clear that this is the only reason," Kovac said in his social media post. Bloomberg News, which initially reported the development, said in its report that Kovac would leave his position immediately, and Ashok Elluswamy, who currently leads Tesla's autopilot teams, will take on his role. Tesla and Elluswamy did not immediately respond to Reuters requests for comment. Musk has earlier said he expected Tesla to make thousands of Optimus robots this year. He said in April that China's export restrictions on rare-earth magnets had affected production of the humanoid robots. Tesla has shifted focus to launching the robots and its robotaxi service, with much of the company's valuation hanging on that bet. "The only things that matter in the long term are autonomy and Optimus," Musk told CNBC in May.

Scoop: Treasury officials defend "revenge tax" from wary GOP senators
Scoop: Treasury officials defend "revenge tax" from wary GOP senators

Axios

time39 minutes ago

  • Axios

Scoop: Treasury officials defend "revenge tax" from wary GOP senators

Top Treasury officials are privately explaining to GOP senators that Section 899 of the House-passed budget bill is already forcing foreign countries to the negotiating table, according to administration officials. Why it matters: Critics are calling the provision a "revenge tax." But the Trump administration sees Section 899 as an important tool — like tariffs — to help negotiate better deals for American multinational corporations. While Trump officials are signaling to senators a willingness to make changes to the provision, they are also making the case for why it should stay in Trump's "one, big beautiful bill," officials said. Some Republican senators, including Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), have expressed reservations about the provision. Zoom out: On his first day in office, Trump promised to undo the Biden administration's plan to impose a global minimum corporate tax. He signed an executive order that it "has no force or effect." Section 899 is an attempt to give the White House more power to negotiate with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, a collection of 38 market-based economies, which has also been critical of Trump's trade policies. While the original outline of the global minimum tax rates was included in President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act, it ultimately required foreign countries to come to a common agreement on how to tax multinational corporations. Republicans howled at that process and argued that it usurped Congress' constitutional power to establish tax rates. They also had policy concerns with a global minimum tax. Zoom in: Section 899 of the House-passed budget bill is designed to penalize countries that impose taxes on U.S. companies, including a global minimum tax of 15% as well as a digital services tax. It allows the U.S. to increase tax rates for foreign direct investment on countries it claims has unfair tax policies. Wall Street is worried that a potential tax on foreign investment could harm U.S. assets and the broader economy. But there's some indication that European countries are open to modifying their policies in order to mollify the Trump administration, Bloomberg reported. The other side: A coalition of trade associations, led by the Global Business Alliance, wrote to Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho) to call for the removal of the provision. "As the budget reconciliation process advances, we urge you to uphold the pro-growth principles embedded in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and avoid tax increases that would undermine American jobs, innovation, and long-term economic growth," the coalition wrote. The bottom line: The Trump administration is essentially arguing to senators that Section 899 might never have to be used.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store